Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Three Essays on Religion: Nature, the Utility of Religion, Theism” as Want to Read:
Three Essays on Religion: Nature, the Utility of Religion, Theism
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Three Essays on Religion: Nature, the Utility of Religion, Theism

3.90  ·  Rating Details  ·  39 Ratings  ·  3 Reviews
Published between 1850 and 1870, these essays by English social and political philosopher John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) offers his most sustained analysis of religious belief. Though not prepared to abandon the idea of an overall design in nature, Mill nonetheless argues that its violence and capriciousness mitigate against moral ends in nature's workings. Moreover, any des ...more
Paperback, 257 pages
Published May 1st 1998 by Prometheus Books (first published 1874)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Three Essays on Religion, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Three Essays on Religion

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 104)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
WT Sharpe
Aug 01, 2015 WT Sharpe rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
One of the most challenging books I've read on the subject; not as immediately accessible as was his book, On Liberty. Mills did not treat this subject lightly, but gave considerable thought to his nuanced conclusions. You might not agree with his opinions, but you will know you have been treated to the musings of a first rate mind. Highly recommended.
Brance Long
Harder than I thought.
Brad
Aug 13, 2010 Brad rated it it was amazing
Mill is concise and convincing. It is hard to imagine that someone could articulate what he says in a more effective manner.
Christopher Fear
Christopher Fear marked it as to-read
Apr 07, 2016
David
David marked it as to-read
Apr 02, 2016
Alexander Eichner
Alexander Eichner marked it as to-read
Mar 12, 2016
Sarah
Sarah added it
Mar 03, 2016
Reader
Reader added it
Jan 17, 2016
Kerry
Kerry marked it as to-read
Jan 16, 2016
Brett
Brett rated it it was ok
Jan 05, 2016
Peter Daniels
Peter Daniels marked it as to-read
Jan 01, 2016
Sancho
Sancho marked it as to-read
Dec 03, 2015
Rebecca
Rebecca marked it as to-read
Nov 25, 2015
Bojan Dragićević
Bojan Dragićević rated it it was amazing
Nov 10, 2015
Corey
Corey rated it really liked it
Nov 19, 2015
Weston Becker
Weston Becker rated it it was amazing
Nov 04, 2015
Radhika A R
Radhika A R marked it as to-read
Sep 21, 2015
Tazeen
Tazeen rated it liked it
Aug 04, 2015
Daniel Taylor
Daniel Taylor marked it as to-read
Jul 14, 2015
Efi
Efi marked it as to-read
Jun 30, 2015
Shawqi Murad
Shawqi Murad marked it as to-read
Jun 29, 2015
Paula Agata
Paula Agata marked it as to-read
Jun 03, 2015
Ryan
Ryan marked it as to-read
Mar 28, 2015
Alexander
Alexander rated it it was amazing
Sep 01, 2015
James F
James F rated it really liked it
Feb 04, 2015
Jason Boffetti
Jason Boffetti rated it it was amazing
Dec 31, 2014
Marko
Marko marked it as to-read
Dec 01, 2014
« previous 1 3 4 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Goodreads Librari...: New edition 2 10 Jun 20, 2014 10:08AM  
57651
John Stuart Mill, British philosopher, political economist, civil servant and Member of Parliament, was an influential liberal thinker of the 19th century. He was an exponent of utilitarianism, an ethical theory developed by Jeremy Bentham, although his conception of it was very different from Bentham's.
More about John Stuart Mill...

Share This Book



“Supposing it true that contrary to appearances these horrors when perpetrated by Nature, promote good ends, still as no one believes that good ends would be promoted by our following the example, the course of Nature cannot be a proper model for us to imitate. Either it is right that we should kill because nature kills ; torture because nature tortures ; ruin and devastate because nature does the like; or we ought not to consider at all what nature does, but what it is good to do. If there is such a thing as a reductio ad absurdum, this surely amounts to one. If it is a sufficient reason for doing one thing, that nature does it, why not another thing? If not all things, why anything?” 0 likes
“If we believed that those agencies were appointed by a benevolent Providence as the means of accomplishing wise purposes which could not be compassed if they did not exist, then everything done by mankind which tends to chain up these natural agencies or to restrict their mischievous operation, from draining a pestilential marsh down to curing the toothache, or putting up an umbrella, ought to be accounted impious ; which assuredly nobody does account them, notwithstanding an undercurrent of sentiment setting in that direction which is occasionally perceptible.” 0 likes
More quotes…