Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Sentimental Education (Barnes & Noble Classics Series)” as Want to Read:
Sentimental Education (Barnes & Noble Classics Series)
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview
Read Book* *Different edition

Sentimental Education (Barnes & Noble Classics Series)

3.83 of 5 stars 3.83  ·  rating details  ·  10,719 ratings  ·  388 reviews
Sentimental Education, by Gustave Flaubert, is part of the Barnes & Noble Classics series, which offers quality editions at affordable prices to the student and the general reader, including new scholarship, thoughtful design, and pages of carefully crafted extras.

Considered one of the greatest French novels of the nineteenth century, Sentimental Education blends brill
ebook, 491 pages
Published June 1st 2009 by Barnes & Noble Classics (first published 1869)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Sentimental Education, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Sentimental Education

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Steve Sckenda
In “Sentimental Education” Gustave Flaubert presents a young man who lacks the will or insight to build his own identity. Ultimately, he lacks the self-reflection to understand his failure. Frédéric Moreau and his circle of friends stumble through successive loves, enthusiasms, and ambitions against the panorama of Paris during the Revolution of 1848. Frédéric is a blank slate upon whom others write a tale. Good-natured and without ambition, he has no clear idea of what he himself wants and is s ...more
MJ Nicholls
An exhausting thrill-ride through the zany world of womanising socialite Frédéric, or—for the first 300 pages, at least—wannabe womanising socialite Frédéric. Because Frédéric can’t make it happen with his mate Arnoux’s missus, nor his mate Arnoux’s mistress, this frustration is the bane of his existence as he falls in and out of money, society and love. Against the backdrop of the 1848 Paris uprising this novel heaves with ornate descriptive grandeur, political commentary and violence, a frenet ...more

Finished. What an achievement. Writing it, not reading it.

I marvel that he has written a book with no character for which one could have a shred of sympathy and yet somehow we sit there caring what happens. I mean, really caring, reading through breakfast caring.

I kept thinking of The Great Gatsby when Nick says to Jay "They're a rotten crowd...You're worth the whole damn bunch put together." and isn't that what makes the book work, that there is somebody worthy of our caring. But here there is
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
*this book deserves anywhere between 4.2 and 4.7 stars

“Funny, how the things you have the hardest time parting with are the things you need the least.” (Bob Dylan)

With every work I read or reread by Flaubert, I am all the more convinced that he was the master craftsman, that he was master of attention to the tiny stuff, the small details that are layered brick by brick (word by word), the master of attention to even the mortar between the bricks, and master of raising the whole damn superstructu
David Lentz
The French word for sentiment is "sentiment" (san-tee-mon). So Flaubert is concerned essentially about what a young French man, presumably him, has learned about love and lust, affection and disaffection, friendship and betrayal, loyalty and disloyalty, admiration and disdain, and other sentiments. He writes precisely within the complex pixilist history of a turbulent political era for France as new liberal rights emerge versus the power of kings and their conservative bedfellows. There is blood ...more
An educational reading indeed, either spiritually or rationally speaking.
The novel talks about the life of a young man, Frederic, during the French Revolution and the founding of the French Empire in 1848. It is said that Frederic is in fact Flaubert himself telling about some real events in his life and of course about his platonic love for an older woman, in the book, called Mme Arnoux.
We are able to follow, with a somehow ironic and pessimistic tone, a different set of characters who live th
Long time friends will know I have a great love of the English novel of the nineteenth century, but, heavens, it’s a ponderous beast when compared to this work by Flaubert.

Written in 1869 this feels a far more modern novel , with a rapid pace which covers events in two chapters that it takes most contemporaneous novels a volume to deal with. Indeed it would be hard to imagine such a swift style ever use in 1800s Britain, if anything it feels more appropriate to a novel about 1960’s Carnaby Stre
Ho letto l’ultima riga, ho chiuso il libro e sono stata colta da un’improvvisa tristezza, profonda come poche altre volte. Al contempo, però, sono soddisfatta perché ho letto un libro che non può non essere letto, imperdibile. E da ora in poi ne consiglierò a tutti la lettura. E’ “IL ” romanzo, per me. Perfetto, stupendo in ogni sua pagina, in ogni riga. Un mondo racchiuso in poco più di 500 pagine.
C’è il mondo di Frédéric Moreau, uno studente diciottenne che, intorno al 1840, lascia Parigi per
Pretty much the best thing ever. Not really Maybe. Yeah, it's 500 pages long and about a guy who wastes his life and is incredibly selfish and everyone else he knows is even worse ). And yeah, not much happens, especially in the first 200 pages or so.

YET the book manages to be fucking intoxicating. The writing is precise, trenchant, etc, as expected, and perhaps because of this it is insanely simple to just get immersed in this world of 1840s Paris. (I know this is selling it on a pretty base l
Čitaoci koji vole da stvaraju hijerarhijske nizove knjiga, to jest da svakom piscu odrede njegovu najbolju knjigu nisu uspeli nikada da se usaglase šta je Floberov magnum opus. Da li je to Madam Bovari ili je to Sentimentalno vaspitanje? Dok su Henri Džejms i Žan Pol Sartr nesumnjivo tu prednost davali Gospođi Bovari, Marsel Prust i Kafka su se kleli u Sentimentalno vaspitanje.

Sentimentalno vaspitanje je roman obrazovanja koji prati emotivno i društveno sazrevanje Frederika Moroa, francuskog pr
Mohammad Mahdi Fallah
این دومین کتاب بلندی بود که از فلوبر خوندم و هر دو عمیقا ملال آور بودند. کتاب سرشار از توصیفات و اتفاق هایی ست که هرچند ممکنه ذکرشون خالی از لطف نباشند و در نهایت منجر به ترسیم بهتر شخصیت در ذهن شود ولی آن چیزی که مسلم است، به واسطه اینکه کارکردهای مشخصی براشون قابل تصور نیست، غالب صحنه ها و رفت و آمدها شدیداً کسالت بارند؛ انگار که ما بخوایم رشد یافتن یک کودک رو گام به گام و لحطه به لحظه ببینیم.
سه جهارم انتهایی کتاب ولی ریتم داستان به نسبت مطلوب تر می شود و شاهد اتفاق هایی هستیم که با ترسیم گری
Jim Coughenour
Flaubert was Kafka's favorite author, and A Sentimental Education his favorite novel. After rereading this book, I think I can understand why. Flaubert's "story of a young man" is the story of a rather witless protagonist and his almost indistinguishable set of friends and lovers, each immersed in her or his illusions, each almost equally stupid (in the phenomenological sense). There is indeed a "sentimental" romance at its heart, which is more or less a disappointment stretching from the first ...more
Bob Koelle
I read this based on Woody Allen's recommendation [] in "Manhattan" when I was 17. Frederic, the protagonist, goes through the tumultuous years of early 19th century France in love with an older woman, Madame Arnoux, but never having more than a close friendship with her, while yearning for much more, and watching her go through one personal and financial disaster after another. Anyway, after years of separation, she visits him at the end of the book, and ...more
Mohsen Rajabi
فلوبر، در میان نویسندگان قرن نوزده فرانسه، یک خصوصیت مهم دارد از نظر من: مقابله با ویکتور هوگو از نظر سبک نوشتار. این تقابل، به گونه ای است که فلوبر یکی از دلیل های نوشتن کتاب تربیت عاطفی را ارائه روایت خودش از انقلاب 1948 فرانسه (که ویکتور هوگو قبلا در رمان بینوایان آورده بود) می داند. در بین دوستداران ادبیات فرانسه، وقتی کار به نویسندگان قرن نوزدهم می رسد، معمولا خواننده به یکی از دو قطب هوگو-فلوبر نزدیک تر است و کمتر می شود خواننده ای را دید که ستایشگر آثار هر دو نویسنده باشد.

من از دسته هوگوی
Anastasja Kostic
Savršenstvo od knjige.
no, didn't finish. three quarters through, and i just got weary of 'and then he sent to his lawyer for 1,500 francs. did he still love her? not at all! oh, wait, did he? he wasn't sure. yes! he would die for her! but no, he would never think of her again! and then he got engaged to the girl next door.' i sympathized most with his roommate, who, after months of hearing madame arnoux this and madame arnoux that, began just inserting the word 'arnoux' arbitrarily in every other sentence. exhausting ...more
Aric Cushing
One word: Masterpiece.
This book is truly great, in every sense of the word.
El adulterio no está tan mal visto si lo comete un hombre que si la instigadora es una mujer, en el siglo XIX y en el XXI. Por eso Madame Bovary (1857) escandalizó tanto a la sociedad parisina decimonónica. En L'éducation sentimentale (1869) el adulterio es un mero trámite que tiene que cumplir cualquier burgués que se precie, y si además de una amante casada tenía una querida (o varias) soltera, más envidiado era el joven aspirante a brillar en sociedad. Así, Frédéric Moreau se sirve de su pode ...more
An amazing analysis of a man pursuing his passions but not strong enough to really attain any of them, and learning nothing about himself along the way. As capable of believing his own bare-faced lie about love or money at the end as at the beginning.

Also a meticulous portrayal of 1840s France, with a broad swath of characters from all quarters of Paris: Bohemian, student, artisan, courtesan, diminished spinster, art trade, banker, political provocateur. Flaubert brilliantly shows how all polit
Elizabeth (Alaska)
Ah, Monsieur Flaubert, you write the most beautiful prose. I found myself re-reading paragraphs just to enjoy the way he puts the words together. Yes, I read a translation - I can imagine he must be a pleasure to translate. These were not the most beautiful, simply two (and not consecutive) paragraphs I thought to highlight.
He saw himself with her at night in a post-chaise, then on a river's bank on a summer's evening, and under the reflection of a lamp at home in their own house. He even fixed
Debería crear una estantería de “novelas incalificables”, en donde podría agregar todos esos libros que me resultaron arduos y que, al mismo tiempo, tienen una construcción y un trasfondo tan fenomenal que sería una completa desalmada si les pusiera una sola estrella. Noté que me sucedió con varias novelas francesas del mismo siglo. La educación sentimental me hizo sufrir, porque sus altibajos son incontables, los personajes son detestables y en ciertos momentos no hay nada por lo cual interes ...more
فلوبر در یک نامه در 1852 به لوییز کوله می نویسد:

"دوست دارم کتابي بنويسم درباره هيچ، کتابي که بر هيچ چيز بيروني که خارج از خود باشد دلالت نکند، کتابي که بتواند به نيروي دروني سبکش، روي پاي خودش بايستد، درست بدان گونه که کره زمين بي هيچ تکيه گاهي خود را در فضا نگاه دارد... کتابی بیهیچ وابستگی به دنیای بیرون، کتابی که به یمن نیروی درونی سبکش، قائم به ذات باشد، همچنان که زمین خود را در خلاء فضا نگه میدارد و از هر پایهای بینیاز است، کتابی که کموبیش هیچ موضوعی ندارد، یا دستکم موضوع آن نادیدنی است، الب
Flaubert, Flaubert, Flaubert. (I actually have no real issue with Flaubert, I just enjoy beginning my ranting reviews pedantically.)

This is a decent younger sibling to his classic, Madame Bovary. It features one of the two nineteenth century protaganists I'd most like to box on the ears and tell them to get a clue, Frederic Moreau. The other being Prince Myshkin of The Idiot which, incidentally, was published the year before Sentimental Education. Weird.

Whenever I read Flaubert, I'm enthralled w
رمان خوب برای من رمانی هست که فاجعه و تراژدیاش نه توی کلمههای کتاب، که توی ذهنم و موقع خوندن اون اتفاق بیافته. اگه رمان معاصر ـ رمانی که متعلق نباشه به ادبیات تعلیمی ـ خودش رو موظف بکنه به شرح و بسط تمام ریز و بم قصه، یکجورهایی میشه گفت تخیل خوانندهاش رو با نشمه اشتباه گرفته؛ گویا. چند سال پیش که یکی از یادداشتهای اورهان پاموک رو میخوندم، توی یکی از بحثهای «ما چگونه ما شدیم؟»ایش، میاد و نویسندهی ترک نسل قبلش رو میزاره رو ترازو و میگه تفاوت رماننویس ترک با رماننویسی مثل تولستوی تو اینه که رماننوی ...more
Reading Sentimental Education is like looking at a massive 19th century oil painting. Though its execution is suave and masterly, its details dense and sumptuous, the story it tells is heart-breaking in its simple humanity.

This French novel is famously "about" a younger man's obsessive love for a married woman. But the story is about so much more than that. Flaubert shows us characters, and a society at large, besotted with complacency, greed, social-climbing, shallow materialism, self-delusion
Elyse Hdez
Más que la historia en general, lo que amé fue la forma de escribir de Flaubert. Las descripciones, los cambios de tiempo, los personajes; en fin, fue magnifico. Además esa tercera parte fue lo que más me agradó del libro. Su calificación sería un 4.5
Patrick Gibson
Twenty years ago I was intoxicated by this book, believing it to be the perfect novel, populated with distinct and realistic characters. But now I feel that the characters are the weakest aspect of the book. There is something sour, cheap and small that make them seem more alike than different. Flaubert was adept at catching the nuances of character flaws but failed to recognize that people can also have great heart, courage and self-awareness.

But, the set pieces are still stunning—unmatched by
Pierre E. Loignon
L’Éducation sentimentale de Flaubert, c'est un livre franchement ennuyant, mais aussi incontestablement magnifiquement écrit. C'est ennuyant, mais d'un très bel ennui!
Flaubert, c'est un talent d'écriture et une capacité de travail qui tiennent du merveilleux. Il nous permet de voir avec une clarté sublime ce qu'il veut bien mettre en lumière devant les yeux des ses lecteurs, que ce soit la pose d'un personnage, le détail d'une scène, la subtilité d'un état d'âme, etc.
Son génie grandiose aura to
This is a book about failure, plain and simple. And maybe this is what our lives end up being when it is all said and done, but I can't help but find my taste in fiction not that of realism genre. So why was this book just "okay" for me, well it has to do with the characters, all of which serve little to no purpose whatsoever, and none of them possess much in the aspect of redeeming value. This is probably what Flaubert and realism where all about, but the funny thing about this is how detached ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • A Harlot High and Low
  • La Bête humaine (Les Rougon-Macquart, #17)
  • Une vie
  • The Charterhouse of Parma
  • Maggie: a Girl of the Streets: and Other Tales of New York
  • Jacques the Fatalist
  • Mademoiselle de Maupin
  • Against Nature (A Rebours)
  • La confession d'un enfant du siècle
  • بوستان سعدی
  • Sodom and Gomorrah (In Search of Lost Time, #4)
  • The Counterfeiters
  • The Book of Job
Gustave Flaubert (December 12, 1821 – May 8, 1880) is counted among the greatest Western novelists. He was born in Rouen, Seine-Maritime, in the Haute-Normandie Region of France.

Flaubert's curious modes of composition favored and were emphasized by these peculiarities. He worked in sullen solitude, sometimes occupying a week in the completion of one page, never satisfied with what he had composed,
More about Gustave Flaubert...
Madame Bovary Three Tales Salammbô Bouvard and Pecuchet The Temptation of St. Antony

Share This Book

“It’s hard to communicate anything exactly and that’s why perfect relationships between people are difficult to find.” 344 likes
“Years passed; and he endured the idleness of his intelligence and the inertia of his heart.” 24 likes
More quotes…