Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “How the South Could Have Won the Civil War: The Fatal Errors That Led to Confederate Defeat” as Want to Read:
How the South Could Have Won the Civil War: The Fatal Errors That Led to Confederate Defeat
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

How the South Could Have Won the Civil War: The Fatal Errors That Led to Confederate Defeat

3.49 of 5 stars 3.49  ·  rating details  ·  41 ratings  ·  9 reviews
Destroying conventional historical wisdom, acclaimed military historian Bevin Alexander reveals how the South most definitely could have defeated the North-and how close a Confederate victory came to happening. Alexander shows:

•How the Confederacy had its greatest chance to win the war just three months into the fighting-but blew it
• How the Confederacy’s three most impor
Paperback, 352 pages
Published November 25th 2008 by Crown Forum (first published December 31st 2007)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about How the South Could Have Won the Civil War, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about How the South Could Have Won the Civil War

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 93)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
I learned so much - for instance, I did not realize that the Civil War was fought entirely in Virginia and Pennsylvania. I did not realize that as late as the week before Appomattox, Lee could have won the Civil War, if he had just turned south to join Bragg in fighting Sherman. I did not realize that social and economic factors were irrelevant. I did not realized that wars are won or lost based on tactics, not strategy. I did not realize that Lee was a great man. I did not realize that Shelby F ...more
John Yelverton
A great book, but the book really doesn't answer the question like the title says that it does.
Excellent book; highly recommended. The author has given a very convincing overview that draws you into the period and the choices of generals, presidents, and other leaders that led to the South's eventual defeat. This reshaped my view of Robert E. Lee: he was a great field commander (far superior to most of his Northern counterparts) but with an antiquated and deeply flawed notion of how to win an 1860's war. Grant was not much better, but he had many more men to follow him. By contrast, Stone ...more
"Counter-factual" history is probably harder to critique than it is to actually write. After all, the author stakes out a "what if" position and then goes on drawing conclusion after conclusion based upon an event or series of events that did not in fact happen. In this case, Alexander seems to, on balance, take the curious position that the Union did not defeat the South in the Civil War, but that the South ultimately defeated itself. And that this defeat rests largely upon the heads of Jeffers ...more
Steve Clark
Like most wars, things could've gone a lot differently if only the generals had done things differently. This book addresses the fact that the South had ample chances to defeat the north, but Lee was too foucesed on trying to defeat the Union army rather than make continuing the war impossible for the North. Eventually, it became a war of attrition and there was no way the agrarian South could defeat the industrialized North at that game.
Lady Belinda
Very informative book. I was really intrigued by how different Jackson, Lee and Davis truely were. They all had a particular way that they wished to fight the war and all of them were polar oppisites. I wish more people had showed interest earlier in Jackson's way of thinking because it could have saved a number of losses I believe.
By reading this I'm not wishing of "bygone" days of these times.
I thought of it as revealing, and realized everything we do does have a historical outcome.
When you read this book, you can see the struggles and battles we all face in our own personal and business lives, albeit in the abstract.
Steven Raszewski
I agree with him that Lee was overrated, but he did not make his point about Jackson.
Darrell Hart
Darrell Hart is currently reading it
Dec 30, 2014
Jasmine Lawton
Jasmine Lawton marked it as to-read
Oct 15, 2014
Jefferson marked it as to-read
Oct 03, 2014
Evelyn marked it as to-read
Jul 26, 2014
Ellen Chow Yan Yi
Ellen Chow Yan Yi marked it as to-read
May 11, 2014
Josh Bradham
Josh Bradham marked it as to-read
Apr 08, 2014
David marked it as to-read
Mar 15, 2014
Taylor marked it as to-read
Mar 13, 2014
Jelle marked it as to-read
Jan 24, 2014
Brenden McMahon
Brenden McMahon marked it as to-read
Jan 23, 2014
« previous 1 3 4 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
Bevin Alexander is the author of ten books on military history, including How Wars Are Won, How Hitler Could Have Won World War II, How America Got It Right, and his latest book How the South Could Have Won the Civil War. He was an adviser to the Rand Corporation for a recent study on future warfare and a participant in a recent war game simulation run by the Training and Doctrine Command of the U ...more
More about Bevin Alexander...
How Hitler Could Have Won World War II: The Fatal Errors That Led to Nazi Defeat How Great Generals Win How Wars Are Won: The 13 Rules of War from Ancient Greece to the War on Terror Sun Tzu at Gettysburg: Ancient Military Wisdom in the Modern World Lost Victories: The Military Genius of Stonewall Jackson

Share This Book