reviews
Dec 08, 2009
Many good ideas and interesting observations. Unfortunately, only rarely did they extend beyond the sketchy, blunt opinion and idea into actual arguments. That's a real shame, because that subtracts from Hite's (often) non-Joshi stance. This simply remains too amateurish, and not at all even the least scholarly.
That said, it was entertaining, an easy read, and Hite had very good points now and then (like why the witch in "The Dreams in the Witch-House" is afraid of a cross, More...
That said, it was entertaining, an easy read, and Hite had very good points now and then (like why the witch in "The Dreams in the Witch-House" is afraid of a cross, More...
Dec 09, 2008
(Originally posted on www.flamesrising.com)
Howard Phillips Lovecraft is one of the few authors of the horror genre who has been dissected rather thoroughly (Edgar Allen Poe being another). Kenneth Hite, who’s made much of his living as both a critic and a Lovecraft enthusiast, has a few things to say on the subject, and they make for very interesting reading. Tour de Lovecraft — the Tales is an engaging breakdown of all 51 of Lovecraft’s mature prose fiction, from 1917’s The Tomb to More...
Howard Phillips Lovecraft is one of the few authors of the horror genre who has been dissected rather thoroughly (Edgar Allen Poe being another). Kenneth Hite, who’s made much of his living as both a critic and a Lovecraft enthusiast, has a few things to say on the subject, and they make for very interesting reading. Tour de Lovecraft — the Tales is an engaging breakdown of all 51 of Lovecraft’s mature prose fiction, from 1917’s The Tomb to More...
0 comments
like
(1 person liked it)
Feb 14, 2010
It is a very opinionated and moderately idiosyncratic commentary on Lovecraft's fiction. It avoids most of his collaborations ("Under the Pyramids/Imprisoned with the Pharaohs" and ""Through the Gates of the Silver Key" are the exceptions, and I am not sure whether the former even counts as a collaboration), and focuses on giving a sold sense of the author's reactions to the story, leavened with a bit of history and a glimpse at other critical reactions. There are not pl
More...
Sep 07, 2010
This book was great for picking up trivia and connections between Lovecraft's stories. It's nice to have on hand as you're reading through Lovecraft (especially in a systematic fashion) and/or listening to the H.P. Lovecraft Literary Podcast (where I first learned about it).
I gave it 4 stars for being interesting and illuminating. That said, it's not very thorough. These are Hite's observations and bits of information he's dug up, it's not meant to be an annotation and it certainly i More...
I gave it 4 stars for being interesting and illuminating. That said, it's not very thorough. These are Hite's observations and bits of information he's dug up, it's not meant to be an annotation and it certainly i More...
0 comments
like
(1 person liked it)
Mar 12, 2010
What have I learned? That it's been too long since I read some Lovecraft. More systematic and rooted in broader knowledge, yet less compellingly written than Houllebecq's study.
Jan 15, 2012
Jan 10, 2012
Dec 25, 2011
Dec 15, 2011
Dec 02, 2011
Nov 30, 2011
Sep 28, 2011
Sep 24, 2011
Aug 27, 2011
Oct 02, 2011
Jun 27, 2011
Jun 27, 2011
May 11, 2011
Aug 02, 2011
Feb 02, 2011
Jul 29, 2011
Dec 20, 2010
Dec 08, 2010
Nov 19, 2010
Sep 03, 2010
Jul 07, 2010
May 01, 2010
Dec 06, 2009
Dec 05, 2009
Mar 18, 2010
