Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Shirley (Volume 1)” as Want to Read:
Shirley (Volume 1)
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

Shirley (Volume 1)

3.66 of 5 stars 3.66  ·  rating details  ·  15,917 ratings  ·  425 reviews
Book may have numerous typos, missing text, images, or index. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. 1905. Excerpt: ... CHAPTER XIII. FURTHER COMMUNICATIONS ON BUSINESS. In Shirley's nature prevailed at times an easy indolence: there were periods when she took delight in perfect vacancy of hand and eye--moments ...more
Paperback, 104 pages
Published January 1st 2012 by General Books (first published 1849)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Shirley, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Shirley

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
...but I perceive that certain sets of human beings are very apt to maintain that other sets should give up their lives to them and their service, and then they requite them by praise: they call them devoted and virtuous. Is this enough? Is it to live? Is there not a terrible hollowness, mockery, want, craving, in that existence which is given to others, for want of something of your own to bestow it on? I suspect there is. Does virtue lie in abnegation of the self? I do not believe it.
This boo
MJ Nicholls
Shirley is Charlotte’s sophomore slump. Her Kill Uncle. Her You Shall Know Our Velocity. Her Supposed Former Infatuation Junkie. And so on. I don’t care how cute Mr Rochester is, this novel is a deeply vexing mess. Firstly, there are several plotlines and not one has the urge to intersect. The rebelling miners plot launches the novel in tandem with the idle curates poor-versus-rich plot, then dribbles away with the introduction of the second plot: Caroline’s crush on Mr Moore. This plot is soon ...more
Ayu Palar
Apr 20, 2009 Ayu Palar rated it 4 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Boof
Compared with other novels by Charlotte Bronte, Shirley is the toughest one for me to read. Narrated through third person POV, it is not easy to get acquainted with the novel. Another reason is because there are too many characters to remember. However, it is still a distinguished novel from the Victorian era. It might not be as enjoyable as Jane Eyre yet it is rich in characterizations and theme.

The novel is set in Napoleon era, in a village where machinery just enters the society. As we often
Favorite tidbit while reading this book: Shirley was largely a male name until this book's publication, at which time more baby girls were given the name. Good job, Charlotte, you changed like... everything.

Shirley's father wanted a boy, didn't get one, so the next best thing was for him to name his new baby chick a boy's name. Which leads me then to wonder if Shirley (as a female character's name) is sort of meant to denote she was a tomboy, kind of like Scout in To Kill a Mockingbird. In any c
Friend the Girl
Oct 29, 2008 Friend the Girl rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: anyone who loves a good Napoleonic love epic
Shelves: yearly-reread
Ahh, Shirley . . . I must read this book once a year, because it affects me so profoundly when I do read it. Though the heroine of Shirley is actually named Caroline, and she isn't a swashbuckling dame or a fiery temptress or really even anything remarkable, she makes for a remarkable read and is surrounded by brilliant people and events. It's a chaotic time in England during the height of the Napoleonic Wars and timid Caroline's world is turned upside-down, but the events that really hook me ar ...more
Barry Pierce
Meh. Meh meh meh meh. Meh. What a boring novel. Everything that made Jane Eyre such a masterpiece is completely missing from this novel. What was Charlotte thinking? I don't even think Brontë purists can find any pleasure in this novel. It's empty. It has no heart. The reason why I'm not giving this one-star is because I only give books that I hate one-star. I don't hate this novel, I'm just severely disappointed. People have told me not to get excited about The Professor either so I don't know ...more
Christopher H.
Charlotte Bronte's Shirley is one of the most beautiful, enriching, and satisfying novels that I've read this year. A novel borne from tragedy, Charlotte published Shirley in 1849; and while writing the novel, her brother Branwell died in 1848; followed shortly thereafter by the death of her sister Emily also in 1848; and then, horrifyingly, by her remaining sister, Anne, in 1849. In fact, it is believed that the characters of her two primary female protagonists in the novel, Caroline Helstone a ...more
Charlotte Bronte reminds us—readers that Shirley is “…something unromantic as Monday morning” (chapter 1). Well I found it true because I see Shirley more as a social novel than a romance. The social background depicts the Napoleonic War and the industrial depression caused by it. This is where I found hard to get to the core of the book because I do not have a wide knowledge about that historical-social background. Another thing that is hard for me to get through is that this book seems to have ...more
The novel Shirley was a pleasant addition to my reading this winter. I love the British novel, but I especially love the one that is little-known to me and takes me by surprise. I must admit that after reading last year and being once again blown away (in spite of past readings) by Emily's Wuthering Heights, I had not felt emotionally ready to tackle another Bronte novel. So glad I did this time though, because it was exactly what I needed this winter.

Shirley is so different from Jane Eyre, an
Melissa Lenhardt
I did not like Shirley.

That could be my entire review. After reading a novel that was at least 200 pages too long, it probably should be. Because it is late and I am not feeling too charitable towards Charlotte Bronte I will make this brief.

There were many things I disliked about Shirley (★★) but the one thing that I did like was the character of Shirley. Where Shirley was lively and engaging, the other characters were dull, overwrought and over described. I may be in the minority but I think it
Maybe the less romantic novel by Charlotte, but her most mature work, an account of the changing times in the early XIXth century.
The story follows the lives of four main characters. Miss Helstone, a young woman with no prospects, niece of a Curate in Yorkshire, her serious cousin Mr. Moore, a businessman who struggles to earn his living, Miss Shirley, a spirited heiress of a great fortune and her tutor Mr. Moore's brother, Louis.
Being a Brontë's novel though, there's not one, but two romances
E. Chainey (Bookowski)
İngiliz Edebiyatı kadın yazarlarına hayranım. Nitekim C.Bronte benim en sevdiklerimden. Romantik bir roman beklemeyin demiş kendisi ama hele sonlara doğru içim sıcacık oldu. Ama kayalar kadar sert ve puruzlu bir kitap bu kitap. Bir yanda servet sahibi uzlaşılmaz Shirley Keeldar, diğer yanda narin ve guzel Caroline Helstone. Bir yanda fabrika sahibi karizmatik Robert Moore, diğer yanda onun hassas öğretmen kardeşi Louis Moore. Başkaldıran işçiler, eski anılar, İngiltere'nin Sanayileşme zamanları, ...more
Almost a feminist and socialist novel until the last chapter, Bronte's independent women (Shirley and Caroline) seem intent on making their own way in life until they both marry like good girls at the end.
Derek Davis
It's not exactly a novel in the usual 19th century sense. It pretty much lacks plot, changes direction several times, loses track of characters, runs on way too long and is used as a platform for a platter-load of mini-essays. And the title character first appears on page 274.

So why 5 stars? Because it may be the most beautifully written work I've read. Every word is exactly chosen, exactly placed and adds to the cumulative effect of its sentence and paragraph. This may sound too precious or co
Anastasia Hobbet
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Coming from an obssessive Brontë devotee who has read all of their works, this was the one that I read last. I tried, several times, to read it, but my interest always wained. Having said that, I am thrilled to have finally finished it and was really impressed with Charlottte's attempt at writing in the third person omniscient...her only attept with regard to her novels, though the technique was prevelant in her juvenilia. "Shirley" is set during the Napoleonic war as England is struggling with ...more
Opinião do blogue Chaise Longue:

Ficou conhecida por ter sido a incentivadora do movimento feminista na literatura da sua época, era a melhor amiga de Elizabeth Gaskell e até assumir a sua verdadeira identidade, pensava-se que os seus livros eram escritos por Thackeray, um dos seus amigos mais próximos. Mas mais do que isso, era a mais velha do trio de irmãs mais conhecidas da literatura, as irmãs Brontë. Criada em colégios internos, Charlotte foi sempre u
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
... Charlotte Bronte said she wrote Shirley as a view of Emily Bronte as she may-have-been, under ideal circumstances. I find myself grateful that circumstances were not perfect. Shirley seems a pale, almost lifeless tribute.
Or maybe Charlotte was too damn hopeless to describe her sister accurately: if I remember right, Branwell, Anne, and Emily all died during the writing of it.


My goodness, Charlotte becomes dialectical at times. She's all over the place. Jane Eyre is more novel & less hi
Christy B
Not bad. Not bad. In comparison to her other novels, I didn't love it as much as Villette or Jane Eyre, of course, but it was much better than The Professor.

We see most of the book through the eyes of two young women: Caroline Helstone, the shy niece of a Rector, who feels stifled by her life, and Shirley Keelder a wealthy young woman who, by her wealth, is able to live life freer than most women of that time.

There is no romance here. In fact, for a while, there is nothing happening. It is also
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Well, for my 500th read book on goodreads, I decided to pick something that I'd been saving for a while, and I settled on Shirley, which was the last Charlotte Brontë novel I had left to read.

Shirley is full of my favorite Charlotte Brontë things, namely feminist social agitation and characters who step outside their expected gender roles. Shirley is obviously the best part of Shirley--she deserves a spot on the list of greatest characters of all time. Supposedly Charlotte told Elizabeth Gaskell
Shirley is Charlotte Brontë's only historical novel and in that her most topical one. Written at a time of social unrest, it is set during the period of the Napoleonic Wars, when economic hardship led to riots in the woollen district of Yorkshire. A mill-owner, Robert Moore, is determined to introduce new machinery despite fierce opposition from his workers; he ignores their suffering, and puts his own life at risk. Robert sees marriage to the wealthy Shirley Keeldar as the solution to his diffi ...more
This is actually my favorite of all of Charlotte's books, and despite the general stance that it isn't as well developed or polished as her other works I actually find it very mature and by far the most epic and social in its scope. Though not on par with MIDDLEMARCH it is in a similar vein, with hints of Hugo and Dickens in both the subject matter and cast of characters. All three of the principles are compelling, finely drawn folks and Catherine's transformation, the most complete arc in the n ...more
After many years of meaning to do so, I am finally reading Shirley. The description (labor reform in England in the 1840s) always put me off. And to tell the truth, I almost stopped reading before the titular character appeared (around page 200). Everything just seemed very muddy, cold, sharp, and difficult (poverty, gruff uncles, self-important Belgian cousins). But I'm glad I kept reading. The central friendship between Caroline and Shirley is fun and complex. And there are romantic misunderst ...more
This is a strange, difficult read, and doesn't capture the imagination as instantly as Jane Eyre. The omniscient narrator reminds me of a male Victorian author like Thackeray, an interesting choice given that the main characters are female, and Bronte deals with women's position in society. The plot and characters are well-drawn and there is some excellent writing here if you look hard enough. But I felt the subplot of industrial unrest wasn't as compelling because it was overshadowed by Charlot ...more
Este é um livro fragmentado, que reflecte talvez o período conturbado da vida da escritora. No início, foi difícil entrar na história devido à narração subjectiva, que acaba por se acentuar outra vez no final do livro. Durante a leitura mudei várias vezes de opinião sobre as personagens, cheguei até mesmo a pensar que faria mais sentido o livro se chamar Caroline que Shirley, mas a evolução da história mostra-nos que a Shirley (apesar de só aparecer para lá da página 100) é a verdadeira heroína. ...more
This novel was mentioned in The Making of the English Working Class so I read it out of interest for the sociopolitical background but didn't enjoy Bronte's treatment of it - sympathetic as she is with the factory owner, though I believe interestingly he is foreign born. Think this is set late in the Napoleonic wars so possibly a rather early industrial novel?
Enough happens in Shirley to sustain interest. There are a few dramas and a few melodramas. Around these events there is a steady development of several characters, who are changed over time in various ways. When that process has exhausted the interest of the writer, the story is brought to a hard and clunky conclusion in terms which will avert any claims for a refund.

Charlotte Bronte was not telling that kind of story in Shirley. The incidents are just that - incidental, except as they provide
Jaime Bridle
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
All About Books: Shirley by Charlotte Bronte (Leslie, Shirley, and anyone else?) 39 19 Nov 19, 2014 01:58PM  
The Brontë Family: Shirley (1849) 2 29 Jul 30, 2014 06:39AM  
  • Agnes Grey
  • Ruth
  • Martin Chuzzlewit
  • Romola
  • The Hand of Ethelberta
  • East Lynne
  • He Knew He Was Right
  • Cecilia
  • Lady Audley's Secret
  • Lorna Doone: A Romance of Exmoor
  • No Name
  • Belinda
Charlotte Brontë was a British novelist, the eldest out of the three famous Brontë sisters whose novels have become standards of English literature. See also Emily Brontë and Anne Brontë.

Charlotte Brontë was born in Thornton, Yorkshire, England, the third of six children, to Patrick Brontë (formerly "Patrick Brunty"), an Irish Anglican clergyman, and his wife, Maria Branwell. In April 1820 the fam
More about Charlotte Brontë...
Jane Eyre Villette The Professor Emma Charlotte & Emily Brontë: The Complete Novels

Share This Book

“If men could see us as we really are, they would be a little amazed; but the cleverest, the acutest men are often under an illusion about women: they do not read them in a true light: they misapprehend them, both for good and evil: their good woman is a queer thing, half doll, half angel; their bad woman almost always a fiend.” 311 likes
“God surely did not create us, and cause us to live, with the sole end of wishing always to die. I believe, in my heart, we were intended to prize life and enjoy it, so long as we retain it. Existence never was originally meant to be that useless, blank, pale, slow-trailing thing it often becomes to many, and is becoming to me, among the rest.” 90 likes
More quotes…