Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Created from Animals” as Want to Read:
Created from Animals
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Created from Animals

4.22  ·  Rating Details  ·  59 Ratings  ·  7 Reviews
From Bishop Wilberforce in the 1860s to the advocates of "creation science" today, defenders of traditional mores have condemned Darwin's theory of evolution as a threat to society's values. Darwin's defenders, like Stephen Jay Gould, have usually replied that there is no conflict between science and religion--that values and biological facts occupy separate realms. But as ...more
Paperback, 256 pages
Published October 28th 1999 by Oxford University Press, USA (first published 1990)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Created from Animals, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Created from Animals

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 155)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
G0thamite
May 09, 2012 G0thamite rated it really liked it
Well, here is one man who understands the implications of Darwinism, without fear. (So also Peter Singer) Rachels rightly understands that Darwinism leads to the rejection of theism as a basis for moral values. In the same way, it leads to a rejection of human dignity and a "rights" basis for morality.

So, now that we have dispensed with God, we definitely suffer a de-valuing of human significance. Since Darwin, we now see that man is just a more sophisticated development of the animal kingdom, a
...more
Betsy Brown
Jul 17, 2009 Betsy Brown rated it it was amazing
Collection of essays I picked up in college during an environmental ethics course. I have generally found essays somewhat dry but this book is fascinating in it's arguments. For example, the section on the differences between humans and animals yields this:"How could anyone seriously believe that animals do not feel pain? After all, we have virtually the same evidence for animal pain that we have for human pain......So, on what grounds could anyone possible say animals are insensitive to pain?" ...more
Nathan
Jan 26, 2011 Nathan rated it it was amazing
What can I say? Nearly sums up my world view and the natural conclusions one draws when recognizing our progenitors are in fact close at hand and all around us. Reminds us also of the great humaneness of Darwin and just how strikingly beautiful his temperament was to those he knew and even the non-humans he encountered [his trigger-happy youth notwithstanding]. Whether Rachels' thoughts on moral individualism were articulated perfectly or likely to be adopted any time in my lifetime will remain ...more
Orde
Sep 17, 2014 Orde rated it it was amazing
Shelves: philosophy
I'm usually rather reluctant about the whole animal rights literature because I think that beyond compassion for other creatures there isn't really a case to be made. Now this book's about animal rights or more precisely about the moarl view of animals (the author prefers 'non-humans') and humans against the background of Darwin's theory of natural selection and hence the emerging continuum of all life as opposed to some seperate existence of humans that was reflected in the notion of a special ...more
Chet Lake
Dec 27, 2014 Chet Lake rated it really liked it
One of the best books I've read in a while, Created From Animals goes where few philosophers dare to go: the intersection of science and ethics.
Karlo
Aug 30, 2015 Karlo rated it it was ok
I'll just note that although it may raise problems for some, if you're not willing to accept the doctrine of special human dignity, whether it be based on the Image of God or some of its secular versions, you're left with no other solution but to grant absolute rights to all sentient beings, as Wright noted in his NYT review of the book. Rachels recongnized this, but proposed us no third solution. What I liked was his clarity of presentation.
Vasha7
May 29, 2011 Vasha7 rated it really liked it
Alexander
Alexander marked it as to-read
Jun 19, 2016
Steven
Steven marked it as to-read
Jun 10, 2016
Naomi
Naomi rated it it was amazing
Jun 09, 2016
Jesse Tiffen
Jesse Tiffen marked it as to-read
May 26, 2016
Rhet Toombs
Rhet Toombs rated it it was amazing
May 21, 2016
Emily
Emily marked it as to-read
May 05, 2016
Deanne Thomsen
Deanne Thomsen marked it as to-read
Apr 28, 2016
Kamil Loon
Kamil Loon rated it really liked it
Mar 23, 2016
Annie
Annie marked it as to-read
Mar 22, 2016
Diogo
Diogo marked it as to-read
Mar 20, 2016
Mark
Mark marked it as to-read
Feb 01, 2016
Gbx Nlk
Gbx Nlk marked it as to-read
Jan 17, 2016
Marnie and Bart Snyder
Marnie and Bart Snyder marked it as to-read
Dec 27, 2015
Gabi Bontea
Gabi Bontea marked it as to-read
Dec 22, 2015
Luke G
Luke G rated it it was amazing
Dec 01, 2015
Gozal
Gozal marked it as to-read
Oct 30, 2015
Gosa
Gosa marked it as to-read
Oct 29, 2015
Elizabeth Wig
Elizabeth Wig rated it liked it
Oct 05, 2015
Taylore
Taylore marked it as to-read
Sep 11, 2015
Joe Shmo
Joe Shmo rated it really liked it
Sep 01, 2015
Seth
Seth marked it as to-read
Jul 28, 2015
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
James Rachels, the distinguished American moral philosopher, was born in Columbus, Georgia, and graduated from nearby Mercer University in 1962. He received his Ph.D. in 1967 from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, studying under Professors W. D. Falk and E. M. Adams. He taught at the University of Richmond, New York University, the University of Miami, Duke University, and the Univers ...more
More about James Rachels...

Share This Book