Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Introducing Wittgenstein: A Graphic Guide” as Want to Read:
Introducing Wittgenstein: A Graphic Guide
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Introducing Wittgenstein: A Graphic Guide

3.58  ·  Rating Details ·  393 Ratings  ·  33 Reviews
This is a superlative graphic guide described as 'warm, witty and wise' by Jonathan Ree to an enigmatic master of twentieth-century philosophy.
Paperback, 176 pages
Published October 15th 2005 by Icon Books (first published July 22nd 1992)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Introducing Wittgenstein, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Introducing Wittgenstein

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Jul 19, 2016 Chris rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
For those of you who don’t know, the “Introducing” series published by Toten Books is a graphic novel presentation of big ideas and their thinkers. They are fun to read and a huge help for visual learners. It’s true there isn’t as much information as could fit onto a fully-worded page, but it makes up in mnemonic assistance what it lacks in exhaustive content. Also, because there isn’t as much emphasis placed on written content as pictorial interpretation, the effort to highlight central concept ...more
Jan 04, 2016 Jimmy rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
An example of a logical picture would be, "There is a lion in the room." But that could be true or false. We can check the room and see that it is false. One problem I have is with Wittgenstein's personal belief system. What if I said, "There is an angel in the room" or "God is in the room." Would Wittgenstein call those statements true? Possibly. Kind of defeats the purpose of what he is saying. I mean, if an angel that we do not see can be in the room, why not a lion?

Solipsism is the belief t
Adriana Scarpin

Pois então, faz muito mais sentido Wittgenstein em quadrinhos ou no cinema, mais que ser lido ou ouvido, Wittgenstein deve ser visto.
Jun 03, 2013 Dale rated it really liked it
I've been reading a few books from the 'Introducing ... A Graphics Guide' series the past several weeks. They've been surprisingly good, and this one is no exception. Over the years I've read quite a bit of Wittgenstein (Foundations of Mathematics, Philosophical Investigations, On Certainty, and the Blue and Brown books), but knew next to nothing of Wittgenstein's life and (ironically) next to nothing of his personal view of life. This little book filled in those gaps.

Wittgenstein is a deceptive
Daniel Chaikin
Jul 10, 2013 Daniel Chaikin rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Immediate response: It helped. This seems to be a good starting point on Wittgenstein.

A short review, from July 10:

As part of my weird quest-to-reread-Infinite-Jest, I decided I needed to read certain key influences on David Foster Wallace, including Wittgenstein's Tractatus...or did I? And anyway, where to start on such a book? So, I started here. The illustrations are random and vaguely pointless, but text is nice and simple. It highlights how absolutely fascinating Wittgenstein the person was
i’ve realized that one of my favorite things about the philosophy classes i took at carleton was hashing it out in class with the other students. somehow, reading a condensed version of philosophy like this, without the knowledge that i’m going to take some kernel of understanding with me into a classroom, the words just don’t resonate the same way. plus, the average person you talk to will treat you like a joker if you engage in the kinds of philosophical ramblings that wittgenstein will induce ...more
Dec 24, 2010 Ruth rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Hmm, it was a comic book so I thought it was going to make things simpler but I still didn't really get a lot of the ideas, plus the drawings weren't that great. I might have been better off actually trying to read the Tractatus. There was a part in the middle about thinking that I got a little interested in, but overall I wasn't feeling it.
Elliot Ratzman
A visiting friend asked me to tell him some about the philosopher Wittgenstein. I did so for a few minutes, and then doubted some of the claims I made, so I read through this book to spot myself on my own faulty memories. This is a nice summary of the basics in his thought, complete with a fair biographical sketch of his more memorable deeds: brave soldier in WWI, rural schoolteacher, polymath prodigy, architect, arrogant student, humble genius and eccentric teacher. The author throws in a few t ...more
David Balfour
The biographical portions of this are pretty good but you can get them equally well from a quick visit to Wikipedia. The images are mostly unrelated to the content - just random, poorly-drawn comics and cheap surrealist collage that fail almost completely to supplement the text. The explanations of Wittgenstein's thought are heavily simplified and paraphrased, and lack his resonant turn of phrase. It all seems either too obvious or too obtuse, and it's hard to understand why anything he says is ...more
May 13, 2009 Neal rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This was my first experience with the "Introducing..." series of books (of which there are many). It was a very enjoyable read, with a ton of illustrative graphics on every page; there are quotations from Wittgenstein scattered throughout, though I would have wanted perhaps a few more than the author chose to include; and it's very concise and informative, ranging from the biographical to the philosophical to the interplay of the two and how they informed each other, from influences to major wor ...more
Mark Valentine
I value the Introducing-- series because they act as a friend who I can trust to give me the basics without too much commitment; they consistently work as a springboard into the topic in an engaging manner. Wittgenstein, now, I have a sense of and will look into his works.

I am moved by Wittgenstein's statement that the hardest thinking we humans can engage in requires us not to deceive ourselves.

I also must ponder some more his negation of the self; that we cannot think without including the "
Ben Bush
I'm pretty shameless about reading these comic philosophy intro guides. This one was much less intelligible than the one on Derrida. Stuff about the way language and the world and the impossibility of language actually describing anything. We can't use words to describe the world the best we can do is point to it. There's a nice succinct description of "Rhizomatic" which I guess Deleuze and Guattari picked up from Wittgenstein. Nice joke: "Consider the lady who wrote to me saying she was a solip ...more
May 23, 2007 Zahreen rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: anyone who likes to think really really really hard
Shelves: academic
I love these Introducing/--- for Beginners Books, and this one about Wittgenstein is no different. It is difficult philosophy to grasp, and the book does a glossing of it, but it's an excellent introduction to a very important philosopher. The book also does a good job painting the historical and biographical context of Wittgenstein's work. His books are littered with examples that make it more comprehensible than most.
Apr 03, 2015 Zach rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Fun, short explanation of Witttgenstein's philosophy done as a strange sort of clip-art comic. The thing looks and reads like a zine, but as if they made an aesthetic choice for it to be a zine, without every seeing one in real life, like a person making a "50's diner" based on nostalgic generalities. For whatever reason i found this really charming. This book is not exhaustive, but it gives a good foothold for the life and work of Wittgennstein, like it's just INTRODUCING him.
May 15, 2008 Isaac rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
What is Wittgenstein about? At first, the possibility of logic as a way of describing everything. Later, the ambiguity of language as a way of describing anything. Either way he breaks it all down quite nicely. I wrote a thesis on Wittgenstein to graduate. It was all about the naming of colors, a process that breaks down and is left open to reinvention at any point. That's what Wittgenstein is about!
Jan 15, 2016 Laura rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
I was disappointed in Wittgenstein I have to say. If the purpose of this book is to make you want to read more Wittgenstein, it partially succeeded as I am curious.

there was too much about his personal life which was only moderately interesting, and his ideas were admired rather than discussed.

ultimately, though, perhaps I found a number of his ideas outmoded.
I found this series to be a clever way of introducing difficult concepts. Wittgenstein has influenced much of modern philosophy and this was a nice afternoon read. 170 pgs of illustrations and summaries of his life and thought.
Kevin Summers
Apr 07, 2015 Kevin Summers rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: adult
This book piqued my interest in Wittgenstein's ideas, to which I had had only a very brief introduction prior to reading Introducing Wittgenstein. Before reading this book, I did not know that three of Wittgenstein's four brothers committed suicide.
Eric Pecile
Dec 23, 2015 Eric Pecile rated it it was amazing
A really good synopsis of the extremely complex philosophy of Ludwig Wittengenstein. While the subject matter is too dense and complicated to be crammed into a single short volume it acts as a great companion to the reading of the Tractatus On Certainty.
Melissa Mcavoy
Nov 10, 2010 Melissa Mcavoy rated it really liked it
What a riot. I'll need to read it 10 more times to get it. The day after I read it I had a waiter in Burlington VT who was wearing a rabbit/duck t-shirt. Without this book I would have missed the college-town inside joke.
David Gross
Dec 24, 2014 David Gross rated it it was ok
Shelves: non-fiction
Enough to intrigue me, but not enough to recommend. It often seemed unnecessarily imprecise and obscure.
Nov 16, 2010 _topo_ rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
In pochi altri casi mi sono trovato di fronte a una così totale incomprensione del testo. Non so se a causa mia, di Wittgenstein o dell'autore del libro.
An interesting and accessible overview of Wittgenstein's life and works. This series is good if you are starting to study philosophy or if you just wish to know more about philosophy.
David Glenn Dixon
Jul 14, 2011 David Glenn Dixon rated it it was ok
Ham-fisted illustrations add little. And the quotes from LW are likely more comprehensible in their original contexts.
Feb 16, 2012 Charles rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: academic
Wittgenstein is complicated. I'm not sure this helped, though. On to Philosophical Investigations!
Borna rated it really liked it
Nov 15, 2011
Zen rated it really liked it
Jul 23, 2015
Stina Schmidt
Stina Schmidt rated it really liked it
Jun 20, 2013
Sheikh Tajamul
Sheikh Tajamul rated it really liked it
Nov 06, 2015
John rated it really liked it
Jan 08, 2015
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Introducing Baudrillard
  • Introducing Hegel
  • How to Read Wittgenstein
  • Introducing Derrida
  • Sartre for Beginners
  • Introducing Machiavelli
  • Introducing Jung
  • Introducing Lacan
  • Introducing Chomsky
  • Introducing Nietzsche
  • Introducing Postmodernism
  • Introducing Ethics
  • Introducing Camus
  • Introducing Semiotics
  • Introducing Modernism
  • Introducing Linguistics
  • Introducing Cultural Studies
  • Introducing Logic

Share This Book