book data
129 ratings,
3.68
average rating, 14 reviews
(more data...)
edit
published
2001
by Goldmann
(first published 1996)
details
Paperback, 217 pages
isbn
3442151112
(isbn13: 9783442151110)
description
In Consciousness Explained, Daniel Dennett embarks on the audacious task of explaining human consciousness. He sets his sights even higher for Kinds o…more
find at:
Amazon • WorldCat • more options…
There is a good chance some of your friends read this book. Sign in to see!
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
friend reviews
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
This book is currently not featured on any Listopia lists.
Add this book to your favorite list »
other reviews (showing 1-20 of 229)
All ratings
|
5 stars (26)
|
4 stars (46)
|
3 stars (50)
|
2 stars (4)
|
1 star (3)
|
avg 3.68
editions: all | this edition
editions: all | this edition
bookshelves:
cognitive-science-and-or-psychology,
consciousness-studies,
evolutionary-theory,
miscellaneous-natural-science,
neuroscience,
philosophy
Owns a copy
—
Read in October, 2009
I listened to this via audio book format as read wonderfully by Dennett himself. Last night/early morning I woke up abruptly in the grip of a vague sort of existential terror and once I got my footing again, I felt a type of comfort in hearing Dennett's calm yet extremely engaged and enthusiastic voice--explaining complex things about the improbable evolution of sentient beings--emerging from the tiny speakers of my laptop. At first, I was seized by a thought like, "I don't want to hear a...more
Like this review?
yes
(7 people liked it)
add a comment
Read in February, 2010
recommended to Silver Fox by:
Sara Waller
Although I do not necessarily agree with all that Dennett stated in this book, I have to say that he stated it exceptionally well. This was an accessible, high level philosophical book detailing the conception of animal minds vs. human minds. Each philosophical concept he put forward he carefully defined and explained with often amusing examples.
The ideas that he came up with himself (i.e. The Tower of Generate and Test, mamataxis, etc.) were novel and interesting without being t...more
The ideas that he came up with himself (i.e. The Tower of Generate and Test, mamataxis, etc.) were novel and interesting without being t...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in September, 2008
well, i got to page 75 of 175. usually i don't give up until page 100, but i'm particular these days, especially because i'm skittish about philosophy in general. in the beginning i was supremely entertained by dennett's clever musings on sentience (he's a wonderful writer, much like douglas hofstadter), but in the end the semantics (as usual!) broke me down. "is x sentient or is it merely sensitive to certain inputs?" my answer: well, it depends on how you define "sentient"...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in March, 2009
Interessant boek waarin Dennett je goed doet nadenken over wat een ziel is. Door vanuit verschillende standpunten de vraag aan te halen of dieren wel een ziel hebben en indien ja, welke wel en welke niet en waarom. Ook vanaf wanneer een foetus een ziel heeft. Als filosoof doet hij de luisteraar de juiste vragen stellen.
Zeer interessant. 3 sterren omdat enkel boeken die ik absoluut aanraad 5 sterren krijgen. Deze is interessant voor wie zich met die problematiek wil bezig houden.
Zeer interessant. 3 sterren omdat enkel boeken die ik absoluut aanraad 5 sterren krijgen. Deze is interessant voor wie zich met die problematiek wil bezig houden.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
More like an egoistical philosophical attempt to define thinking and you end up more confused about the process which is why it alway puts me in an unconscious state after 3 chapters.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
More questions here than answers, which is basically the strength of the book. I remember Dennett mentioning before how Kanzi doesn't quite make it into the group of real 'language users'. I'll need to research on why that is again later...
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
This book is very educational, but can be a tough read. I enjoyed it because my interest in the subject was high, but I imagine most could easily fall asleep reading it.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in January, 2008
According to Daniel Dennett, even though we would like to think that non-human species are thinking beings, there are different degrees of sentience. In a nutshell, intentionality is what separates the higher order beings from those who are incapable of keeping secretes for example, verbal communication, and acquiring and reflecting on concepts. In combing through this question, he invokes everyone from Socrates to Skinner.
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
Read in January, 2007
recommends it for:
anyone interested in consciousness
Basically, this book is an overview of how consciousness evolved. Beginning with the simplest self-replicating molecules and moving all the way up to human consciousness and all of its subjective experience. Most interesting is his explanation of 'the intentional stance', an explanatory view lets us examine mindless organic things in the same way that we look at mindful things like chimps and people.
Fascinating
Fascinating
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in September, 2005
recommends it for:
Consciousness readers, development readers, evolution readers
Short and much more accessible than most of Dennett's books, Kinds of Minds attempts to explore consciousness through biological and philosophical lenses. While he doesn't use the most advanced brain-scanning science to back up some of his beliefs, his intuitions are easy to follow. His conclusions are unsatisfactory, but his exploration is certainly worth a look.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
makes you wonder and thats about it. Consiousness is a deep concept that is not easily guessed at or scientifically understood. Dennett brings up some interesting and fascinating ideas but thats all they are.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
If you are really worried about whether you have free will, this book probably won't convince you one way or the other, but it is a fun read nevertheless. Dennett is an engaging writer.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in September, 2007
Beautifully written. His central thesis is interesting and plausible, but maybe no more than 'less arbitary' than other theories. At least it was clear and engaging.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in September, 2007
This not very scientific book left me cold. Better than angry, I suppose.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in February, 2010
to-read
(on 56 people's shelves)
philosophy (on 20 people's shelves)
science (on 17 people's shelves)
non-fiction (on 9 people's shelves)
psychology (on 5 people's shelves)
currently-reading (on 5 people's shelves)
neuroscience (on 3 people's shelves)
mind (on 3 people's shelves)
brain (on 2 people's shelves)
consciousness (on 2 people's shelves)
More shelves...
philosophy (on 20 people's shelves)
science (on 17 people's shelves)
non-fiction (on 9 people's shelves)
psychology (on 5 people's shelves)
currently-reading (on 5 people's shelves)
neuroscience (on 3 people's shelves)
mind (on 3 people's shelves)
brain (on 2 people's shelves)
consciousness (on 2 people's shelves)
More shelves...





























