Dead and Alive (Dean Koontz's Frankenstein, #3)

Rate this book

Clear rating

1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars

Dead and Alive (Dean Koontz's Frankenstein #3)

3.92 of 5 stars 3.92 · rating details · 10,443 ratings · 523 reviews

From the celebrated imagination of Dean Koontz comes a powerful reworking of one of the classic stories of all time. If you think you know the legend, you know only half the truth. Now the mesmerizing saga concludes...

As a devastating hurricane approaches, as the benighted creations of Victor Helios begin to spin out of control, as New Orleans descends into chaos and the f...more

Mass Market Paperback, 352 pages

Published July 28th 2009 by Bantam (first published January 1st 2009)

more details... edit details

Get a copy:

More…

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Lists with This Book

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)

filter | sort: default (?) | rating details

May 21, 2011 Stephen rated it 1 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: audiobook, shame-on-you, monsters, science-horror

NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO!....Bad Author...Bad Naughty Author...Look what you’ve done on the paper.....you have written a big pile of

Uh.....sorry....no pass for you Koontzie on this piece of shit....You are not some struggling writer who needed to get this book published pronto because of cash problems and thus decided you had to cut a few corners with elements like plot, prose, personality and passion. Nope, no excuse for ta...more

like 83 likes · see review

Mar 09, 2013 Mike rated it 1 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: science-fiction

Quite a disappointment after the initial build-up of the first 2 books in the series. The final climax was too short and VERY convenient. The original "monster" became a side character in this one. Characterization became pretty thin and the book was very short compared to the first 2.
Koontz had indicated that the delay in the release of this volume was due to the fact that the action took place in New Orleans and he wanted to incorporate the Hurricane into the story. Guess what, the hurricane h...more

like 2 likes · see review

Feb 22, 2012 Ken Consaul rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Let me preface this with saying I'm not a big Dean Koontz fan. Usually his characters are pretty shallow and the villains all seem to be carbon copies (<-dates the reviewer) of each other. The killer thinks he is smarter and better than everyone else and he is entitled to kill. It gets old quick.

Now, that said, I'm really enjoying this Frankenstein series. The protagonists are interesting. There are many points of view from a wide variety of characters and they are all well developed and comp...more

like 1 like · see review

Nov 21, 2009 Howard rated it 5 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: i-own

a long awaited journey coming to a sense of closure.. i enjoyed reading this suspenseful third book

like 3 likes · see review

Nov 16, 2011 ♥ Marlene♥ rated it 2 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: dean-koontz, horror, sf-fantasy, series

We had to wait 3 years for this book. 3 years longer than anticipated. I even re-read the first 2 books because I knew this book was finally on its way to me but I feel a bit how do you say it. fooled? disappointed?

First of all it is only 400 pages. You expect a big fat book cause the first 2 books were at least 550 pages and there were so many little stories in those which I expected to get closure in book 3 so that was the first surprise.

Then while reading I just felt a bit cheated. Still do n...more

like 2 likes · see review

Feb 07, 2013 Al rated it 2 of 5 stars

N this fast-paced third installment of his Frankenstein series, Koontz continues, without necessarily concluding, his modern-day reimagining of Mary Shelley's horror classic. Leaving his co-authors behind, Koontz makes the most of previous developments, which set the stage for an epic showdown in storm-soaked New Orleans between Victor Helios and the high-tech, artificial beings he created to destroy the human race. Many members of the unhappy, soulless "new race," created by Helios to kill his...more

like · see review

Jan 16, 2013 Brittni Smyers hill rated it 1 of 5 stars · review of another edition

I loved the first two Frankenstein books. They came across as tightly formatted and carefully structured, which made me as a reader feel cared for and tended to. You felt the consideration that was put into a well-crafted story, and you were able to enjoy the books greatly because of that. The first two in the series did not have loose ends; every side story was lovingly rendered and came across with a depth, despite or because of their brevity, that was quite enjoyable.
You can imagine my disap...more

like 1 like · see review

Aug 06, 2012 Jen rated it 1 of 5 stars

And then this happened. Well, at least the way I read it (omnibus edition), I didn't have to wait long for it to happen. But happen it did. The conclusion of the first Frankenstein story arc, that is.

So, we're still in New Orleans and it is still sometime between a week and two weeks after the start of the first book where Detective O'Connor busted out some gang street know-how. All told, Carson and Michael have continued to not say they are in love, crack awful jokes, drive recklessly, and subs...more And then this happened. Well, at least the way I read it (omnibus edition), I didn't have to wait long for it to happen. But happen it did. The conclusion of the first Frankenstein story arc, that is.

So, we're still in New Orleans and it is still sometime between a week and two weeks after the start of the first book where Detective O'Connor busted out some gang street know-how. All told, Carson and Michael have continued to not say they are in love, crack awful jokes, drive recklessly, and subsist on caffeine and delicious Cajun food. Sleep? That will happen when Carson and Michael become human and thus have a need for it, rather than being your typical cop duo from ~~Miami~~ New Orleans Vice.

Deucalion continues to hold such promise. But that's all he does with his promise: hold it. He also travels rather quickly in between locations, which would be eerily fascinating, except for the fact that Carson drives just as quickly and so Deucalion's amazing lightning understanding of quantum travel just seems ordinary.

I was right: there was a deus ex machina however I was wrong about who that might be. Given how the story played out, why, exactly, did I have to suffer through Carson and Michael? Why? When, in the end, their role was as it was. I feel like the ending would have happened even without crime's most daring duo (of eaters and talkers).

Jocko and the bug provided an amusing little interlude. The slang for the garbage workers to describe their aroused state made my brain vomit a bit. It is bad enough that there is slang in use in modern day, but no need to go and make up new slang, too. Why not use: hot, bothered, aroused, hard, excited, wet? At least those are common.

I like Erika 5's spunk. I like her spirit. I think she'd be a better Carson than Carson. Or perhaps she and Carson would make a better couple than Carson and Michael.

In short: Plot resolution was unique and unexpected. Having to suffer through poorly developed characters with minor roles in the plot resolution annoyed me. Still not sure the purpose of Arnie as it would seem more respectful not to put someone on display just because they are different. A friend of mine who has a child with autism was enraged that Koontz would suggest that autism can just be healed with the laying of hands. Insensitivity all around.
(less)

like 2 likes · see review

Nov 09, 2011 Rick rated it 4 of 5 stars

Upon finishing this third book you would think this to be the last but there is one to go and I will begin reading it today. I can't say I completely liked the ending because it did leave unanswered questions. I could foresee what was happening at the Mansion while Victor is headed to the second operation. I did like the last chapter but it moved you sometime into the future. The books are all an interesting mix of the classic Frankenstein story mixed with a current mystery/crime/detective story...more

like · see review

Jul 28, 2011 Adriane Devries rated it 3 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: summer-read-novels

Koontz set this third book in his Frankenstein series New Orleans during a hurricane—before Hurricane Katrina hit—and it only this year has been released after sufficient grieving time has passed. Now, finally, he brings to conclusion (or is it?) the two century saga of Dr. Victor Frankenstein’s diabolical plan to remove humanity and replace it with his own army of minions, with the help of fellow like-minded despots along the way. I suppose this is the sort of junk fiction that I’m not supposed...more

like · see review

Jun 29, 2011 William M. rated it 2 of 5 stars

Shelves: horror

1 AND 1/2 STARS

I'm not sure how to explain the drastic change in quality from the previous two books to this one. Perhaps Koontz's partnership with co-writers Kevin Anderson and Ed Gorman were inspired collaborations and when faced with finishing the series alone with this third book, Koontz simply had no one to bounce ideas off of. Maybe he let Anderson and Gorman write the bulk of the first two and was not very familiar with the chararacters. Whatever unfortunate circumstances occurred, it wa...more

like 1 like · see review

May 12, 2011 K.V. Briar rated it 3 of 5 stars

I'm a bit disappointed with book 3 in the Frankenstein series. I loved the first and second books, but the third book fell short. This enstallment was more of the same, but with less characterization.

The plot was quickly paced as all of Koontz books are, but there were plot holes and loose ends and things that just don't quite make sense.

The setting is New Orleans, which is awesome, I LOVE New Orleans. But the book lacked the "feel" of New Orleans that I wanted. Koontz did an okay job in the oth...more I'm a bit disappointed with book 3 in the Frankenstein series. I loved the first and second books, but the third book fell short. This enstallment was more of the same, but with less characterization.

The plot was quickly paced as all of Koontz books are, but there were plot holes and loose ends and things that just don't quite make sense.

The setting is New Orleans, which is awesome, I LOVE New Orleans. But the book lacked the "feel" of New Orleans that I wanted. Koontz did an okay job in the other books from what I remember, but this one was lacking. However the Helios mansion and The Hands of Mercy hospital are well mapped out and I can definately picture the creepiness of both locations.

Now here is my big beef with this book, the characters. The lack of characterization drove me crazy. Koontz jumped around between characters too much and didn't let the characters grow the way they should. My favorite parts from the other books were getting into Victor (Helios) Frankenstein's head, his first creation (the Frankenstein monster) Deaucalion, and the interaction between the detectives, Carson O'Connor and Michael Maddison. They were hilarious in the other books, in this one however, we barely even see them. Then Koontz drops us a line at the end of the book that's supposed to make us feel better about the lack of interaction between those two? Ugh. I wanted to hit him.

And yes, Frankenstein is the bad guy, but what makes him tick? Why is he bad? People are rarely just bad to be bad.

Deaucalion rocks, but like the detectives, we rarely get to see him.

I can only imagine what book 4 is like, it seemed like he wrapped up everything (or almost everything) in this book. Why did he write another? I don't understand why authors turn trilogies into series. Seriously, why? Maybe they just can't let go of the characters, as a writer I get that, but sometimes you just need to let it go. I was given both 3 and 4 at the same time so I'll be reading it shortly. I'm hoping Koontz will surprise me. (less)

like 1 like · see review

Mar 03, 2011 Perry Reed rated it 4 of 5 stars

I'm writing one review for all four (so far) of Dean Koontz's Frankenstein books.

In the Koontz take on the Frankestein story, the old Mary Shelley novel was based on true events. And old Dr. Victor Frankenstein (now called Victor Helios) and his monster (who now goes by the name Deucalion) have survived to the present day. Deucalion is no longer a monster in thought and deed, but has learned a lot about the universe and his place in it, some of that knowledge coming from Tibetian monks with whom...more

like 1 like · see review

Feb 23, 2011 Froztwolf rated it 4 of 5 stars

While the ending itself is slightly disappointing, at least it never flails around, like many authors tend to do when trying to tie together a story with so many characters and sub-plots.
There is always a clear direction throughout the book and though I disagree with some of the choices Koontz took in his conclusion, I can't fault his style.

As a third book of a trilogy, I found that it to be missing some sort of revelation or twist that made things take an unexpected turn. Aside from the story...more

like 1 like · see review

Jun 16, 2010 Greg McClay rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

I've read all three of this trilogy (and yes there's a 4th now out though its supposed to be somewhat seperated from this set), and the only way to describe them is very funny and bizarrely weird. But then Koontz is pretty weird.

I read Fear Nothing and its sequel Seize The Night and those were cool weird. I liked the lead charachters, I liked the plot, you wanted to get involved as you read. I read Odd Thomas, just the one, and that was sad weird which is why I only read the one.

The Frankenstein...more

like · see review

Mar 09, 2010 Andrew rated it 3 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: fantasy, horror

To be honest looking back on my thoughts on the previous two books I have had a bit of a turn around, The first book I rated 4 stars,the second only 2 and this one 3.
The narrative is fast and gripping with this one and to be honest I found it far more enjoyable than I was expecting,Prior reviews I read suggested this as a book to far and although it suspended belief much more than the 2nd one(which is where I struggled) I couldn't help but enjoy the rapid fire almost TV movie type feel of this b...more

like · see review

Feb 12, 2010 Scott rated it 3 of 5 stars · review of another edition

If you've read the first two books I won't bore you with more story set up. I was so pumped to start this book because the first two were so well written and incredibly exciting. Maybe I was asking too much for Koontz to get all three books exactly right. Maybe I had an image in my head as to how the third book would go. I don't know what it was but I am for damn sure this book was not written in the same ilk as the first two.

Yes it was still suspenseful, exciting and had me wondering what was g...more If you've read the first two books I won't bore you with more story set up. I was so pumped to start this book because the first two were so well written and incredibly exciting. Maybe I was asking too much for Koontz to get all three books exactly right. Maybe I had an image in my head as to how the third book would go. I don't know what it was but I am for damn sure this book was not written in the same ilk as the first two.

Yes it was still suspenseful, exciting and had me wondering what was going to happen next, but it felt rushed. Two things that should have become more of the story (THEY WERE EVEN MAIN TAGS ON THE BACK COVER!!!) were barely mentioned. One was the chameleon which I think had all of twenty pages of total coverage. With a book built around strange things killing people how do you drop the ball with one of the coolest concepts for a killing machine? I was amazed.

The other factor that should have been more present was the hurricane (Katrina I'm assuming). Apparently life goes on as normal with a hurricane bearing down on a major city. You're able to drive around just fine and walk around outside with out a problem. Infact, its so easy to do things in a hurricane that the main characters don't even realize that they're in a hurricane. The tag line on the back of the book reads "as a devastating hurricane approaches New Orleans". If you read the book you got the feeling that it was nothing more than a sprinkle.

Asside from all the things I thought were bad about this book it was still a good story. It was still fun to read and was a good close to this series. It was impossible to give it more than three stars just because it does not equal any of the other two books. The first two installments were thought out and complete, this installment never felt that way. It felt like Koontz knew how he wanted it to end and wanted to hurry up and get there already. I would have rather seen an exaggerated third installment and a rambled fourth installment than what felt like a "synopsis" of a third installment.(less)

like · see review

Jan 29, 2010 Margo Kelly rated it 1 of 5 stars

Dean Koontz what happened?? Book one and two in the series were great, but then book three fell apart.

I felt like maybe Koontz only wrote it because he was under contract or for some other reason was compelled to finish the trilogy, but his heart wasn't quite in it.

The writing wasn't up to Koontz's usual standard and the story line was SO REPETITIVE! Not only did book three recap everthing that happened in books one and two, but it also recapped what happened in previous chapters of book three....more

like 5 likes · see review

Jan 08, 2010 Jeff Steward rated it 2 of 5 stars

After a long wait, I discovered that Dean Koontz had finally
delivered on his promise of a third book in the Frankenstein
series. However, I can only report that it was a poorly kept
promise. Though it does more closely match the first book (prodigal son)
in the series than the second book (City of Night)does, it
fails to deliver on the same level as the first. Through the
series Koontz and his collaborators(Ed Gorman & Kevin Anderson) treat us to reflections of creepy but campy horror of th...more After a long wait, I discovered that Dean Koontz had finally
delivered on his promise of a third book in the Frankenstein
series. However, I can only report that it was a poorly kept
promise. Though it does more closely match the first book (prodigal son)
in the series than the second book (City of Night)does, it
fails to deliver on the same level as the first. Through the
series Koontz and his collaborators(Ed Gorman & Kevin Anderson) treat us to reflections of creepy but campy horror of the the past such as brains in tanks and crawling hands. They don't stop there. Added is a mix of insanity visited in the form of murder in the quiet of night upon the neighbors by a fine upstanding couple (of sorts). Central to
the story of course the Frankenstein' creature, who is going
by the name of Deucalion. In the first book we are given tidbits that make the creature interesting and of course we read seeking more. Victor himself is in the book and equally as mysterious as Deucalion, but is cast as the central villain. The second book, sadly seems to want to take a different course than the first and brings an end to several plot points staged in the first. The third book seems a bit lost between the two and in attempting to wrap things up gives us very little new or entertaining. Also, Koontz can't seem to bring himself to wrap things up (I'll say no more as that would be a complete spoiler).
But the wrap up seemed unable to live up to the ideas conceived in
book 1. Suffice it to say, I was thrilled by the first book, disappointed by the second, and after waiting over a year for the third book was let down. I can't say that I belief this work as Koontz's full
heart in it. But with the movie, and new graphic novel it seems
to have taken on too much of a life for him to just drop. We (the
fans) pushed for the third novel impatiently and we got. Perhaps we
should have left it alone until Koontz had time to fully brew it.
Needless to say I am still a Koontz fan and with this series behind
look forward to his other works. Odd Thomas anyone? (less)

like 1 like · see review

Sep 21, 2009 Imautahmansir rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Well, it took over 2.5 years for Koontz to get back to finishing his Frankenstein series. These books are nothing like Mary Shelley's original late 1800's stories. The final book see's Dr. Frankenstein having relocated and set up shop in Louisiana, north of New Orleans. We still have Carson and Maddison hot on the trail of Dr. F's freakish exploits.

In this series of tales, Victor Frankenstein is still a mega-utopian of the first order, who originally hoped to perfect God's creation, to reanimate...more

like 1 like · see review

Aug 12, 2009 Bob rated it 2 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Worst ending to a series, or the start of an even worse continuation of the series?
After 12 or so Koontz books, I don't know why I still pick up a Koontz novel. My first was Intensity which was excellent. If I wasn't a fan of the original Frankenstein, I wouldn't have give Koontz another try, but I did, and probably thanks to co-writers, they did a great job on the first two books of this series.
I thought his delay in the release of book three was because he found a new twist with hurricane Katr...more

like 2 likes · see review

Jun 07, 2012 Holmes rated it 2 of 5 stars · review of another edition

On its own, this book is not that bad, just a bit bland. But being the culmination of his three-part Frankenstein epic, it is a major disappointment. The first in the series is electrifying, and it promises a dark and horrible world to be unfolded in subsequent sequels. The second book has a few unnecessarily slow moments, but it is still a gripping read. Now the third - it is nothing more than an embarrassment.

What a waste of intriguing characters such as Deucalion, Carson O'Connor, Michael Mad...more

like 1 like · see review

Jun 23, 2010 Lauren rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.

like · see review

Aug 30, 2010 Jennifer rated it 1 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: dean-koontz, reading-regrets

This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.

like 2 likes · see review

Apr 07, 2013 K.B. Hallman rated it 3 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: 21st-century, booksfree, completed-2013

This review applies to the initial trilogy.

As a general rule, I'm not a fan of reworking classics. It seems like cheating. So I was prepared to dislike this series. But I have to admit that Koontz and his coauthors did a decent job. This series will never be (I hope) classic, but it is a quick, entertaining read.

I was pleased that Victor Frankenstein, now Helios, the scientist, continues to be a monster, and his creation, Deucalion, is the creature with grace (or at least who is working toward...more

like · see review

Aug 06, 2012 Kelsey Jayy rated it 1 of 5 stars · review of another edition

This. Book. Sucked. So. Hard.

Frankenstein: Dead and Alive was written without a co-author. I’m glad to hear that this is the one of the worst of Dean Koontz’s work because if it was the best I’d never want to read his work again. This book feels like Dean Koontz’s screw you to the fans of the other books.

Honestly, I have almost nothing nice to say about this book. It was a huge let-down. All of the things I loved about the first book (and parts of the second) got shat all over in this book. All...more

like 2 likes · see review

Jun 30, 2010 Johnny rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here. The third and what was once presumed the final volume in Koontz’s Frankenstein series is a direct continuation of the events in “City of Night”. While overall a great story, there’s a difference in tone compared to the previous two installments. While the two main characters, Carson O’Connor and Michael Maddison, already had great dialogue between them, another duo is introduced with Erika Five and Jocko, with whom the humor borders with the absurd.

Jocko’s dialogue actually reminded me a bit of...more The third and what was once presumed the final volume in Koontz’s Frankenstein series is a direct continuation of the events in “City of Night”. While overall a great story, there’s a difference in tone compared to the previous two installments. While the two main characters, Carson O’Connor and Michael Maddison, already had great dialogue between them, another duo is introduced with Erika Five and Jocko, with whom the humor borders with the absurd.

Jocko’s dialogue actually reminded me a bit of when Koontz allows his dogs to talk. It’s fast-paced, he says everything that comes up in him, it’s very instinctual. I was really surprised to see that Jocko takes on the role I had originally envisioned for Randal Six, though at this moment him inadvertently saving Frankenstein from Chameleon is a plot choice I don’t yet have a full handle on. Sure, I get the irony that Jocko first wanted to kill Frankenstein, but the ramifications of his act are a bit lost. Perhaps it would’ve made even more sense if Koontz had the Duke of Orleans kill Chameleon.

The majority of the book is actually more of the same: the crumbling of Frankenstein’s empire, the New Race breaking their bonds through all kinds of means, adding the occassional anomaly in the form of so-called “gone-wrongs”. In between all that, our two law enforcement officers stumble their way through the city, giving up a good fight, while Deucalion sets some things in motion on his own by destroying the main lab.

The unexplained dump scenes in “City of Night” are finally explained when all different factions end up together. It was pretty obvious from the start that the hidden room in the mansion held Frankenstein’s clone. His demise was also unavoidable, though I do wish it had happened with some more fanfare; here’s a kind of mythological figure, alive for over two hundred years, a great mind when it comes to his technological achievements, and he’s just swept up by the mob, dropped in a grave and buried while the other main characters simply stand by and watch. No special power of Deucalion was needed, and neither did Carson and Michael do anything in particular. It’s almost as if these events would have played out anyway, even without their presence. I understand that this enigmatic creature, the Mother of all Gone-Wrongs, tricked his mind into believing the mob is benign, yet in the end it just feels that he goes down way too easy.

Either I’m totally missing out on some stuff, or this series relies far more on deus-ex-machina solutions than any other Koontz novel.

Of course now we know the story is still going on with “Lost Souls”. The last page of “Dead and Alive” already gave us each character’s situation and setting. Carson and Michael moving to California is a bit of a cliché, though. And I would’ve liked to actually witness Arnie’s healing. Deucalion suddenly ending up in the monastery of “Brother Odd” was amazing, but I doubt it’ll actually lead to anything bigger.(less)

like · see review

Jan 26, 2011 Melissa rated it 1 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: horror

Wow, what a horrendous ending to a series that started out good. To start, the book had about ten pages worth of Koontz's acclaims before you could get to the story. Its almost as if he was trying to prove something, and in doing so, lost sight of how to write a decent story. He also had no co-authors for this edition of the trilogy and maybe that's why it was so different as the coauthors must have been pulling all the weight before. There are two books that come before this, and they're both p...more Wow, what a horrendous ending to a series that started out good. To start, the book had about ten pages worth of Koontz's acclaims before you could get to the story. Its almost as if he was trying to prove something, and in doing so, lost sight of how to write a decent story. He also had no co-authors for this edition of the trilogy and maybe that's why it was so different as the coauthors must have been pulling all the weight before. There are two books that come before this, and they're both pretty good, and the series should be read in order. For those unfamiliar with the tale (and possibly a spoiler, you are warned), Deucalion (Frankenstein's monster) has discovered his creator still lives and is in New Orleans. He travels there and discovers that Victor has created many more beings and they are slowly taking over the city. Cops Michael and Carson have been trailing a serial killer and when they meet Deucalion, they realize there's a much bigger threat to the city in the form of Victor's creations and the penchant they have started to have for going out of control and crazy. They struggle to keep alive despite assassins and bring us to this book, Dead and Alive.

Dead and Alive takes place shortly after the 2nd book and there is so much going on and it's all over the place that its hard to describe the plot. Carson and Michael drive around a lot and meet up with Deucalion when they discover there's something at the dump that could help them out in ways unimaginable. Mostly the book focuses on Victor and his creations that are losing their minds and going against their programming.

The characters were horrendous in this book. We barely see the main characters of Deucalion, Michael, and Carson, which is surprising considering they were the main focus in the first two books. Victor goes even more and more unbelievable, and his creations are even stranger. There is a glimmer of light in Jocko, but really, his character didn't actually fit with the story.

The writing was pretty awful as well. Koontz jumps all over the place and adds things that don't need adding. He also unleashes a pretty big, definitely inappropriate, deux ex machina in his story that just made me groan and shake my head in disbelief. But hey, at least there weren't too many pop culture references in this book (something that drives me nuts in the first two). This book abounds with tons of gore and violence and murders and may be a little too much for more sensitive readers.

This book definitely doesn't inspire me to go read anything else by Koontz for awhile. Its amazing that he could take such a good series and turn it into a deplorable book like this.

Dead and Alive
Copyright 2009
352 pages

Review by M. Reynard 2011 (less)

like 1 like · see review

Jun 19, 2010 Suzanne rated it 3 of 5 stars · review of another edition

When i first started the Frankenstein series by Dean Koontz, i thought it would just be a thrilling adventure, but i was wrong. It was so much more than that.
This series has made me think hard about both the good and bad of humanity and why we are worth saving despite the evils we commit to each other and the world we live in. I've learned that a race without the capacity to hope and love is no race at all, but merely sad tragedies.
Out of all the characters, Deucalion and Jocko are my favorites....more

like · see review

Dec 08, 2008 Tina W marked it as to-read · review of another edition

Can't wait for this one to hit the shelves!

like 1 like · see review

« previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 … 99 100 next »

new topic
Discuss This Book

topics	posts	views	last activity
Anxiously Awaiting	13	140	Aug 16, 2009 07:32pm

combine
Other Editions (21)

More editions...

Genres

Horror

218 users

Thriller

57 users

Fantasy

49 users

Suspense

34 users

Science Fiction

29 users

Mystery

28 users

Fantasy > Paranormal

22 users

Fantasy > Supernatural

9 users

Science Fiction Fantasy

8 users

Thriller > Mystery Thriller

8 users

See top shelves...

Readers also enjoyed similar books

Dean Koontz's Frankenstein, Volume 1: Prodigal Son
by Chuck Dixon
Chase
by Dean Koontz
The Key to Midnight
by Leigh Nichols (pseudonym)
The Dean Koontz Companion
by Martin H. Greenberg (Editor)
Predators
by Ed Gorman (Editor / Contributor)

About Dean Koontz

Acknowledged as "America's most popular suspense novelist" (Rolling Stone) and as one of today's most celebrated and successful writers, Dean Ray Koontz has earned the devotion of millions of readers around the world and the praise of critics everywhere for tales of character, mystery, and adventure that strike to the core of what it means to be human.

Dean R. Koontz has also published under the na...more

More about Dean Koontz...

Books by Dean Koontz

More…

Share This Book

Facebook Twitter Your website

Trivia About Dead and Alive

1 trivia question

More quizzes & trivia...

Quotes from Dead and Alive

“For the likes of you, the path to happiness is one mean son of a bitch of a path.” — 46 people liked it

“...in an infinite universe, anything that could be imagined might somewhere exist.” — 41 people liked it

More quotes…

title link	preview: Dead and Alive
avg rating	preview: Dead and Alive Goodreads rating: 3.92 (10443 ratings)
small image	preview: click here [close]
med image	preview: click here [close]
BBCode	[url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6409700-dead-and-alive?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book][img]http://d.gr-assets.com/books/1320400005l/6409700.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6409700-dead-and-alive?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book]Dead and Alive by Dean Koontz[/url]

Dead and Alive (Dean Koontz's Frankenstein #3)

Friend Reviews

Community Reviews

Share This Book

Share This Book on Your Website