Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Fiction Editor: A Book for Writers, Teachers, Publishers, Editors and Anyone Else Devoted To...” as Want to Read:
Blank 133x176
The Fiction Editor: A ...
Thomas McCormack
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Fiction Editor: A Book for Writers, Teachers, Publishers, Editors and Anyone Else Devoted To...

3.8  ·  Rating Details ·  83 Ratings  ·  17 Reviews

"Lucid, thoughtful . . . writers and teachers will learn much from it. . . . Belongs wherever Strunk and White's The Elements of Style finds frequent use."-Booklist

"Writers will actually learn things here."-Los Angeles Times

"Perfect for teachers, critics and general readers."-Library Journal

Drawing upon twenty-eight years of experience as the CEO and editorial director of
Hardcover, 202 pages
Published June 26th 2000 by St. Martin's Press (first published 1988)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Fiction Editor, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Fiction Editor

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Jul 18, 2009 Robin rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
A simple tag for this book might be "Erudite". Or perhaps "Repetitive".

I found it disappointing. The back cover says --

"McCormack gives practical guidance about how to plan, write, and revise a novel. ... He details how to structure the novel, choose the characters, drive the story, diagnose narrative ailments, and find and apply specific remedies."

Except -- he doesn't. What advice there is must be painstakingly picked out from McCormack's harping that 'editors need a textbook of craft'. After r
Jessica Colund
As shocking as it may sound, many books on editing fail to give helpful, practical advice. This book succeeds where others have failed. McCormack's chapter on craft stands out like a shining beacon in the field of publishing books. Because of that chapter alone, I recommend this book to anyone who wants to write, edit, or teach fiction (or even non-fiction, which is actually what I want to edit).

McCormack's ideas on sensibility (you either have it or you don’t) are interesting and, in some place
Mar 23, 2008 Sarah rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: writers
Recommended to Sarah by: Rose Green
This technical book, written for editors, tends to be repetitious but was worth my time. McCormack believes the craft of editing can be taught.

The book is divided into 4 parts.

The first section, “Reading requires Sensibility,” explains why an editor needs to be able to respond as “an appropriate reader would.”

The second section of the book is “Reading requires Sensibility and Craft.” Surface faults and internal failures, ways to diagnose problems, and possible solutions are mentioned. Some ways
Lavinia Ludlow
Jan 29, 2010 Lavinia Ludlow rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
If you're an avid reader, this will change your perspective. If you're a writer, this will change your life.

Formal personal essay combined with a review pending...
Suzie Quint
while this book is addressed to everyone interested in the publishing industry, it seems that the primary intended audience is editors. The author Thomas McCormack was an editor for over 30 years and at the time of publication served as Chairman and Editorial Director of St. Martin’s Press. Impressive credentials.

According to him, the two primary skills an editor needs are a highly developed sensibility and craft skills. Now, when he says “craft,” he means editing craft.

Sensibility is about how
Rachel Pollock
Yeah, not what i hoped it would be. Another short book, purportedly on the process of editing of novels once picked up by a publisher, but really, this felt like it was 203984 times longer. What a slog through a quagmire of pontificatory grousing and protracted, belabored metaphors. Sometimes it felt like a writing textbook, except it was so obfuscative, half the time i lost track of what he was bitching about as stylistic or structural problems before i got to the end of the paragraph. And it p ...more
Jun 29, 2011 Chris rated it did not like it
This trite piece of crap is something like a graduate student turned publisher/editor's blog, if blogs existed in the 80s. He's whiny, uppity, and really enjoys the view from his personal pedestal. He thinks he knows it all, and talks down toward you for the entire book.

I grant that I skimmed this; however, this is not the sort of book you want to spend time to read. It's cheap and wasteful, and really obnoxious. The few good points he makes are marred by his general incompetence. Read something
Shawn Scarber
Oct 26, 2015 Shawn Scarber rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
An interesting look at fiction and the skills of an editor in particular

As a writer of short fiction, I'm always interested in discovering some new storytelling gem. This book uncovers a few. This is one editor's attempt to layout the foundation for a means of instructing an editor. However, if you're an author looking to improve your craft, this book presents an opinionated means of evaluating and considering good fiction. Not as structured as I would like, but overall the book works to deliver
Itzel Gil
Un libro que pretende dar un panorama del trabajo del editor, o eso te venden... Más bien está lleno de analogías sin sentido que de consejos o experiencias concretas. No sirve como manual, ni lo pretende, pero es muy superficial a mi punto de vista. El libro fácilmente podría resumirse en un consejo: sensibilidad y efecto principal. No lo recomiendo para los que buscan un conocimiento profundo.
René López Villmar
Engaging and entertaining, but ultimately misguided, The Fiction Editor is a book that calls towards the making professional editors and yet it depends on flimsy prejudices and misapprehensions to makes it point. Good for thought, and good for its valor, but lacks real argumentation and a real knowledge of the novel.
Apr 21, 2009 RJW rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
I gave this book five stars because while it is not in my typical genre choice, I think that anyone writing a book, editing, or teaching, should read this book. It has a lot of valuable information that I will revisit time and time again.
Jul 31, 2007 Jenni rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: critical-essays
Very interesting. Is meant as sort of a textbook for editors, but is also helpful for writers. He gets very technical, talks a lot about specific problems in novels and how to solve them as an editor.
I found his tips helpful when I was getting my first editing jobs. It's the author's book. The editor's job is to figure out what the author wants to do and help him do it more effectively. He rants a bit on editors not doing their job.
Denise Ortakales
This book gave me a different perspective on writing, and gave me a few new tools in my craft box that I hadn't previously owned. Perhaps I had, but they were presented in a way that resonated with me.
Jan 18, 2015 Andy rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
A great read for editors and writers. McCormack has some strong opinions, and you'll likely find a few things to disagree with, but that only means you've read something that makes you think.And who could fault a book for that?
Feb 28, 2015 Catalina rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Gran libro. Lectura OBLIGATORIA, para todos y todas los que quieran dedicarse al arte de la edición.
Sep 27, 2011 Stephanie rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to Stephanie by: Daniel Weaver
I found McCormack to be endearingly cranky--he refreshingly does not pretend not to be a real person, which makes his advice that much more trustworthy to me.
Sarah rated it it was amazing
Jan 17, 2012
Nela rated it it was ok
Aug 09, 2014
Lisa rated it really liked it
Jan 03, 2014
Nita rated it really liked it
Jan 19, 2011
Jennifer rated it it was ok
Apr 23, 2013
Magali Espinosa
Magali Espinosa rated it it was amazing
Mar 09, 2017
Alina rated it really liked it
Jan 13, 2011
Steven rated it liked it
Nov 02, 2010
Fran Apey
Fran Apey rated it really liked it
Nov 21, 2013
Flaca rated it it was amazing
Jul 10, 2012
Isabel Serna
Isabel Serna rated it liked it
Feb 03, 2014
Stephen rated it liked it
Feb 10, 2015
Jefferson Fortner
Jefferson Fortner rated it liked it
May 03, 2015
« previous 1 3 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Share This Book

“An author needs a lot more than one person to succumb to his literary seductive charms, but, like Saul, he must realize that he doesn't have to--and indeed cannot--capture the hearts of every possible reader out there. No matter who the writer, his ideal intended audience is only a small faction of all the living readers. Name the most widely read authors you can think of--from Shakespeare, Austen, and Dickens to Robert Waller, Stephen King, and J.K. Rowling--and the immense majority of book-buyers out there actively decline to read them.” 2 likes
More quotes…