Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Henry IV, Part Two” as Want to Read:
Henry IV, Part Two
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview
Read Book* *Different edition

Henry IV, Part Two (Wars of the Roses #3)

3.78 of 5 stars 3.78  ·  rating details  ·  8,212 ratings  ·  242 reviews
Our Signet Classic Shakespeare Series was extensively revised in 1998. We offer the best of everything -- unforgettable works edited by eminent Shakespeare scholars, comprehensive notes on the text, an essay on Shakespeare's life and times, source material, critical commentaries, extensive bibliographies, and footnotes. And there's more
-- Grow with the times by including b
...more
School & Library Binding, Signet Classic Shakespeare, 0 pages
Published March 28th 2001 by Topeka Bindery (first published 1600)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Henry IV, Part Two, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Henry IV, Part Two

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Bill  Kerwin

This is a much chillier, soberer world than the first part of Henry IV, lacking in both its good humor and its generosity. Falstaff is not nearly so funny apart from Hal, Prince John is a much icier foil than the mercurial Hotspur, and Hal himself--whom we wish to like--makes himself disagreeable by stealing his dying father's crown and snubbing the fat knight we love.

Yet Shakespeare, by subtle degrees, leads us to the point where we come to admire Hal and believe in his moral transformation. I
...more
David Sarkies
Jun 20, 2015 David Sarkies rated it 4 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Those who have read Henry IV Part 1
Recommended to David by: Nobody, it's Shakespeare and it has Falstaff so I was bound to read it sometime
Shelves: historical
The prodigal prince returns
15 May 2013

In the particular edition of this play that I read the editors included and essay by Harold Jenkins (not that that name means anything to me) about whether Henry IV is two five act plays or one ten act play. Personally I don't care either way and would really not want to write a major thesis on that particular point, but that is probably because there is so much more with regards to Shakespearian plays, such as the nature of the human condition, and also th
...more
Trevor
I really did expect to like this play much more than I did. I read somewhere that both plays had originally been one play, but that the Falstaff character proved so popular that Shakespeare split the play in two and added more Falstaff. This play doesn’t quite hang together as well as part one. I’m tempted to say something about sequels always being crap. In many ways this is the same story over again – but bizarrely Falstaff and Hal hardly meet in the play – they only meet as ‘friends’ once and ...more
Lotz
This is the first of Shakespeare’s plays that fell completely flat for me. How could the world’s greatest dramatist write a play so singularly devoid of drama? The impending battle comes to naught; Falstaff wastes his time doing God-knows-what; and Prince Henry undergoes an instantaneous character development that is hard to believe, and even harder to approve of.

The two scenes of real conflict—when the dying king Henry IV thinks that Prince Hal is usurping the throne, and when the new king Hen
...more
Catherine  Mustread
I love the history plays — my interest in British history has been piqued!

Reading Shakespeare’s plays in the chronological order in which he is presumed to have written them I find his growth as playwright is in direct correlation to my appreciation of his plays; and to the blog, The Play's The Thing: Reading Shakespeare with Dennis Abrams, for making that possible.

Though Hotspur was important in the transition of Hal to Henry V, I found him to be a character for whom I had little sympathy. He
...more
Jimyanni
The Folger library edition is a very fine edition; if I were rating strictly according to the quality of the scholarship shown here, I'd cheerfully rate the book at five stars. The play itself, however, is one of the weakest of Shakespeare's plays.

The plot isn't as vile as I find the plot in the Taming of the Shrew; the misogyny displayed here is of the common, garden variety of the misogyny found throughout Shakespeare, rather than the exceptional, "beyond the call of cultural duty" variety fo
...more
Ben
King Henry IV Part Two ends in transition, both for the English political atmosphere and for the central characters. Part of this transition takes place in the audiences' perspective. We witness the rise of a young prince and the deterioration of an illegitimate king amidst the fog of civil war. And yet Shakespeare twists the end. The truly naive patron cannot predict precisely how these events will resolve. I did not imagine King Henry IV repenting the means of his ascension, nor did I imagin ...more
M. D.  Hudson
Again, Shakespeare's histories are sort of new to me, I am embarrassed to say. I won't try to add my feeble little voice to 300 years of Shakespearian lit crit, but I must say Falstaff on the actual page is considerably crueler, pettier and meaner than his popular image would lead one to think. He is damned funny though.

Incidentally, my recent Shakespeare jag has been via a set of 1888 Plays edited by the Rev. Hudson (no relation, so far as I know). I didn't feel like screwing around finding th
...more
Ricardo
Se a primeira parte transparecia um teor optimista, pincelado pelas tropelias que Falstaff induzia o príncipe herdeiro a praticar, nesta segunda encontramos um Falstaff pessimista, saudosista e cada vez mais consciente da sua própria decadência. Leva-me a crer, se tal é possível para esta personagem, que sente alguns remorsos por ter desencaminhado alguém de quem o autor tem como objectivo final atribuir uma espécie de redenção gloriosa em França.
Não é só Sir John que sente o peso da velhice ent
...more
Matthew
Of the four plays that make up Shakespeare's second history cycle, Henry IV Part 2 is the one that has most difficulty in existing as a stand-alone play. The very title informs the reader/audience that they have missed out something if they failed to at least read the first part. Similarly, the action of the play follows directly on from the earlier play, with the divisions and inter-relationships already in place.

This is one reason (though not the only one) why the play is the least satisfactor
...more
Arcadius

We left Part 1 with the battle won, but not the war, so justifying the sequel. What we discover in Part 2, however, is that the rebels have actually had the stuffing knocked out of them at Shrewsbury. Deprived of Hotspur’s drive and Worcester’s brains, this sorry lot never really look like getting their act together - and in the end, they just fold before the efficient ruthlessness of Westmorland and Prince John. So much for the central action of the play.

Of course, 2H4 was also intended as a sh
...more
Marty
I find it comforting to know that sequels were not just products of the 20 and 21st Century's shameless quest for capitalizing off of previous successes. This, apparently, has been around as long as literature, and Shakespeare is no exception--as King Henry IV, Part 2 so readily attests.

Of course, it is less comforting to know that sequels are generally not as dynamic or impacting as their predecessors--with notable exceptions to this rule, but KHIVP2 is not one of them.

The same, intriguing char
...more
Justin Evans
Overall, I thought this was less interesting than Henry V, but that might just be because I paid more attention to HV (I have to teach it; I read this for kicks). There's not a whole lot of beautiful Shakespeare moments, the humor didn't hit me (possibly my fault, of course), and the best bit was probably the Induction, in which Rumour discourses on herself. On the upside, I learned the word 'fustilarian' and the phrase 'I'll tickle your catastrophe!', and I'm pretty sure I now understand the ti ...more
Dave
Jan 08, 2013 Dave marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: calibre, fiction
SUMMARY: After defeat at the Battle of Shrewsbury the rebels regroup. But Prince Hal's reluctance to inherit the crown threatens to destroy the ailing Henry IV's dream of a lasting dynasty. Shakespeare's portrait of the prodigal son's journey from youth to maturity embraces the full panorama of society. Under the editorial supervision of Jonathan Bate and Eric Rasmussen, two of today's most accomplished Shakespearean scholars, this Modern Library series incorporates definitive texts and authorit ...more
João Fernandes
The first half of this book might as well be called "Falstaff, Part II".
Not as endearing as Henry IV, Part I, but definitely has a great conclusion with the two Harrys reconciling. Great character development for Hal and Henry both.
Can't wait to read Henry V and the Battle of Agincourt!
Patrice
The continuing history of the British crown, but what overshadows all is the incredible character of Falstaff.
He seems to be part of the drama and yet set apart. Ageless. He seems more real than the real historical characters.
Who is he? An Elizabethan hippie? Our inner child? I'm still not sure but I do know that he interests me more than anyone else. He seems to go through life free, guiltless, without worry. I keep thinking of those other Shakespearean lines about how life is nothing but sound
...more
Lexxie
Finished reading this just in time for a test today o.O I don't know why, but I've mostly felt like reading contemporary stories lately.

Full review will come later, as I'm going to London and Stratford-upon-Avon in May with Uni to see all the plays we are reading for class.

This and all my other reviews are originally posted on my blog (un)Conventional Bookviews
...more
Richard Leis
I'm only four plays into William Shakespeare's oeuvre, but of these, three are masterpieces and the fourth only a little less so because I found it the most difficult to comprehend, because of its cultural differences.

2 Henry IV is one of the masterpieces.

The play is complex and compelling. At first it read to me like a retread of Part 1, only a little bit bigger in scope, like a sequel to a summer movie blockbuster. One signature of a great sequel is if it puts the original in a new light. Keep
...more
Mary
A little boring, really, after Henry IV Part 1. While Part 1 focused on a coming of age of a new king, Part 2 focuses on bowing out--SPOILER Henry IV dies and Falstaff is old, is old, as he plaintive cries, sending his urine out for tests and being dismissed for his white-haired buffoonery. The key scene is just awkwardness, instead of being sweet battle scenes, like Part 1, but in someway that matches the themes: coming of age is big, bold and bloody while leaving is staggered, misunderstood, a ...more
Hóvirág
3 csillag - tetszett! :)

Ez most nem jött be annyira, mint az első rész. Nem is tudom, talán azért, mert nem értettem egyet a módszerekkel. Mármint a lázadás leverésének módszereivel. Azt belátom, hogy ez így szükséges és jó döntés volt Lancaster részéről (vagyis hát IV. Henrik részéről, gondolom a fia az ő utasítására cselekedett), de na.
Továbbá Falstaff jelenetei itt már időnként untattak, legalábbis ami a Balgával közös jeleneteket illeti. Az a fickó roppantul idegesített!
Henrik herceg pedig m
...more
Valerie
I my no means want to steal the thunder of Madeline,who does a great job with these, but my friend requested some quirky summaries of my own interpretation on Shakespeare plays, and I thought I'd share.

Henry IV Part 2: Abridged

Lord Baldoph: The rebels won!

Travis: No, the rebels lost.

Northumberland: This sucks. My son is dead. We’ll mount another attack.

Archbishop of York & company: We are also planning some shit.

***

Falstaff: I may be a drunken old lout, but I’m a knight, by Jove.

Lord Chief J
...more
Dan
Yet again, Henry IV Part II is not truly the story of Henry IV, but it does contain his signature line, "Heavy is the head..." This is the conclusion of the story of Hal's journey from a spoiled rich brat palling around with a criminal class to King of England. Falstaff yet again gets the majority of the lines in this play and most of them are about drinking and whoring. By the end of Part II, for me the whole routine is starting to get old. Here we see a contrast between the sullen, taciturn He ...more
Cemre
Esasen oyunun ilk yarısında sıkılmış ve acaba Shakespeare neden bir bütün halinde yazmamış IV. Henry'i diye düşünmüştüm. Kitabın ikinci yarısı çok daha akıcı ve çok daha başarılıydı. Yine de hala Falstaff'ın sahnelerinin çok uzatılmış olduğunu ve onlar olmaksızın oyunun çok daha anlamlı ve akıcı olduğunu düşünüyorum.

Oyun, II. Richard'ı halkın desteğiyle tahtından edip tahta çıkan IV. Henry'nin ölümünden önceki son dönemi anlatıyor. Zamanında II. Richard'ın tahtan inmesi gerektiğini düşünen ve b
...more
Leila
I absolutely loved this play! I really feel like the first few acts are more about Falstaff than anybody else, which was very interesting. It also allowed me to see into Falstaff and get a better idea of who he was. I also really love him now! So the first part of the play was very happy, I felt. Act's 4 and 5 are beautiful in terms of character development for Henry V. You get to see him really mature within these acts (and, really, the whole play), from an immature prince to a proud king. I lo ...more
Brian Barbour
This is one of my favorites of Shakespeare's works for the simple fact that we get to see Hal come to the cross roads of his life. Henry V does a great job showing us what kind of man he becomes once he makes the decision to abandon his wild ways and accept his role in the Monarchy of England.
Amanda
Heartbreaking and inevitable. Falstaff's life leads to the same pettiness that Hal once enjoyed, but now cannot afford to even witness. Hal takes on more and more of a courtly life. The death scene of Henry IV, when Hal takes the crown and meditates on the responsibilities and losses of kingship, was so good -- and having to convince your own father that you love him! Hal says it and I believe it: "Uneasy lies the head that wears a crown." Hal is uneasy, and is two people; he is wise enough to k ...more
Carrie
I enjoyed both parts of "Henry IV", although Part 1 was my favorite. I do wonder if Shakespeare knew that this would be true. The ending of this play - which includes a Dancer apologizing for the ending - made me smile. I suppose that, even with a heavy Tudor bias, Shakespeare couldn't completely rewrite history and make Henry IV's death more exciting.

I liked his transformation of Prince Hal into Henry V, which really does seem to be the focus of these two plays - far more than Henry IV himself
...more
Nick Parkinson
With an interesting apology from Shakespeare about the play being "displeasing" hidden in the epilogue, Henry IV, Part II was sure to be an interesting read. Indeed, the eponymous king hardly features at all. Rather, it is Falstaff's humorous (yet pitiable) antics and his inexorable spiral towards rejection that captures our attention. The final heartbreaking scene - in which Hal is but a shadow of the witty, jocular reprobate he was in the earlier play (Henry IV, Part I) - reminds us of the sob ...more
Jeff
While I enjoyed this play I do think that the second part, as it is called, suffers in comparison to the first. I found the language in Part Two to be a bit thicker, harder to discern. I also am not a big fan of Falstaff, his consistent levity at Prince Hal's expense seems like it would not be tolerated as long and as often as it is. I think the overall theme of Prince Hal coming to the realization that it was time to grow up and turn away from the layabouts is a story that is consistent of wha ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Goodreads Librari...: Alternate book cover 3 12 Aug 05, 2014 01:14AM  
Happy or sad ending? 2 16 Jul 14, 2012 11:03AM  
  • A Bolt from the Blue and Other Essays
  • The Fall of the Athenian Empire
  • Moliere: A Biography
  • Brigadoon (Vocal Score)
  • The Mojo Collection: The Ultimate Music Companion
  • Novels, 1930-1942: Dance Night / Come Back to Sorrento / Turn, Magic Wheel / Angels on Toast / A Time to Be Born
  • Chamber Music
  • Goldilocks & Three Bears Sb-Apov
  • New Poems of Emily Dickinson
  • The Vanishing Newspaper: Saving Journalism in the Information Age
  • My Life As Author And Editor
  • The Holy Barbarians
  • Gidget (Gidget series, #1)
  • Tamburlaine
  • The Little Locksmith
  • The Spanish Tragedy
  • Samson Agonistes
  • My Lai 4; a Report on the Massacre and Its Aftermath
947
William Shakespeare (baptised 26 April 1564) was an English poet and playwright, widely regarded as the greatest writer in the English language and the world's pre-eminent dramatist. He is often called England's national poet and the "Bard of Avon" (or simply "The Bard"). His surviving works consist of 38 plays, 154 sonnets, two long narrative poems, and several other poems. His plays have been tr ...more
More about William Shakespeare...

Other Books in the Series

Wars of the Roses (8 books)
  • Richard II
  • King Henry IV, Part 1 (Wars of the Roses, #2)
  • Henry V
  • Henry VI, Part 1
  • King Henry VI, Part 2
  • King Henry VI, Part 3
  • Richard III
Romeo and Juliet Hamlet Macbeth A Midsummer Night's Dream Othello

Share This Book

“O sleep, O gentle sleep, Nature's soft nurse, how have I frightened thee, 1710. That thou no more will weigh my eyelids down, And steep my senses in forgetfulness?” 183 likes
“Thou art a very ragged Wart.” 116 likes
More quotes…