Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Miracle of Theism: Arguments for and Against the Existence of God” as Want to Read:
The Miracle of Theism: Arguments for and Against the Existence of God
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Miracle of Theism: Arguments for and Against the Existence of God

4.06 of 5 stars 4.06  ·  rating details  ·  121 ratings  ·  10 reviews
The late John L. Mackie, formerly of University College, Oxford
Paperback, 288 pages
Published January 13th 1983 by Oxford University Press, USA
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Miracle of Theism, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Miracle of Theism

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 475)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Mr Mackie does an above average job of introducing arguments for the existence of god. The title of the book is a bit misleading: The miracle of theism is not what Mackie is espousing here. His book is in the same genre as Smith's Atheism: A Case Against God, but goes into a bit more detail, philosophically speaking.
This is a nice middle-ground between George Smith and Michael Martin, more on Smith's side of things in terms of ease of reading. Mackie is thorough, but not so thorough as to make
Reinhard Gobrecht
Mackie diskutiert Argumente für und gegen die Existenz Gottes.
Er beschreibt Humes Argumente gegen Wunder, Descartes Argumente und Gedanken zu einer ersten Ursache (Gott) und die Sachgehaltsbeziehung zwischen Ursache und Wirkung. Das Problem des rein denkbaren Gottes (Anselm). Das Problem der Existenz (als außergewöhnliches Prädikat)(Kant und Frege). In diesem Buch findet man ontologische, kosmologische, moralische und teleologische Argumente. Ebenso das Problem des Übels
und Pascals Wette. u.v.a.
This is definitely one of the most rigorous and critical examination of the arguments in favor for Theism from the skeptical perspective. Furthermore, Mackie was able to give the most charitable interpretation possible to any theistic arguments from Descartes to Kierkegaard. While it is open to dispute whether Mackie undermined particular arguments such as Plantinga's Freewill defense argument, this book is nonetheless valuable to anyone who desires a very robust argument.
Jelle de Jong
begin sterker dan het eind. Alle mij bekende goede filosofische Godsbewijzen worden behandeld op een manier dat ik ze nu beter begrijp dan daarvoor. Daarna bestudeert deze kerel of ze houdbaar zijn. Naarmate het boek naar het einde nadert begint zijn schr; uitgeleend aan Marnix (20110824)
Grasped in Thought
This is a fantastic introduction to the philosophy of religion. Mackie gives a fair treatment of theistic arguments and then provides some very strong objections. The one problem I had was his section on miracles in which he basically re-iterates David Hume's position.
Jan 20, 2013 Liya marked it as unfinished
Despite what it says on the back, I doubt that the general reader can follow the discussion. My brain was certainly broken. Giving up after 100 pages. Leads me to believe I should avoid philosophy books in future.
A lot more boring than I had hoped. Rehashes old arguments you should have had in Phil 101. Perfect for insomnia.
Charles Curtis
Best work I have ever read from an atheist. Arguments are well developed and thoughtful.
Tarek Sweedan
just as expected...another masterpiece written by Mackie...
Trudna, głęboka, satysfakcjonująca. Polecam.
Bill Johnston
Bill Johnston marked it as to-read
Jul 02, 2015
Sherry marked it as to-read
Jun 23, 2015
Amogh Sahu
Amogh Sahu marked it as to-read
Jun 23, 2015
Brittany LeMoine
Brittany LeMoine marked it as to-read
Jun 21, 2015
Ty marked it as to-read
Jun 14, 2015
laika marked it as to-read
Jun 05, 2015
Loren marked it as to-read
May 31, 2015
Matt Evans
Matt Evans marked it as to-read
May 31, 2015
Carson marked it as to-read
May 29, 2015
Mrs. Bunny
Mrs. Bunny marked it as to-read
May 26, 2015
Gonnamakeit marked it as to-read
May 25, 2015
Blossom marked it as to-read
May 23, 2015
Mjr marked it as to-read
Apr 29, 2015
Michal marked it as to-read
Apr 28, 2015
Efi marked it as to-read
Apr 25, 2015
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 15 16 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Atheism: A Philosophical Justification
  • The Essence of Christianity
  • Sense and Goodness Without God: A Defense of Metaphysical Naturalism
  • Philosophers Without Gods: Meditations on Atheism and the Secular Life
  • God and Philosophy
  • Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy
  • The Atheist's Guide to Reality: Enjoying Life without Illusions
  • Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion/The Natural History of Religion (Oxford World's Classics)
  • God, Freedom, and Evil
  • From a Logical Point of View: Nine Logico-Philosophical Essays
  • The Christian Delusion: Why Faith Fails
  • In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion
  • Principia Ethica (Philosophical Classics)
  • Atheism: The Case Against God
  • How to Think Straight: An Introduction to Critical Reasoning
  • Philosophical Foundations for a Christian Worldview
  • Losing Faith in Faith: From Preacher to Atheist
  • The Reason Driven Life: What Am I Here on Earth For?
John Leslie Mackie was an Australian philosopher, originally from Sydney. He is perhaps best known for his views on meta-ethics, especially his defence of moral skepticism. However, he has also made significant contributions to philosophy of religion, metaphysics, and philosophy of language.
More about John Leslie Mackie...
Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong Problems from Locke Hume's Moral Theory The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation Truth, Probability, and Paradox

Share This Book

“The argument from design, therefore, can be sustained only with the help of a supposedly a priori double-barrelled principle, that mental order (at least in a god) is self-explanatory, but that all material order not only is not self-explanatory, but is positively improbable and in need of further explanation...this double-barrelled principle is recognizable as the core of the cosmological argument...The argument will not take us even as far as Kant seems to allow without borrowing the a priori thesis that there is a vicious metaphysical contingency in all natural things, and, in contrast with this, the 'transcendental' concept of a god who is self-explanatory and necessarily existent. It is only with the help of these borrowings that the design argument can introduce the required asymmetry, that any natural explanation uses data which call for further explanation, but that the theistic explanation terminates the regress. Without this asymmetry, the design argument cannot show that there is any need to go beyond the sort of hypothesis that Hume foreshadowed and that Wallace and Darwin supplied... The dependence of the argument for design on the ideas that are the core of the cosmological one is greater than Kant realized.” 1 likes
More quotes…