<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	
<book id="698866">
  <title><![CDATA[The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies]]></title>
  <isbn><![CDATA[0691129428]]></isbn>
  <isbn13><![CDATA[9780691129426]]></isbn13>
    <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1177378072m/698866.jpg</image_url>
    <work>
  <best_book_id type="integer">698866</best_book_id>
  <books_count type="integer">2</books_count>
  <default_description>&lt;p&gt;The greatest obstacle to sound economic policy is not entrenched special interests or rampant lobbying, but the popular misconceptions, irrational beliefs, and personal biases held by ordinary voters. This is economist Bryan Caplan's sobering assessment in this provocative and eye-opening book. Caplan argues that voters continually elect politicians who either share their biases or else pretend to, resulting in bad policies winning again and again by popular demand.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boldly calling into question our most basic assumptions about American politics, Caplan contends that democracy fails precisely because it does what voters want. Through an analysis of Americans' voting behavior and opinions on a range of economic issues, he makes the convincing case that noneconomists suffer from four prevailing biases: they underestimate the wisdom of the market mechanism, distrust foreigners, undervalue the benefits of conserving labor, and pessimistically believe the economy is going from bad to worse. Caplan lays out several bold ways to make democratic government work better--for example, urging economic educators to focus on correcting popular misconceptions and recommending that democracies do less and let markets take up the slack.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;The Myth of the Rational Voter&lt;/i&gt; takes an unflinching look at how people who vote under the influence of false beliefs ultimately end up with government that delivers lousy results. With the upcoming presidential election season drawing nearer, this thought-provoking book is sure to spark a long-overdue reappraisal of our elective system.&lt;/p&gt;</default_description>
  <id type="integer">685181</id>
  <media_type nil="true"></media_type>
  <original_language_id type="integer" nil="true"></original_language_id>
  <original_publication_day type="integer">16</original_publication_day>
  <original_publication_month type="integer">4</original_publication_month>
  <original_publication_year type="integer">2007</original_publication_year>
  <original_title>The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies</original_title>
  <rating_dist>total:94|5:28|4:41|3:19|2:5|1:1|</rating_dist>
  <ratings_count type="integer">94</ratings_count>
  <ratings_sum type="integer">372</ratings_sum>
  <reviews_count type="integer">277</reviews_count>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">26</text_reviews_count>
</work>

  <average_rating><![CDATA[3.96]]></average_rating>
  <ratings_count><![CDATA[88]]></ratings_count>
  <text_reviews_count><![CDATA[24]]></text_reviews_count>
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/698866.The_Myth_of_the_Rational_Voter_Why_Democracies_Choose_Bad_Policies]]></url>
  <authors>
        <author id="373203">
      <name><![CDATA[Bryan Caplan]]></name>
      <role><![CDATA[]]></role>
      <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/373203.Bryan_Caplan]]></url>
      <average_rating><![CDATA[3.96]]></average_rating>
      <ratings_count><![CDATA[94]]></ratings_count>
      <text_reviews_count><![CDATA[26]]></text_reviews_count>
    </author>
      </authors>
    <reviews start="1" end="20" total="277">
    <review id="3842720">
    <user id="57663">
    <name><![CDATA[Courtney]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[North Chatham, MA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/57663-courtney]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>1</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="currently-reading" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Wed Aug 01 00:00:00 -0700 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Jul 31 06:54:43 -0700 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Sep 03 06:44:07 -0700 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Since I probably won't finish this book before school starts, I figure I'd put in my review now based on the first few chapters.  While I was really excited to see this book come out and feel it's a topic long overdue for a good discussion, I believe Caplan is too smart for his own good.  <br/><br/>...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/3842720">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/3842720]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="3790020">
    <user id="58482">
    <name><![CDATA[Carl]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Brooklyn, NY]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/58482-carl]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>1</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Wed Aug 01 00:00:00 -0700 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Jul 30 08:54:08 -0700 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Aug 16 09:57:00 -0700 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Requiring my concentration throughout, this book packs a big payoff in every section. The author presents the economic biases shared by a frighteningly large majority of voters and follows by clearly (although with a lot of empirical evidence) demystifying these biases in a way that makes your brain...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/3790020">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/3790020]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="28822587">
    <user id="1380007">
    <name><![CDATA[Nate]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Salt Lake City, UT]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1380007-nate]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>1</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="economics--politics--law" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Jul 30 19:16:49 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Jul 31 18:17:22 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Caplan's general argument is that a majority of voters in democracies (or representative republics) are rationally irrational when it comes to politics. Since the likelihood of one voter's vote being decisive in an election is practically nil, the costs for being wrong (i.e., choosing a candidate wh...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/28822587">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/28822587]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="16482173">
    <user id="255134">
    <name><![CDATA[Nicole]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Chicago, IL]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/255134-nicole]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Feb 26 20:38:11 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Feb 26 20:38:11 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Caplan begins by outlining current theories of voter behavior that emphasize voter rationality + voter ignorance, and lays out persuasive objections to this view. First, he describes and provides empirical evidence for four systematic biases of the general public. He refers to these as antimarket bi...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/16482173">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/16482173]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="56954134">
    <user id="821228">
    <name><![CDATA[Adrienne]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/821228-adrienne]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Fri May 22 07:56:01 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Fri May 22 08:50:58 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Another one of those feel-good economics books that destroys your faith in democracy. It completely affirmed my love for economic analysis.<br/><br/>This book blew me away with the way it approached both the field and specific issues of democracy. It's one of only a few books (that I've seen) that...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/56954134">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/56954134]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="41879426">
    <user id="1802861">
    <name><![CDATA[Greg]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1802861-greg]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue Dec 30 00:00:00 -0800 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Jan 04 15:18:27 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Jan 04 15:20:50 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[This book builds on the rational ignorance voter theory that claims people choose to stay ignorant because it isn't worth their time and effort to research the issues or candidates because their vote doesn't matter.  This author claims that people actually are choosing to vote for bad policies becau...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/41879426">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/41879426]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="44937627">
    <user id="1482810">
    <name><![CDATA[Scott]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Brazil]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1482810-scott]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 -0800 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Jan 31 06:08:53 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Jan 31 06:13:28 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Shows how were all doomed, democracies don't work.<br/>There's lot of non intuitive nuggets, in this book that I didn't know before.<br/>The only downside is that it reads like a research paper (lots of quoted material, in depth analysis of research performed on the subject).  I would have preferr...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/44937627">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/44937627]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="24909298">
    <user id="953590">
    <name><![CDATA[Ben]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[New York, NY]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/953590-ben]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="currently-reading" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Jun 19 11:36:10 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Jun 19 11:42:59 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Caplan takes a very obvious premise, that people are stupid, and backs it up with one tenuous piece of evidence and a lot of sketchy reasoning.  The arguments go like this:  free trade enlarges the economic pie, so free trade increases prosperity per person, so free trade makes everyone more prosper...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/24909298">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/24909298]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="56386024">
    <user id="2280809">
    <name><![CDATA[Wilte]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Leiden, 11, Netherlands]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2280809-wilte]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sun May 17 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Sun May 17 12:01:08 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun May 17 12:03:09 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Voter are not ignorant, but irrational. They have systematic bias, not a random bias.<br/>SIVH = special interest voter hypothesis is not true. Males are more pro-choice, elderly support less Medicaid etc.<br/><br/>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/56386024]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="70157801">
    <user id="2674867">
    <name><![CDATA[Lynn]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Salt Lake City, UT]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2674867-lynn-fikstad]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sat Nov 01 00:00:00 -0700 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Sep 05 10:53:35 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Sep 05 10:57:23 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I read this in order to help explain the results of the last election.  It did.  In fact, it explained our choices too.  The book primarily shows the irrational economic views of the non-economist.]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/70157801]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="32627754">
    <user id="1074513">
    <name><![CDATA[Rob]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Towson, MD]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1074513-rob]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Thu Sep 11 00:00:00 -0700 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Sep 11 13:41:16 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Fri Sep 12 05:33:12 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[This seemed like a timely book for the season, especially given the attention given to lipstick and not say, um, what is that stuff called...oh...policy.  This book details exactly what the title claims, from the point of view of a data-driven economist.  It was much more academic than I expected (l...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/32627754">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/32627754]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="31438477">
    <user id="1472458">
    <name><![CDATA[Jake]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Chicago, IL]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1472458-jake]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[Anone interested in politics and economics]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[Someone mentioned it on jewishworldreview.com]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Fri Nov 16 00:00:00 -0800 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Aug 28 11:16:26 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Aug 28 11:21:39 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Fantastic book.  The only drawback is that many laymen will find it a little slow going and a bit of an information overload.  Caplan does an incredible job of expressing his latest research in economics.  Also, the conclusion of the book is absolutely extraordinary.  He does an excellent job tying ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/31438477">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/31438477]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="1867795">
    <user id="126059">
    <name><![CDATA[Daniel]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Gaithersburg, MD]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/126059-daniel]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon Oct 01 00:00:00 -0700 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Jun 11 19:42:24 -0700 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Nov 10 12:18:33 -0800 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Caplan’s book makes a solid case that voters are biased: they prefer bad economic policies. Caplan also convincingly argues that their biases result from improper incentives, since in a democracy one vote rarely makes a difference. But he fails to demonstrate that their biases much matter—how ha...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/1867795">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/1867795]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="18059157">
    <user id="447316">
    <name><![CDATA[Tim]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Columbia, MO]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/447316-tim]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon Jan 01 00:00:00 -0800 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Mar 18 19:14:35 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Mar 18 19:16:51 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I found the book to be well written and communicating a fascinating message, but couldn't help but feel that the evidence the author leaned on for some of his conclusions was a little weak in sample size.<br/><br/>Nevertheless, this book is a must-read for people interested in communicating in polit...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/18059157">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/18059157]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="49350960">
    <user id="869560">
    <name><![CDATA[Cortney]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Tallahassee, FL]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/869560-cortney]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sat Aug 01 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Mar 15 11:54:00 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Aug 19 21:21:48 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[A heterodox view of individual behavior. Caplan outlines his theory of the rational irrationality, basically setting up irrationality as a good with a price leading to a demand function. When price of irrationality is low, consumption of it is high. Politics is a realm where the price is very low du...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/49350960">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/49350960]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="22499525">
    <user id="793094">
    <name><![CDATA[Lisa]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Richmond, VA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/793094-lisa]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="nonfiction" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon Jun 02 00:00:00 -0700 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Sun May 18 14:16:00 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Jun 03 04:39:57 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I just started this book, but every time I pick it up, I fall asleep. That's odd because I'm very interested in politics and the economy. I think the author's thesis is very interesting. Maybe I should try reading it during the day.<br/>Now that I have finished this book, I am glad that I read it, ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/22499525">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/22499525]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="27329006">
    <user id="98312">
    <name><![CDATA[J]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Snoqualmie, WA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/98312-j]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="stopped-reading" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Jul 15 11:54:50 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Jul 15 12:01:59 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Maybe I am being a dick by closing this book after ten pages, but I was not expecting the book to only be about why voters don't vote like economists.  Also, &quot;enlightened public&quot; voters vote like economists, the market will solve our problems more effectively than democracy in the future, ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/27329006">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/27329006]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="9053464">
    <user id="154132">
    <name><![CDATA[Anthony]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Toa Payoh, Singapore]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/154132-anthony]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sat Dec 01 00:00:00 -0800 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Nov 13 09:39:13 -0800 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Fri Dec 21 05:19:08 -0800 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Rational choice analysis of democracy and how underinformed (read: economically illiterate) citizens victim to anti-market, anti-foreign, make-work, and pessimistic biases systematically corrode proper policy-making.  Recommendation: gain familiarity with Tullock and Brown's GWU school of public cho...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/9053464">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/9053464]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="5746629">
    <user id="350217">
    <name><![CDATA[Damir]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Washington, DC]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/350217-damir-marusic]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="political-science" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Fri Jun 01 00:00:00 -0700 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Sep 05 21:05:52 -0700 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Sep 05 21:10:50 -0700 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Overall, it's an interesting book with a provocative thesis. Caplan seems to be too one-dimensional in his analysis, however, and he seems to draw broader implications than his evidence warrants.<br/><br/>Lots of good fodder for debate, however. The book should not be ignored.]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/5746629]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="11894682">
    <user id="752750">
    <name><![CDATA[Matthew]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Seattle, WA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/752750-matthew]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue Mar 17 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Jan 07 12:18:06 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Mar 17 21:38:04 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[A &quot;must read&quot; for anyone interested in making good decisions for the social welfare. This would've been five stars if it had been written more for a popular, rather than an academic, audience, but the arguments for why we get the governments we deserve are strong. ]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/11894682]]></url>
</review>
    </reviews>
  <popular_shelves>
        <shelf name="to-read" />
        <shelf name="economics" />
        <shelf name="currently-reading" />
        <shelf name="non-fiction" />
        <shelf name="politics" />
        <shelf name="political" />
        <shelf name="econ" />
        <shelf name="nonfiction" />
        <shelf name="to-read-bookclub" />
      </popular_shelves>
  <book_links>
    <book_link id="8">
  <name><![CDATA[WorldCat]]></name>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book_link/follow/8?book_id=698866</link>
</book_link>
  </book_links>
</book>
</GoodreadsResponse>