Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Perils of Masculinity: An Analysis of Male Sexual Anxiety, Sexual Addiction, and Relational Abuse” as Want to Read:
The Perils of Masculinity: An Analysis of Male Sexual Anxiety, Sexual Addiction, and Relational Abuse
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Perils of Masculinity: An Analysis of Male Sexual Anxiety, Sexual Addiction, and Relational Abuse

it was ok 2.0  ·  Rating Details ·  2 Ratings  ·  2 Reviews
In this book, Andreas G. Philaretou uses autobiographical reflection to investigate the negative impact of traditional masculine gender socialization on men's lives. In particular, Philaretou examines personal recollective accounts from early childhood socialization, and experiences with a number of traumatic episodes that unfolded during his intimate heterosexual and ...more
Paperback, 210 pages
Published April 19th 2004 by Upa (first published 2004)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Perils of Masculinity, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Perils of Masculinity

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-4)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Alexine Fleck
Aug 05, 2014 Alexine Fleck rated it did not like it
I'm only adding this book because I want credit for skimming it. The author makes a useful argument for my research into masculinity and sexual addiction. (He says that sexual addiction is the result of male sexual anxiety, which is the result of trying to live up to impossible masculine ideals, particularly for men who are either over or under masculinized). Whew. (I am planning to argue this argument's dopplegonger: that the behaviors we now class as "sexual addiction" are residues of the sort ...more
Matthew
Apr 29, 2015 Matthew rated it liked it
Shelves: gender-studies
Very repetitive. He had several good arguments, but they were outed in the beginning of the book and the rest of it seemed to be saying the same things over again. I also didn't like the causal language he used in the processes he described. Maybe he explained it in his long sections justifying autobiographical research, but I skimmed those sections because they didn't seem relevant to the information I wanted from the book.
Diane
Diane marked it as to-read
Feb 03, 2016
Brittany Miller Miller
Brittany Miller Miller is currently reading it
Jun 07, 2016
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Share This Book