by
3.7 of 5 stars
After a close encounter of the sexy kind,
Chloe discovers her wild side. . . .

Plain-Jane Chloe Sinclair has never been bad . . . ... read full description

reviews

Dec 22, 2009
Juliana rated it: 3 of 5 stars
(3.5 stars) This is the second book that I have read by Linda Francis Lee and I'm very conflicted about what rating to give it - 3.5 stars (worth reading once, recommendable, check it out from the library) or 4 stars (will want to read it again, buy a copy of my own if I read a borrowed one). The other book was Looking for Lacey and it was really not a recommendable book, except for the side romance going on between the heroine's high school daughter and her classmate - that was literally the on More...
0 comments like (1 person liked it)
Sep 12, 2009
Joy rated it: 4 of 5 stars
I liked this better than the first one. In here we see a transformation, and realistic character developments. Our heroine Chloe, whom we met at the first book of this series was always described as a china doll in physical appearance, and the words used by her grandmother are "plain, sensible, and smart" and all her life she grew up believing that "Men cheat, lie, and leave". She clearly has intimacy issues until she decides to take a plunge and do something reckless, someth More...
0 comments like (1 person liked it)
May 19, 2011
RomReader rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Plain & somewhat prudish El Paso local station manager almost has sex in hotel bathroom with attractive man who she finds out next day works for interested but ruthless buyer of their tv station. Although it started as a case of mistaken identity, hero goes on with the pretense that he just works for the buyer but regrets it when he becomes emotionally involved with heroine. BUT other things get in the way...like the Bachelor-type show they're trying to put on as last-ditch effort to save the st More...
May 06, 2009
Alicia rated it: 3 of 5 stars
The two main characters are likable and engaging - it's easy to relate to Chloe, the female lead. A fun plot that includes mistaken identity, strong attraction, and friends met in the first book of the trilogy make this a solid read. There was one part, however, that made absolutely no sense, or rather it made sense only with a gigantic leap on the part of the reader. I had to re-read the page several (that's 5-7) times before I convinced myself that I was reading it correctly.
Apr 22, 2011
Brigette rated it: 3 of 5 stars
I like the book. The story of Chloe and Sterling. Her fears to let men come in into her life and the problems of Sterling known for his name and power and give up to his name for a month..... The book has romance, fears, and much more.
Aug 21, 2011
Susan (susayq) rated it: 3 of 5 stars
I didn't like this one as much as the first one. I think Chloe got over her anger too quickly towards Sterling and the lie he had told. Not a bad read though :)
0 comments like (1 person liked it)
Nov 12, 2008
Tressa rated it: 2 of 5 stars
Chloe Sinclair and Sterling Prescott met in an interesting and unusual manner. Unfortunately, as the book progressed, I was distracted by how the characters acted. Though the setting is modern-day El Paso, Texas, the characters, especially Sterling, acted asynchronously. Sterling's actions did not seem correct for a corporate raider. In fact, he seemed like a throwback to an idealized historical time. Also, I felt that Chloe acted in ways that didn't seem what a modern and independent woman More...
Jul 27, 2011
Jennifer added it
Fun and sexy! Likable characters.
Sep 02, 2011
Ivana rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Worth every penny!
Sep 01, 2009
Heather rated it: 1 of 5 stars
throbber
Jan 29, 2012
Nefret rated it: 2 of 5 stars
Auch das zweite Buch der Reihe ist nicht besser als der Vorgänger. Aber als Krankenbettlektüre reicht es allemal, da die Seite nur schnell überflogen werden müssen.
Sep 08, 2011
Patricia rated it: 3 of 5 stars
light reading... guilty peasure hahah!!
Feb 09, 2012
Jaime added it
Feb 07, 2012
Angelica rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Feb 07, 2012
Romanceh rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Feb 06, 2012
Stacey rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Feb 02, 2012
Lyndsie rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Feb 02, 2012
Blanka rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Jan 31, 2012
Christine rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Jan 28, 2012
Timothy rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Jan 29, 2012
Eva marked it as to-read
Jan 24, 2012
Jamie rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Jan 22, 2012
Alyssa rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Jan 19, 2012
Trish rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Jan 15, 2012
Lucia rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Jan 14, 2012
Jasmine rated it: 5 of 5 stars
Jan 14, 2012
Flor rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Jan 12, 2012
Cornflower rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Jan 12, 2012
Sylvia rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Jan 09, 2012
Sharon rated it: 4 of 5 stars