Troublesome Words
by
Bill Bryson
Why should I avoid discussing the 'weather conditions'?
Can a woman be 'celibate'?
When can I use 'due to', or should I play safe and always use 'because of'?
What's wrong with the way I'm using 'crescendo'?
This book provides a simple guide to the more perplexing and contentious issues of standard written English. The entries are discussed with wit and common sense, and are i...more
Can a woman be 'celibate'?
When can I use 'due to', or should I play safe and always use 'because of'?
What's wrong with the way I'm using 'crescendo'?
This book provides a simple guide to the more perplexing and contentious issues of standard written English. The entries are discussed with wit and common sense, and are i...more
Paperback, 241 pages
Published
September 1st 2010
by Penguin Books
(first published 1984)
Friend Reviews
To see what your friends thought of this book,
please sign up.
This book is not yet featured on Listopia.
Add this book to your favorite list »
Community Reviews
(showing
1-30
of
3,000)
I read this book two times in about six months, so I think I'm done with the cover to cover work. I have it marked and highlighted and handy for reference.
Along with discussions of spelling and usage, Bryson includes many examples of incorrect usage from well-known publications and authors (including his very august self). The examples let you see what it looks like when it's done wrong, and you may recognize your own errors in those of other people. It's also nice to know that even the profess...more
Along with discussions of spelling and usage, Bryson includes many examples of incorrect usage from well-known publications and authors (including his very august self). The examples let you see what it looks like when it's done wrong, and you may recognize your own errors in those of other people. It's also nice to know that even the profess...more
This is a brilliant little book amd a must read/desk companion for professional writers. Arranged alphabetically, it basically explains correct spellings, etymology and meanings of various words and the mistakes that even lovers of words and writing can make. For example when to use compliment or complement; when to parlay or attend a parley. He explains the real meaning of condone (which is not to approve or endorse but to forgive - whoops!) and takes his time over who and whom. He also explain...more
Aug 16, 2007
Summer
rated it
5 of 5 stars
·
review of another edition
Recommends it for:
folks who like words
Shelves:
five-star-favs,
non-fic
I really enjoyed this, but then I do sometimes read the dictionary for fun. I found Bryson’s expectations of correct usage to be insightful and realistic. I appreciate his examples of incorrect usage.
An example of something I have applied to my own writing is the entry for include. He writes, "include indicates that what is to follow is only part of a greater whole. To use it when you are describing a totality is sloppy, as here: “The 630 job losses include 300 in Redcar and 330 in Port Talbot”...more
An example of something I have applied to my own writing is the entry for include. He writes, "include indicates that what is to follow is only part of a greater whole. To use it when you are describing a totality is sloppy, as here: “The 630 job losses include 300 in Redcar and 330 in Port Talbot”...more
One of the English language’s most skilled and beloved writers guides us all toward precise, mistake-free usage.
As usual Bill Bryson says it best: “English is a dazzlingly idiosyncratic tongue, full of quirks and irregularities that often seem willfully at odds with logic and common sense. This is a language where ‘cleave’ can mean to cut in half or to hold two halves together; where the simple word ‘set’ has 126 different meanings as a verb, 58 as a noun, and 10 as a participial adjective; wh
A friend asked if this is worth getting. I replied,
Hm, it's certainly briefer than Garner's modern usage, which I am reading cover to cover. But less meaty might be just right. (In Garner I hiccuped my wonted plodding A-to-Z to see what Garner says about which's increasing use as a conjunction. Surprisingly (to me), he doesn't mention it.)
Some of Bryson's explanations I doubt you need (antennae or antennas, auger v. augur), but your students might. Some I don't care about (short of publication...more
Hm, it's certainly briefer than Garner's modern usage, which I am reading cover to cover. But less meaty might be just right. (In Garner I hiccuped my wonted plodding A-to-Z to see what Garner says about which's increasing use as a conjunction. Surprisingly (to me), he doesn't mention it.)
Some of Bryson's explanations I doubt you need (antennae or antennas, auger v. augur), but your students might. Some I don't care about (short of publication...more
(When I read this it was just called Troublesome Words, but is now called Bryson’s Dictionary of Troublesome Words: A Writer’s Guide to Getting it Right.)
Plot: Bill Bryson is always learning and when he’s not travelling around the world, or compiling a book about the history of the world and all the science that goes along with it, he’s correcting all us writers on our grammer.
Characters: Just Bill, 26 letters of the alphabet, a bookful of words and several grammatical theories.
Style Of Writing:...more
Plot: Bill Bryson is always learning and when he’s not travelling around the world, or compiling a book about the history of the world and all the science that goes along with it, he’s correcting all us writers on our grammer.
Characters: Just Bill, 26 letters of the alphabet, a bookful of words and several grammatical theories.
Style Of Writing:...more
I'm a fan of Bryson, and this book -- though not intended to be entertaining -- is invaluable. Even though most of us aren't writers, with the proliferation of e-mail and correspondence for our jobs, I feel that this book is something all of us should read and use.
From the introduction: "What follows should be regarded less as a book of instruction than as a compilation of suggestions, observations, and even treasured prejudices. Never forget that no one really has the right to tell you how to o...more
From the introduction: "What follows should be regarded less as a book of instruction than as a compilation of suggestions, observations, and even treasured prejudices. Never forget that no one really has the right to tell you how to o...more
This book definitely earns a 5 star rating, I'm just not sure who to recommend it to:
Professional writers and grammar nerds will love the book's utility; this is a resource I know I'll be returning to often. For example, if all I'm trying to do is spell or define a word then I'll pull out a basic dictionary. But what if three different words seem to have identical definitions, are there situations I'm supposed to use one word over another? Or let's say I see several respected publications handle...more
Professional writers and grammar nerds will love the book's utility; this is a resource I know I'll be returning to often. For example, if all I'm trying to do is spell or define a word then I'll pull out a basic dictionary. But what if three different words seem to have identical definitions, are there situations I'm supposed to use one word over another? Or let's say I see several respected publications handle...more
Mar 13, 2010
Tim
rated it
5 of 5 stars
·
review of another edition
Shelves:
non-fiction,
highly-recommended

I might be starting towards lexophilia, but this book is the only dictionary/ thesaurus that I can seriously read. That is sit and read through it one word at a time. The only disadvantage is that it tends to make one nervous in one's own writing and want to check everything with Bryson just in case you have just made another almighty clanger.
It was given to my by a lovely friend and it has proven to be a delight, you can't categorize it well, it isn't really a dictionary and it's not a thesauru...more
As this is a reference book, only the most committed logophile will read it from cover to cover.
The book has one section, "Troublesome Words", and an appendix, "Punctuation".
What makes this guide to correct English stand out from the cluttered shelves of similar books is two things. Bryson delivers his advice with his trademark humor that readers of any of his other books will immediately recognize. That itself leads to the second point — Bryson isn't some grammarian tucked away in the dusty sta...more
The book has one section, "Troublesome Words", and an appendix, "Punctuation".
What makes this guide to correct English stand out from the cluttered shelves of similar books is two things. Bryson delivers his advice with his trademark humor that readers of any of his other books will immediately recognize. That itself leads to the second point — Bryson isn't some grammarian tucked away in the dusty sta...more
I taught middle school grammar for six years, and my favorite part of the grammar book (didn't you have a favorite part of the middle school grammar book?) was always the glossary of usage. I saved that part of the curriculum for the end of the year, like a desert that you look forward to throughout a long meal.
"Class, do you know when to use 'fewer' instead of 'less'? No? Oh, goodie."
After the joyful experience I had reading A Short History of Nearly Everything, I wanted to check out more Brys...more
"Class, do you know when to use 'fewer' instead of 'less'? No? Oh, goodie."
After the joyful experience I had reading A Short History of Nearly Everything, I wanted to check out more Brys...more
This is a great book, one any writer should have on a shelf near their keyboard. It explains most of the words, phrases, and basic punctuation issues that regularly screw up even professional writers and editors, and is handy to have within reach when you have a, "Wait, which one was that again--?" moment. All the examples are from professional (and often highly respected) publications, showing that even the folks one looks up to screw up over and over; it's just part of the business.
That said,...more
That said,...more
Excellent book. There was much here I just didn't know, and a lot of other material that I might once have known but had forgotten. I actually read through the entire thing, although it would be a great browsing book for anyone who wants to write or who just loves langauge. I got several blog posts out of the interesting material I found within.
Jan 01, 2010
Kathleen Dixon
rated it
4 of 5 stars
·
review of another edition
Shelves:
language-and-literacy
We just titled it Troublesome Words here in NZ.
Someone (or ones) in Reading Seals recommended this, so I borrowed it from the library. He's a very entertaining writer, though he hasn't said anything here that can't be found in other collections like this.
Someone (or ones) in Reading Seals recommended this, so I borrowed it from the library. He's a very entertaining writer, though he hasn't said anything here that can't be found in other collections like this.
What a delightful surprise. I can't say that I've ever read a dictionary from cover to cover, but that's just what I did with this book. Unlike other books by Bryson, this really isn't humorous...so don't read it looking for chuckles...but it was so clear and helpful that I just had to read it all. My sister asked me jokingly if I was getting that smug feeling that sometimes accompanies reading about grammar and spelling and so forth--"Oh yes, I already knew that,"--but no. If anything I was ver...more
There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
Be the first to start one »
Bill Bryson was born in Des Moines, Iowa, in 1951. He settled in England in 1977, and worked in journalism until he became a full time writer. He lived for many years with his English wife and four children in North Yorkshire. He and his family then moved to New Hampshire in America for a few years, but they have now returned to live in the UK.
In The Lost Continent, Bill Bryson's hilarious first t...more
More about Bill Bryson...
In The Lost Continent, Bill Bryson's hilarious first t...more
Share This Book
No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »
“Before, prior to. There is no difference between these two except length and a certain affectedness on the part of 'prior to.' To paraphrase Bernstein, if you would use 'posterior to' instead of 'after,' then by all means use 'prior to' instead of 'before.”
—
11 people liked it
More quotes…

Loading...
view 2 comments































