Jacques the Fatalist and the Master
Jacques the Fatalist is a provocative exploration of the problems of human existence, destiny, and free will. In the introduction to this brilliant translation, David Coward explains the philosophical basis of Diderot's fascination with fate and examines the experimental and influential literary techniques that make Jacques the Fatalist a classic of the Enlightenment.
Abou...more
Abou...more
Paperback, 258 pages
Published
June 1st 2009
by Oxford University Press, USA
(first published 1778)
There is a good chance some of your friends read this book. Sign in to see!
sign in »
Friend Reviews
To see what your friends thought of this book,
please sign up.
This book is currently not featured on any Listopia lists.
Add this book to your favorite list »
Community Reviews
(showing
1-30
of
1,686)
Paquita Maria Sanchez
rated it
·
review of another edition
Shelves:
literature,
invisible-pink-unicorn
Master: Do you pray?
Jacques: Sometimes
Master: And what do you say?
Jacques: I say: "Thou who mad'st the Great Scroll, whatever Thou art, Thou whose finger hast traced the Writing Up Above, Thou hast known for all time what I needed, Thy will be done. Amen."
Master: Don't you think you would do just as well if you shut up?
It is often too easy for me to forget that high humor and religious cynicism are not new developments within the realm of published ...more
Jacques: Sometimes
Master: And what do you say?
Jacques: I say: "Thou who mad'st the Great Scroll, whatever Thou art, Thou whose finger hast traced the Writing Up Above, Thou hast known for all time what I needed, Thy will be done. Amen."
Master: Don't you think you would do just as well if you shut up?
It is often too easy for me to forget that high humor and religious cynicism are not new developments within the realm of published ...more
For those exhausted or defeated by Tristram Shandy, here is a precursor to the postmodern novel that packs in more incident, philosophy, bitching and warm humour in its 237 pages than most modern avant-garde writers manage in a whole corpus. Jacques—the titular Fatalist—attempts to recount the tale of his “first loves” while accompanying his Master on a series of oblique misadventures that invariably end up as digressions and more digressions. All postmodern tricks—stories-within-stories, frame...more
yellow tree
rated it
·
review of another edition
Recommends it for:
cogitating people
Recommended to yellow tree by:
my mother
Shelves:
prose
this book really has something. its style is as innovative now as it was in diderot's time, and the ideas being articulated, then ground-breaking, are still worth some thoughts. for a work of this age, it's surprisingly easy to be read, and the difficulties arise from elsewhere then expected. the storyline is permanently interrupted by stories, dialogues, and the narrator, suddenly starting to talk to the reader about the trustworthiness of the former reports, so sometimes it's hard to reorienta...more
Much is made of Diderot's rather bald appropriations from Sterne's "Tristram Shandy." Diderot made no secret of it-- his book is, in many ways, the Dionysian face of that book (! if that can be said with a straight face). Just look at Sterne's material-- war, and the wounds that result; Diderot, on the other hand, skips lightly past the battlefield to the real seat of Uncle Toby's wound, the heart, and its battles.* As such, Jacques put me more in mind of "The Decameron," or ...more
I read this first when I read Kundera's "Jaques and His Master"(1971) and his higly recommendation on Diderot. I'm a bit cautious when it comes to Classics and big shots! don't know what to say / write! What I could say is that without Kundera's description on Diderot's work, I was possibly not able to get the esense of this magnificent work.
جالب تر آن که بدانیم، "دنیس دیدرو" کتاب مشهورش "ژاک قدری و اربابش" را در بحبوحه ی انقلاب نوشت و منتشر کرد. شخصیت این رما...more
جالب تر آن که بدانیم، "دنیس دیدرو" کتاب مشهورش "ژاک قدری و اربابش" را در بحبوحه ی انقلاب نوشت و منتشر کرد. شخصیت این رما...more
بهتره درباره نویسنده چیزی نخونید و بعد از تموم کردم کتاب مشخصات نویسنده رو ببینید. اون وقت هست که حسابی متعجب میشید وقتی میفهمید این کتاب رو یه نویسنده قرن هجدهمی نوشته.
اگر اهل خوندن کتابهای ایتالو کالوینو بوده باشید احتمالاً نوع نوشتار و زبان راویان کتاب شما رو یاد کتابهای این نویسنده میندازه. نوع نوشتار "اگر شبی از شبهای زمستان مسافری" رو به یادتون میاره و طنز موجود در کلام شخصیتها و راوی "سه گانه نیاکان ما". اون وقت ممکنه توقع داشته باشید که این نویسنده هم ایت...more
اگر اهل خوندن کتابهای ایتالو کالوینو بوده باشید احتمالاً نوع نوشتار و زبان راویان کتاب شما رو یاد کتابهای این نویسنده میندازه. نوع نوشتار "اگر شبی از شبهای زمستان مسافری" رو به یادتون میاره و طنز موجود در کلام شخصیتها و راوی "سه گانه نیاکان ما". اون وقت ممکنه توقع داشته باشید که این نویسنده هم ایت...more
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it,
click here.
Mildly amusing, but mostly exasperating. I know that the point here was to be different from other novels and to bite the proverbial thumb at your traditional narrative, and all that was interesting to a point. I just didn't get that excited about any of the characters or the stories they were trying to tell. Between the interruptions built into the novel and the actual interruptions of life, I could never remember what was going on or who anyone was.
One thing that interested me that wa...more
One thing that interested me that wa...more
It may be your destiny to read and adore the pithy wit of Diderot. At a time when the novel was new as a genre as a contemporary of Sterne and Richardson, Diderot confronts the religion and philosophy of his day entrenched in the idea that man's fate was written on a scroll on high and that man only acted out a bit part devoid of real choice in his slavery to destiny. Pre-destination did not sit well with Diderot and Jacques is the novelist in this "dog's breakfast" he has served up ra...more
Another one of my favorite books. Diderot was one of the few men to be brave enough to admit his atheism in a pre-Darwin world, and definitely suffered many a setback for it. However, this examination of fatalism, life, love, religion, society etc. etc. is both hilarious and undeniably clever. It's not terribly dense, and is pleasurable while remaining clearly smart - read immediately.
I truly love this book. I first read this at St. John's College, school of knowledge, during a preceptorial or the Philosophical Novel. The Preceptorial was not great, but the books chosen were, and this was really the best of them. I have since taught the book several times, and as of this writing I consider this to be one of the great works of literature. Diderot is really investigating how both the novel and the individual subject comes into being. The story starts from nowhere, with a s...more
Good times.
Full Review
Full Review
Recent reading of Carlos Fuentes essay "Two Centuries of Diderot" persuaded me to add this to list. CF argues that DD was highly influential on development of novel and remains quite contemporary in vision of writer-reader relationship. I'm a bit wary though, as my love of French novels is rooted in much more traditional narratives of Balzac, Flaubert and Zola. But it's always good to shake out the gnarly trees of tradition now and then to see what nuts fall upon one's head, knocking...more
Fenomenale. Un racconto - "ceci n'est point un roman" - in cui il narratore, lui, l'enciclopedista, si rivolge in continuazione al lettore per discuterne le reazioni. Giacomo il servo dal cervello fino che, consapevolmente, guida il proprio padrone e glielo fa anche notare. Il divertente e surreale filo conduttore della narrazione, e dei vari episodi che si inseriscono, è la storia degli amori di Giacomo.
Per citare la quarta di copertina: "Qualunque cosa dica, Diderot crea e sorp...more
Per citare la quarta di copertina: "Qualunque cosa dica, Diderot crea e sorp...more
When I mentioned to some French friends that I was reading Jacques le Fataliste et Son Maitre, written in the l770's. I thought they might show some enthusiasm for this French "classic", or at least a "curiosity". Instead, they rolled their eyes and asked why? Good question. I read somewhere that it was a French version of Lawrence Sterne's TRISTAM SHANDY, as well as a riff on Don Quixote, so I became curious and read it. It's worth the read and is often a very funny b...more
ye ja mige:
miduni chera mardom miran maraseme edam (dar zadan) ro tamasha mikonan?! chun ye chizi dashte bashan ke dar moredesh ba ham harf bezanan.
alan ketab hamram nis,badan eine ebarato mizaram inja vaghan aalie in ketab.
به نظر شما چه چیزی عوام را به میدان اعدام میکشاند؟ سنگدلی؟ اشتباه میکنید، مردم سنگدل نیستند و اگر زورشان میرسید این بدبختی را که روی سکوی اعدام احاطهاش کردهاند از چنگال عدالت بیرون میکشیدند. اینان اگر به میدان اعدام میروند برای آن است که وقتی به محله...more
miduni chera mardom miran maraseme edam (dar zadan) ro tamasha mikonan?! chun ye chizi dashte bashan ke dar moredesh ba ham harf bezanan.
alan ketab hamram nis,badan eine ebarato mizaram inja vaghan aalie in ketab.
به نظر شما چه چیزی عوام را به میدان اعدام میکشاند؟ سنگدلی؟ اشتباه میکنید، مردم سنگدل نیستند و اگر زورشان میرسید این بدبختی را که روی سکوی اعدام احاطهاش کردهاند از چنگال عدالت بیرون میکشیدند. اینان اگر به میدان اعدام میروند برای آن است که وقتی به محله...more
I dreamed I was in "sunny Somerset," England, but it was night. I was finishing dinner at Henry Fielding's house, and Jonathan Swift and Laurence Sterne were also there. We had dined on cold meats and red wine. Three hound dogs were dozing near the fire, and I played with some dried fruit while I listened to the three men's conversation. The atmosphere is one I would confidently define as "jovial." Fielding, Swift, and Sterne were talking about the Odyssey and how epic, poetr...more
18th century french novel written by a man who was among the first ones who were able to say to the world: "Hey, there may not be God the way we have always thought..." A novel about a journey from one nameless point to another, a journey of Jacques the servant and his master. A must read for everyone studying literature. A need read for all those who ever told themselves: Is this honestly my boss? What if I am more although he is my master? A book for all those who believe in destiny...more
I love this book and have already started to reread it in anticipation of my French book club's discussion. Diderot pays unabashed obeisance to Sterne's Tristram Shandy with his constantly interrupted, disrupted, and recommenced tale. As noted in the Preface to the novel (or anti-novel, as Diderot might have considered it)Jacques le fataliste is composed of one long chapter (over 300 pages in this edition)and includes around 60 characters, 21 stories and 180 breaks in the narrative. This is 18t...more
Brian Burt
rated it
·
review of another edition
Recommends it for:
philosophical fiction; literary style
An entertaining wandering and more importantly an essential piece of literary history. The novel is philosophical in content and almost exhaustive in its exploration of literary style. The story seems aimless but humorous, even if the narrator is too clever for his own good. The casual reader may not be impressed, but anyone interested in the progression of literature will find much here. To be read after Cervantes.
Brilliant - very impressed. It felt like a cross between The Canterbury Tales and Tristram Shandy. Lots of farcical stories and lots of comments on the writing process. I didn't enjoy Rameau's Nephew but this was quite enchanting and made me laugh. One I wouldn't have read if I hadn't been attempting the '1001 bookes to read before you die' list.
Read Laurence Sterne's 'The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman' first; otherwise this book will seem more original and strange than it really was, plus you won't get half the allusions. Diderot took up Sterne's mantle (and some of his narrative) and somehow made the tone even more lighthearted, added some elements forbidden to Sterne - blasphemy, social criticism, more explicit sexual references. It also lacks the weight of Tristram Shandy, as the digressions are limited to a few pa...more
One of my absolute favorite classical books, taking a lot from Tristram Shandy comedy wise, this book talks to and makes fun of the reader at all times. It is at times a frustrating read, as our protagonist deviates from the main story, but it makes out for an unforgettably funny read.
Le jeu que Diderot entretient avec le lecteur est excellent. Il le malmène constamment, retarde son histoire, manipule ses personnages avec une ironie subtile. Mais on ne dira peut-être pas autant de bien de l'histoire en elle-même.
I'm making my way through the classics of 18th century lit via the "1001 Books to Read Before you Die" (I know, I know, I'm embarrassed.) Anyway- it's been a mixed back. I've enjoyed books like Tom Jones, suffered through books like Pamela & puzzled through but ultimately enjoyed books like Tristram Shandy.
The point of the preamble is that Jacques the Fatalist is the first of these 18th century books that I've really, really loved. I agree with all of the other reviewers- th...more
The point of the preamble is that Jacques the Fatalist is the first of these 18th century books that I've really, really loved. I agree with all of the other reviewers- th...more
Diderot el ilustrado, rompe con la novela en medio de un romanticismo pleno, descarado como lo fue Bocaccio dos siglos antes, adelantado a su época cien años.
"Jaques" se revela contra las formas de la novela, una atisbo a lo postmoderno, la novela es un conflicto en si misma. Mientras Jaques el férreo determinista expone ampliamente su filosofía "Il est ecrit la haut - Esta escrito allá arriba", la narración es casi cuántica, todo pasa y no pasa, vuelve en si mis...more
"Jaques" se revela contra las formas de la novela, una atisbo a lo postmoderno, la novela es un conflicto en si misma. Mientras Jaques el férreo determinista expone ampliamente su filosofía "Il est ecrit la haut - Esta escrito allá arriba", la narración es casi cuántica, todo pasa y no pasa, vuelve en si mis...more
ça a un peu vieliit tout de même.
indispensable pour sa culture, le lire n'est tout de même plus vraiment un plaisir. Même si sa sagesse vous servira chaque jour.
indispensable pour sa culture, le lire n'est tout de même plus vraiment un plaisir. Même si sa sagesse vous servira chaque jour.
I'm too distracted to read this in French, since Sophocles is still giving me fits and, well, I do have a life. Besides, the translation I'm reading is wonderfully brisk and colloquial. How can you not love a novel from 1780 that begins with this Beckettian up-yours?:
How had they met? By chance, like everybody else. What were there names? What's it to you? Where were they coming from? From the nearest place. Where were they going? Does anyone really know where they're going?...more
How had they met? By chance, like everybody else. What were there names? What's it to you? Where were they coming from? From the nearest place. Where were they going? Does anyone really know where they're going?...more
Brilliant book.The way Diderot plays with the reader's patience and expectations was a stroke of genius.It's the most original novel I have ever read.
I read this for a comedy writing class in college. It is probably one of the funniest books I've ever read and I highly recommend it.
There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
Be the first to start one »
Denis Diderot (October 5, 1713 – July 31, 1784) was a French philosopher, art critic, and writer. He was a prominent persona during the Enlightenment and is best known for serving as co-founder and chief editor of and contributor to the Encyclopédie.
Diderot also contributed to literature, notably with Jacques le fataliste et son maître (Jacques the Fatalist and his Master), which emulated La...more
More about Denis Diderot...
Diderot also contributed to literature, notably with Jacques le fataliste et son maître (Jacques the Fatalist and his Master), which emulated La...more
Share This Book
1 trivia question
More quizzes & trivia...
“The fact is that she was terribly undressed and I was extremely undressed too. The fact is that I still had my hand where she didn't have anything and she had hers where the same wasn't quite true of me. The fact is that I found myself underneath her and consequently she found herself on top of me.”
—
4 people liked it
More quotes…

Loading...

view all 27 comments













































