Rate this book

Clear rating

1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars

My Sister's Keeper

by Jodi Picoult (Goodreads Author)

4.01 of 5 stars 4.01 · rating details · 445,744 ratings · 24,083 reviews

The Barnes & Noble Review
Known for writing novels with provocative themes centered on family conflict and difficult moral choices, Jodi Picoult presents the story of a child whose sole reason for existence is to assure a genetic match for her terminally ill sibling.

Conceived in vitro, 13-year-old Anna Fitzgerald has decided to sue her parents to stop them from using he

...more

Paperback, 500 pages

Published April 6th 2004 by Pocket

more details... edit details

Get a copy:

More…

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Lists with This Book

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)

filter | sort: default (?) | rating details

Mar 17, 2008 Lindsay rated it 1 of 5 stars · review of another edition Recommends it for: Jodi Picoult fans, chick lit fans

Shelves: misc

This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here. Have you ever read a book that really pissed you off? Pissed you off so much all you could do was rant about it until everyone told you to just shut up? This is that book for me.
Picoult's dialogue is excellent, but her characters annoy me and the ending of this book was such a cop-out I almost wrote her an angry letter about it, but decided against it, as she'd never read it anyway.
Basically, "My Sister's Keeper" is about a family with three kids - I forget their real names, so I'm giving them f...more

380 likes · like · see review

Jun 08, 2007 Lisa rated it 2 of 5 stars · review of another edition

As I said before: I'm still reading this book but I'm not sure why. My mom lent me the book and she loved it, everyone tells me they loved it and I'm sort of hating it while I read. I just want to finish it and move on. Maybe I'll change my tune when it's over.

Well... I hate it less, but I'm still not in love with it. I think I know the problem, though. It's Jodi Picoult. My mom loves her, my sister loves her, everyone I know loves her and I can't stand her. She just writes in this odd way that...more

182 likes · like · see review

Jun 19, 2012 Bex rated it 1 of 5 stars · review of another edition Recommends it for: No one.

Ugh- I've read some of these reviews and people keep saying great story- the end sucked... 4 stars! Okay- the ending sucking is a bit of an understatement. It was probably the worst ending to anything I've ever read or seen in my whole life- and I've watched UltraViolet and Sunshine and read some pretty terrible books.

Picoult rambles- and rambles. She takes a family, smacks them with the most typical "dysfunctional family" stereotypes and then add a topic that *should* be interesting (aka medica...more Ugh- I've read some of these reviews and people keep saying great story- the end sucked... 4 stars! Okay- the ending sucking is a bit of an understatement. It was probably the worst ending to anything I've ever read or seen in my whole life- and I've watched UltraViolet and Sunshine and read some pretty terrible books.

Picoult rambles- and rambles. She takes a family, smacks them with the most typical "dysfunctional family" stereotypes and then add a topic that *should* be interesting (aka medical ethics and cloning) and writes to the lowest common denominator. Her main character is more grown up than anyone else in the book and her adults are no better than stupid children (and I am talking really stupid children). Are these the types of adults Picoult comes in contact with everyday? She created the most unbelievable characters- and I read the whole darn book hoping against hope that somewhere she would redeem herself.

I gave this book a shot- my sister loved it, my best friend loved it- I thought it was a big pile of dog poop. I wasted two days of my life reading this- and I can't get those two days back. Shame on you for writing this kind of garbage Picoult!

(Note: People seem to think that I shouldn't call out an author for writing lowest common denominator crap. I beg to differ. I like several of Picoult's books. This simply isn't one of them. I don't care if she took 20 years to write this story. In my opinion, it sucked and should have been retooled by her following of very talented editors and first readers. Someone should have said- hey you are on to something, but it is a bit of a mess. It is what I wish people would say to George Lucas- "Dude, you are seriously effing up Star Wars. Just stop. You may have more money than god, but you seriously don't know best right now." A lot of people work for a really long time on their craft. Should I not get a poor review at work because "I worked really hard on that project that didn't go great?" Should my husband not be critiqued harshly for his video game that didn't sell well or was derivative garbage. No, of course not. You don't get better and you waste everyone's time. I get people liked it, that's cool. But just because I didn't, and thought this book was horrible doesn't mean you're taste (thus your identity) is in question. If that was the case I would be a miserable wife as I have a very special place in my heart for pop music, especially the spice girls, which is horrible "derivative crap.")(less)

87 likes · like · see review

Jun 30, 2007 Lobeck rated it 1 of 5 stars · review of another edition Recommends it for: people who like trash pop fiction

Shelves: least-favorite-of-all-time

this book is a shameless and unskillful manipulation of human emotions. i felt dirty when i was done with it. the story is on par with cheap natural disaster movies like deep impact that are formulated to tug at your heartstrings in very predictable ways. the author painfully over uses the dramatic blackout technique where she writes a line that's trying too hard to be clever or profound and then fades to black - aka, leaves extra space before the next paragraph or ends a chapter - sometimes wit...more

134 likes · like · see review

Jan 19, 2010 Mery rated it 5 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: punya

Jika kau menggunakan cara yang salah secara moral untuk menyelamatkan hidup anakmu, apakah itu menjadikanmu ibu yang buruk?

bagaimana menjawabnya?
Aku harus kasih bintang berapa?
Aku harus komen apa?
Buku ini bikin aku terenyuh dari awal sampai akhir...
Bikin marah dan menangis di waktu yang sama...

Begitu tersentuh dengan kegigihan Sara memperjuangkan nasib Kate yang menderita leukimia APL akut, sampai dia harus melahirkan seorang anak dengan rekayasa genetika hingga DNA anak itu 100% sama seperti K...more

22 likes · like · see review

Jun 13, 2007 Sammy rated it 5 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: a-the-best

This book was stunning. In writing, in style, in plot, in character! It truly is one of those books that you really can't stop reading. Especially for me, because in a way it took me back to my Lurlene McDaniel days. Did anyone ever read her? She was always writing books about different teenagers and young children with terminal illnesses. I was addicted to those books. So it was no surprise when the young reader in me sort of jumped up when I saw a friend of mine reading this book and she descr...more

73 likes · like · see review

Mar 15, 2012 Richard rated it 1 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: pearl-ruled

Rating: fifteen one-thousandths of a single star (out of five; p44)

Many are the yodels of praise for this horrifying book. The details of the main character's use as a farm animal for a more-favored older sibling are too grisly to recount without vomiting on my keyboard.

People die. Even when we don't want them to, and even when it hurts for them to, and even when we've given them life. It's happened to me. I know it hurts, but the ghastly vile disgusting nauseating practice of having a child *sp...more

20 likes · like · see review

Aug 31, 2011 K.D. Oliveros rated it 2 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Recommended to K.D. by: Nenette

Shelves: banned, drama, hospital-drama, saddest

My first book written by Jodi Picoult (born 1966) and I had mixed feelings about it. I don't know if I hate or love it so I just rate this with 2 stars that in Goodreads means, It's okay.

I have a friend in the office who is a solid Jodi Picoult fan. She encouraged me to read this a couple of years back as my intro to Picoult's world. I took the book home, read the first 10 pages, closed it and gave the book back to her the following morning. My reason? I did not like the 13-y/o Anna suing her pa...more My first book written by Jodi Picoult (born 1966) and I had mixed feelings about it. I don't know if I hate or love it so I just rate this with 2 stars that in Goodreads means, It's okay.

I have a friend in the office who is a solid Jodi Picoult fan. She encouraged me to read this a couple of years back as my intro to Picoult's world. I took the book home, read the first 10 pages, closed it and gave the book back to her the following morning. My reason? I did not like the 13-y/o Anna suing her parents for emancipation. Suing one's parents is very un-Filipino, IMHO and I don't think it will happen in the Philippines because Filipinos are reared to be God-fearing and God commands us to respect our parents so I think that situation is unrealistic. It is something I can't relate with.

However, the Filipinos group here in Goodreads chose this book last month as our bestseller read. I tried reading it within the schedule but again, I got stuck in the first few pages. I still could not make me accept that suing part but I went on reading but when I encountered that backstory about Anna's conception just to be the perfect donor for her older sister Kate, I again back off as it is again another unrealistic point: couples decide to have children because they love each other and children are proof of that love. Children are not created to serve as organ donors unless we are talking here of Kazuo Ishiguro's mileau in his Never Let Me Go.

Thank God for the long weekend I had the time to finish some of my stalled books in my currently-reading folder. This one included. I am glad I finished the book. It's still worth the time.

It is a nicely written book. Multiple narrators and POVs. Beautiful metaphors. Memorable quotes. Nice play of words. Any novel about family is on top of my list. However, the characters and the situations they get themselves into felt too contrived just for the sake of getting the lachrymal glands of the readers working hard and probably working overtime. I admire Picoult's efforts to make her story interesting and educational by throwing lots of details regarding leukemia, APL, fire-fighting, kidney transplant, bone marrow extract, etc. "A" for the efforts but I guess the plot is overwritten to the extent of being too manipulative for my taste. This is the reason why I do not watch TV teleseryes unless when my mom is in town and I would like to bond with her by us watching her soap operas on the telly.

But contrary to most of my friends' reviews here in Goodreads, I loved the ending in the book. I think it is the right conclusion as a reminder to parents not to take their children for granted. Well, it is quite different in the movie adaptation for obvious reason: viewers normally want to have a happier ending. Maybe the director of the movie was on Sarah's side since mothers normally have the purse where the money to pay for the movie tickets come from.

I definitely have no regrets reading this book. I just will not read another Picoult again. For me, reading Picoult is like bungee jumping. Once is enough.(less)

37 likes · like · see review

Apr 09, 2008 Nola rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition Recommends it for: parents, christians,

Shelves: fiction-drama

I hate novels where parenting is questioned, simply because I too often find myself thinking, “Well I would never do THAT.” I then have to do the whole knock-on-wood routine and hope that I didn’t just invite divine retribution for being too judgmental. So it was with Jodi Picoult’s novel My Sister’s Keeper. After reading the summary of the novel, I knew that I would never make the choices that the parents shown did. After reading the novel, I found myself questioning what I might really do if...more I hate novels where parenting is questioned, simply because I too often find myself thinking, “Well I would never do THAT.” I then have to do the whole knock-on-wood routine and hope that I didn’t just invite divine retribution for being too judgmental. So it was with Jodi Picoult’s novel My Sister’s Keeper. After reading the summary of the novel, I knew that I would never make the choices that the parents shown did. After reading the novel, I found myself questioning what I might really do if my child was facing death.

In case you missed the summary, My Sister’s Keeper is the story of Anna, a thirteen year old girl genetically conceived to be a match for her leukemia-positive sister. Within minutes of her birth, she was a donor for Kate, sharing her cord blood to save her sister’s life. By the time she is thirteen, when the novel takes place, she has been in the hospital almost as much as Kate, donating things such as blood and bone marrow. After being asked to donate a kidney, she seeks legal emancipation from her parents. And so the story begins.

One of the things that bugged me was the chapter-by-chapter switch of the point of view. It was very well handled and, once I got past the irritation stage, I had to admit that it helped the story along. And so we skip through the minds of Anna, her lawyer, her court-appointed guardian ad litem, her brother, her father, and her mother – in short, everyone close to Anna except her sister. Each of these perspectives is given in the present, with the notable exception of her mother. Instead, we trace the mother’s path of learning that her daughter has leukemia, and what decisions led her (and Anna) to the current moment. This, too, was initially annoying, but proved well-chosen; I’m not sure the same impact would have been made if we simply had the mom looking back. It would have been far easier to judge her at that point than it was to see her experiencing her pain.

In fact, it was from Sara’s perspective that I learned the most, and that I questioned myself. If my young daughter, the light of my life, was threatened with death, how far would I go to save her? I don’t think that I honestly would have even thought up the idea of conceiving a child specifically for that purpose, but what do you do once the idea has been planted? Furthermore, it is clear that Sara loves and cherishes Anna, even as she worries incessantly over Katie. True, she neglects her, but she also neglects her son, who had been born prior to the diagnosis, turning most of her attention to her sick child. And though this also made me pass judgement, it also made me wonder – would I be able to balance my attention on all my children if one were struggling through a life-long illness? How easy would it be to make small decisions that hurt the others to save the one?

In short, I hated this well-written, well-developed, well-plotted book because it made me think. The moral and religious side of me rejects the notion of a test-tube baby conceived for a specific purpose, but the mother in me wonders. If my child were starving, how easy would it be to remain true to my moral perspectives and not steal (assuming, of course, the government weren’t around to save me)? If someone threatened my child, how far would I go to protect them? In short, when it comes down to crunch time, how true would I stay?

To fall asleep, I have to assure myself that I would, of course, be perfect in all things. And then knock soundly on the nearest wood, and pray I never have to find out.
(less)

66 likes · like · see review

Jan 27, 2009 Mitabird rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: fiction

My Sister's Keeper was one of the most heart wrenching stories I've ever read. Anna's sister, Kate, is dying from a rare form of leukemia. She was conceived as a genetic match to help save her sister's life. It was supposed to be a one-time deal, but over the course of her 13 years, Anna has donated multiple times. Her sister is in need of a kidney and Anna's decided she's had enough of being told how to use her body. She decides to sue her parents for medical emancipation and refuses to give up...more

28 likes · like · see review

Jun 03, 2010 Penny rated it 2 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: chick-lit, disappointing, reviewed-books, wish-i-could-unread

Anyone who has a kid has probably, at one point or another, battled with them at bedtime. That's what I do, every night. There is much yelling, crying, begging and pleading. It's horrible.

Kid #3 is out like a light, so she's not part of the problem. Kid #2 puts up a good fight, whining and tantrum throwing, but eventually she succumbs to her sleepiness. Kid #1, however... well, she's another story altogether.

At night, she's afraid of everything and feels that if she sleeps something will get he...more

65 likes · like · see review

Sep 17, 2007 Sharon added it · review of another edition Recommends it for: no one, really

Shelves: sofarin2007

it would be impossible for me to overstate how much i hated this book. I hated, hated, hated this book. I guessed the end 5 pages into it, but read it through anyway (why?)(probably because everyone else in nursing school was reading it and wanted to tell me how good it was. Never trust nurses). Interesting for the medical information, and if it convinced one person to become an organ donor it served its purpose in the world, but man, was it hard to read. It was trite and simplistic and written...more

38 likes · like · see review

Feb 11, 2009 Lynn rated it 2 of 5 stars · review of another edition

**If you're planning on reading this book, don't read my review. I give away the horribly disappointing ending. On second thought, don't read this book, read my review.**

I know several people who have read this book, so I decided to give it a go. I was immediately intrigued by the subject of the book. The Fitzgerald family has one daughter, Kate, dying of kidney failure. The kidney failure is a result of her weary body's 14 year battle with a rare form of leukemia. Their other daughter, Anna, is...more

139 likes · like · see review

May 11, 2009 Annalisa rated it 2 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: chick-lit, speculative, issue, psychology

If you haven't read the book it's about a girl (Kate) with leukemia whose parents had a second genetically matched child (Anna) to help with blood and bone marrow to save their first daughter. As the girls grow up, more and more is required of Anna until she's had enough of being nothing but an organ donor.

There are a lot of interesting points in the book, like what do you do when you have to pick one child over another, how do you balance your time and love between children especially when one...more If you haven't read the book it's about a girl (Kate) with leukemia whose parents had a second genetically matched child (Anna) to help with blood and bone marrow to save their first daughter. As the girls grow up, more and more is required of Anna until she's had enough of being nothing but an organ donor.

There are a lot of interesting points in the book, like what do you do when you have to pick one child over another, how do you balance your time and love between children especially when one requires more from you, and at what age can you be responsible enough to make choices about your own body instead of letting your parents word go as law. Even at a young age, a child's sense of self and decision making should always be respected. Even a three-year-old should be asked, not even such catastrophic questions as do you want to donate blood, but would you like to give your teddy bear away. If a child even considers emancipation, then you have crossed the line. Use your persuasion skills with children, not force or games.

When you read a second book by an author it's easier to pay attention to the writing style and not get so carried away with the story. Her techniques were a distraction from the story. Picoult is very good at doing research to get statistics on paper, but that's all her characters feel like it. None of these characters had a real breathing personality. They were just stereotypes of what she wanted to portray and therefore not very deep. Even the little memories of the girl's childhood felt like stock photographs set to these vague lives. Throw in a politically correct tendency to add variety to your characters with random stereotypes and I enjoyed the story more for the case study it could be then the story it was.

The character I enjoyed the most in the book was Jesse, the older brother who had fallen off the deep end in an attempt to get his parent's attention and still went unnoticed. I liked the quiet things he set about doing to help his sisters. Although I did not find him very well developed, I liked the father, Brian, too. I think he truly did love both his daughters and wanted to set out to do good by both of them. Even though Sara kept saying she loved both her daughters, I failed to find the evidence. All I got was a brazen woman who bullied everyone, especially Anna, into saving the only daughter she did care about. I found her completely unsympathetic, even the chapters written in her perspective, especially then. When she told Anna she couldn't go to hockey camp because she had to be around in case Kate when into relapse, I was disgusted. Yes a sick child would take up more time and emotion, but not to the exclusion of other children. How hard is it to yank Anna out of camp if necessary? Picoult wanted to show a woman who loved both her daughters but had to make tough decisions in order to keep both of them alive, but it fell flat. She tried to credit her with too many contradictory emotions and never fully justified her behavior.

I wasn't satisfied with the family dynamics. I found the emotional neglect completely at odds with the scenes of a loving huggy family Picoult threw in to convince us that it was a good family with good intentions. Sara and Anna constantly saying they loved each other just didn't jive with the way Sara treated Anna. I could not picture this child on the verge of growing up wrapped up in her mother's arms when she's being scolded and manipulated by that very woman. But if I found Sara a hard character to pin down, I found Anna even more elusive. Again, too many contradictory motives that just didn't make sense. I got why Anna and Kate loved each other, but I didn't get why the rest of the family did. I think the idea of the story was a good concept, but I think it was under developed.

Spoiler:
I found the twist at the end unnecessary. I keep asking myself it is the most tragically beautiful ending and I'm not sure it is. Even though I get the point of it, I think I would have rather had a resolution that required a decision, a choice. I liked what Kate said at the end that Anna took her place and how it showed how much of a shadow she was, but it felt a little like a cop out. I want to know what Anna would have done and how her parents would have reacted if she said no or how belittled she would have felt had she said yes.(less)

12 likes · like · see review

Dec 28, 2008 Peregrinn rated it 1 of 5 stars · review of another edition Recommends it for: cheesy drama lovers

Shelves: novels, by-women

This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here. i originally picked up this book at my boyfriend's house (his mom had read it) because i read the back and the basic premise? fascinating. also, i needed something to do while my boyfriend was hogging the x-box.

and the premise is fascinating. and something about the plot kept me reading to the end. but her god awful treatment of it made me so mad, so if i could rewrite the book, this is what i'd do:

1. cut out all the weird little subplots that stray too far afield from the basic theme of the boo...more i originally picked up this book at my boyfriend's house (his mom had read it) because i read the back and the basic premise? fascinating. also, i needed something to do while my boyfriend was hogging the x-box.

and the premise is fascinating. and something about the plot kept me reading to the end. but her god awful treatment of it made me so mad, so if i could rewrite the book, this is what i'd do:

1. cut out all the weird little subplots that stray too far afield from the basic theme of the book: anna's coming of age, and how kate's leukemia affected her family. cramming in irrelevant subplots does not make your book deeper. it makes it confused. i would axe the romance between the lawyer and the guidance counselor. i would axe the guidance counselor's artsy twin sister. i would axe the "conflict" between the mother and her career-woman sister. i would axe the lawyer's service dog. all this manages to do is clutter the book and distract from what's actually happening. i mean, what is the point of the seizure during the courtroom scene? it's like she didn't actually want to deal with the central questions and just wanted to pile on melodrama.

2. characterization does not happen when you tack on internal suffering to every single character. even the bit characters--you must know about their deep, internal struggle. i'm not saying you shouldn't give your minor players depth, but this is not the way to do it. it just comes off as cheesy.

3. speaking of cheesy, she kept making these metaphors (both actually good and kind of played out) and then totally spoil them by all but declaring to the reader, "hey! i made a metaphor! and this is what it symbolizes!" cut. that. shit. out. this was especially frustrating because there was a lot of rare but really well-written bits.

4. make the hard choices. send that delinquent brother to jail. kill off kate and let anna grow up. the back of the book said this was a coming-of-age story, but it can't be if anna dies in a car crash before your main conflict is resolved! resolve it properly! there is not enough bolding in the world to properly emphasize how strongly i feel about that statement. she continually shied away from making the right choices for the plot. cancer girl needs to die. she said she wanted to die. the miracle healing was not uplifting, it was just plain weird.

god, this book could have been a really cool examination of the effects of a serious illness on this family, and a really awesome coming of age yarn, but instead it's a pile of cheesy schlock, which i find really disappointing.(less)

37 likes · like · see review

Jul 07, 2007 Madeline rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

The conflict alone is what makes this book fascinating - the story focuses on two sisters, Anna and Kate. The older sister, Kate, was diagnosed with leukemia when she was four. Knowing that their daughter would need blood donations, bone marrow, and possibly organ donations in the future, Kate's parents had another child whose sole purpose would be to provide a blood match for Kate. Thirteen years later, Anna gets tired of spending almost all her time in hospitals, giving bone marrow and blood t...more

15 likes · like · see review

Jun 25, 2008 Maggie rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: contemporary, 2008, audiobooks

An ethical quandary, a family's dynamic, and a poignant love story. I laughed out loud, I sobbed. Truly powerful. Bravo, Ms. Picoult.

13 likes · like · see review

Feb 28, 2012 Aleeeeeza rated it 2 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: 2011-read, book-includes-fatal-disease-dun-dun

Edit 2/29/12: THE MOVIE VERSION IS SO MUCH BETTER!!!! Seriously, go watch it. I DARE you to not cry.

The gist of the book is this: the Fitzgerald have a daughter, Kate, who's extremely fucking unlucky and her whole life basically revolves around getting disease after sickness after cancers. She almost dies when she's two, and her bro Jesse ain't a donor match, so her parents decide to have a genetically designed baby according to Kate's needs, who will eventually turn into spare parts machine for...more

8 likes · like · see review

Nov 15, 2008 Rita rated it 1 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: hated, most-recent

Spoiler Alert. This review contains spoilers.

I hated this book so much. I only kept reading it because I had to find out why Campbell, the lawyer, had a service dog, since he kept that such a secret.

I hated the clichés (Julia chose just that moment to crash through the door… Anna chose that precise moment to speak up… Rita chose this moment to gag on bad writing…).

I hated the overwrought melodrama. Everything was just so saturated with heavy-handed tear-jerking prose that the book was soggy and...more Spoiler Alert. This review contains spoilers.

I hated this book so much. I only kept reading it because I had to find out why Campbell, the lawyer, had a service dog, since he kept that such a secret.

I hated the clichés (Julia chose just that moment to crash through the door… Anna chose that precise moment to speak up… Rita chose this moment to gag on bad writing…).

I hated the overwrought melodrama. Everything was just so saturated with heavy-handed tear-jerking prose that the book was soggy and just about dripping. About halfway through the book, I started skimming it, looking for dialogue relevant to the plot. Brian’s metaphors about fire and Sara’s reminiscing about the kids’ childhoods and Campbell’s backflashes about Julia and Julia being pathetic in every possible way and Anna’s cluelessness just got so very dull. If I was ever to find out why Campbell had that dog, then I needed to get through the material faster. Putting the book down to groan out loud every few paragraphs was taking too long.

The characters were two-dimensional and irritating. They really were just like paper dolls, given name tags, dressed up in stereotypes and given lines to say (and melodramatic thoughts to spill out). It was like, This is the mom and she’s a big martyr who puts her children first all the time… she’s a GOOD mother, she just got blinded by trying to be too good, so she seems kind of bad now. But we’ll be on her side in the end because of her deep insight. Waggle mom paper doll and have her blah, blah, blah and then Over here is the Big Bad Lawyer doll… ooooh, he’s a ruthless go-getter with a hazy past, but he’ll have some secrets to pull out at the end so we’ll realize he’s a decent, stand up guy after all. Waggle lawyer paper doll and have him blah blah blah, and so on.

The plot was all right through all of that until the big Law and Order courtroom twist at the end. That was just a convenient trick to get out of actually trying to find a solution for such a dilemma. She worked it up to such a point that there was no way out that would sit well with an audience, there was no good way to wrap it up, so she pulled a rabbit out of a hat. Then she went a step further and did something that I guess some might find bold, but it just made me shout a stream of obscenities and then made me thankful that I had just skimmed the second half of the book and didn’t really invest in it at all. Otherwise, I would have been furious with such an ending.

This is the second Jodi Picoult book I’ve tried to read. I didn’t like the other one either (Vanishing Acts), so I guess I won’t be reading anything else by this author.

(less)

43 likes · like · see review

Apr 12, 2008 April rated it 1 of 5 stars · review of another edition Recommends it for: Overly emotional chick-lit addicts to whom meaning must be spoonfed

Recommended to April by: A book club I have chosen not to join

I read this for a book club I was going to join before I found a better one that meets at the library across the street. The subject and basic premise were interesting enough to keep me reading, but my god the writing was awful. AWFUL. Everytime one character asked another a question, the answer was some corny, overly-symbolic story from the past. The whole book was one clichéd analogy after another...she even put analogies WITHIN analogies. For example:

"About five years ago a new family bought...more

27 likes · like · see review

Mar 31, 2008 Marissa Noe rated it 5 of 5 stars · review of another edition Recommends it for: Anyone unless you absolutely hate sad stories

This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here. I read this book for the book club that I belong to.

I don't really know how to write a good book review, but I can say that this book is very well written. She ties the characters together really well, and you easily come to know them. The end is REALLY REALLY sad... I cried like crazy... but I still thought it was wonderful. I didn't find it predictable at all.

The book is about a 13 year old girl, Anna, who was genetically engineered to help her sister Kate who has been suffering from a rare...more I read this book for the book club that I belong to.

I don't really know how to write a good book review, but I can say that this book is very well written. She ties the characters together really well, and you easily come to know them. The end is REALLY REALLY sad... I cried like crazy... but I still thought it was wonderful. I didn't find it predictable at all.

The book is about a 13 year old girl, Anna, who was genetically engineered to help her sister Kate who has been suffering from a rare form of Leukemia. Although it is apparent that Anna was a well-loved girl in her family, everyone feels like their lives revolve around Kate. All decisions made in the family are based upon Kate's wellness. After numerous treatments, Kate's body is starting to fail her and she would need a kidney transplant to give her even a fighting chance to live longer. This is when Anna decides to sue her own parents for the right to make medical decisions on her own, and 'hires' Campbell to represent her. (He actually represents her for virtually free... partly selfish reasons in the beginning)

The lawyer, Campbell, owns a service dog and each time someone asks him what it's for (because he's not blind) he makes up some funny reason, and it keeps you wondering throughout the whole book what the real reason is. It was actually quite funny. I guess I could have figured it out if I thought really hard, but the answer ended up surprising me in the end.

One of the reasons I love this book is because it really illustrates the kind of love we can have for our sisters. Because my sisters are my best friends, I could really relate to the characters in the book. It was kind of funny because although Anna is suing for the right to her own body so she won't have to donate a kidney to her dying sister, the love she has for her sister is undeniable and you really wonder what her motives are. Toward the end I did start to figure it out, but not until I was about to find out the real reason she did it anyway. I was not surprised when I found out the real reason, only because by that time it is only obvious that Anna would do such a thing.

If there was anything I DIDN'T like about it it would be some of the language written in there. The F word is in there a few times, and that is my least favorite word in the English Language.

(less)

13 likes · like · see review

Feb 02, 2010 April rated it 3 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: mooched

I love me some melodrama, absolutely love it. Especially when the melodrama results in gasps, and anger, and tears. My jury is still out on My Sister's Keeper by Jodi Picoult. The plot had such huge potential. We've got a 13 year old girl, Anna, who is basically born as spare parts for her sister, Kate, who has leukemia. Well, Anna does not enjoy being harvested, so she initiates a lawsuit to be medically emancipated from her parents so she won't be obligated to be spare parts anymore. Oh, and t...more

5 likes · like · see review

Jul 07, 2008 Amy Galaviz rated it 3 of 5 stars · review of another edition

This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here. This novel had moments when it just broke my heart, as well as other moments that were so cheesy I felt like I was reading a Hallmark card. Apart from the overuse of clichés, the fire and star metaphors got old, and I found myself skimming over those sections.

The ending was very powerful and nearly brought me to tears. However powerful it was, I was disappointed that Anna died; the entire novel was her struggle for the right to choose what she does with her body, but that power of decision was u...more This novel had moments when it just broke my heart, as well as other moments that were so cheesy I felt like I was reading a Hallmark card. Apart from the overuse of clichés, the fire and star metaphors got old, and I found myself skimming over those sections.

The ending was very powerful and nearly brought me to tears. However powerful it was, I was disappointed that Anna died; the entire novel was her struggle for the right to choose what she does with her body, but that power of decision was ultimately taken out of her hands. The ending was perhaps a cheap attempt to neatly tie things together when in reality no good ending would have been possible. I would have instead liked to see Anna make a decision one way or another, and then for her as well as Sara to face whatever consequences came of that decision.

Other than the ending, the other most moving section of the novel was Kate’s brief romance with Taylor. Could it get much sadder?

I know there are mixed reviews on this, but I liked how the chapters alternated between the perspectives of different characters. This allowed the reader to really understand all sides of the controversy. I found myself at times sympathizing with Anna, while at other times thinking her selfish for even questioning the act of donating a kidney to her dying sister. Evoking these opposing feelings in the reader was probably Picoult’s main purpose of writing this book, and she did a good job of that. However, why Picoult did not include any chapter written from Kate’s perspective until the very end is a mystery to me. One would think that a book centered around a cancer patient would include chapters written by the patient herself, but I guess not.

Campbell with his sidekick dog Judge was the quirkiest and funniest character of the bunch, which definitely added some much-needed humor to a very depressing subject. However the whole subplot about his newly reinvigorated romance with guardian ad litem Julia was completely unnecessary, and bore no relation or relevance to main theme of the novel. I would even go so far as to say that Julia’s presence at all in the novel was more of a distraction than a necessity. And the whole section about Campbell as the popular rich jock who falls for the dorky outsider in high school? Gosh, I felt like I was reading The Breakfast Club. Another weakness I found with the novel was the wording of Anna’s perspective and dialogue. I know kids these days are smarter and more precocious than ever, but much of the dialogue and insight (and swears!) that came from 13-year-old Anna were not believable at all.

(less)

9 likes · like · see review

Jan 04, 2008 Leila rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: book-club

It’s impossible to talk about this book without discussing the ending but I promise to give warning before I do so it won't be spoiled for those who haven't read the book yet.

I had two main concerns going into this book. The first was that it would be nothing more than a political commentary on stem cell and embryo research. While it does touch on these issues, the book does not take a stand or attempt to pontificate a political stance to the reader. While I am sure the author has her own belie...more It’s impossible to talk about this book without discussing the ending but I promise to give warning before I do so it won't be spoiled for those who haven't read the book yet.

I had two main concerns going into this book. The first was that it would be nothing more than a political commentary on stem cell and embryo research. While it does touch on these issues, the book does not take a stand or attempt to pontificate a political stance to the reader. While I am sure the author has her own beliefs, she does an excellent job of not pushing them through the story of this family. Ultimately, that there is no “winning” scenario.

The second concern that I had was that the story would not be believable. I couldn’t help but ask myself how a mother could possibly love one daughter so much that she would give up any semblance of a life to be by her side at all times, yet completely disregard the life of her other daughter; born specifically to save the first daughter. This seemed beyond belief to me, and this disbelief would surly make it difficult to develop a connection to the characters. The first few chapters were a little difficult due to this initial impression of the situation. Then the author uses a prior time line, starting with the discovery of leukemia in her 2-year-old daughter that intermingles with the current time line to help with the character and plot development. This alternate time line, combined with memories described by the characters in the current time line lead to a very compelling and believable train of events that lead up to the decision.

The story is also told from the view point of the 6 people who are closely involved in the court case; Anna, Kate, their mother, their father, their brother, the attorney, the court appointed guardian ad-litum. The different view points also help the ready understand the complexities in the situation as all of the characters struggle internally with what the right decision is. This also helps to understand the mothers motives, which on the surface can seem selfish and even cruel.

The only complaint I have about the characters is that there are certain characteristics that are the same for all of the characters. It smacks you in the face at times and reminds you that this is just a story and that is unfortunate. The main instance of this is the dry, cynical, sarcastic sense of humor that is shared, not only by every main character, but even by the extras. The sister relationships (there are 3 of them) also show too many similarities.

**SLIGHT SPOILER**

The biggest complaint I have about this book is the ending. After such a believable start and such great plot development, the ending comes completely out of left field. It serves as nothing more than a way for the author to avoid having to make a decision regarding the girl’s life. I sincerely hope that the ending was not the original but was forced on the author by the publisher. There are more than 3 endings that could have made this a 5 star book; the one published was not one of them.

(less)

12 likes · like · see review

Feb 20, 2010 Heather rated it 1 of 5 stars · review of another edition Recommends it for: Adults, Book Clubs

Recommended to Heather by: Rory's Book Club

Shelves: contemporary, adult, read-in-2007

This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here. I found this book frustrating. I really liked the author's writing style - I had a hard time putting it down. But at the same tine I think the author took the easy way out with the ending and didn't give some of the characters the chance to reach their potential.

~~SPOILERS BELOW~~
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
I found Sara really easy to dislike. I don't know if I'm the only one, but I found her to be amazingly selfish. All she cared about was keeping Kate alive, weather Kate wanted to be or not. She onl...more

14 likes · like · see review

Aug 04, 2007 Kathryn rated it 2 of 5 stars · review of another edition

This book was an extremely difficult read for me. I had to force myself to continue reading, as I didn’t want to feel as though I had wasted $14.00 by not completing it. It took about a month for me to finish the book and that is an unusual amount of time for me as I generally finish books in less than two weeks. I actually found myself scanning the pages and only reading the dialogue so I could move along towards the end.

What I really didn’t care for was that the story moved as slow as molasses...more This book was an extremely difficult read for me. I had to force myself to continue reading, as I didn’t want to feel as though I had wasted $14.00 by not completing it. It took about a month for me to finish the book and that is an unusual amount of time for me as I generally finish books in less than two weeks. I actually found myself scanning the pages and only reading the dialogue so I could move along towards the end.

What I really didn’t care for was that the story moved as slow as molasses and the subplot of the relationship between Campbell and Julia was completely unnecessary.

Furthermore, the author chose too many narrators for the story. There are a total of seven and the switching from one to another became annoying.

Basically, the story is this: Anna is a young girl that was genetically created at her parent’s request to help save her sister Kate’s life as she has acute promyelocytic leukemia. Anna gets an attorney so that she can become medically emancipated and no longer have to participate in any more medical procedures. Later, we find out that Anna doesn’t have a problem with helping her sister. Rather, it’s Kate who doesn’t wish to go on living in agony anymore. She wants to be allowed to die and she has asked her sister to not donate one of her kidneys to her. Anna becomes medically emancipated and then ends up in a car accident where she becomes brain dead. One of her kidneys is taken from her and Kate goes into remission and Anna dies. That’s the story and could easily have been told in under 200 pages instead of 423.

I must add that this book does serve as a catalyst for a great discussion on many levels and topics. Some of which are extremely controversial such as: (1) Is it morally and ethically alright to genetically create a child for the sole purpose of being able to harvest bodily fluids and organs from them in order to save or prolong someone else’s life? (2) At what age does a child have the right to say “NO” to undergoing medical procedures? (3) At what lengths do we go to in order to save another human beings life? (4) When does the legal system have the right to interfere in the dynamics of the family?

(less)

7 likes · like · see review

Apr 06, 2009 Melanie rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Recommended to Melanie by: Kjersti

I am torn as I write the review for this book. I am amazed at how masterfully Picoult is able to tell a story from viewpoints of half a dozen people, and really pull it off. There is no stereotypical heroine/villain in this book. As I read each chapter from a different character's viewpoint, I developed compassion for each one in an amazing way. I downright bawled my eyes out at the end and felt I had truly gained something from the read. I considered it a great shame to have to sift through so...more

11 likes · like · see review

Oct 19, 2012 Inge *Studying for Exams* rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: young-adult, realistic-fiction, emotional, chicklit, diseases, ending-was-great, put-a-sock-in-it

To save your daughter, you must sacrifice her sister.

If I had to describe My Sister’s Keeper in one word, it would be ‘confusing’. It’s confusing because it’s your typical Jodi Picoult novel – a controversial topic, lots of contrast and damn good arguments that make you root for one side one moment, then have you wheeling over to the opposite side the next. Same for the characters: just when you think you don’t like a character, there he/she goes and does something awesome and you smile. Then yo...more To save your daughter, you must sacrifice her sister.

If I had to describe My Sister’s Keeper in one word, it would be ‘confusing’. It’s confusing because it’s your typical Jodi Picoult novel – a controversial topic, lots of contrast and damn good arguments that make you root for one side one moment, then have you wheeling over to the opposite side the next. Same for the characters: just when you think you don’t like a character, there he/she goes and does something awesome and you smile. Then you hate them again. And there’s always the shocking ending. Always.

Kate Fitzgerald was diagnosed with acute promyelocytic leukemia at the age of two. Without a suitable donor in the family, she would die for sure. So parents Sara and Brian Fitzgerald make a tough decision: they decide to make another baby, a ‘design baby’, so it will be the perfect donor for Kate. Meet Anna. She has been donating blood, stem cells and bone marrow to Kate her entire life, but Kate is relapsing again and needs a kidney transplant. Her parents immediately turn to Anna, but she has hired a lawyer and is suing her parents for medical emancipation. She doesn’t want to donate anymore.

Man, why are Jodi’s topics always so heavy? Her books are never a light read, that’s for sure. It depends on what you’re in the mood for. It may be difficult to read, but it’s also a novel filled with love – both inside the family and out. It touches upon other heavy topics such as alcoholism, drug abuse, arson, as well as fluffier topics such as your first crush, your first kiss, the little things in life that make you laugh and keep you going. It mixes the downfall of Kate’s health with cute little memories that give you some insight into how the Fitzgeralds have lived together over the years. It also shows you the lives of the judges included in the lawsuit.

Anna’s lawyer, Campbell Alexander, was my favourite character. At the beginning of story, he was a jerk, but at the end of the story… actually, he was still a jerk, but he did change in many ways. Somewhere along the way, he started caring. I love how every time someone asks him why he has a service dog, he gives a different explanation. “I am colour-blind, he tells me when the traffic lights change”, “He’s a chick magnet”, “I have an iron lung”. He does this to amuse himself and because he’s never told anyone about his actual condition before.

Sara Fitzgerald is a tough one to evaluate. I hated and loved her. As a former lawyer, she represents herself, and obviously she’ll do anything to save Kate. On one hand, it’s only normal that you’ll do absolutely everything to save your child. On the other hand, is that a reason to neglect your other to children? It’s controversial because obviously nobody knows the perfect way to raise your children. It’s obvious that Sara and Brian love their children, but they choose Kate over Anna and Jesse because she’s sick. You can’t really know for sure how you’ll act in a situation until you’re in that very situation.

My Sister’s Keeper is not for everyone. When reading Jodi Picoult, you have to keep an open mind and think about all the possibilities. Think about everything that could happen and what it would mean to every character. And when you’ve made your decision, read the next page and have the story fuck you over all over again.(less)

5 likes · like · see review

Aug 28, 2007 Anne rated it 3 of 5 stars · review of another edition

My first taste of what Jodi Picoult has to offer. I love how she allows the reader to see the same story from different view points. And she picks topics that many people tend to view as "black and white" but are really filled with color.

6 likes · like · see review

Mar 13, 2010 Lena 714 rated it 5 of 5 stars · review of another edition

This book is really amazing because it shows two sides of the story. One is about saving Kate which sounds like a really good idea when you look at it from Kate's perspective. But when you look at it from Anna's perspective it sounds horrible that your parents are making you donate a kidney that takes you out of some very important sports and events that are natural to happen in life. It also shows everything from different points of view which introduces you to how hard it is to deal with this....more

9 likes · like · see review

« previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 … 99 100 next »

new topic
Discuss This Book

topics	posts	views	last activity
E-xraordinary E-...: My Sister's Keeper!	1	4	May 11, 2013 03:28pm
do you think its fair for Anna to die, or did Kate had to die?	232	1135	May 11, 2013 09:07am
the mother	49	285	May 06, 2013 09:32pm
Like the movie?	78	368	May 06, 2013 09:28pm
Other books by this author	21	92	Apr 28, 2013 01:48pm
Movie adaptation?	26	155	Apr 28, 2013 06:04am
Ouch, Jodi	16	170	Apr 20, 2013 08:42am

combine
Other Editions (94)

More editions...

Videos About This Book

8 comments

Add a comment

Genres

Womens Fiction > Chick Lit

603 users

Book Club

600 users

Drama

355 users

Adult

316 users

Adult Fiction

289 users

Young Adult

289 users

Contemporary

266 users

Realistic Fiction

245 users

Novels

165 users

Family

141 users

See top shelves...

Readers also enjoyed similar books

About Jodi Picoult

Picoult was born and raised in Nesconset on Long Island, New York. Her first story, at age 5 was "The Lobster Which Misunderstood." She studied writing at Princeton University, graduating in 1987, and had two short stories published by Seventeen magazine while still in college. Immediately after graduation, she took on a series of miscellaneous jobs, from editing at a textbook publishing company t...more

More about Jodi Picoult...

Books by Jodi Picoult

More…

Share This Book

Facebook Twitter Your website

Trivia About My Sister's Keeper

46 trivia questions
16 quizzes

More quizzes & trivia...

Quotes from My Sister's Keeper

“You don't love someone because they're perfect, you love them in spite of the fact that they're not.” — 12,558 people liked it

“Let me tell you this: if you meet a loner, no matter what they tell you, it's not because they enjoy solitude. It's because they have tried to blend into the world before, and people continue to disappoint them.” — 5,355 people liked it

More quotes…

title link	preview: My Sister's Keeper
avg rating	preview: My Sister's Keeper Goodreads rating: 4.01 (445744 ratings)
small image	preview: click here [close]
med image	preview: click here [close]
BBCode	[url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6575385-my-sister-s-keeper?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book][img]http://d.gr-assets.com/books/1330600015l/6575385.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6575385-my-sister-s-keeper?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book]My Sister's Keeper by Jodi Picoult[/url]

My Sister's Keeper

Friend Reviews

Community Reviews

Share This Book

Share This Book on Your Website