Black Dogs: A Novel
by Ian McEwan
|
|
Sign in to Goodreads to see your friends' reviews of Black Dogs: A Novel.
discuss this book
friend reviews (0)
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
other reviews (showing 1-20 of 527)
bookshelves:
1001
Read in March, 2008
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
ian-mcewan
Read in November, 2007
recommends it for:
McEwan fans
The protagonist of Black Dogs states early on that the memoir he set out to write quickly turned into something else: the word he uses is "divagation," and it's impossible to imagine McEwan's novels without their digressions. In this novel, though, they don't work as well as they do in Atonement, Enduring Love or Saturday. The passage that best illustrates why is the short vignette that closes part 3. In it, the narrator is having dinner in a nearly-deserted hotel restaurant when a fa...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in January, 2007
recommends it for:
Literary fiction lovers
McEwan's Black Dogs was written in 1992 and follows up the Cold War Innocent with a story that includes both the beginning and the end of the War. It is far more metaphorical than its predecessor, using the story of a failed marriage to show how we react to horror. In 1946, a young pair of newly married socialists travel to France where the bride has a run-in with a pair of malevolent black dogs. Their contrasting reactions destroy their marriage. These reactions, in one case spiritual and in ot...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in June, 2007
I want to love Ian McEwan based on Zadie Smith’s (hilarious) interview with him in the Believer book of Writers on Writing. Maybe Black Dogs wasn’t the place to start. It was interesting to see his life work paralleled against Roth’s in the New York Review of Books (Al Alvarez, July 19 2007), suggesting that McEwan, like Roth, came of age as a writer at a moment when sexuality had to be busted out and that he, like Roth, was in the vanguard of this. I was expecting something more original ...more
Like this review?
yes
1 comments
Read in September, 2007
i am still haunted by this little book--about a turning point in the lives of a newly married english couple traveling in france in 1946--since finishing it a few days ago. the event itself is elusive, refracted through years of consequences and resentment, through memory and relentless memoir-izing. i've been curious about ian mcewan for years, and finally decided to read him after observing how intensely the british media is shitting itself right now over the world-historical importance of th...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
2007,
fiction
Read in October, 2007
In this book, there are three main characters, a couple where he is a skeptic and she has had a 'revelation', and a narrator who carefully conceals himself. The book is a long discussion on the nature of faith and of good and bad and the couple stand as moral opposites thoughout most of the text... until as revealed by the narrator, their faith in their beliefs (science and a religion of sorts), proves to be the thing that makes them more similar than they would have thought, and the narrator, a...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
I guess I don't really care for McEwan but I can't stop reading him. I did like this book, I think he does much better in his shorter stuff.
Families are strange things, especially one's you marry into. I don't know when or how, but I do love my in-laws and I've been drawn into their dramas, much like in this book - although not as much traveling or Englishness. I liked how these people were drawn, flaws and all. I didn't think McEwan passed judgment on them or that the reader can either. ...more
Families are strange things, especially one's you marry into. I don't know when or how, but I do love my in-laws and I've been drawn into their dramas, much like in this book - although not as much traveling or Englishness. I liked how these people were drawn, flaws and all. I didn't think McEwan passed judgment on them or that the reader can either. ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in April, 2008
Are all McEwan books the same? The only other one I’ve read is On Chesil Beach, but there are so many similarities. A newlywed couple who love each other but through a single wrong incident find themselves parted forever, unable to continue on together. The false frame of “the current time,” where minutely examined actions break up the real narrative, which is accumulated gradually through flashbacks, recall, history and he-said she-said. This one was less about blame and it roamed farther...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Has a copy to sell/swap
—
Read in March, 2007
recommends it for:
people who like France?
After reading Atonement, I was very excited to start Black Dogs, which is a totally different style of book (novella) with a totally different plotline (based before and during the fall of the Berlin Wall). Wow, was I disappointed. The plot is not intriguing, the characters are flat, and the action is minimal. When something eventful does occur, it's overly dramatized to the point of being ridiculous.
I hate to say it, but this book was pretty bad. If you really love how McEwan writes, I supp...more
I hate to say it, but this book was pretty bad. If you really love how McEwan writes, I supp...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in May, 2007
I'm a huge Ian McEwan fan and Black Dogs is my second fav from him. Atonement is still his masterpiece & Amsterdam is the only one I truly didn't care for.
Black Dogs is about many things: family,friends, memories, and regret. I love the language McEwan uses to describe simple things. It sets him apart from other male writers.
Women are considered to be more descriptive but McEwan gives them a run for their money.
Black Dogs is more optimistic than Atonement which was a complete down...more
Black Dogs is about many things: family,friends, memories, and regret. I love the language McEwan uses to describe simple things. It sets him apart from other male writers.
Women are considered to be more descriptive but McEwan gives them a run for their money.
Black Dogs is more optimistic than Atonement which was a complete down...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in August, 2007
Liked it, but I kept wandering off. Not something I do usually, but then, neither is McEwan the sort of writer who lets you.
Maybe that's it: It didn't feel like a McEwan book to me. I've always found his writing to be incredibly well-constructed and very firmly edited, so that the end product is 'finished' to an almost alien degree. 'Black Dogs' wasn't like that at all, for the most part.
Still, it's a well-told story. Not as chilling as 'The Cement Garden'. Nor as stunning as 'First Love...more
Maybe that's it: It didn't feel like a McEwan book to me. I've always found his writing to be incredibly well-constructed and very firmly edited, so that the end product is 'finished' to an almost alien degree. 'Black Dogs' wasn't like that at all, for the most part.
Still, it's a well-told story. Not as chilling as 'The Cement Garden'. Nor as stunning as 'First Love...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in July, 2007
This was such an interesting book and I completely loved reading it. McEwan uses the metaphor of a splintered marriage to examine the precarious co-existence of spirituality and reason. Can these two ideas co-exist (i.e. can these two married people co-habitate)? The answers seems to be "almost, but not quite". McEwan manages to examine these issues with both objectivity and sensitivity, it seemed to me that he loves both of these characters and he empathizes with both points of vi...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in July, 2007
I did enjoy this McEwan book, though not as much as Atonement or Child in Time. A master of character psychology, McEwan drew me into the relationships and many different kinds of heartaches in the book. However, I was not as compelled by the plot or as invested in the outcomes as I wanted to be. I found the lifetime of self-chosen separation of June and Bernard fascinating an their inability to reconcile despite being so in love haunting. A great book overall, but not my favorite of his.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in April, 2008
I seem to be on an Ian McEwan kick, and I'm starting to see some recurring themes in his works. One such involves a character having a random encounter with a malevolent force, which is overcome physically by said character, but grappled with psychologically by her/him for a long time after. It's a motif that crops up in some of his books, and in this one it's the central theme.
This novel has more ideas than plot, but is beautifully written, as McEwan always is.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in October, 2007
This book came highly recommend it, and I wanted to love it, but just couldn't. Moments of the book were brilliant - particularly the opening and the scenes set in France - but other parts seemed cliche - the mother and father seemed overdrawn, too archetypal, more ideas than flesh-n-blood characters, and I found the entire episode in Berlin somewhat ridiculous. But, overall, finely written - whatever else one wants to say about McEwan, he is a master craftsman.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in January, 2008
I like Ian McEwan a lot and I really like his stories. This one was not as great as others and it got a little tedious in spots but that was easy to overlook since it is so short.
I thought I was going to be a little bored with this one since it seemed to be the typical husband vs. wife trapped in a loveless marriage. However, that "McEwan Suprise" that he puts in every novel was especially shocking here.
I thought I was going to be a little bored with this one since it seemed to be the typical husband vs. wife trapped in a loveless marriage. However, that "McEwan Suprise" that he puts in every novel was especially shocking here.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
1001-books,
booker-prize,
britlit
Read in March, 2006
I love McEwan’s writing. This is my second book by him, and I can see I need to make a point of reading the rest. This love story was particularly interesting to me because it was partially set against the backdrop of the fall of the Berlin Wall. I had no idea. And amazingly I picked this up to read only two days after booking a vacation to Germany that includes three days in Berlin. Serendipitous!! ☺
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
started-but-never-finished
Read in March, 2008
Just finished this for book club - very boring. I didn't like his writing style and had no real sense of humor - dry or otherwise. I actually didn't finish the entire thing which for me is rare - it has to be pretty bad for me to decide that it's not worth my time. One of my club members read a really good paragraph from the end that made up for some of the early drudgery but overall I did not enjoy it.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
I really enjoyed reading this book. It was about something that happened in the past and changed this couple's lives forever. The story is unraveled during the book and you go along and figure out the significance along with the characters. I thought it was very interesting and I liked seeing the character's react to certain historical moments.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in November, 2007
My feelings on this book went back and forth while I was reading it, but I think it ends up holding together very well. I thought the prologue was actually one of the best sections of the book, and could have sustained an entirely different novel. I want to go back to it in the next year or so and see what I get out of a second read.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment






















