Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Whig Interpretation of History” as Want to Read:
The Whig Interpretation of History
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Whig Interpretation of History

3.74 of 5 stars 3.74  ·  rating details  ·  140 ratings  ·  16 reviews
It is not as easy to understand the past as many who have written it would have us believe. The historians who look at it from the Protestant, progressive, "19th Century gentleman" viewpoint are defined by Professor Butterfield as "the Whig historians." The Whig historian studies the past with reference to the present. He looks for agency in history. And, in his search for ...more
Paperback, 144 pages
Published September 17th 1965 by W. W. Norton & Company (first published 1931)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Whig Interpretation of History, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Whig Interpretation of History

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 290)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
The phrase 'Whig history' is a dirty word; to merely accuse a historian of Whiggishness is not only to impute false methodology but even to question whether they are an authentic historian at all. Much of this is down to the influence of Sir Herbert Butterfield and specifically this work. Published in 1931, this tract has an interwar, Stracheyeqsue taste to it; irreverent towards cherished orthodoxies, self-consciously abandoning the accepted beliefs of the age.

Butterfield eschews the tradition
Mike Horne
Everyone interested in history should read this very short book. Though Whig historians are no longer in the ascendency, this is a good antidote for reading history as if it were a story that leads to your particular view of the present. I think everyone tends to read history as evidence of whatever they believe (certainly I fall into this often). Great quote from the book.

"History is all things to all men. She is at the service of good causes and bad. In other words she is a harlot and a hireli
It is easy to see why this little book is such an influential text for historians. It brings to light overlooked assumptions and presents a sharp critique of historians who simplify history and adore it only for what it can give to the present.

Butterfield’s writing is pleasant, though at times his points could be made more succinctly. I began by thinking I would agree completely with him, in the middle thought I disagreed entirely, and by the end decided he is right about many things but is sti
I liked...I think. I'm not an historian so I'm not sure I actually understood everything that the author discusses. I will re-read sections this weekend. I think he makes a good point that history should not be a slave to our modern causes; that is, it isn't there to serve our principles. The Whig interpretation of history is always "present looking"; in other words, how does history support what the present "good." Butterfield also argues for the complexity of history, and that finding the caus ...more
Douglas Wilson
Butterfield is a superb writer, and is obviously learned. Reading this book was like watching someone put five coats of high gloss paint on a rotten board. Relativistic to the core. Put me down as a whig.
A quick read, and justifiably a classic. Butterfield argues that historians should write aesthetically rather than polemically, exercising "imaginative sympathy" in appreciating the lost worlds of the dead rather than seeking (or expecting) the vindication of their own current positions. In particular, he attacks a more or less literally whiggish tendency among British historians, who have always written history as the story of liberty and constitutionalism. The "whig interpretation," as Butterf ...more
Easily readable in an evening and best consumed whole, Herbert Butterfield's book is a wonderful indictment of the historical meta-narratives that are typical of 'Whig' historians. He rightly cautions us away from linear, progressive, value-laden, reductionist interpretations of history toward an approach that appreciates the diversity and the meanderings of the past and one that sees the events and people of the past as they saw themselves.
A classic work in historiography. Butterfield decries the tendency of historians to interpret history as progressively cumulative in the present; or equally, to selectively use history as an ideological justification of "my views"; or finally, to anachronistically read their ideologies into the past so that its heroes were all fighting to produce the ideas they now possess. If you've ever wanted to throttle someone for claiming "all of history shows..." or if you've heard yet another sermon illu ...more
Mastugae Kiyoaki
Nov 03, 2010 Sam rated it 5 of 5 stars
Recommended to Sam by: Dr. Gamble's Philosophy of History
Excellent analysis of Whig history--that is, defining the past in terms of the present. The Whig historian oversimplifies and overdramatizes, trying to draw similarities between the past and present that don't take into effect the complexities of history. This book reminded me of why I love history so much: the beauty of a well-constructed narrative that embraces the complexity of history instead of trying to draw a straight line from Luther to modern religious liberty.
Allan Williams
This was actually the second time I read this -- first was back in '93 but seemed like a good time to re-read it after finishing volume two of Macaulay's History of England from the Accession of James the Second, and it's a quick read. Great food for thought, however much one might like Macaulay's story-line of progress down to the present.
Daniel Jones
Jul 26, 2007 Daniel Jones rated it 4 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: Historians
Shelves: history
This is a must-read for all historians. Butterfield presents a monumental thesis on our interpretation of history-- especially for Americans. It's a fascinating discussion of how history is written by the winners-- the protestant, liberal, democratic winners. One of my favorites.
Alan Cornett
A much needed--still, after all these years--call for humility and restraint for the historian.
Christopher McCaffery
I don't know how I feel about history. Butterfield's book is excellent, though.
Usha Chilukuri
Could have been half the length.
David Vanness
I might be a Whig.
Alexander marked it as to-read
Jul 08, 2015
Hessa Almutairi
Hessa Almutairi marked it as to-read
Jun 30, 2015
Booksearcher marked it as to-read
Jun 13, 2015
Gaurav Srivastava
Gaurav Srivastava marked it as to-read
Jun 08, 2015
Sarah Swernofsky
Sarah Swernofsky marked it as to-read
Jun 02, 2015
Tim marked it as to-read
May 31, 2015
Busch marked it as to-read
May 28, 2015
Hazlit marked it as to-read
May 13, 2015
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • The Idea of History
  • A History of Histories: Epics, Chronicles, Romances and Inquiries from Herodotus and Thucydides to the Twentieth Century
  • What Is History?
  • Patriotic Gore: Studies in the Literature of the American Civil War
  • Historians' Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought
  • The American Revolution: A History
  • Giovanni and Lusanna: Love and Marriage in Renaissance Florence
  • The Making of the Middle Ages
  • The Later Roman Empire
  • The Birth of the Republic, 1763-89
  • The Christians as the Romans Saw Them
  • The New Science of Politics: An Introduction
  • The Historian's Craft: Reflections on the Nature and Uses of History and the Techniques and Methods of Those Who Write It.
  • The Ethics of Authenticity
  • The Gift of Prophecy in the New Testament and Today
  • Freedom's Battle: The Origins of Humanitarian Intervention
  • Always Ready: Directions For Defending The Faith
  • The Great Tradition: Classic Readings on What it Means to Be an Educated Human Being
Sir Herbert Butterfield was a British historian and philosopher of history who is remembered chiefly for two books—a short volume early in his career entitled The Whig Interpretation of History (1931) and his Origins of Modern Science (1949). Over the course of his career, Butterfield turned increasingly to historiography and man's developing view of the past. Butterfield was a devout Christian an ...more
More about Herbert Butterfield...
The Origins of Modern Science Christianity and History Napoleon George III and the Historians Writings on Christianity and History

Share This Book

“The study of the past with one eye upon the present is the source of all sins and sophistries in history. It is the essence of what we mean by the word "unhistorical".” 3 likes
“History is not the study of origins; rather it is the analysis of all the mediations by which the past was turned into our present.” 3 likes
More quotes…