The Miracle of Theism: Arguments for and Against the Existence of God
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

The Miracle of Theism: Arguments for and Against the Existence of God

4.06 of 5 stars 4.06  ·  rating details  ·  104 ratings  ·  9 reviews
The late John L. Mackie, formerly of University College, Oxford
Paperback, 288 pages
Published January 13th 1983 by Oxford University Press, USA
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Miracle of Theism, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Miracle of Theism

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 403)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Mark
Mr Mackie does an above average job of introducing arguments for the existence of god. The title of the book is a bit misleading: The miracle of theism is not what Mackie is espousing here. His book is in the same genre as Smith's Atheism: A Case Against God, but goes into a bit more detail, philosophically speaking.
This is a nice middle-ground between George Smith and Michael Martin, more on Smith's side of things in terms of ease of reading. Mackie is thorough, but not so thorough as to make...more
Paul
This is definitely one of the most rigorous and critical examination of the arguments in favor for Theism from the skeptical perspective. Furthermore, Mackie was able to give the most charitable interpretation possible to any theistic arguments from Descartes to Kierkegaard. While it is open to dispute whether Mackie undermined particular arguments such as Plantinga's Freewill defense argument, this book is nonetheless valuable to anyone who desires a very robust argument.
Jelle de Jong
begin sterker dan het eind. Alle mij bekende goede filosofische Godsbewijzen worden behandeld op een manier dat ik ze nu beter begrijp dan daarvoor. Daarna bestudeert deze kerel of ze houdbaar zijn. Naarmate het boek naar het einde nadert begint zijn schr; uitgeleend aan Marnix (20110824)
John Christmann
This is a fantastic introduction to the philosophy of religion. Mackie gives a fair treatment of theistic arguments and then provides some very strong objections. The one problem I had was his section on miracles in which he basically re-iterates David Hume's position.
Liya
Jan 20, 2013 Liya marked it as unfinished
Despite what it says on the back, I doubt that the general reader can follow the discussion. My brain was certainly broken. Giving up after 100 pages. Leads me to believe I should avoid philosophy books in future.
sam
A lot more boring than I had hoped. Rehashes old arguments you should have had in Phil 101. Perfect for insomnia.
Charles Curtis
Best work I have ever read from an atheist. Arguments are well developed and thoughtful.
Tarek Sweedan
just as expected...another masterpiece written by Mackie...
Jezier
Trudna, głęboka, satysfakcjonująca. Polecam.
Jeff
Jeff added it
Aug 17, 2014
Sobhan Pourmasjedi
Sobhan Pourmasjedi marked it as to-read
Aug 11, 2014
Greg Brown
Greg Brown marked it as to-read
Aug 10, 2014
Melissa
Melissa marked it as to-read
Aug 06, 2014
Nathan Byrd
Nathan Byrd marked it as to-read
Aug 03, 2014
Barbara
Barbara marked it as to-read
Aug 02, 2014
Julie
Julie marked it as to-read
Jul 26, 2014
Abdel Ilah
Abdel Ilah marked it as to-read
Jul 20, 2014
Jonathan
Jonathan is currently reading it
Jul 07, 2014
Sara Hamzeh
Sara Hamzeh marked it as to-read
Jul 04, 2014
Andrew Anony
Andrew Anony marked it as to-read
Jul 01, 2014
Richard
Richard marked it as to-read
Jun 25, 2014
Sylvia
Sylvia marked it as to-read
Jun 22, 2014
Sean Strnad
Sean Strnad marked it as to-read
Jun 18, 2014
Arian Evans
Arian Evans marked it as to-read
Jun 11, 2014
Louise
Louise marked it as to-read
Jun 11, 2014
Minamanjari
Minamanjari marked it as to-read
Jun 04, 2014
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 13 14 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Philosophers Without Gods: Meditations on Atheism and the Secular Life
  • Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong
  • The Essence of Christianity
  • Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion/The Natural History of Religion (Oxford World's Classics)
  • Sense and Goodness Without God: A Defense of Metaphysical Naturalism
  • The Atheist's Guide to Reality: Enjoying Life without Illusions
  • God, Freedom and Evil
  • Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy
  • The New Atheism: Taking a Stand for Science and Reason
  • The Christian Delusion: Why Faith Fails
  • In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion
  • Atheism: The Case Against God
  • From a Logical Point of View: Nine Logico-Philosophical Essays
  • The Cambridge Companion to Atheism (Cambridge Companions to Philosophy)
  • Losing Faith in Faith: From Preacher to Atheist
  • Principia Ethica (Philosophical Classics)
  • 50 Reasons People Give for Believing in a God
  • Critique of Religion and Philosophy
Problems from Locke The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation Truth, Probability, and Paradox The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation (Clarendon Library of Logic and Philosophy) Persons and Values: Selected Papers Volume II

Share This Book

“The argument from design, therefore, can be sustained only with the help of a supposedly a priori double-barrelled principle, that mental order (at least in a god) is self-explanatory, but that all material order not only is not self-explanatory, but is positively improbable and in need of further explanation...this double-barrelled principle is recognizable as the core of the cosmological argument...The argument will not take us even as far as Kant seems to allow without borrowing the a priori thesis that there is a vicious metaphysical contingency in all natural things, and, in contrast with this, the 'transcendental' concept of a god who is self-explanatory and necessarily existent. It is only with the help of these borrowings that the design argument can introduce the required asymmetry, that any natural explanation uses data which call for further explanation, but that the theistic explanation terminates the regress. Without this asymmetry, the design argument cannot show that there is any need to go beyond the sort of hypothesis that Hume foreshadowed and that Wallace and Darwin supplied... The dependence of the argument for design on the ideas that are the core of the cosmological one is greater than Kant realized.” 1 likes
More quotes…