Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Meaning of Shakespeare, Volume 2” as Want to Read:
The Meaning of Shakespeare, Volume 2
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Meaning of Shakespeare, Volume 2

4.45 of 5 stars 4.45  ·  rating details  ·  62 ratings  ·  4 reviews
In two magnificent and authoritative volumes, Harold C. Goddard takes readers on a tour through the works of William Shakespeare, celebrating his incomparable plays and unsurpassed literary genius.
Paperback, 306 pages
Published September 15th 1960 by University Of Chicago Press (first published January 1st 1951)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Meaning of Shakespeare, Volume 2, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Meaning of Shakespeare, Volume 2

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 128)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Martina
This guy is completely out of his mind--and amazing. Hardcore New Criticism stuff, the text itself. Psychoanalysis, free-association, the "rather like a whale" is about Hamlet's unconscious emotional stuff" and "Cordelia is essential not dead, Lear's a miracle play" type stuff. Every essay, whether I agreed or disagreed or fell somewhere in between, allowed me to look at the play in question drastically differently and infinitely deeper.
Sammy
100% bonkers but awesome. Goddard was from a very different age of criticism - one rejecting much of the criticism of the early 20th century, but also coming to terms with a move toward historical study and context rather than the slightly ignorant processes that had come from the Victorian era.

Often, his points are completely absurd, argued on a philosophical level rather than even remotely relating to form or context. And his elitism - particularly when it comes to material he believes to have
...more
Dan
In both volumes of his study of Shakespeare's plays, Goddard usefully calls attention to parallels among characters from the different plays--e.g., Prince Hal could be thought of as a later version of Romeo, and Hamlet as a later version of Prince Hal. In this way, it is possible to trace the development of Shakespeare's expressive powers and psychological insight.
Julie Davis
This isn't the sort of book that I'm going to sit down and read cover to cover. However, it IS a perfect resource for anyone dipping into Shakespeare's plays. Harold Goddard's essays cover a depth and breadth that reflect his many years spent teaching. We're very lucky that these were written before his death. I've seen much praise of these two volumes and it is well deserved.
Zaara
Zaara marked it as to-read
Jan 29, 2015
Chris
Chris marked it as to-read
Jan 22, 2015
Aa
Aa is currently reading it
Jan 03, 2015
M. Milner
M. Milner marked it as to-read
Dec 21, 2014
Crys
Crys marked it as to-read
Dec 10, 2014
Samantha
Samantha marked it as to-read
Dec 04, 2014
Amanda
Amanda marked it as to-read
Nov 13, 2014
Mary Cornelius
Mary Cornelius marked it as to-read
Nov 13, 2014
Stephanie
Stephanie marked it as to-read
Nov 11, 2014
Martin
Martin marked it as to-read
Oct 20, 2014
Yu Liu
Yu Liu marked it as to-read
Oct 13, 2014
Noah
Noah marked it as to-read
Sep 30, 2014
SC
SC added it
Dec 25, 2014
Jane
Jane marked it as to-read
Sep 06, 2014
Carolyn
Carolyn marked it as to-read
Aug 29, 2014
Melanie
Melanie marked it as to-read
Aug 28, 2014
Amanda
Amanda marked it as to-read
Jul 31, 2014
« previous 1 3 4 5 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
The Meaning of Shakespeare (Volume 1) Meaning of Shakespeare Alphabet of the imagination;: Literary essays of Harold Clarke Goddard Vanna's Favorite Crochet Gifts W. H. Hudson: Bird-Man

Share This Book

“The destiny of the world is determined less by the battles that are lost and won than by the stories it loves and believes in.” 11 likes
“If the distinction is not held too rigidly nor pressed too far, it is interesting to think of Shakespeare's chief works as either love dramas or power dramas, or a combination of the two. In his Histories, the poet handles the power problem primarily, the love interest being decidedly incidental. In the Comedies, it is the other way around, overwhelmingly in the lighter ones, distinctly in the graver ones, except in Troilus and Cressida--hardly comedy at all--where without full integration something like a balance is maintained. In the Tragedies both interests are important, but Othello is decidedly a love drama and Macbeth as clearly a power drama, while in Hamlet and King Lear the two interests often alternate rather than blend.” 2 likes
More quotes…