Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Dawkins Delusion?: Atheist Fundamentalism and the Denial of the Divine” as Want to Read:
The Dawkins Delusion?: Atheist Fundamentalism and the Denial of the Divine
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Dawkins Delusion?: Atheist Fundamentalism and the Denial of the Divine

3.28 of 5 stars 3.28  ·  rating details  ·  893 ratings  ·  121 reviews
The McGraths present a reliable assessment of The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins, famed atheist and scientist, and the many questions this book raises--including, above all, the relevance of faith and the quest for meaning.
Hardcover, 118 pages
Published July 6th 2007 by IVP Books (first published January 2007)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Dawkins Delusion?, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Dawkins Delusion?

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 1,786)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Andy
I read this concurrently with The God Delusion, and must say I really appreciated McGrath's tone of patience and reasonableness, even when it was clear he strongly disagreed with Dawkins' arguements. As someone who is examining his beliefs and is fairly open to good arguments, no matter what they are, I found this slim volume helpful as a reminder, while reading Dawkins, that the passion and certainty of the author should not be substitutes for logic and evidence. For what it is intended to be, ...more
Luke
When I picked up this book, I thought to myself that the authors were going to have a hard time disputing 400 pages of atheist vitriol with less than 100 pages. I was wrong. The McGraths (husband and wife), both fellow Oxfordians with Dawkins, cleanly and effectively eviscerate many of Dawkins' most egregrious arguments in The God Delusion. I did my best to approach this book with an open mind (as I did with Dawkins' book) and to weigh the arguments on their own merit. This task was much easier ...more
Marvin
A friend of mine told me a story about the first book club he went to in our little desert town. The book to be discussed was The DaVinci Code by Dan Brown. It was a big meeting but only a few were there to discuss the book. The bulk of the attendees were from churches in the area and their sole purpose for attending was to shut down the discussion, an objective which they achieved. The meeting soon degenerated into chaos.

This is typical of my many years of studying various religions and philoso
...more
Jason
Jul 06, 2009 Jason rated it 1 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: Nobody
Recommended to Jason by: Brian Clarke
Shelves: non-fiction, theology
The best thing that can be said for "The Dawkins Delusion?" is that at under 100 pages, it didn't waste too much of my time. To save you from wasting any of yours, let me summarize (and paraphrase): "Dawkins makes hateful baseless claims and ignores evidence that cuts against his position." If you're hoping for this book to say more, you'll be sorely disappointed (though perhaps appreciative of the irony).

I think perhaps I just need a break from this genre, for it has gotten to feel like a horri
...more
Cheri
The McGraths engage in a much more civil debate than Dawkins; I'll give them that. And that IS important. However, they deliberately miss many of the points that Dawkins makes in his book. Their arguments turn into more of a defense of their particular religion (Christianity) than a rebuttal to Dawkins assertions that support a theory that there is no god. Given the brevity of the book, which amounts to little more than a rap on the knuckles for being disrespectful, the McGraths would probably h ...more
Steve Cann
Oh dear me. I approached this book with an open mind, having recently read the excellent God Delusion, to see if the authors could provide me with a solid argument in defence of religion - and perhaps even give me a hint of proof of the existence of the supernatural deity they cling to.
No chance! This book appears to be the literary equivalent of the proverbial child who has thrown his or her toys out of the pram.

It begins (mistakenly) with repeatedly classing atheist belief as 'dogmatic' (fooli
...more
Tim
Feb 28, 2008 Tim rated it 1 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Christians who want to argue with atheists
Hmm.. I only got about 1/3 of the way through this very short book which was a present to me by someone who disagrees with Dawkins' 'God Delusion'...even though they haven't read that book.

Essentially, Dawkins who writes in a fundamental atheist manner in his book 'The God Delusion' and is responded to here in this book by McGrath, a fundamental Christian. There was great potential to hear reasoned debate and response to the Dawkins.

Sadly i could not not appreciate his arguments because he was
...more
James
McGrath is a real smart guy and his criticisms made me think more deeply about what I read in The God Delusion.
Paul
[The] McGrath(es) do(es) a nice job at showing how The Dawkins constantly overreaches in his criticisms of God (Christianity, religion, &c.). How Dawkins continually substitutes rhetoric, vitriol, and ignorance in lieu of sustained and cogent argumentation. How Dawkins is selective in his appeal to history to indict the faithful (e.g., Pape's analysis of the motives of suicide bombers, the claims of some who died under the French revolution, the phenomena attending the problems in Northern I ...more
Charbel
The Dawkins Delusion? promises counter-arguments to those presented by Richard Dawkins in The God Delusion, but unfortunately fails. Instead of a comeback volume designed to dispute Dawkins' massively popular book, we get just-over-a-100 pages of rants that strangely read like a negative review of the God Delusion.

I picked up this book for two reasons: 1) I liked the idea that someone wanted to add something to the debate, and 2) the authors seemed credible to do that, with Alister McGrath havin
...more
Ryan
On the whole, I enjoyed the book.

As for its strengths, I think that the authors provide reasonable critique of The God Delusion. Yes, the writers are Christians, but their only reliance upon Christian doctrine for rebuttal is found in chapter four. This provides a broader basis for their critique, highlighting both theists and atheists who disagree with Dawkins on evidential and philosophical grounds. Two things stood out as particularly insightful and devastating. What I find most devastating i
...more
Carl
Sep 21, 2010 Carl rated it 4 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: Anyone who has read Dawkins or is interested in the relationship of religion and science
So, for some reason this book is coming up pretty high on my Goodreads list, even though it's been a while since I've read it. My review seems a bit like trash talk to me now, esp. seeing as I still haven't actually read Dawkins' book. To be honest, I saw an uncut debate between these two on youtube a while back, and have to admit Dawkins came out on top. Well, it's been a while-- and I just don't trust debates anyway, I think written, relatively sympathetic communication is the best way to work ...more
jeff
Jan 15, 2008 jeff rated it 5 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: anyone that read The God Delusion.
Recommended to jeff by: Tony Abruscetto
I read The Dawkins Delusion not long after reading The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins and I have to say, he "eviscerates" (Dawkins' cheesy word) Dawkins' arguments.

I had problems with The God Delusion as I noted in my review of the book and I don't hide the fact that I am a Christian. Maybe because of this I was more critical while reading Dawkins than I was with McGrath. I certainly did not make a conscious decision to do so.

McGrath completely tears down virtually all of Dawkins' arguments. I
...more
Jeff
I picked this book up with the Dawkin's God Delusion because it was right next to it. I'm sorry to say as short as it is I couldn't get through two chapters. Every other paragrah seemed to reference an earlier book or argument either by McGrath or Dawkins. When he wasn't self-promoting he was nitpicking on Dawkin's choice of examples or quotes. I won't say that its not informative as to different interpretations of the situations Dawkin raises in his book but it does little else. I found it a bi ...more
Kerrie
I give the McGraths props for deconstructing Dawkins in a very polite, intellectual manner (most of the time). The barb near the end - is Dawkins so strident an atheist because he's losing faith in atheism? - was gratuitous and a moment of WTF.

McGrath does take the standard position that atheism is simply another form of religion, which doesn't sit right with me. When taking apart Dawkins' points that religion leads to violence, the literal interpretation of Scripture is ridiculous, etc. McGrath
...more
♥ Ibrahim ♥
Alister McGrath acted like a Christian fundamentalist when he responded to the book of Richard Dawkins with an attack on his personality in the form of a book "The Dawkins Delusion". Richard Dawkins has every right to look at me as a believer in God and say that the idea of God is a delusion, since it is all in the mind and in the heart, etc. But does that give me the right to attack his person and publish a book about it attacking his mental powers by calling my book "The Dawkins Delusion"? Ali ...more
Philip
First off I'll admit to not having read The God Delusion itself. So until then, my 4/5 rating is provisional; 3.5/5 would probably be more accurate, and giving 4/5 instead of 3/5 shifts the average rating in that direction.

The absolutely fundamental point for anybody thinking of reading this book to consider is that it is NOT a plug for Christianity. The book is very short (my edition is 78 pages - 12 of those pages are notes, references and further reading) and focuses on refuting the points Da
...more
Jess
Recommended by Chad, and largely appreciated -- not just for the facts, but also for the dispassionate and reasoned tone in which the McGraths go about this task. Not a line-by-line or premise-by-premise refutation of Dawkins' God Delusion, but it does not set out to be. Rather, it addresses a number of issues raised in Dawkins' work and attempts to approach those who hold them "with complete intellectual respect rather than dismissing them as liars, knaves and charlatans" -- an approach he repe ...more
Tattered Cover Book Store
Whether you loved The God Delusion or hated it (few people felt anything in between), you really ought to read this book. (If you didn't read The God Delusion, then there's not much point in reading this one either.) In 97 pages, the McGraths lay out clearly and concisely the many points in
Dawkins's book that are exaggerated, misguided, or just plain false. Though we keep the book in Theology, it does not in fact propose any religious stance or system, but rather defends the legitimacy (rather t
...more
Dean P.
I have read many of McGrath's textbook/research books and have come to expect a certain tone and style to his writing. His ability to maintain a level-headed response to Dawkins' works was encouraging. At times he wanders a little close to the "defense of Christianity" perspective, but for the most part he maintains a logical and even-keeled tone. I think the most beneficial chapter in this short work is the final one titled "Is Religion Evil?" in which he carefully shows how Dawkins' impassione ...more
Virgiliana
McGrath does a nice job of exposing Dawkins' The God Delusion for the unscholarly jumble of half-arguments that it is. McGrath's clarity of thought and calm, even tone provide a soothing contrast after one has endured Dawkins' venomous ramblings. But other than that, McGrath's response seems superfluous to anyone familiar with the history of serious debate between Christians and atheists. I suppose his effortless refutation of Dawkins' accusations would be helpful to someone who has only been in ...more
Mike
Mar 01, 2013 Mike rated it 2 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: anyone that has read the The God Delusion
A VERY fair and forthright dealing with a few of the quotes from Dawkins' book, The God Delusion.

Otherwise, he is obviuosly ignorant of the science involved.
Clare
This book is concise and well-reasoned, and serves its purpose as a contrast and alternative to The God Delusion by means of those very characteristics.
Drew Smith
Great book! While reading it, be sure to remember that it is merely a response essay rather than a book presenting an argument. McGrath does a fantastic job explaining his purpose in the introduction, so be sure to read that and not just jump in chapter 1. There are only 4 chapters for a total of 100 pages, but it is very rich in context and does a brilliant job pointing out the flaws in Dawkins's argument in "The God Delusion". Even though McGrath disagrees with Dawkins, even showing where he t ...more
Wendy
I find it sad in our day and age, that most people, believe what they believe, and if they come across someone who believes differently, well, THEY are automatically the crackpot. So I find in the pretty much polarized views of this book.

Atheists pretty much all think this book stinks, while the 'others' be they Christian, religious or just looking for a reason to dissect Dawkins book rate it much higher and full of insight?

Who is right? who is wrong? Are we all just entitled to our own opinio
...more
Renay
i found this book to be quite horrible to read. to me it is obvious that the author - whether christian or not, atheist or not - simply needed an excuse to attack and insult dawkins, and this book was his excuse.
rather agressively, the author constantly attacks and degrades richard dawkins and his book "the god delusion".
in the book's introduction, mcgrath suggests that his book, "the dawkins delusion", will be short and to the point - arguing against dawkin's god delusion. it is definately shor
...more
R.P. Bosman
Alister McGrath, a biochemist and Professor of Historical Theology at Oxford University, may be Richard Dawkins' most prominent critic. As the author of "Dawkins' God: Genes, Memes and the Meaning of Life," he was interviewed extensively for Dawkins' recent documentary, "The Root of All Evil." Not a frame of these interviews made it into the final edit. Alister McGrath shows that the aggressive rhetoric of Richard Dawkins' books masks a deep insecurity about the public credibility of atheism.

McG
...more
Karl
A succinct and fair-minded critique of Richard Dawkins' misrepresentation of religion, religious people and belief in God.
Rod

I was hoping for alot more info from this little book. Which probably wasn't fair - its a little book after all.
He pretty much discussed all the faults with Dawkins lame efforts that I found as well. I can't believe Dawkins was actually a scientist at one time.

I don't think I would recommend this book to anyone. If people are uneducated enough about world religions to actually read Dawkins writings then they probably wouldn't know the truth if it smacked them upside the head. They would be bett
...more
Anđela
Odličan komentar na Dawkinsonovu ''Iluziju o Bogu'', pokazuje koliko je Dawkins u spomenutoj knjizi pristran i kontradiktoran. Onaj koji imalo razmišlja čitajući ''Iluziju o Bogu'' može sam doći do tih zaključaka, toliko da mu ova knjiga možda nije potrebna, međutim dobra je ako želite učvrstiti svoje mišljenje.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 59 60 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • The Devil's Delusion: Atheism and Its Scientific Pretensions
  • God's Undertaker: Has Science Buried God?
  • God and the New Atheism: A Critical Response to Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens
  • Atheism Remix: A Christian Confronts the New Atheists
  • Apologetics to the Glory of God: An Introduction
  • Reasonable Faith
  • Christian Apologetics
  • Darwin on Trial
  • God, Freedom, and Evil
  • Defense of the Faith
  • The Dawkins Letters: Challenging Atheist Myths
  • Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design
  • Atheist Delusions: The Christian Revolution and Its Fashionable Enemies
  • Is God a Moral Monster?: Making Sense of the Old Testament God
  • Beyond Opinion: Living the Faith We Defend
  • The Resurrection of the Son of God (Christian Origins and the Question of God, #3)
  • Five Views on Apologetics
  • There Is a God: How the World's Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind
1009890
Alister E. McGrath is a biochemist and Christian theologian born in Belfast, Northern Ireland, and currently enjoys the Title of Distinction “Professor of Historical Theology” granted by the University of Oxford. He is the author of several books on theology and history, including In the Beginning: The Story of the King James Bible and How it Changed a Nation, a Language, and a Culture and The Twi ...more
More about Alister E. McGrath...
C. S. Lewis: A Life: Eccentric Genius, Reluctant Prophet Christian Theology: An Introduction In the Beginning: The Story of the King James Bible and How it Changed a Nation, a Language, and a Culture Christianity's Dangerous Idea: The Protestant Revolution: A History from the Sixteenth Century to the Twenty-First The Twilight of Atheism: The Rise and Fall of Disbelief in the Modern World

Share This Book