Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Дитя во времени” as Want to Read:
Дитя во времени
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Дитя во времени

3.6 of 5 stars 3.60  ·  rating details  ·  6,162 ratings  ·  429 reviews
У детского писателя Стивена Льюиса прямо из супермаркета неожиданно и необъяснимо исчезает трехлетняя дочь. Эта потеря переворачивает всю жизнь Стивена, наглядно демонстрирует ему, что дочь была единственным смыслом его жизни. Личная драма Стивена разворачивается на фоне непрекращающегося течения времени, затеявшего странную борьбу с главным героем. Лишь постепенно Стивен ...more
Hardcover, 352 pages
Published 2008 by Эксмо, Домино (first published 1987)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Дитя во времени, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Дитя во времени

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
K.D. Absolutely
Jan 23, 2011 K.D. Absolutely rated it 3 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to K.D. by: 100 Must Read Books for Men; 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die (2006)
My fourth book by Ian McEwan. Enduring Love. Amsterdam. Atonement. The more I read his works, the more I get convinced that he is the author who knows how my brain is wired. He knows what I want, what I expect from my reading, how I would like my brain to be stimulated, how to keep me awake and keep on reading till the wee hours of the morning.

Reading his books is like drinking a perfect blend: just enough decaf coffee, enough non-fat milk and brown sugar. Those are healthy choices because had I
Dec 15, 2011 Shovelmonkey1 rated it 1 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: people who were children
Recommended to Shovelmonkey1 by: the 1001 books list (wrongly if you ask me)
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz... oh yes, where was I? Mmm, reviewing The Child in Time by Ian McEwan...I remember now. To summarise; an overview of what it is to
a) be a child
b) have a child
c) lose a child
d) regress to a child like state (with the finally irony being that once you've gone through the first three and spend a lot of the book daydreaming about what it would be like to get your child back, you choose to ignore and abandon your friend who, for reasons of a personal/mental health/ sexual nature has
A superb book about every parent's worst nightmare (a child goes missing), but you don't need to be a parent to appreciate it because it is primarily a story of loss, family (is it a couple, parents and children or a patriarchal institution such as the RAF?), distortions in (the perception of) time and reality, and of growing up and of regressing.

Stephen Lewis is a children's author who also sits on a government committee that is meant to produce a handbook on childrearing - to regenerate the U
I was steered towards this—my first encounter with Ian McEwan—several years ago subsequent to discovering in an interview with troubled actor Tom Sizemore that he deemed this book one of the greatest novels he had ever read. Since at the time I was personally in a state of mind that allowed me to relate quite sympathetically with his particular struggle against demons, I impulsively purchased a copy of the book later that same day.

While I can't agree with him on the novel's relative merit, McEwa
Apr 14, 2007 Lauren rated it 3 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Anglophiles, depressives
I always have the same reaction to McEwan's books: why does an author who can create passages about human disturbance and misery that ring so true insist upon adding elements into every novel that ring so false? Setting aside his formulaic plotting (barely plausible but not entirely ridiculous tragedy occurs, human relationships suffer - or don't - in the aftermath), why does McEwan throw in government ministers who wear short pants and freeze to death; or possibly-magical religious fanatics; or ...more
An internal novel that plays on its title: the search for childhood lost or to be yet found, and time moving back and forth in waves, weaving past and present into one tapestry.

In typical McEwan tradition, the novel hovers around a singular event - protagonist Stephen loses his three year old daughter in a supermarket -an event that send his marriage and personal life into a dark spiral. As Stephen tries to grapple with his loss and revisits his own lost childhood, his friend and one-time publis
Sep 22, 2009 Barbara rated it 4 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Maria, Susan
A routine, but joyful trip to the supermarket ends in tragedy. Steven Lewis's three year old daughter, Kate has disappeared from his side during a brief lapse of his attention.This book deals with the deep emotional turmoil and sorrow which he and his wife, Julie attempt to endure and to continue their existences following this loss.

Although at times the narrative seemed to drag and cause me to question the direction McEwan had taken, further analysis following my reading proved that it was quit
Ok, that's it. I'm done with Ian McEwan. This book was total bullshit.
This was my third book by the author, and this is why I don't like reading too much by the same writer, especially popular "NYT best-seller" authors. I purchased this book because I thought it was going to be about a three year old girl (Kate) who gets kidnapped at a supermarket while out with her dad. True, McEwan wastes no time in describing the kidnapping in the very first chapter of the book, but after that the rest is ab
Robert Beveridge
Ian McEwan, THE CHILD IN TIME (Penguin, 1987)

Something happened to a number of bang-up in-for-the-kill horror writers in the early to mid eighties. I'm still trying to figure out what. Patrick McGrath, who'd given the world some of its most wonderfully gut-wrenching tales in _Blood and Water_, started writing slick, witty novels that came to just this side of horror. Clive Barker started writing fantasy. Anne Rivers Siddons gave us one of the definitive modern haunted house novels and then start
Ben Babcock
Childhood is magical.

There is a myth, or at least a misconception, that this is a result of children being innocent. If you have ever been a child, then if you look deep into your heart, you will recognize this as the lie we tell ourselves to conceal the painful truth. Childhood is magical because it is inaccessible. Once gone, it can never be reclaimed, revisited, redone. It is lost to us except through the unreliable route of memories and mementos. Childhood is almost like a separate, first li
In what might be Ian McEwan’s least-read, but perhaps best novel, The Child In Time, a children’s book author, Stephen, must come to terms with his three-year old daughter’s abduction and, presumably, her death. Complicating this heart-breaking situation is Stephen’s wife Julie, who has hermited herself away in the countryside, and the fascinating and surreal parallel stories of Stephen’s own childhood, and that of his best friends—his publisher and his wife, a physicist. “The child in time” is ...more
THE CHILD IN TIME. (1987). Ian McEwan. **.
I never thought I’d rate a book by this author as low as this, but here it is. Frankly, I had to put it down at about page 100, never to be picked up again. I think I know what the author was trying to do, but I’m not sure I could explain it to anyone else. It’s a novel about time, and it’s fluidity. It is set in a slightly dystopian future that mimics the realities of our present time. England has a female prime minister, who, though not named, has the
Nelson Zagalo
"A Criança no Tempo" é um trabalho no qual McEwan procura subverter a estética do romance trágico, evitando focar-se sobre a tragédia e levando o leitor pela mão ao longo dos momentos comuns de um regresso à normalidade por parte dos seus protagonistas. Teria sido muito mais simples focar toda a energia na narrativa do drama que emerge depois de um rapto de uma criança, mas McEwan optou por se colocar no lugar dos pais, nomeadamente do pai, na sua tentativa para regressar ao mundo, vendo através ...more
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Beware: this review contains some spoilers (although if you're thinking of reading this book for the plot, you should look elsewhere).

I have no idea how Ian McEwan did it, but he managed to take a bunch of interesting events (the loss of a child, a car crash, a friend going insane and committing suicide) and make them booooooring. Maybe the writing is absolutely brilliant. I can't tell. The figurative language is okay, the imagery is okay (I've seen far better from populist genre writers), the r
Lori Bamber
I'd like to think that reading this book is akin to taking a guided tour through Ian McEwan's mind. It is not what I thought - based on the cover material - it is about. It is about the nature of time, and relationships, especially our relationship to ourself. It is about the fact that we know very little about ourself, about the people closest to us (never mind those at a distance) and about what is really going on in our lives. It is about grief, the healing nature of joy, and about the way th ...more
Mădă Kruppa
Nu știu cine a zis vorba asta, dar a avut mare dreptate : "Copilăria e singurul paradis pierdut".
O carte de o profunzime și o simplitate emoționante.
Lewis Weinstein
It's not correct to say I finished this book; I just stopped reading. With one exception (The Innocent) I have put down every McEwan book I tried to read. I find his initial premises fascinating, but after 50 pages or so, I start to get bogged down in what I would call "over-writing," by which I mean writing for the author and not the reader. The story becomes relatively meaningless, and even the characters are subservient to the writer's phrase. I'm probably in a minority, but that's my take.
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Marc Maitland
One of Ian McEwan’s earlier offerings. It contains all of the characteristics found in his later novels, and therefore it comes as no surprise that the finely written intrigue of human relationships tantalises, right to the very end.

There are disparate threads, such as the abduction of a child, the palpable sense of loss, marriage breakdown, journeys made, membership of a government committee, constant seeking, the fascinating interaction between passage of time and events, interesting sexual co
Dorothy Tu
My third book by Ian McEwan (first was The Cement Garden, then Amsterdam). Again, the writing is beautiful and something I can get lost in, and with this beauty McEwan is consistent. In Cement Garden, he fashioned the a supreme eeriness, in Amsterdam the lighthearted, and in this book, the grief and displacement that comes with any tragedy.

I get lost in that displacement with Stephen, the main character of this story, yet this empathy for him made me frustrated too because there were a lot of in
Here's how it went: first, there was casual sightseeing in McEwan's beautiful sentences, then full investment in the harrowing disappearance of the protagonist's daughter, then a slog through a few chapters in which I contemplated cutting my loses, then a slide into the gentle rhythms of the writing, and finally I was at the end. It's the story of the dissolution of a marriage in the wake of said disappearance, though it's the husband's story as the wife is relegated to symbolic status. The prob ...more
Mark Wilkerson
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Caela Harrison
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Bee Bishop
I first read this 14 years ago when I was studying A level English literature. I disliked the language, the depressing tone and felt no empathy for the characters. I'd seen McEwan give a lecture and thought he was pompous. So for years I've sworn I'd never read a McEwan book again. That was until one of our book sharers read and reviewed it, and kindly lent me his copy. we'd talked about how the books you're 'made' to read at school can make you love or loathe a genre/author and this was a class ...more
Wow, what an unexpected story. The loss of a child almost becomes a minor theme to the effects the occurrence has on those who remain. Beautifully written, it’s a story that exudes so much humanity and the reality of sadness. McEwan has a unique gift with his writing and I felt consistently confronted with what I would do if I suffered the same circumstance. For instance, how does ones day end when your child is abducted? Can it? How inconsolable it must feel. How unimaginable his wretched sense ...more
Sunny Shore
This is my 6th McEwan book and probably my least favorite, but I gave it a 3 anyway. It was written quite a while ago and maybe it would've changed for the better, had he been writing it today....don't know for sure, but McEwan has improved with age. Also, I was not crazy about the ending and at times, the story was hard to follow and dragged at too many spots for me. Other than that, this is a worthwhile and of course, well-written story about a children's book writer, Stephen Lewis, whose 4 ye ...more
Beautiful and satisfying.

McEwan represents complexity and ambiguities with eloquence. There are interesting thematic links between authority and childhood and time and the act of creation and death. The sense of completeness upon reaching the conclusion of this novel was kind too amazing for me to come up with an adequate review. McEwan is excellent.

There are probably weaknesses in plotting/tone, but I'm too impressed by the overall effect to care much at the moment. Maybe I'll feel
I'm not sure what to make of this novel. It was strange, to say the least. It does have a few hints of time travel in it, sort of. Barely. And it had a few hints of magical realism, sort of. Barely.

But I don't think McEwan was really trying to go the magical realism route - at least not consciously.

I read an essay the other day that examined why "literary" people like magical realism and turn their noses up at normal fantasy. The article proposed that there was a spectrum of fantasy with surrea
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Era Bom Que Trocássemos Umas Ideias Sobre O Assunto
  • Gente Feliz com Lágrimas (Colecção Mil Folhas, #29)
  • Fanny Owen (Colecção Mil Folhas, #31)
  • A Costa dos Murmúrios (Colecção Mil Folhas, #10)
  • Sinais de Fogo (Colecção Mil Folhas, #48)
  • O Caso Morel (Colecção Mil Folhas, #87)
  • Húmus (Colecção Mil Folhas, #57)
  • The Echoing Grove
  • Maurice Guest
  • The Shadow-Line
  • Don Giovanni in Sicilia
  • Balada da Praia dos Cães
  • The Man Who Watched Trains Go By
  • Diario di un killer sentimentale
  • Uomini e no
  • Nação Crioula
  • Buying a Fishing Rod for My Grandfather
  • The Seven Minutes
Ian McEwan was born on 21 June 1948 in Aldershot, England. He studied at the University of Sussex, where he received a BA degree in English Literature in 1970. He received his MA degree in English Literature at the University of East Anglia.

McEwan's works have earned him worldwide critical acclaim. He won the Somerset Maugham Award in 1976 for his first collection of short stories First Love, Last
More about Ian McEwan...
Atonement Saturday On Chesil Beach Sweet Tooth Amsterdam

Share This Book

“For children, childhood is timeless. It is always the present. Everything is in the present tense. Of course, they have memories. Of course, time shifts a little for them and Christmas comes round in the end. But they don’t feel it. Today is what they feel, and when they say ‘When I grow up,’ there is always an edge of disbelief—how could they ever be other than what they are?” 11 likes
“Only when you are grown up, perhaps only when you have children yourself, do you fully understand that your own parents had a full and intricate existence before you were born.” 1 likes
More quotes…