Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Marketplace of Ideas: Reform and Resistance in the American University” as Want to Read:
The Marketplace of Ideas: Reform and Resistance in the American University
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Marketplace of Ideas: Reform and Resistance in the American University

3.53  ·  Rating Details ·  252 Ratings  ·  54 Reviews
Has American higher education become a dinosaur?

Why do professors all tend to think alike? What makes it so hard for colleges to decide which subjects should be required? Why do teachers and scholars find it so difficult to transcend the limits of their disciplines? Why, in short, are problems that should be easy for universities to solve so intractable? The answer, Louis
Hardcover, 176 pages
Published January 18th 2010 by W. W. Norton & Company
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Marketplace of Ideas, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Marketplace of Ideas

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 697)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Jimm Wetherbee
Jul 26, 2011 Jimm Wetherbee rated it liked it
Back in the dark ages when dinosaurs ruled the earth and I was in college my father wondered aloud about the value of a BA. He argued that the literature and philosophy classes did not contribute one iota to his career as a research chemist, and that he had not any reason to refer back to a single class that did not have to do with his major in chemistry. As a philosophy of religion major, this hurt. I muttered something about a liberal arts education being valuable because it inculcates a love ...more
Antonio Baclig
Aug 22, 2010 Antonio Baclig rated it it was amazing
I took two classes with Menand, so I had to pick this up. I wasn't disappointed.

He draws a couple of strands into one appraisal of the American university system. The debate on the General Education curriculum at Harvard, which dragged on for years; the "Humanities Revolution" in the 70s and 80s (a revolt against the disciplines and a proliferation of fields, emphasis on diversity and the contingency of representations); the current anxiety over getting professors to do things interdisciplinaril
Steven Peterson
Feb 17, 2010 Steven Peterson rated it really liked it
Louis Menand notes at the outset of this rather brief volume (Page 15): “There is always a tension between the state of knowledge and the system in which learning and teaching actually take place. The state of knowledge changes much more readily than the system.” We see institutions of higher education with cutting edge research housed within institutional structures that are a century or more old.

The book’s central chapters address, in order, one of four general questions: (1) Why is a sound ge
Mar 17, 2012 Alison rated it really liked it
This should be required reading for all academics. Menard gives a concise overview of the history of higher education in the U.S., pointing out that a crucial moment was the separation between the idea of a liberal arts degree and professional degrees. He accepts lots of the things we claim about a liberal arts education--that it "exposes the contingency of present arrangements" and "encourages students to think for themselves," but argues that academics--in particular those in the humanities--a ...more
Louis Menand's "The Marketplace of Ideas: Reform and Resistance in the American University" is an insiders guide to the history, current state, and potential future of higher education in the United States. This book is a part of the "Issues of Our Time" series "in which some of today's leading thinkers explore ideas that matter in the new millennium."

As a product of a four year liberal arts undergraduate institution in the United States, I didn't think twice about taking this book to the check
J. Alfred
Jun 23, 2016 J. Alfred rated it liked it
A tight, lively little book on some of the problems in professional academia today, including, Why does it take so long to get a Ph.D in humanities, and Why do all professors seem to think alike? It's well done and thought provoking. Menand's idea on how to solve the problem that there are too many Ph.Ds running around without enough jobs seems to be to make it easier for people to attain Ph.Ds, which seems paradoxical, but I think I follow him. A quick and enjoyable argument for people interest ...more
Feb 05, 2010 Kevin rated it really liked it
I would walk blindfolded into traffic if I thought there was something to read by Louis Menand on the other side of the street, but since I work at what some might be tempted to call a major mid-western University, I was not anxious to hear more about what is wrong with higher education today -- a game that is generally best played at a campus bar, with rules similar to "Hi, Bob." My fears were unfounded. Menand provides a recognizable account of life on the ground, enlightening historical analy ...more
Dec 21, 2015 Patrik rated it really liked it
I found Menand's book to be interesting, but not compelling. The book is a four essay discussion of liberal education in the US, in the past and today.

The first essay explored the problem of general education and I appreciated learning about the history of the idea of general education. The second essay discussed the humanities, I found it less interesting. The third essay explored the call for interdisciplinarity. I had never really thought about why we often consider interdisciplinarity to be
Much in the spirit of Allan Bloom's "The Closing of the American Mind", Menand's "Marketplace of Ideas" is a disconcerting exposé of the current university system, specifically in the Liberal Arts. Suffice to say that during the past 150 years universities were frequently reinvented--with good intentions--but have become (at best) a monstrosity incapable of providing a real education, and even (at worst) a drain of society's best & brightest.
Jun 28, 2014 Ed rated it liked it
This book is short (39,000 words). I liked best chapter 2, an early rough-draft of which can be read here.

An early draft of chapter 3, on academic interdisciplinarity, can be read here.

A 5000-word excerpt from the book's final draft can be read here.
Neil Coulter
Mar 17, 2016 Neil Coulter rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Anyone in higher education in the US
I loved this book. It's been on my to-read list for a while, and now as I work on the details of a new doctoral program at my institution, I finally get to check out the big pile of relevant books from that list. Menand's book was right at the top. I value the history of the development of American higher education that Menand presents. It's helpful to me, in designing a new program, to understand the historical foundation and how in some areas reverence for tradition is a hindrance to where gra ...more
Maughn Gregory
How and why was liberal arts education ever distinguished from professional schools and trade schools? Should professional and trade schools be liberalized by giving some attention to their own history, theory, and relationship to culture? How many divergent aims - e.g. teaching people to think for themselves, preparing them for the job market, binding them into a common culture, enlightening them with great works by great minds, making them smart enough to help with national security (fighting ...more
Bonnie Irwin
Mar 25, 2011 Bonnie Irwin rated it really liked it
Another book on higher ed that gives one a lot to think about. It will take some processing before I decided how much I agree with Menand, but certain points ring true. "The state of knowledge changes much more readily than the system." Much of the so-called crisis in the humanities today is not only systemic, but of our own making, Louis Menand argues, dating back to the move toward professionalizing our fields in the late 19th century.
I especially appreciated the way he contrasts the professio
Jan 04, 2011 Megan rated it it was ok
This book was frustrating, but I'll say up front that it was probably my fault. No wait. Scratch that. It was not my fault. I'm noticing the irony that my first instinct is to deprecate myself as "too dumb" to understand the dry prose and windy academese of this book. But the author himself discusses the necessity of tenure-track professors to write books that few read and even fewer understand. Why didn't Menand follow his own cue and write something a little more engaging?

The sheer number of
Book Calendar
Mar 06, 2010 Book Calendar rated it really liked it
The Marketplace of Ideas Reform and Resistance in the American University by Louis Menand

Louis Menand is critiquing the concept of a library education in todays world. He is doing this from the point of view of a professor inside the university system. The book is focused on what happened in fairly recent history.

There is a lot on the production and dissemination of knowledge. This is focused on teaching and research. Libraries are not that well covered in this book. There is more about the cre
Dec 29, 2010 Villate rated it liked it
The most interesting parts of this book were the sections on the professions and "interdisciplinarity" (which I run into a lot in my clients' work - it has replaced "post-structualist" as the buzzword du jour in academe) and Part 4 about why professors seem to think the same way. In my work as an editor of dissertations and scholarly articles (with the occasional PhD application essay thrown in there), I hear a lot of horror stories about doctoral candidates forced to stay in their programs for ...more
Brian Ayres
Feb 13, 2010 Brian Ayres rated it liked it
This book is a concise look at the state of higher education from a number of angles, including the decline of general education and a look into why professors pride themselves on academic freedom but think the same way politically. Menard writes as an historian of higher education as he winds the reader through the destruction and attempted resurrection of a core curriculum at the undergraduate level. While I found the middle two essays tedious and a rehash of the lament of the humanities, Mena ...more
Aug 09, 2013 Alex rated it really liked it
PRO: Eminently useful history of four keywords in American higher ed, four keywords central to understanding current debates -

Essay 1: the "general education" requirement
Essay 2: the very idea of "the humanities"
Essay 3: the rise and reproduction of academic "disciplines"
Essay 4: professors as "professional" guild

I like that he denaturalizes certain distinctions that get drawn and redrawn in discourse about and within higher-ed: vocational/knowledge-for-itself; self-interested/disinterested; ge
Apr 16, 2010 Nat added it
Menand assembles a handful of helpful reminders about pressures shaping University education. The only claim in the book that I can personally confirm figures in Menand's discussion of why it takes so long for humanities grad students to finish their PhDs (the average time to completion is 11.3 years!). He says:

"People in the humanities are uncertain just what research in the humanities is supposed to constitute, and graduate students therefore spend an inordinate amount of time trying to come u
Apr 05, 2010 Wm rated it really liked it
Shelves: higher-ed
Menand has received criticism in some quarters from not being prescriptive enough and for not going super in-depth. Well, for those of us who are only peripherally aware of the issues that he raises, it's an excellent introduction and brings a few new insights both to one's experience as well as to much of the public debate around academia.

Of course, it helps for this reader that he deals with his four main topics -- General Education; the revolution in the Humanities (the turn to and then some
Sep 09, 2010 loafingcactus rated it liked it
Shelves: read-2010
This book actually showed up as a "people who read that also read this" on Goodreads! I would have dismissed it as yet one more anti-intellectual screed, except this is the author of the Metaphysical Club (very fabulous).

The book is a nice short review of the history that leads up to the format of today's university- very eye openeing! Menand then focuses on a few statistically demonstrable elements of dysfunction. He doesn't present any concrete suggestions for reform, which I would have liked
Travis Timmons
Apr 11, 2014 Travis Timmons rated it liked it
I was hoping for a more sustained and coherent argument about higher education and/or reforming it. However, Menand's analysis is remarkably concise (and breath-taking in a sense!) with sparking clear prose. An analytic and stylistic achievement. While the book offers argument-via-exposition (and subtly in smaller Menand makes), I don't find this method strong enough, considering the topic and purpose for the book.
Jul 16, 2015 Thor rated it really liked it
Shelves: non-fiction
Dense, but compelling. The rating is my balance between the intellectual depth, which I found inspiring, and the accessibility and breadth, which I found somewhat wanting. As a professor with nearly four decades of experience, I found the book immensely helpful for explaining the answers to four questions that I have been asking myself for my entire career.
Oliver Bateman
May 27, 2010 Oliver Bateman rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
The first part of Louis Menand's latest book is a summary of richer and more detailed sources (e.g., John Thelin's excellent overview of the history of higher education). However, the second part--which raises questions about the ideological makeup of the liberal arts professoriate (the real problem, it seems, is that the academy is filled with mainstream liberals and few radicals of any stripe) and the training of graduate students (Menand argues that eight years of benign neglect in a Ph.D. pr ...more
Jan 22, 2013 Laurel rated it liked it
The author presents, from a historical perspective, four problems facing Higher Education. He begins his thoughts by stating "The American university is a product of the nineteenth century, and it has changed very little structurally since the time of the First World War" (p. 17). He addresses 1) General education 2) The Humanities 3) "Interdisciplinarity" and 4) Why Professors think Alike. His discussion is interesting, and one would assume that there would be suggestions for reform (based on t ...more
John Cutler
Interesting book about the university. Provides a compelling explanation for why professors seem to think alike (high barrier to professional entry) and interesting musings on the state of the humanities in particular.
Jan 18, 2016 Travis rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
An accessible book on the current state of American academia. For all of us in the midst of "the crisis in the humanities," this is a necessary read that provides a context and history for what we all too-often see as a crisis of the present. Sheds much-needed light on the tensions surrounding Gen Ed requirements and interdisciplinarity, as well as the professionalization of academics. In many ways, the crisis we face is systemic, as Menand underscores from the book's beginning. Would have liked ...more
Dec 31, 2010 Ray rated it really liked it
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Aug 25, 2010 Krista rated it really liked it
This book didn't introduce a new reality as I spent the last year working with humanities scholars, but it painted a pretty vivid, accurate, and depressing picture of the landscape of higher ed and, in particular, of humanities departments. Marketplace of Ideas echoed a lot of the history of higher education that I read in graduate school, so the historical context also wasn't new for me (but was interesting). I was disappointed that there weren't more suggestions of changes, although there is c ...more
Melissa B.
Feb 22, 2016 Melissa B. rated it it was amazing
A brief and highly readable history of the American university system.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 23 24 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities
  • Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses
  • Universities in the Marketplace: The Commercialization of Higher Education
  • DIY U: Edupunks, Edupreneurs, and the Coming Transformation of Higher Education
  • College: What it Was, Is, and Should Be
  • The Last Professors: The Corporate University and the Fate of the Humanities
  • In the Basement of the Ivory Tower: Confessions of an Accidental Academic
  • How the University Works: Higher Education and the Low-Wage Nation
  • How College Affects Students: Volume 2 - A Third Decade of Research
  • A History of American Higher Education
  • Common as Air: Revolution, Art, and Ownership
  • The Heart of Higher Education: A Call to Renewal
  • How Colleges Work: The Cybernetics of Academic Organization and Leadership
  • The Innovative University: Changing the DNA of Higher Education from the Inside Out
  • How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment
  • Reframing Academic Leadership
  • Sexism in America: Alive, Well, and Ruining Our Future
  • The Price of Admission: How America's Ruling Class Buys Its Way into Elite Colleges -- and Who Gets Left Outside the Gates
Louis Menand, professor of English at Harvard University, is the author of The Metaphysical Club, which won the 2002 Pulitzer Prize in History. A longtime staff writer for The New Yorker, he lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
More about Louis Menand...

Share This Book

“The biggest undergraduate major by far in the United States is business. Twenty-two percent of all bachelor’s degrees are awarded in that field. Ten percent of all bachelor’s degrees are awarded in education.” 0 likes
“What are the liberal arts and sciences? They are simply fields in which knowledge is pursued disinterestedly—that is, without regard to political, economic, or practical benefit. Disinterestedness doesn’t mean that the professor is equally open to any view. Professors are hired because they have views about their subjects, views that exclude opposing or alternative views. Disinterestedness just means that whatever views a professor does hold, they have been arrived at unconstrained, or as unconstrained as possible, by anything except the requirement of honesty.” 0 likes
More quotes…