Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Animal Rights and Wrongs” as Want to Read:
Blank 133x176
Animal Rights and Wrongs
Roger Scruton
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Animal Rights and Wrongs

3.33 of 5 stars 3.33  ·  rating details  ·  30 ratings  ·  5 reviews
A revised and improved edition of a book in continuing demand.

Do animals have rights? If not, do we have duties towards them? If so, what duties?
These are myariad other issues are discussed in this brilliantly argued book, published in association with the leading think-tank Demos.

Why are animal-rights groups so keen to protect the rights of badgers and foxes but not of ra
Paperback, 224 pages
Published June 3rd 2004 by Bloomsbury Academic (first published April 1st 2003)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Animal Rights and Wrongs, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Animal Rights and Wrongs

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 93)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Scruton Scrutinized

Animal Rights and Wrongs: a review

In his 107 page "pamphlet" Scruton offers 4 components of moral thinking, most of which he conveniently ignores when considering the actual question at issue. He therefore begs the entire question.

The question is whether or not animals have rights; the most basic of which, many might argue, is a right to life. But Scruton ignores this most basic right and dispatches with it as if it were a side-note, treating it briefly and only after relative
More than done with this guy.
Has he never heard of, as Hume put it, "the unbridgeable gap between do and ought to do"? He leaps over it at least twice every chapter, and all his arguments come down to the same fallacy: this is how our (current) society works, so that is the way morality works.
And he is not even a cultural relativist - the only reasonable thing he appearantly needed so many pages to say was an echo of what Kant said many years ago (and I strongly disagree with this, but is not un
By far the most charming defense of animal exploitation. Ultimately unsuccessful but thoughtful nonetheless.
By far the most charming defense of animal exploitation. Ultimately unsuccessful but thoughtful nonetheless.
Nov 27, 2008 Flavio rated it 5 of 5 stars
Gli animali hanno diritti?
Cortina Raffaello, 2008
Travis marked it as to-read
Nov 05, 2015
Carolina Neves de amaral
Carolina Neves de amaral marked it as to-read
Oct 29, 2015
Dylan Groves
Dylan Groves marked it as to-read
Sep 05, 2015
Meredith marked it as to-read
Aug 22, 2015
Whitney marked it as to-read
Aug 19, 2015
eden added it
Jul 18, 2015
Miles Rind
Miles Rind marked it as to-read
Jul 01, 2015
Willy Hagi
Willy Hagi marked it as to-read
Jun 01, 2015
Carrie Jolly
Carrie Jolly marked it as to-read
May 27, 2015
Lynne marked it as to-read
Mar 31, 2015
Axel Byberg Fosse
Axel Byberg Fosse marked it as to-read
Feb 06, 2015
Gabe marked it as to-read
Jan 07, 2015
Adrian Mróz
Adrian Mróz marked it as to-read
Nov 16, 2014
Donald Forster
Donald Forster marked it as to-read
Sep 20, 2014
« previous 1 3 4 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
Roger Vernon Scruton is a self-employed English philosopher and writer, known in the UK as a key figure in the "New Right" in the 1980s and 1990s. He currently lives in rural Wiltshire, but was a professor of philosophy at Boston University from 1992 to 1995, and subsequently a professor at Birkbeck College, London.
More about Roger Scruton...

Share This Book