Rate this book

Clear rating

1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars

The Princes in the Tower

3.77 of 5 stars 3.77 · rating details · 3,011 ratings · 193 reviews

"A surprisingly fresh & tremendously thorough contribution to the debate...Weir's book is, no doubt, not the last on this subject, but it might be the best...[She] constructs a devastating case...[&] brilliantly illuminates the nature of late-medieval political power."--
The Boston Globe

Despite five centuries of investigation by historians, the sinister deaths of t...more

Hardcover, 304 pages

Published January 3rd 1994 by Ballantine Books/Random House (NY) (first published January 1st 1992)

more details... edit details

Get a copy:

More…

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Lists with This Book

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)

filter | sort: default (?) | rating details

Jan 14, 2009 Lucy rated it 3 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: adult, history, richard-iii

This is my favorite book to mutter angrily at. I actually told my library that I lost it and paid for it so I could keep the copy I had scribbled angry comments in the margins.

That said, it's an excellent overview of the historical scenario of the time--it's very readable, if a bit pulpy. Unfortunately, Weir did not go into writing this book with an open mind--she went in condemning Richard, and it shows.

I read this right after reading Josephine Tey's excellent and eye-opening The Daughter of Ti ...more

14 likes · like · see review

Dec 08, 2011 Pete daPixie rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: history-roses, conspiracy-schmiracy

Having read the Bertram Fields 'Royal Blood' investigation into this fifteenth century murder mystery, I travelled back in time to examine Alison Weir's 1992 publication of 'The Princes in the Tower.' Of the two, I have to go with Weir's verdict and pronounce Dick III guilty. Here was a coup, perhaps with Buckingham's help among others, but with Richard's hands all over it. Bloody hands too at Stony Stratford. All these dark deeds undertaken on his watch. No surprise he had trouble sleeping at n...more

4 likes · like · see review

Jun 27, 2011 Orsolya rated it 4 of 5 stars

Shelves: wars-of-the-roses, library, history, own

The Princes in the Tower (these would be Edward V and brother Richard-- sons of King Edward IV and Elizabeth Woodville); is a fascinating and unsolved mystery (cue Robert Stack) which hundreds of years later, STILL raises eyebrows, bogs some minds, and interests history and non-history buffs alike.

The desperately unlikable usurper Richard III, who does have a claim to the throne as a decendent of Richard, Duke of York who descends from both Lionel (Duke of Clarence) and Edmund (Duke of York) wh...more

3 likes · like · see review

May 23, 2008 Kelly rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition Recommends it for: european history geeks

Shelves: history-british, history, owned

This book focuses around the short lives and mysterious death of the two sons of Edward IV and Elizabeth Woodville. (Who, as a fun little anecdote, Edward IV threatened at knifepoint to get her to marry him. In any case.) They were declared illegitimate after Richard III took power, and imprisoned in the Tower of London and were never seen again. Richard III supposedly had them murdered within a year of this time. Alison Weir does clearly have a bias against Richard, but I think that the bias is...more

4 likes · like · see review

Jan 20, 2013 Erik Graff rated it 3 of 5 stars Recommends it for: English history fans

Recommended to Erik by: no one

Shelves: history

Having read Tey's famous novel, I thought reading a contrary account by an historian would be adviseable. Besides, knowing a bit about the Tudors from Henry VIII through Elizabeth, I wanted to learn more about the first Tudor king, Henry VII. Finally, having seen Shakespeare's Richard III, I wanted to be able to compare his representation of the monarch with the historical evidence.
Weir certainly gives the appearance of being on top of the material, such as it is, regarding the reign of Richard...more

like · see review

Dec 02, 2011 Laura rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

This was an interesting book that covered the murder of Edward V and his brother, Richard of York, as well as histories of the reigns of Edward IV and Richard III (and a bit of Henry VII). The book is well-researched, and very readable. I also thought her source explanations were a good idea, and the family tree in the back of the book was also useful.

I would have liked a little more information on the family dynamics of Edward IV and his queen; the princes had many siblings and I wondered what...more

like · see review

Aug 13, 2011 Aaron rated it 5 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Medievalist Alison Weir sets her sights on one of history's most controversial mysteries with this volume. At the conclusion of the Wars of the Roses in England, everyone thought that things would settle down. The House of York had defeated the House of Lancaster and seemed firmly in control of the country with Edward IV ruling. The only problem is that Edward dies with his two sons Edward and Richard in the minority (ages 12 and 10).

Edward's brother Richard definitely was loyal during the civil...more Medievalist Alison Weir sets her sights on one of history's most controversial mysteries with this volume. At the conclusion of the Wars of the Roses in England, everyone thought that things would settle down. The House of York had defeated the House of Lancaster and seemed firmly in control of the country with Edward IV ruling. The only problem is that Edward dies with his two sons Edward and Richard in the minority (ages 12 and 10).

Edward's brother Richard definitely was loyal during the civil wars between the Yorks and Lancasters, but the loss of his brother with two young heirs provided him with a major opportunity to grab the throne for himself. There is no questions that he had the two princes taken and placed in the Tower of London, which would later gain a reputation of being a horrible prison. With that said, not everyone agrees that he was responsible for their deaths even though they disappeared at that time.

With her usual thorough research, Weir presents information from contemporary, later historical, and modern works that examine the question of whether or not the two brothers were killed by their uncle in an attempt to prove the truth.

Weir starts by presenting a historiography (the study of the study of history and the changing biases over time) to highlight how views about events have changed dramatically over time. This is largely due to the fact that there is little contemporary documentation that provided a clear statement of what happened to the two princes.

While she has no trouble in piling up the evidence against Richard, who ruled for a period as Richard III before being removed by the first of the Tudor kings (Henry VII), she is also careful to highlight how his enemies did much to demonize him further, even to go so far as to change painting to make him appear a hunchback with unequally-lengthed arms and a constant sneer.

Weir has a talent for writing documentary works in a narrative that is so comfortable that it sometimes feels like you are reading fiction. She always uses a wealth of quotations and information drawn directly from contemporary resources, even items such as household budgets, making the people living at the time come to life for the reader.

I really enjoyed seeing how the Tudors, who were actually really minor nobility in Wales until just a generation before becoming the ruling dynasty, came to be front and center.

Alison Weir never disappoints! This is just further evidence of that.(less)

2 likes · like · see review

May 10, 2011 Erik rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

I’m clearly a fan of Weir as both an historian and a writer of historical fiction. And I was no less impressed with her research behind the murder of Edward IV’s two young sons, Edward V and Richard, the Duke of York, at the hands of Richard III – who usurped the English throne during the tumultuous years now referred to as the War of the Roses.

Although there is certainly no surprise that Weir reaches her verdict that Richard is solely responsible for ordering the two princes deaths while locke...more

2 likes · like · see review

Feb 05, 2011 Jennifer rated it 3 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: first-read-in-adulthood, mildly-diverting, on-loan, non-fiction-ish

From the start, Weir states that she believes that Richard III is guilty. I've actually always thought this, based on the evidence, but Weir seems to go above and beyond. Other reviewers have said that she's quite biased against Richard, and though I don't disagree, I still feel that she has some valid points.

One issue I had with the book, though, is that it kind of reminded me of a History Channel or Discovery Channel special where they advertise it as finally solving a certain mystery, such a...more

2 likes · like · see review

Aug 23, 2010 Ali rated it 3 of 5 stars · review of another edition

I really enjoyed this book - and thought it absolutely fascinating in many respects. However I did get a strong feeling of bias against Richard lll from Alison Weir right from the start. Many of Alison Weir's evidence is taken from gossip and the annoymous Croyland chronicles which she assumes were written by someone on the council - which would give them more validity. Although I suspect her of a strong bias - something an historian shouldn't have - she convinced me - which I suppose is what th...more

like · see review

Jan 14, 2010 Donna rated it 3 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: biography, unfinished

I've started this book twice, now, and quit at about the same place midway through it. I give up.

Alison Weir is a masterful British historian and can be a compelling writer who breathes new life into historical characters, both in fiction and biography. (See, for example, Innocent Traitor and Mary Queen of Scots and the Murder of Lord Darnley--both memorable page-turners.)

The Princes in the Tower, however, seems to be written more for academics than for general readership. While it seems to fai...more

like · see review

Feb 22, 2013 Katherine Gilraine rated it 2 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Weir presents her evidence, but while she promised to examine it objectively, it's clear as soon as she begins on Richard's accession to the throne that she firmly believes him to be guilty. That is nowhere near objective, first of all, and secondly, she glosses over that Richard and John Morton had a falling-out over the war in France. Human nature is human nature, and if John Morton was keeping a grudge, then I severely doubt he'd tell Thomas More an impartial account of Richard's court.

True,...more Weir presents her evidence, but while she promised to examine it objectively, it's clear as soon as she begins on Richard's accession to the throne that she firmly believes him to be guilty. That is nowhere near objective, first of all, and secondly, she glosses over that Richard and John Morton had a falling-out over the war in France. Human nature is human nature, and if John Morton was keeping a grudge, then I severely doubt he'd tell Thomas More an impartial account of Richard's court.

True, if people detested Richard, they would have freely aired their ills under the Tudors, but that's hardly "speaking the truth", as Weir puts it. Free airing of grievances, yes. Truth? I wouldn't be too sure. Moreover, with the Tudors then moving forward to secure every Plantagenet heir, with the direct male line being mostly scotched out by the time Henry VIII was in power, people would hav very vested interest in not speaking favorably of Richard III, primarily keeping their heads attached.

The evidence does point to Richard III as the person behind the disappearance of the Princes in the Tower. But wouldn't the bodies of the Princes have been displayed? It was custom, one, and if the brothers of York killed Henry VI and displayed him after the fact, why the breach of precedent with the Princes, if they had in fact been killed at that time? In the late 1400s, knowledge of forensics was nowhere near sufficiently evolved to distinguish between a smothering and death by natural causes.

I enjoy Weir's writing, but this was heavily biased. I was, based on the intro, expecting to see both sides of it weighed equally, but the further I continued, the more anti-Ricardian it became. Now that Richard's skeleton has been recovered, it's a pretty good time to re-review the evidence in the case.

ETA: Upon re-reading, the book is even less palatable than before. The evidence is well-listed, yes, however, nowhere does Weir actually stop and analyze any other implications of what she says. She makes the evidence fit her theory that Richard was guilty. I'm no Ricardian as of yet, but I have a degree in criminal justice, and even a rookie cop wouldn't make half the logic errors that Weir had demonstrated. This is shoddy analysis. Considering that Weir's analyses of the Tudor era are fairly good, I expected better.(less)

like · see review

May 03, 2011 Rebecca rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

It was good, so good I actually managed to read it in two days. Generally, familial interruptions ruin my reading time in a good way. It did not seem to contain any shocking conclusions, however, I am no fifteenth century scholar or a novice historian of the English monarchy, so I could have overlooked them. I enjoyed it and gained a better understanding of the War of the Roses and pre-Tudor dynasty England. I tried to read her book about the War of the Roses but it became too complex and diffic...more

1 like · like · see review

Feb 12, 2013 lia rated it 2 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: history

I'm of two minds on ALison Weir's The Princes in the Tower. At first it was good, and descriptive. Weir explains her sources and chronologically guides us to what happened with the young princes. It means that we can get a good details of Edward IV and his reign and Richard III when he was still duke of Gloucester.

But it dwindled after that. It was like Weir was having personal vendetta against him. She passionately pointing out in every imaginable ways why we have to think Richard III is the m...more

like · see review

Jul 11, 2011 Erica St. Lawrence rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

On the one hand, Princes in the Tower is a great representation of Weir's research and storytelling capabilities. Her logic, as usual, is not only sound, but brilliant, and she makes her thesis defense effortlessly and clearly. At times, her conclusions seem so obvious that it's disturbing that such conclusions have only recently been made regarding a 500 year old mystery. Her research is well documented and easy to follow, as is the case with all her books.

On the other hand, you can tell that t...more

like · see review

May 04, 2011 Becky rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: tudor-obsession

One of Great Britain's age old mysteries - what happened to the princes in the tower? Most historians believe that Richard III had his nephews murdered so he could be king and all the evidence Weir brings certainly doesn't make me think otherwise. Granted, there could be evidence that supports another perpatrator, but I have yet to read that book. There are those that think Richard III got a raw deal - but what isn't debated is that he stole the throne from his nephew. He wasn't happy with being...more

like · see review

May 30, 2010 Wendy rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: history

A careful and thorough examination of the evidence related to the fate of the princes in the tower.

Weir does her best to be objective, beginning with a very thorough evaluation of the credibility of the major contemporary and near-contemporary sources. One of the things that this book makes clear is that the documentary evidence is scant enough, and some of the events just plain odd enough, that it's impossible not to bring some biases and assumptions to one's interpretations of events. Weir, a...more A careful and thorough examination of the evidence related to the fate of the princes in the tower.

Weir does her best to be objective, beginning with a very thorough evaluation of the credibility of the major contemporary and near-contemporary sources. One of the things that this book makes clear is that the documentary evidence is scant enough, and some of the events just plain odd enough, that it's impossible not to bring some biases and assumptions to one's interpretations of events. Weir, at least, doesn't seem to have any preconceived bias either for or against Richard III. To the extent she makes assumptions, they're about how people would have responded to the political and psychological pressures of the situation. Her treatment of questions like, "How could Elizabeth Wydville be so easily reconciled with the man who murdered her two sons?" or "Why didn't Henry VII make more of a fuss about Richard's murder of the princes?" seems very plausible. (Her assertion that Elizabeth of York, the princes' sister and eventual wife of Henry VII, actually seems to have been passionately in love with Richard III for a time boggles the mind slightly, but Weir actually seems to have pretty good documentary evidence for that.)

Weir also gives a good overview of the forensic evidence related to a pair of adolescent skeletons found buried under a staircase in the Tower of London in 1674. It seems almost certain that these are the remains of the princes, although one can't help but wish that somebody would just go ahead and do the obvious DNA testing and settle the matter once and for all. (A google search turned up a 2007 news article about a Ph.D. student who was seeking to match mitochondrial DNA from the skeletons with that from the hair of the princes' niece, Mary Tudor. I haven't turned up any follow up: possible the project is still working through the necessary logistics and obtaining of permissions.)

Weir builds a case that, while it might not be enough to convict Richard III beyond a reasonable doubt, certainly places the balance of probabilities on his being ultimately responsible for the princes' death. In any case, the book is both informative and a pleasure to read. (less)

1 like · like · see review

Feb 27, 2013 Bridget rated it 5 of 5 stars · review of another edition

I have read the book with a somewhat biased view, for I had already concluded that Richard III was responsible based on my own extensive research. It seems strange to me that so many reviewers are criticizing Weir for relying heavily on Sir Thomas More. She explains the theories of every contemporary account and then explains why her research discounts most of them except for More's. That is the job of any historian, separating logic from fantasy. More's explanation of where the princes were bur...more

like · see review

Apr 08, 2012 Kathy Mcanulla rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Alison Weir manages to write a fascinating book using carefully researched pieces of information from a period of history that has patchy first hand records. Amazingly she says that quite a lot of information still waits to be fully researched. The book is clearly written and has much detail. I personally feel that I absorbed only a small amount though, the period of history having very complex politics based on convoluted family relationships, and I was hampered by most individuals having both...more

like · see review

Jan 26, 2009 Anna Hanson Bevens rated it 2 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: history, biography, library-book, read-in-2009

This book is a hypothesis of the fate of Edward V and his brother Richard, who were 10 and 12 when they were shepherded into the Tower of London and never seen alive again.

Did their uncle, Richard III, have them killed? Was it Henry VII? Alison Weir's book is a thorough, well-researched body of evidence that definitely points to one person.

The book was scholar-dry to read, but you can't argue the research and objectivity behind it. Weir takes extreme pains to gauge the veracity of sources quote...more

1 like · like · see review

Sep 19, 2011 Melisende d'Outremer rated it 2 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: england, history, royalty, crime

This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here. Giving this one a go despite Weir not being a favourite author of mine.

So, I've finally finished this one. If I was hoping for something at least semi-objective, I was mistaken. From the outset Weir lets you know firmly which camp her tent is pitched in - and the book then follows this course.

What I find disconcerting is all her arguments against Richard III could equally be applied to Henry VII - however I personally don't believe that she achieved this. Weir sets out from the start with the a...more

like · see review

May 03, 2013 Whitney rated it 3 of 5 stars

Shelves: library-borrowed, non-fiction, read-in-2013

This one was not as good as other books I have read by Weir. Perhaps because it is one of her earliest works. Whatever the reason, this one did not engage me like the others did and it took me longer to get through then I would have liked. I had to make myself pick it up and read it, whereas others by Weir I have had a hard time putting down.

The beginning of the book moved quite quickly through a chunk of history to set the background and it was very confusing. Additionally I usually find Weir...more

like · see review

Apr 10, 2013 Shelly rated it 2 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Alison Weir sets out to make the case that Richard III murdered the princes in the tower, his nephews Edward V and Richard, Duke of York. It's clear from the start that she despises Richard and she views all evidence in light of how it might show his guilt. While I don't disagree with the idea that he was the most likely person to have ordered the murder of the princes, what I found most convincing was something she hinted at but never really explored in her narrative (because she was too busy h...more Alison Weir sets out to make the case that Richard III murdered the princes in the tower, his nephews Edward V and Richard, Duke of York. It's clear from the start that she despises Richard and she views all evidence in light of how it might show his guilt. While I don't disagree with the idea that he was the most likely person to have ordered the murder of the princes, what I found most convincing was something she hinted at but never really explored in her narrative (because she was too busy heaping scorn on Richard to take a moment and be objective).
Richard had been loyal to his brother, Edward IV. As a result he was richly rewarded. Another result was that Edward IV's wife, Elizabeth Wydville and her family saw him as a rival. While Edward was alive, Richard stayed in the north and wasn't much of a threat to the Wydville interests. They were able to have themselves elevated above older families of higher birth and gained many positions of power. However, once Edward died, the Wydvilles moved to secure their position. They controlled Edward V and had raised him to be loyal to their faction and distrustful of his uncle. If Edward V had been crowned, Richard most likely would have lost many if not all of his titles and wealth, and possibly even his life. To preserve what he had, he had to act and that was what led to him intercepting Edward V on his way to London. Unfortunately, once that chain of events was set in motion, there was no hope of Richard reconciling with Edward V and Richard couldn't allow an enemy to take the throne. After that, the death of the princes was inevitable as Richard struggled to hold on to what he had.
Weir's contempt for Richard shows through her narrative. I certainly don't condone murder, but I can understand why Richard would have taken the actions he did. His only alternative, it seems to me, would have been to sit back and allow Elizabeth Wydville to lead her son onto the throne and after him. He acted to defend himself and keep what he'd earned through his loyalty to his brother. Sadly, the inevitable result of his actions was the murder of his nephews and that, in turn, cemented his own downfall. He was stuck in a no win scenario; it was only a matter of when he would lose his life.(less)

like · see review

Mar 30, 2010 Bitsy rated it 3 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: non-fiction

There were two princes of England who were eight and twelve when the oldest of the two inherited the throne. Their father had died unexpectedly young and this lead to an unfortunate power struggle. The two boys were ultimately locked up in the White Tower by their uncle, Richard III who then assumed the throne.

This book takes the debate, and approaches it in a very linear and logical fashion. The author lists all of the sources of reliable information and lists not only what she considers to be...more

1 like · like · see review

Jan 15, 2013 John Betts rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: history

The mysterious and brutal deaths of the boy king Edward V and his younger brother Richard, Duke of York, still brings fascination despite five centuries into the details of what happened to the Princes in the Tower. English historian Alison Weir reconstructs the entire chain of events leading to the double murder, examining contemporary evidence as well as dozens of modern accounts. This is an interesting piece of historical research and a riveting story of conspiracy and deception in which the...more

like · see review

Dec 15, 2012 Kristen rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: non-fiction

I see a number of goodreads reviewers have stated that they think this book is biased against Richard III. I came at this book as a complete novice (and realizing there are huge holes in my knowledge of British history). I am definitely putting trust in her background as a historian to have sifted the evidence and come to a conclusion. I would not expect an expert to present both sides equally, but to use her abilities and background to evaluate sources and evidence, sharing with me why she thin...more

like · see review

Aug 08, 2010 Persephone rated it 2 of 5 stars

I am not, nor have I ever been, a member of the Richard III Society. My husband was (I bought a membership for him as a birthday present) and occasionally wears a sweatshirt with the White Boar emblazoned across it. He remains a staunch Ricardian (and a champion of James I, the subject of his thesis for his Honours History).

This book would drive him crazy. I had never heard of Alison Weir; she seems to be a prolific writer. She pretty much agrees with Shakespeare's portrayal of Richard, opening...more

like · see review

Aug 23, 2009 Caroline Selby rated it 3 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: 2009, alison-weir

In the late 15th century, the 14-year-old King Edward V and his 12-year-old brother Richard, Duke of York, disappeared, imprisoned in the Tower of London by their uncle, Richard III, never to be seen again.

It is generally accepted that Richard ordered his nephews' deaths in order to secure the throne for himself. This book looks at all the evidence of those few years of Richard's reign to prove this.

All the evidence is circumstantial, but compelling. I don't think there's any doubt he removed...more

1 like · like · see review

Aug 08, 2011 Karen rated it 5 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Alison Weir is such a master historian and story-teller. I love how she gives me a view into life in England through her meticulous research into surviving documents. She even discusses the "contemporary" historians of the time and their biases in order to assess which of them offer the most accurate accounts of what was happening. This would be a perfect subject for "The History Detectives" program on PBS-- full of intrigue, mystery, and political scheming. Whenever I read one of Alison Weir's...more

like · see review

Sep 12, 2012 Lezley rated it 3 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: br-hist-fic-nonfic

Alison Weir failed to convince me that Richard III was responsible for the deaths of the little Princes. Josephine Tey made a valid observation that Sir Thomas More was eight years old when Richard died.Because he was so biased in favour of the Tudors, I would tend to omit references to his writings about Richard III. If this is considered, I think Ms. Weir's case is weakened considerably. It also seems counterintuitive that a man who was a dignified Duke, loyal, just, amiable, a great administr...more

like · see review

« previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 … 99 100 next »

new topic
Discuss This Book

There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Recommend it | Stats | Recent status updates

combine
Other Editions (13)

More editions...

Genres

History

325 users

Non Fiction

170 users

Biography

58 users

European Literature > British Literature

37 users

Historical Fiction > Medieval

21 users

History > European History

11 users

Mystery > Crime

8 users

Literature > 15th Century

8 users

Mystery

7 users

Crime > True Crime

4 users

See top shelves...

Readers also enjoyed similar books

About Alison Weir

Librarian Note: There is more than one author in the GoodReads database with this name.

Alison Weir (born 1951) is a British writer of history books for the general public, mostly in the form of biographies about British kings and queens. She currently lives in Surrey, England, with her two children.

Before becoming an author, Weir worked as a teacher of children with special needs. She received her...more

More about Alison Weir...

Books by Alison Weir

More…

Share This Book

Facebook Twitter Your website

Trivia About The Princes in th...

2 trivia questions

More quizzes & trivia...

title link	preview: The Princes in the Tower
avg rating	preview: The Princes in the Tower Goodreads rating: 3.77 (3011 ratings)
small image	preview: click here [close]
med image	preview: click here [close]
BBCode	[url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/530728.The_Princes_in_the_Tower?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book][img]http://d.gr-assets.com/books/1240769416l/530728.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/530728.The_Princes_in_the_Tower?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book]The Princes in the Tower by Alison Weir[/url]

The Princes in the Tower

Friend Reviews

Community Reviews

Share This Book

Share This Book on Your Website