A Handful of Dust
by Evelyn Waugh
|
|
Sign in to Goodreads to see your friends' reviews of A Handful of Dust.
discuss this book
friend reviews (0)
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
lists with this book
Where's the love? Add this book to your favorite list.
other reviews (showing 1-20 of 1029)
I work at a library and am privy to all donations that come through our branch. It’s not in the employee guidebook, but everyone does it. We are a pretty popular branch, if I do say so myself, and the influx of books is quite varied and full of gems. When choosing, I base my picks on three things. One, if I know that the book is good by some previous recommendation. Two, if the title catches my eye. Or three, the cover kicks my visual ass. Personally, it was option two. I’ve read “The Was...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
finished,
owned-and-still-own
Read in June, 2000
Now I know where Martin Amis got his writing style from. "Pastoral" would be a kind word to describe this work, as weirdly absorbing as it becomes. The basic premise mirrors that of many comedies of manners from around its time; wife takes apartment in the city and takes a lover, leaving the hapless husband at home. Wife feels guilty. Wife attempts to set husband up with a lover. Husband is oblivious. The repercussions are immense.
I got the feeling that Waugh was trying too hard at t...more
I got the feeling that Waugh was trying too hard at t...more
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
Read in September, 2007
This was my second Evelyn Waugh novel (after Brideshead Revisited), and while A Handful of Dust is a quick, humorous tale with some serious twists, it lacked the overall depth of character and insight that I had expected, given a writer of Waugh's talents.
The first half of the novel operates on a level that is almost strictly social satire. Waugh's portrayal of inter-war Britain is wicked in its force; every character is bored or disillusioned and they are all inevitably more i...more
The first half of the novel operates on a level that is almost strictly social satire. Waugh's portrayal of inter-war Britain is wicked in its force; every character is bored or disillusioned and they are all inevitably more i...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in August, 2005
As you’d expect from Evelyn Waugh, A Handful of Dust is a very funny novel. But this is very black comedy. Written in 1934, this is a biting and at times quite cruel satire on the aimless, bored, empty and hedonistic and lifestyles of the upper classes and their hangers-on. The Depression has hit so many are feeling the pinch, including Tony Last as he tries desperately to hold on to the crumbling gothic pile that he loves so much. Meanwhile his wife, Lady Brenda, is bored. So bore...more
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
bookshelves:
fiction
Read in July, 2007
I've spent much of my life narrowly eluding the works of Evelyn Waugh, unconsciously at that though I'm unsure as to why. Now, I'm even more confused as to that.
It's a slow day here at the ol' book store, and I was merely ambling down the line of fiction shelves when the cover art caught me. It really is quite pleasing. A jacket! I wear those. What a nice pattern, and ooo! a flower. Then, right there on the cover near the bottom, a NY Times blurb says "A vicious, witty novel." And...more
It's a slow day here at the ol' book store, and I was merely ambling down the line of fiction shelves when the cover art caught me. It really is quite pleasing. A jacket! I wear those. What a nice pattern, and ooo! a flower. Then, right there on the cover near the bottom, a NY Times blurb says "A vicious, witty novel." And...more
Like this review?
yes
1 comments
bookshelves:
post-1900s
Read in January, 2008
I read this book for a university literature module regarding British social change from the 30s to 60s, and found it very insightful into the lives of 1930s socialites. It is extremely similar to The Great Gatsby, although Tony's trip to South America near the end of A Handful of Dust changes the tone completely. Some believe it is Evelyn Waugh's protest against the realism/modernism debate of the time regarding literature, and how he wasn't quite sure where he stood. There are many clues in th...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
classics,
humor
It is appropriate that Waugh should allude to "The Waste Land," since A Handful of Dust is itself a satirical expose of the moral waste land that is modern society, a world drifting without the anchor of religion and tradition. But Waugh’s message is communicated both gradually and subtly, and with great wit. He seems always to select the perfect turn of phrase, and he creates extremely amusing and original situations. Take, for instance, the sad case of Tony Last, who, delirious wit...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in June, 2008
I guess this is supposed to be a tragedy of sorts, or Gothic as his chapter titles suggest, but Waugh treats everything so lightly that you finish it not feeling overly sorry for the poor man who is wronged, nor do you care much for the other characters and their "satisfactory" endings. It strikes me as a bit too callous, even for the "traditional" British way that affairs were treated at that time.
The only rationale I see for doing this would be as a commentary on the t...more
The only rationale I see for doing this would be as a commentary on the t...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in April, 2008
According to the Modern Library, this is slightly better than "As I Lay Dying" but no match for "Sister Carrie." I was pleasantly but completely lost a good deal of the time by the submersive approach to the between-wars society which Waugh makes look at once very musty and more libertine than our own--one where infidelity is treated as a natural stage of married life. It begins like a tart and too-grouchy Wodehouse and ends like "Heart of Darkness." The last thi...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in October, 2007
Wonderfully acerbic satire of upper-class life. In some ways very relevant to the present, where a large swath of America lives a bit like the British aristocracy of 70 years ago.
Still, enough has changed that I feel certain I missed a lot of the commentary, not understanding, for instance, the importance of some sort of community hearing about pig policy that has a prominent place in the story.
The ending is bleak, very bleak, maybe too bleak even for me (and Dr. Strangelove is one of my...more
Still, enough has changed that I feel certain I missed a lot of the commentary, not understanding, for instance, the importance of some sort of community hearing about pig policy that has a prominent place in the story.
The ending is bleak, very bleak, maybe too bleak even for me (and Dr. Strangelove is one of my...more
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
Read in October, 2005
I loved Waugh's wit and sense of humour, but the ending of this book really, really irritated me. I know that it was supposed to be ironic or whatever, but it was still an annoying denouement. And why in the world did Lady Brenda fall for a loser like John Beaver? Her husband was 100 times better. This book had plot twists that came out of absolutely no where. Tony and Brenda appeared so happy at the beginning of the book, so why did Brenda become so discontent? Mr. Todd was perhaps the mo...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in October, 2007
I'd only read Brideshead Revisited, so I didn't know Waugh's other work was so skillful and acidly funny as he skewers the English upper class. It always amazes me that British 20th century humor writers write such wonderful prose. The dialogue in this book is spot-on (how's that for some British slang?) I didn't really care for the ending--it's pretty racist (the hero goes to Brazil and the natives are portrayed as simple-minded savages) as well as not as interesting as the first three-quarters...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
read-and-re-read
This book has two endings, and that is the truly hilarious mystery of humanity portrayed here. The first ending is the intended ending, the one the author had in mind... the natural and ironic finality for the characters that had journeyed through the pages. The second ending is the result of an audience revolution. "Nay Nay Nay" they cried upon reading the author's original intent. "Recant, Heretic!"... he gave in... but mocked them in doing so... and the mocking of the s...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
I feel like these reviews are making up for all the book reports I didn't do in school!
This guy writes unusually: it's not the most flowing of prose, but the way he crafts his words- and his very faulted characters- makes you feel almost like a voyeur. This is another book that doesn't go exactly where you think it will, and what happens when things fall apart. As this is feeeling a little too much like school, I will stop typing now. But the ending- what happens to poor Tony- will HAUNT y...more
This guy writes unusually: it's not the most flowing of prose, but the way he crafts his words- and his very faulted characters- makes you feel almost like a voyeur. This is another book that doesn't go exactly where you think it will, and what happens when things fall apart. As this is feeeling a little too much like school, I will stop typing now. But the ending- what happens to poor Tony- will HAUNT y...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
historical
Read in October, 2007
Waugh once again turns his piercing eye toward high society...and once again creates a thouroughly unlikeable novel. Every single character is either completely cruel and selfish or an absolute idiot; both types are utterly unrealistically written. After Waugh killed off a small child just to demonstrate Brenda's unfeeling nature, I lost all patience with the book. Waugh mistakes unmitigated vitriol for a discerning eye, and lacks empathy for any of his characters.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in June, 2007
Maybe it's because I don't know the author, but I was not impressed with the writing. It jumped around from character to character with no ties. I think the jumping around from character to character was a set-up for the hallucination scene later. But we are all sharp people we didn't need all that useless set-up. The hallucination part was good and the book was funny at times. But I kept waiting for something great to happen and I was dissapointed each time.
Like this review?
yes
1 comments
Read in May, 2008
The first novel of his that I have read - one of my dad's favourite authors. And yet, I still found it a good read. A black comedy with jokes you have to look for (as is often the case). However, not to give away the plot, but I was rather unsatisfied with the lack of concern over the death of a minor character, and then the lack of confirmation over the death of a major one - but perhaps that's the style, innit. (Yes, I purposely put innit!)
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
I gave this book five stars, then looked over the other reviews and thought I should add a couple of disclaimers. There are some racist moments in the book and that's always repellent, but they're very brief and far apart. Waugh was a racist, but so many great creative people have ugly aspects to their character.
If you can tolerate that drawback, and enjoy a dark sense of humor, then I recommend this book.
If you can tolerate that drawback, and enjoy a dark sense of humor, then I recommend this book.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
The first part of this book is brilliant; the ended is bolted on. Waugh adapted a short story published in an American magazine for the ending and is it completely differnt in tone and structure from the rest of the book. To avoid violating copyright he had to write a second ending for the American edition. And it's not quite right either. Still this is a far better book than most.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in March, 2008
My friend and fellow angophiliac recommended this to me as one of his favorites. We can almost always recommend stuff to each other because we both love late 19th & early 20th century British fiction. Good, though not as humorous as Waugh can sometimes be. Rather sad, actually. Still, a light and entertaining read. I read it all on a rainy, cold, muddy March day.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment





















