Jaguar Smile
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

Jaguar Smile

3.51 of 5 stars 3.51  ·  rating details  ·  971 ratings  ·  74 reviews
This edition includes a new Preface by the author to the 1997 paperback edition. In this portrait of the people, the politics, the land, and the poetry of Nicaragua, Rushdie brings to the forefront the palpable human facts of a country in the midst of a revolution. Rushdie went to Nicaragua in 1986, "harboring no preconceptions of what he might find." What he discovered wa...more
Paperback, 160 pages
Published June 1st 1997 by Holt McDougal (first published 1987)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 1,833)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Ms Bubbles SockieP
I loved the breadth and brilliance of Rushdie's Midnight's Children, admired his clever, biting and sly portrait of Benazir Bhutto (the 'Virgin Ironpants') in Shame, was confused with the immature ramblings of Grimus, bored with the Satanic Verses, but to some extent sympathised with the author's viewpoint in The Jaguar Smile.

One of many anti-American, or at least pro-socialist, books that seeks to cast doubt on US involvement on foreign soil in the name of political freedom and the expansion o...more
Amber
Este fue el primer libro de Salman Rushdie que habia leido. Me llamó la atención porque habia visitado Nicaragua un par de meses antes de que lo econtrara en una librería en San Salvador. Entonces, no lo leí por el autor sino el tema.
Este libro consiste de sus entrevistas y observaciones del gobierno Nicaraguense en la época de la guerra civil. Sin embargo, si piensas que el Sr. Rushdie es periodista, este libro te va a decepcionar porque a veces parece que el autor tiene predisposición hacia el...more
Chad Bearden
I didn't know much about Nicaragua or the Contra War of the 80s, as I was only in gradeschool at the time. I didn't pick this book up because I wanted to find out more about the topic either. I picked it up, because I thought it would a short novel I could finish off before the new year. I was the definition of a blank slate. Imagine my surprise when I realized that this was actually a work of non-fiction.

As a blank slate, I can't really rate this book based on how accurate Rushdie's depiction o...more
Mike
This isn't a badly written book by any means. Rushdie is, of course, a great writer, and when he's describing the nonpolitical people and places he visited in Nicaragua it's an interesting book. But what he had to say in this book overall really bugged me. I read it along with Kinzer's book about Nicaragua, "Blood of Brothers", and Kinzer has profoundly different things to say about the Sandinistas than does Rushdie. At one point, he actually mocks and criticizes an unfavorable story about the S...more
Paul
I discovered this in the Latin America section in Stanfords, quite unaware that Salman Rushdie had written it, and central America was somewhere I have always wanted to travel around.

Rusdie’s trip of three weeks was made at the invitation of the Sandinista Association of Cultural workers and he was there at the seven year anniversary of the Sandinista’s rise to power. While there he conversed with the President, Daniel Ortega, ministers (most of whom are poets) the owner of the recently closed L...more
Marie
Especially meaningful for me because I was in Nicaragua the same year as Salman Rushdie, so he reminds me of much and brings back memories.
Trebor
This is an excellent look at the Sandinista revolution and historical period from the perspective of a great and objective mind. Rushdie didn't go as a booster of Nicaragua, and though he remains skeptical throughout the book about press censorship, he ends up very impressed with the movement overall. The tragedy ends up the usual Central American tragedy of centuries...the US, which shamefully throws its own history under the bus in its efforts to control markets in its 'hemisphere' suppresses...more
Emily
Jun 21, 2011 Emily rated it 4 of 5 stars Recommends it for: Anyone who is travelling in Nicaragua
On 27 June 1986, in The Republic of Nicaragua v. The United States of America , the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that the United State’s aid to the Contras, the counter-revolutionary army assembled and armed by the CIA to fight the Sandinistas in Nicaragua, was in violation of the international law of war. As legal protégées we studied this case thoroughly in law school, as it was a landmark case that went some way in clarifying what constituted the “lawful” use of force and the “r...more
Thomas
Rushdie's literary journalism is an outstanding introduction to Nicaraguan culture. Written during the height of the Contra War, he is largely sympathetic to the Sandinista cause, but it is not without critique. Revolutions are not panaceas for societal or governmental disfunction. Too often they turn into what they overthrew. Still, Rushdie expressed optimism for the country that rid itself of an oppressive dictator, and regardless of the course of history, the Nicaraguan people continue to be...more
Brian
Mike's review on 06/18 is right on the mark. Rushdie, obviously has written this book after having very little exposure to the Sandinista government of the 1980's. Taking into consideration the red carpet treatment he got for the 3 weeks he was in Nicaragua, it's understandable why he may have come to the ill-informed illusions regarding the Sandinista that he puts forth in this novel.

Disregarding Rushdie's bias, this book is a well written behind the scenes look at the country of Nicaragua duri...more
Mat
I wanted to give this one four stars but docked one star because it is no longer relevant to present-day Nicaragua. Not saying that this is a bad book at all, it is in fact quite good. However, it does not rank among Rushdie's classics like Midnight's Children, The Satanic Verses of The Moor's Last Sigh, which are all fantastic stories filled with Rushdie's scathing tongue-in-cheek humour.

The Jaguar's Smile, the title of which comes from a famous Nicaraguan poem, is the first (and possibly only)...more
Becca
I went to Nicaragua in August and was very struck by the timbre of the place. Literally every kind of political, social and natural disaster that could occur, has occurred in Nicaragua, and yet, the citizens seem to wake up every morning with a great pride in their past and hope for their future. One of the most inspiring places I've ever been. I went with only a basic knowledge of Nicaragua's political history, so I've been reading up since then. I chose this book because I needed a break from...more
Ryan
I bought The Jaguar Smile a few years ago after having spent a bit more than a week in Nicaragua visiting a friend. I was a little surprised to see Salman Rushdie writing about Central America, and I think at first I thought it was a collection of fiction stories. I was pleasantly surprised to find that it was actually a nonfiction look at his stay in Nicaragua during the time the Sandinistas were in power in the late 80s. Apparently the book got a lot of flak for being too kind to Ortega and th...more
Shannon
it's partisan, sure. but that's not the problem: it's too light! i'll also grant that the book documents a two week stay by a non-specialist. that's not the problem either.

the problem: where's the background? rushdie is a expert in one thing; he's a great writer of fiction. and he should know that for three-dimensional characters, even in a travel book, the reader needs a clue on whose claims are suspect, who's not telling the whole truth (and which part are they omitting)? the good guys might...more
Miranda
Sterling journalism mixed with poetic ruminations on the political climate of Nicaragua in 1986. Rushdie can take just about anything and turn it into a metaphor that gives his reader a sudden, profound insight into whatever it is he's expounding upon (also a highly apropos technique for a writer writing about Nicaragua, a country of poets). My favorite passage, however, is when he doesn't poeticize experience but rather recogizes the extreme "realness" of existence in the face of making history...more
Bob Keller
Rushdie's first non-fiction foray, it's an account of his three week 1986 trip to Nicaragua as a guest of the Sandanistas, during their war with the US backed Contras. This edition includes a 1994 prologue in which he admits to being naive about what he was told and what was real, but he still overall was a supporter. By then subsequent elections had thrown out most of the rebel leaders and the movement seemed to have fizzled out. He gives them credit for walking away when they lost the election...more
Patrick McCoy
The Jaguar's Smile (1987) is Salman Rushdie’s first nonfiction book about his visit to Nicaragua in the heat of the battle communist Sandinistas versus the US government backed Contras. It is a curious book since it reads like a personal essay that exposes Rushdie’s political leanings, literary tastes and discoveries made in Nicaragua, as well as part travelogue. Rushdie is sympathetic to the cause, but also cautious and skeptical and he doesn’t swallow everything that is told or shown to him. B...more
Rachel
"To visit Nicaragua was to be shown that the world was not television, or history, or fiction. The world was real, and this was its actual, unmediated reality."

This book meant a lot to me because of the time I spent in Nicaragua. For someone less affected by the country, it might not be as good. Still, I thought it was generally well-written and presented a little-heard but much-needed perspective on the Sandinista government in the 1980s. In light of subsequent developments (especially Ortega's...more
Matt
The access allowed Rushdie because of his success as a writer is incredible. In three weeks time, he records the perspectives of many of the major players shaping Nicaragua during the '80s. If you want to focus in on the Nicaraguan summer of 1986, this snapshot is for you.
Raúl Aníbal
En el Rushdie rush, este libro lo devoré, practicamente. Una visita a Nicaragüa, Daniel Ortega, la Contra, etc. Vemos al Rushdie más ingenuo politicamente hablando, no por lo que demostraria la historia respecto a Ortega, sino porque realmente sus observaciones son ingenuas. Sin embargo, comparto mucha de su ingenuidad. Creo en que un pueblo tiene derecho a autogobernarse, creo que Vargas Llosa apoya gobiernos de derecha en nombre de la democracia, pero no de izquierda (aunque intente hacernos c...more
Gunnar
Rushdie always struck me as a blowhard. That was before reading him. Now, he seems smart and in touch.
Good writer, too. Making me want to check out some of his more well known stuff.
As for the content of the book, the basic premise is a three-week trip to Nicaragua in the mid-1980s, during US-backed Contra war.
Rushdie is sympathetic to the Sandistas and deservedly critical of the United Statees.
For anyone desiring to know more about one example of America's abysmal Central American foreign poli...more
علی
From Midnight Children on, seems that Roshdie’s preference moves tward the language rather than the narration itself. Comparing ”The ground beneath of her feet” and ”Midnight children” one comes to a more beautiful language but less interesting events.
در اثار رشدی زبان از زیبایی خارق العاده ای برخوردار است. واژه هایی که رشدی در زبان انگلیسی ابداع می کند و عمدتن مخلوطی از انگلیسی هندی- بریتانیایی ست، گاه به توجیه صحنه، عمل یا شخصیت در روایت کمک شایانی می کند. بسیاری از واژه های ابداعی رشدی در انک...more
Andrew
Never read any Rushdie, and I don't think this book (nonfiction) gave me a good sense of what his fiction is probably like. This is a short book about SR travelling to Nicaragua in 1986 during the Sandanista revolution. There are some pretty good portraits of key figures (like Ortega) and also a good sense of the history leading up to the revolution, as well discussions of Liberation Theology and the role of censorship during war, but the writing is often underwhelming and ah-shucks-y at times....more
Ross
I read this book in preparation for our trip to Nicaragua. Written during the 80s, Rushdie was obviously sympathetic to the Sandinistas at the time. My edition had an updated forward where Rushdie looks back at his commentary after the Sandinistas were out of power (and before they came back). It is more of a history lesson than a travel biography, but it still provides an excellent glimpse into the lives of the people and their country. That being said, I can't really recommend it unless you ei...more
Larry
I read this book after living in Nicaragua for over a year, It helped me understand some of the unsettling aspects of the local culture. It also focused me onto the reality that at least some of the prosperity and wealth enjoyed by the USA and other "rich" nations was gained at the expense of what are now called "third world countries" This book lead me to others which reinforced my conclusion. Among them: "The Country Under My Skin" by Gioconda Belli, "To Bury Our Fathers" by Sergio Ramierez, "...more
Stefano
A great overview of the Nicaraguan situation during the 80s. Rushdie is able to give a good perspective of the Sandinista revolution and the crisis with the U.S. of the Reagan era.
It is quite easy to see that the author is not objective in his analysis but that is what bring you to choose this book instead of an history manual.
The best parts are clearly the encounters and the discussions with the protagonists of the revolution (first of all Daniel Ortega).
Although it has more than 25 years old r...more
Mohit Mehta
I find it remarkable that Rushdie can fill 160 pages of commentary on Nicaragua after only a three week visit in 1986. His ideas reflect this abbreviated stay and his observations on the Contra War, the FSLN and the cultural politics of the Sandinista 1980's are incoherent and conflictive at times. Nonetheless, the most salient part for me (after living in Nicaragua for more than a year) is that what happened in the post-Revolution 1980's still has an impact on Nicaraguans day-to-day life more t...more
Tera
Salman Rushdie explored Nicaragua as other authors have done and reported honestly on the people’s struggle against dictatorship. There is a flury of poets and authors trying to describe the landscape and conditions the people live in. Surprisingly, it is often the ‘friend’ up north who restricts trade, medical assistance, or technology that would greatly benefit the people strengthening them against dictatorship. Rushdie wrote this non-fiction with his smooth and casual way many will easily und...more
Frank
I read this book while teaching English to residents on the island of Mancarron, Solentiname Islands, Nicaragua. In it, Rushdie recounts his three weeks in the country in 1988, the end of the contra war. The writing is good, but was somewhat biased towards the Sandinistas. I think that Kinzer's book, Blood of Brothers presents a more balanced picture of the politics and issues at the time.
Al
More direct prose than his novels, but the subject matter was unexpected. Focused more on artists amidst a revolution- sort of a 1920s Paris if the government was in turmoil. I was expecting more of a travel memoir. However, Rushdie strove to give a balanced account of his experiences and made no attempt to give an overarching or historical account, which gave his narrative credence and honesty.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 61 62 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Blood of Brothers: Life and War in Nicaragua (Latin American Studies)
  • The Country Under My Skin: A Memoir of Love and War
  • Beyond Belief: Islamic Excursions Among the Converted Peoples
  • The Heart That Bleeds: Latin America Now
  • Tropical Gangsters: One Man's Experience with Development and Decadence in Deepest Africa
  • The Road to Ubar: Finding the Atlantis of the Sands
  • The Case of the Pope
  • A Struggle for Power: The American Revolution
  • No Mercy: A Journey Into the Heart of the Congo
  • An Age Like This: 1920-1940 (The Collected Essays, Journalism & Letters, Vol. 1)
  • Down and Delirious in Mexico City: The Aztec Metropolis in the Twenty-First Century
  • Testaments Betrayed: An Essay in Nine Parts
  • Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History
  • The Culture of Terrorism
  • Hunting Mister Heartbreak: A Discovery of America (Vintage Departures Edition)
  • Journey Without Maps
  • Wild Coast: Travels on South America's Untamed Edge
  • The Marsh Arabs
3299
Sir Ahmed Salman Rushdie is a novelist and essayist. Much of his early fiction is set at least partly on the Indian subcontinent. His style is often classified as magical realism, while a dominant theme of his work is the story of the many connections, disruptions and migrations between the Eastern and Western world.

His fourth novel, The Satanic Verses, led to protests from Muslims in several coun...more
More about Salman Rushdie...
Midnight's Children The Satanic Verses Haroun and the Sea of Stories The Enchantress Of Florence Shalimar the Clown

Share This Book

“Happy birthday, Nicaragua. I drank a toast in the best rum in the world, Flor de Caña Extra Seco. Mixed with Coke, it was called a Nica-libre, and after a few glasses I was ready to take on the salsa champions and knock them dead. I went outside to dance.” 2 likes
More quotes…