My rating:

add to my books

The Murder of King Tut

by James Patterson (Goodreads Author), Martin Dugard

3.23 · rating details · 2,288 ratings · 574 reviews

A secret buried for centuries

Thrust onto Egypt's most powerful throne at the age of nine, King Tut's reign was fiercely debated from the outset. Behind the palace's veil of prosperity, bitter rivalries and jealousy flourished among the Boy King's most trusted advisors, and after only nine years, King Tut suddenly perished, his name purged from Egyptian history. To this day...more

Hardcover, 332 pages

Published September 28th 2009 by Little Brown and Company (first published January 1st 2009)

more details... edit details

Get a copy:

More…

There is a good chance some of your friends read this book. Sign in to see!

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Lists with This Book

The Other Boleyn Girl by Philippa Gregory

The Boleyn Inheritance by Philippa Gregory

Most Inaccurate Historical Fiction

7th out of 42 books — 123 voters

What Should I Read in 2012?

165th out of 346 books — 224 voters

More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,989)

filter | sort: default (?) | rating details

Mar 26, 2010

Janet added it

Shelves: failed-attempts

What is with Patterson's writing style? There were 25 chapters in the first hundred pages! I felt like I was a Big Girl reading a Chapter Book for the first time. Every time I turned around there was another chapter. These constant interruptions prevented me from getting into any of the three stories (Patterson's "I'm so great I wrote this book," Carter's discovery of the tomb, and Tut's life) taking place. Finally I gave up in disgust.

like 2 likes

· see review

Dec 31, 2009

Kevin rated it

Recommends it for: No

Recommended to Kevin by: Linda Tepper

I'm half way through with the book and like a few of other reviewers have mentioned.....as soon as I read how much time and effort went into the researching of this book, my cynical side came out...I'm thinking don't tell me how much time you put into it but let me gauge that for myself after I've read it....I'm no Egyptologist by any stretch but for a book that has been heavily researched it is definitely light on details...another thing I don't like is when the author places himself within the...more

like 9 likes

· see review

Jan 24, 2012

David Magnenat rated it

I do not like James Patterson's writing. Here on GoodReads I've noted that his Alex Cross character is cliche to the point of cartoonish, his prose is choppy and clunky, and his plots ludicrous.

"Murder of King Tut" piqued my interest because of the upcoming Tut traveling exhibit. I saw the 1978 exhibit and look forward to the new tour. I thought a quick review, plus some fun speculation, might be in order.

The book proceeds along three lines: events in Egypt before...more

· see review

Jan 15, 2012

Toni rated it

James Patterson writes mysteries, and he writes them well. However, he claims this book is a “non-fiction thriller.” It reads well and would have been a great page-turner if the claim to non-fiction hadn’t irritated me so much. (Note to Kaydeen: It is actually catalogued in the 932.14s! Personally, I would have considered it fiction--sensational but risky speculation with no reference sources listed.) Even a novice such as I knows no one has discovered with certainty what (or who?) killed...more

· see review

Oct 27, 2011

Joy rated it

A secret buried for centuries

Thrust onto Egypt's most powerful throne at the age of nine, King Tut's reign was fiercely debated from the outset. Behind the palace's veil of prosperity, bitter rivalries and jealousy flourished among the Boy King's most trusted advisors, and after only nine years, King Tut suddenly perished, his name purged from Egyptian history. To this day, his death remains shrouded in controversy.

The keys to an unsolved mystery

Enchanted by ...more

· see review

Aug 11, 2011

Nesa Sivagnanam rated it

Thrust onto Egypt's most powerful throne at the age of nine, King Tut's reign was fiercely debated from the outset. Behind the palace's veil of prosperity, bitter rivalries and jealousy flourished among the Boy King's most trusted advisors, and after only nine years, King Tut suddenly perished, his name purged from Egyptian history. To this day, his death remains shrouded in controversy.

Enchanted by the ruler's tragic story and hoping to unlock the answers to the 3,000 year-old mystery...more

· see review

Mar 24, 2011

Taylor rated it

Review: Egyptology has always fascinated me and it is one of my biggest passions in life, which is why I snatched this book up in a heartbeat! King Tutankhamen (King Tut) is the most fascinating Pharaoh in my opinion because he has mystified us all.

Patterson wrote this as a three part story. It is told in present day by Patterson himself where he describes his journey in trying to learn and write about Tut as the boy king. The second story line takes place in the early 1900’s and is to...moreReview: Egyptology has always fascinated me and it is one of my biggest passions in life, which is why I snatched this book up in a heartbeat! King Tutankhamen (King Tut) is the most fascinating Pharaoh in my opinion because he has mystified us all.

Patterson wrote this as a three part story. It is told in present day by Patterson himself where he describes his journey in trying to learn and write about Tut as the boy king. The second story line takes place in the early 1900’s and is told by the Egyptologist, Howard Carter, and his amazing discovery in 1922 of King Tut’s tomb in the Valley of the Kings, which took him nearly thirty years to find. The last and most interesting story in my opinion takes place in 1335 B.C. and is based on King Tut’s story as a young boy king who married his half sister Ankhesenpaaten in order to secure his right as pharaoh once his stepmother, Nefertiti, died.

This has been the most difficult review for me to write without completely giving away the entire story and also because I came across some flaws in Patterson’s research. With being an Egyptian history fanatic, I was already very familiar with Tut’s story and the multiple theories of his death. I can’t reveal what I know without completely spoiling this book, which is why I stated before how this was such a difficult review for me to write.

Opinion: Overall, I found this book to be very interesting and easy to read. I thought overall this book to be well researched and thought out. I loved the pictures that Patterson incorporated into the book in order to paint a better picture for the reader of what Carter saw when entering Tut’s tomb. I did not know about Howard Carter’s story and his discovery of King Tut’s tomb and how many setbacks he had to face such as getting the funds to excavate, fending off tomb robbers, and fighting the Egyptian government for the rights to dig.

I would have given this book a 5 star rating if Patterson would have mentioned the multiple theories of Tut’s death. With this being a nonfiction book I would have liked for Patterson to have listed references in order to back up both his and Dugard’s theory. I will allow you to find out for yourself what Patterson and Dugard came up with for their final conclusion of Tut’s demise and why. I would really like to sit down and talk to both Patterson and Dugard and ask them to explain their reasoning but that’s completely wishful thinking on my part. Overall, this was a great book especially for it being nonfiction. I definitely would recommend this book to those who would like to learn about tomb excavation and King Tut’s story, but I would suggest once finishing the book to do a little research on the multiple theories of Tut’s death so you will know the multiple sides of the story.

Before I end this review, I would like to make one last statement. Egyptian history will always remain a little murky. We will never know the TRUE cause of death of King Tut because we simply do not have all the facts. Right now I have Egyptian history on my brain so I hope to sometime in the next day or so discuss more about King Tutankhamen and I hope you all will enjoy it and find it as intriguing and spell bounding as I do.

For more of my reviews visit my Historical Fiction site: http://allthingshistoricalfiction.blogspot.com/(less)

like 2 likes

· see review

Dec 07, 2010

Mindy rated it

I have never read any of Patterson's books. I see them every time I go to the library. They're all over the freaking book tables at Costco, and he takes up an entire bloody shelf at Borders. My only thought on an author that produces that many books that quickly is... How could all of his books possibly be that good without being repetitive?

When I saw this title at Costco, I jumped on it immediately. I've always loved archeology--Egyptian history was the trigger for my passion. So when...more

· see review

Sep 30, 2010

Megan rated it

· review of another edition

Shelves: read-on-audio, read-in-2010

This has got to be the most awful book I have read in a long time, if not my entire life. I have never read a James Patterson book, never had an urge. The only reason I picked this one up was because it sounded interesting as an historical novel. He bills this book as a 'non-fiction thriller'. This is complete and utter bulls**t. I was a history major in undergrad. I have read PLENTY of non-fiction books. This is NOT one of them. Patterson is making crap up as he goes along. He's making these re...more

like 1 like

· see review

Jul 09, 2010

Meghan rated it

I found this one in the nonfiction section of my local library (having been labeled a "nonfiction thriller" by the publishers), and was disappointed to discover that it was nothing more than historical fiction (emphasis on fiction).
I realize that the author claims he performed extensive research while writing this book, however, I was anticipating true (though outdated) nonfiction.
Written in novel form, The Murder of King Tut was interesting, but it was impossible to tell w...more

like 1 like

· see review

Jul 03, 2010

Judy rated it

I don't know what I was expecting, but this nonfiction "thriller" from James Patterson and Martin Dugard wasn't it. The book is written in three parts, but changes from part to part by chapter. That can be a bit annoying. The parts are "who killed King Tut, how, and why", "Howard Carter overcomes tremendous obstacles to discover Tut's tomb and gets himself kicked out of Egypt", and "the story of how I 'solved' a 3,000 year old mystery." Yawn. The stor...more

· see review

Apr 12, 2010

Laura rated it

I always have to remind myself after reading a James Patterson book that I have never liked any of his books so I should stop trying to read them! This book is supposed to be nonfiction and Patterson goes on about how he did so much research for this book, more than he has ever done for any other book. However, none of this research is evident. No footnotes, no end notes, no sources. He also mentions that his assistant did the bulk of the research (so not sure why he claims in other places h...more

like 2 likes

· see review

Mar 30, 2010

J-Lynn rated it

Shelves: adult-books, historical-fiction

This reads like any Patterson book, smoothly and quickly. He has attempted to make King Tut's unsolved demise into a best-selling murder mystery, a genre he knows very well. The book is compelling because what we know and don't know about King Tut is compelling.

The book is split into three voices--the down and out 19th century Egyptologist who discovered Tut's tomb when everyone said the Valley of the Kings had no more treasures to uncover; King Tut and the people who surrounded hi...more

· see review

Feb 15, 2010

Kenny rated it

Shelves: fiction

To say Patterson writes ten books a year is supposed to be a compliment. It shouldn't be.

Obviously, his co-writers do most of the work and I suspect in this case Patterson merely wrote the self-serving self-descriptive entries and broke the book down into his famous "two page" chapters, because he thinks his readers are such numbskulls that they cannot concentrate for more than sixty seconds at a time.

He may be right, if you judge his readers by the writer.
...more

like 4 likes

· see review

Jan 10, 2010

Tony rated it

James Patterson & Martin Dugard- The Murder of King Tut (Little, Brown and Company 2009) 2.75 Stars

Very little is known about King Tut. He became the ruler of Egypt when he was but nine years old, and this led to upheaval amongst his advisers. Although he seemed fairly successful on the outside, he somehow died at a young age and his name was mysteriously removed from Egyptian history. No one knows just how he died, but many suspect foul play.
Years in the future Howard Carter ...moreJames Patterson & Martin Dugard- The Murder of King Tut (Little, Brown and Company 2009) 2.75 Stars

Very little is known about King Tut. He became the ruler of Egypt when he was but nine years old, and this led to upheaval amongst his advisers. Although he seemed fairly successful on the outside, he somehow died at a young age and his name was mysteriously removed from Egyptian history. No one knows just how he died, but many suspect foul play.
Years in the future Howard Carter is trying to discover the location of King Tut’s tomb. It is the kind of mission that could make or break his career. He will become the laughing stock of many before finally discovering the location, only to find that it was not quite as he had expected it.
In the present James Patterson and Michael Dugard are scrounging for clues to come up with their own theory on this Boy King’s death. In their opinion it is a story of one of the greatest betrayals known to man.

I won this book in an online contest. It was one that I wanted to read, but wasn’t sure if I wanted to buy it, I am kind of glad I did not pay for it. The story kept jumping between three different time periods, the time of King Tut, the time of Howard Carter, and the present (featuring James Patterson himself). It was kind of like he wrote three different short stories and then combined them into one and separated them into breaks to make them seem more intriguing. I found it a little annoying and felt like he was trying to make it seem more intriguing then it really was. To be honest most of the book was kind of dry and boring. I only enjoyed the last third of the book. In the end it all boils down to a theory on the death, which for all we know has true parts to it, no one can possibly know for sure. There did not seem to really be a point in putting the present into the book as it just slowed down the plot, it may have been less annoying if it was just jumping between two time periods, not likely, but it may have helped me focus. Without the ending coming through to make it seem more interesting my rating would have been a two. As you can see I was not overly impressed by this nonfiction thriller, but I encourage you to pick up a copy from your local library and formulate your own opinion on the matter.

For more of my reviews check out my website, www.tonypeters.webs.com

Tony Peters
Kids on a Case: The Case of the Ten Grand Kidnapping
http://authortonypeters.blogspot.com/

(less)

· see review

Dec 29, 2009

Emrys rated it

Shelves: fiction

The writing in this book is abysmally poor and the historical inaccuracies were astounding. A certain level of bad writing might be worth overlooking if the plot were especially strong or if recent findings were revealed, but the plot is weak and the premise is not based on any archeological findings. This book is advertised as a nonfiction thriller, but it's really a fictional non-thriller.

The author begins the book with much pomp about how the materials were thoroughly researched ...moreThe writing in this book is abysmally poor and the historical inaccuracies were astounding. A certain level of bad writing might be worth overlooking if the plot were especially strong or if recent findings were revealed, but the plot is weak and the premise is not based on any archeological findings. This book is advertised as a nonfiction thriller, but it's really a fictional non-thriller.

The author begins the book with much pomp about how the materials were thoroughly researched so that the reconstructed story of Tutankhamun would be accurate and the theory would be sound. He then proceeds to write insanely bloated, inaccurate sub-Harlequin Romance prose about Ancient Egypt and Howard Carter. The two timelines are ocassionally interrupted by the author's modern-day soliloquies about how puzzling everything is when one is looking across the lake at one's yacht, thinking about how wealthy one is. I really don't care about Patterson's yacht or bank account, but I do find Ancient Egypt to be fascinating. Sadly, there are huge pieces of important information about Tut's life missing from this book, most obviously the simultaneous name changes of Tutankhaten to Tutankhamun and Ankhesenpaaten to Ankhesenamun. Those name changes were extremely significant, but Patterson ignores history and instead uses only the names Tutankhamen and Ankhesenpaaten alongside each other with no regard for accuracy. There is also no evidence given for Patterson's relationships between characters, relationships that either vary from historical evidence or have no historical evidence to back them up.

Such disregard for historical facts is behind Patterson's cheez-whiz of a "murder theory." My incentive for reading further was to find out what evidence proved his theory, but Patterson never mentioned any evidence. He never attempted to tie his theory to any evidence of any nature, which astounded me. When zero evidence is ALL Patterson and his "researcher" come up with after spending thousands of dollars and years doing HEAVY DUTY RESEARCH, someone owes someone a refund! There is a LOT of current information out there, and none of it is in this book.

If you must read this, check it out from your local public library. But don't be suckered into buying it!(less)

like 2 likes

· see review

Dec 24, 2009

Gaby rated it

Shelves: detective-and-mystery, nonfiction

If you're fascinated by King Tut and Ancient Egypt, you are sure to enjoy James Patterson's latest, The Murder of King Tut: The Plot to Kill the Child King - A Nonfiction Thriller.

The Murder of King Tut
This is my first time to read a work of non-fiction by James Patterson. In The Murder of King Tut: The Plot to Kill the Child King, Patterson tells us King Tut's story from three time periods.

Patterson first takes us to Ancient Egypt around 1490s B.C. when Pharoah A...moreIf you're fascinated by King Tut and Ancient Egypt, you are sure to enjoy James Patterson's latest, The Murder of King Tut: The Plot to Kill the Child King - A Nonfiction Thriller.

The Murder of King Tut
This is my first time to read a work of non-fiction by James Patterson. In The Murder of King Tut: The Plot to Kill the Child King, Patterson tells us King Tut's story from three time periods.

Patterson first takes us to Ancient Egypt around 1490s B.C. when Pharoah Amenhotep the Magnificent, King Tut's grandfather, ruled Egypt. He shows us the decadence and style of governance under Pharoah Amenhotep IV and Queen Nefertiti's reign and gives us a glimpse of what King Tutankhamen faced during his reign. Next Patterson focuses on the 1880s onward where he paints a clear picture of the ups and downs of Howard Carter's career in Egyptian archeology, his excavation of the Valley of the Kings and his discovery of King Tut's tomb. Patterson also focuses on the present and shares what he went through as he searched for the truth behind King Tutankhamen's death.

Patterson writes as though he was a fly on the wall, watching the events of Tutankhamen's life unfold. He does not skimp on details and we read about the unsavory details of the lives of the pharoahs, their wives, consorts, and his unscrupulous advisors. I enjoyed the conversations that he extrapolated - Patterson takes you to right to Egypt and you share Tutankhamen's fear and uncertainty as he takes on his role as a young pharoah. I sympathized with the young Pharoah and his half sister and wife, Ankhesenpaaten. Patterson's hypothesis as to Ankhesenpaaten's death does not seem sufficiently substantiated to me. I would love to learn the truth about what happened to her after Tutankhamen passed away and she ruled as Pharoah. Did she really attempt an alliance? Was her burial truly that ignominious? Ankhesenpaaten was one of my favorite characters in the book. My only criticism of The Murder of King Tut is that I don't feel that Patterson's fully substantiated his inferences about Ankhesenpaaten's role in King Tut's demise.

Publisher: Little, Brown and Company (September 28, 2009), 352 pages.
Review copy provided by the publisher.

Patterson writes as though he was a fly on the wall, watching the events of Tutakhamen's life unfold. He does not skimp on details and we read about the unsavory details of the lives of the pharoahs, their wives, consorts, and his unscrupulous advisers. I enjoyed the conversations that he extrapolated - Patterson takes you to right to Egypt and you share Tutukhamen's fear and uncertainty as he takes on his role as a young pharoah. I sympathized with the young Pharoah and his half sister and wife, Ankhesenpaaten. Patterson's hypothesis as to Ankhesenpaaten's death does not seem sufficiently substantiated to me. I would love to learn the truth about what happened to her after Tutakhamen passed away and she ruled as Pharoah. Did she really attempt an alliance? Was her burial truly that ignominious? Ankhesenpaaten was one of my favorite characters in the book. My only criticism of The Murder of King Tut is that I don't feel that Patterson's fully substantiated his inferences about Ankhesenpaaten's role in King Tut's demise.

Publisher: Little, Brown and Company (September 28, 2009), 352 pages.
Review copy provided by the publisher.(less)

· see review

Dec 13, 2009

Lydia Presley rated it

Shelves: egypt, fiction, non-fiction, mystery

In The Murder of King Tut James Patterson attempts to solve the mystery of King Tut's death by approaching it the way he approaches mysteries solved by Alex Cross, for example. This book has three distinct timelines - 1300BC, early 1900's and present day time. As might be expected the first timeline revolves around Nefertiti and King Tut, the second timeline around Carter and his discovery of King Tut's tomb and the final timeline revolves around James Patterson and his research (and thankfull...more

· see review

Nov 13, 2009

Richard Lollar rated it

Recommends it for: People who like Egypt and archaeology.

Recommended to Richard by: I read all Mr. Patterson's work.

Nothing really new. James Patterson and Martin Dugand's flipping back and forth from the time of the Pharoahs to the end of the 1800's and start of the 1900's to tell Howard Carter's story and finally to modern time to tell James Patterson's story was interesting. However, having multiple chapters in a row of two or three pages concerning the same character made for a chopped up presentation. Since many of the sequential chapters were set at the same time, they could have easily been one chapter...more

like 1 like

· see review

Nov 08, 2009

Aaron rated it

Put your seat belts on because this is going to be a bumpy review. In all his arrogance, Patterson claims to have done a great deal of research as he and Martin Dugard try to solve the mystery of the boy king, Tutankhamun. This is not non-fiction as it claims to be, but historical fiction. The tale is told on three levels: chapters highlighting how Patterson visited the recent controversial Tut exhibit that toured America a couple of years ago, chapters that introduce readers to the life of arch...morePut your seat belts on because this is going to be a bumpy review. In all his arrogance, Patterson claims to have done a great deal of research as he and Martin Dugard try to solve the mystery of the boy king, Tutankhamun. This is not non-fiction as it claims to be, but historical fiction. The tale is told on three levels: chapters highlighting how Patterson visited the recent controversial Tut exhibit that toured America a couple of years ago, chapters that introduce readers to the life of archaeologist and Tut tomb founder Howard Carter, and chapters covering the short life of Tut himself.

The writing is light and breezy as most of Pattersons other works, which makes it a comfortable and quick read. The main problem is that the book is simply full of errors. It is clear that Patterson and Dugard only did a cursory search of information about Tut and his family and the events surrounding his death as most of what is presented is connected to out of date theories. For example, the vizier Aye, which is traditionally spelled Ay, is generally considered the father of Nefertiti (Tut's step mother). It is quite bothersome to see Patterson have him practically ruling over her through most of the early part of the book.

It is generally believe that Tut lived for quite some time as he ruled, and he and his wife are considered models of ancient romance. During his reign, much was done to reinstate the gods and both he and his wife Ankhesanamun dropped the Aten from their names to be replaced by the traditional lord of the gods Amun. As a result, major holes are punched into the theories presented by Patterson and Dugard as to who killed the boy king.

Howard Carter is also presented as a talented archaeologist who worked hard to find success and was beaten down by others. In some ways, this was true, but he was also considered by many of his contemporaries to be arrogant and boorish. Few wanted to work with him or respected him before and after the finding of Tut's tomb. He is well-known and respected for the findings, but he was not well-loved.

To be honest, it almost feels like Patterson and Dugard basically sat down and watched The Face of Tutankhamun, a pretty good, but outdated 3-part documentary put out by the BBC in 1993. Much of the proposed theories in the book are similar, though many have been overruled by new scientific techniques and further findings in the field. For example, the head injury cited in the book as possibly playing a major role during his death is now believed to have been caused by the embalming process after Tut's skull has been examined with modern MRI technology.

It irks me that a book filled with this many errors is being marketed as non-fiction, particularly in light of the fact that the format of the presentation is novelization. Those with any knowledge of ancient Egypt's 18th Dynasty will see the wholes, and the general public will find themselves misled. Writers of historical fiction are allowed to take liberty with the facts as the storytelling is at the core of the presentation. Writers of non-fiction should not since they are presenting things as being fact. This is the first time I have not enjoyed Patterson ... I am actually disgusted. He should be ashamed and should maybe consider actually contacting an Egyptologist if he would like to try this again.

Those looking for great mysteries set in King Tut's time, should read the Lord Meren series by Lynda S. Robinson. There is also the mystery series by Lauren Haney that focuses on Lt. Bak, a Medjay detective during the time of Hatshepsut. Other great writers with stories centering around ancient Egypt include Judith Tarr, Pauline Gedge, and Michelle Morin.

For those looking for mysteries relating to archaeologist, the best choice is the Amelia Peabody series by Elizabeth Peters, the pen name of well-respected egyptologist Barbara Mertz. Both Amelia and Dr. Mertz would greatly disagree with the view of Carter presented in Patterson's work.

As for looking for biographies about Nefertiti, Tut, Akenaten, or any other of the people presented in the book, there is no shortage of great works by specialists in the field. Any of them would be better than this.(less)

like 8 likes

· see review

Oct 24, 2009

Kevin rated it

It's been years since I've read a James Patterson book. Even longer since I feel I've truly enjoyed one. Sure, they're a quick read. Good beach fare. But, after a while, all his Alex Cross or Women's Murder Club books feel the same. I can't remember the plot from one or another at all. It feels like one mass story with a body count that rivals a world war.

So, imagine my surprise when I saw that he was writing about King Tut. Imagine my even greater surprise when I read the jacket and...more

like 1 like

· see review

Aug 01, 2009

Christine (booktumbling) rated it

James Patterson begins The Murder of King Tut with a short author’s note emphasizing the tremendous research that went into writing this “nonfiction thriller”. Teaming with fellow author Martin Dugard, travels to London, Tut’s tomb and studying books and information online gave the authors the historical perspective to turn facts into a fast-paced novel that reads like fiction.

The book covers three time periods:

* The present and how the idea monopolized Mr. Patterson...moreJames Patterson begins The Murder of King Tut with a short author’s note emphasizing the tremendous research that went into writing this “nonfiction thriller”. Teaming with fellow author Martin Dugard, travels to London, Tut’s tomb and studying books and information online gave the authors the historical perspective to turn facts into a fast-paced novel that reads like fiction.

The book covers three time periods:

* The present and how the idea monopolized Mr. Patterson’s thoughts and time.
* 1891 – 1939 London/Egypt and how the quest for discovering a virgin tomb, ultimately King Tut’s tomb, monopolized the life of Howard Carter
* 1492 BC to 1319 BC Egypt and how the duty of being pharaoh monopolized the life of a young Tutankhamen

This is a straight-forward story which moves at a very fast pace. Yet, there is just enough detail concerning characters and setting that I had no trouble in picturing the great pyramids or empathizing the boy king’s plight. Explanations are given as to why young Tut married his half sister, why the tomb was so difficult to find and why there seemed to be an attempt to erase history of Tutankhamen. Tut’s ability to lead was just developing when he mysteriously died during the night.

The story of Howard Carter is also well-presented. Though he was not the most gracious of men, his zeal for all things Egypt advanced him from being a sketch artist of other men’s findings to being commissioned to conduct his own excavations. His gained knowledge over the years brought him to the highest honor but his lack of bedside manner plundered him to a street corner artist looking for his next meal. He never lost sight of his goal and through luck and determination was given another chance to discover the great Tut’s tomb. Actual snippets from Mr. Carter and some of his associates notes are included in the book (observations of Mr. Carter leave something to be desired).

The jump from time period to time period could have been confusing but I did not have any problems leaving one set of characters and picking up where I left off with another group from a previous chapter. The book is not very long or extravagantly detailed but I did learn a couple of interesting facts and it did peak my curiosity. And the Mr. Patterson divulges his own theory on what exactly happened to the king. Makes sense to me but I now may want to conduct my own investigation.(less)

· see review

Oct 13, 2010

Shaunesay Eslanai rated it

I don't think it should be advertised as a non-fiction thriller, there's not a single source reference anywhere in the book and he makes a lot of assumptions. So he was interested in the story and wanted to write his version of it, okay, that's fine, do it as a novel. It is a mediocre effort in an area where so much work and speculation by experts in the field has already happened. Quite honestly it comes across as Mr. Patterson acting like this was a new thing that had never been thought of b...more

· see review

Dec 11, 2009

Natalia rated it

Shelves: ebook, 2009, library

This book is set in three timelines, intersecting:

- Present day, James Patterson talking about writing the book - these sections boil down to "I'm doing sooo much research, look at how much research I'm doing! And I'm solving the mystery no one else could solve! Who knew being a best-selling mystery author could make me such a great armchair Egyptologist?!" But for all the research he says he does, the theory he puts forth sounds familiar. I'm not a hard-core ancient Egypt ...more

· see review

Nov 15, 2009

Haley Mathiot rated it

· review of another edition

THE MURDER OF KING TUT—THE PLOT TO KILL THE CHILD KING (Audio Book) by James Patterson and Martin Dugard, read by Joe Barrett
Genre: non-fiction thriller
Rating: 4.5/5

Summary: James Patterson tells a story in three parts—one part, the mysterious death of King Tut, the second part the discovery of his tomb by Carter, and the third part his writing, own exploration, research, and discovery of the elusive history of the boy king.

Thoughts: This is one of the bes...moreTHE MURDER OF KING TUT—THE PLOT TO KILL THE CHILD KING (Audio Book) by James Patterson and Martin Dugard, read by Joe Barrett
Genre: non-fiction thriller
Rating: 4.5/5

Summary: James Patterson tells a story in three parts—one part, the mysterious death of King Tut, the second part the discovery of his tomb by Carter, and the third part his writing, own exploration, research, and discovery of the elusive history of the boy king.

Thoughts: This is one of the best James Patterson books I’ve ever read (listened too). JP has taken an age old mystery and solved it. Yes, it appears as though the mystery of Tut is mystery no more. This book is very alive, even though the plot revolves around a murder. I felt like I was standing right there, watching it all take place. At times, I felt like the characters themselves. This was an amazing escape from reality.

Characters (5/5): Characters should be relatable for a book to be enjoyable, and the characters in Tut’s world were wonderful. They were highly developed right away, and were the kind that either you routed for or hated with a passion.

Writing (4/5/5): James is an awesome writer. I always love reading his work because it’s so lyric. His words flow smoothly and he doesn’t overuse too many phrases (though several “waves” of various things did “wash over” many people).

Content (4/5): There was barely any language in this book, which was a nice change of JP’s work. It wasn’t necessary, either. It just goes to show that the point can be made—and made well—without filthy language. There was a little bit of sex but it wasn’t too graphic, nor was it frequent.

Reader (4/5): I really liked the voice of the reader for this book. I’ve heard some pretty awful ones before, I’ll say that much right now! But Joe’s voice was perfect for this book. The only thing I didn’t like were the voices he put with the characters—the accents were pretty lousy, and when he put on a “fake” voice for the child characters, it just sounded a little silly. I was glad when Tut got old enough that he didn’t have to do that anymore!

Recommendation: Ages 16+ to lovers of fiction, history, nonfiction, thrillers, mystery, or to any James-Patterson-addict.
(less)

· see review

Nov 02, 2009

Tina rated it

Recommends it for: Older teens interested in Ancient Egypt

This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.

like 2 likes

· see review

Mar 25, 2010

Heidi rated it

ok- this is so bad, but we are almost done listening to it. I will update my review when we are done.
_______________________________
This book proved to me why I should never, ever read James Patterson. Firstly, the 2 page chapters are so irritating, that I wanted to bang my head on the dashboard every time he stopped the story in some random spot to move to the next chapter (0ver 100 chapters for a 350 page book??). Secondly, he interjected himself as part of the book with regular c...more

· see review

Feb 16, 2010

Carrie rated it

Shelves: non-fiction, book-club

Truly, I must be a librarian, because I knocked a full star off of this book due to its failure to provide references.

like 1 like

· see review

Jan 11, 2010

Heather T. rated it

Shelves: 50-books-2009

The fastest 352-page read in history, which is really Patterson's trademark. What I love about James Patterson's books is all the chapers are 2-5 pages long, making them so easy to read (and are really great for busy people who are then able to pick up a book and put it back down 3 minutes later, without having to get back into the plot 2 days later). In any case, I was SO excited to read this book. It combined my love of James Patterson (oh, "Kiss the Girls"....you make me swoon) a...more

· see review

Nov 19, 2009

Megan rated it

Shelves: audiobook

From my glowing review of The Heretic Queen, you have probably guessed I love everything involving Ancient Egypt. With that being said, I wanted to love this book but it fell incredibly short of expectations.

I started out so hopeful when, during the prologue, the Patterson stressed how much research he had done for the book. I’m certainly no Egyptologist but I was frustrated when, barely into the story, I started to notice several historical errors. For example, in Akhenaten’s death ...moreFrom my glowing review of The Heretic Queen, you have probably guessed I love everything involving Ancient Egypt. With that being said, I wanted to love this book but it fell incredibly short of expectations.

I started out so hopeful when, during the prologue, the Patterson stressed how much research he had done for the book. I’m certainly no Egyptologist but I was frustrated when, barely into the story, I started to notice several historical errors. For example, in Akhenaten’s death scene, Nefertiti makes some comments about how she will miss her husband’s “brain” as though that is the seat of his thinking and soul. Patterson rightly corrects this later by noting that Egyptians believed the seat of the soul to be housed in the heart but the damage was done.

That was just one of my gripes about this book and relatively minor in comparison to my largest problem with the book–I got more than a third of the way through and Tut had been mentioned in ONE of the scenes that took place in Ancient Egypt. ONE scene? Isn’t the book titled the Murder of King Tut? Patterson spent so much time setting up the family history there was barely any space left to actually discuss the reign and murder of his main character.

The book also has a frustrating format; the narrative has two separate tracks–one set in Ancient Egypt and the other during the time of Howard Carter (the eventual discoverer of Tut’s tomb. I have no idea why Carter’s story was included in the story; Carter is an interesting man and worthy of his own biography but it added very little to the book.

Even if I had ignored the poor format and historical errors, the story just isn’t compelling and never really takes off. All in all, this book was a serious disappointment. If you are looking for a good historical narrative set in the times of Ancient Egypt, look elsewhere because this book contains too little focus on the main characters. If you are looking for a good examination of the Murder of King Tut and the theories and facts involved, you should read Bob Brier’s work on the subject–The Murder of Tutankhamen–it is a much more academic look at the subject.

This book unfortunately falls into the “didn’t finish” category. I wanted to struggle through and finish but I hate to waste precious reading time on a book I find inaccurate and poorly written.

Audiobook Details

The reader, Joe Barett, does an adequate job. He isn’t an incredibly engaging reader but I don’t want to judge him on this book–I’m afraid I’m holding the poor quality of the book against him when it clearly isn’t his doing.

Run time: 5 hours, 59 minutes(less)

like 1 like

· see review

« previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 … 132 133 next »

new topic
Discuss This Book

topics	posts	views	last activity
Does James Patterson always write like this?	6	14	Jan 26, 2012 12:54pm

combine
Other Editions (18)

More editions...

Genres

Non Fiction

69 users

History

45 users

Mystery

42 users

Cultural > Egypt

13 users

Thriller

7 users

Crime > True Crime

6 users

Adult

6 users

Biography

5 users

Book Club

4 users

Cultural > Africa

4 users

See top shelves...

Readers Also Enjoyed

About James Patterson

Offical US Site
Offical UK Site

The subject of a Time magazine feature called, "The Man Who Can't Miss," James Patterson is the bestselling author of the past year, bar none, with more than 16 million books sold in North America alone. In 2007, one of every fifteen hardcover fiction books sold was a Patterson title. In the past three years, James has sold more books than ...more

More about James Patterson...

Books by James Patterson

More…

Share This Book

Facebook Twitter Your website

Pin It

Trivia About The Murder of Kin...

No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »

Groups That Shelved The Murder of Kin...

UK Book Club

1513 members

last activity 3 hours, 28 min ago

shelf: read

History: Actual, Fictiona...

389 members

last activity Feb 08, 2012 03:14am

shelf: read

Around the World in 80 Books

332 members

last activity 1 hour, 16 min ago

shelf: read

title link	preview: The Murder of King Tut
avg rating	preview: The Murder of King Tut Goodreads rating: 3.23 (2288 ratings)
small image	preview: click here [close]
med image	preview: click here [close]
BBCode	[url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/5819756-the-murder-of-king-tut?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book][img]http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1255637915m/5819756.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/5819756-the-murder-of-king-tut?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book]The Murder of King Tut by James Patterson[/url]

The Murder of King Tut

Friend Reviews

Community Reviews

Readers Also Enjoyed

Share This Book

Share This Book on Your Website