Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “David Hockney” as Want to Read:
David Hockney
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

David Hockney

by
4.29  ·  Rating Details  ·  24 Ratings  ·  2 Reviews
This book presents a clear, critical analysis of the key developments in Hockney's work since the mid - 1960s. Topics examined include Hockney's participation in the London arts scene of the "swinging 60s", his images of Southern California, images of landscapes, Hockney's questioning of the status of the modern art object, the conjunction of word and image in his work, hi ...more
Paperback, 288 pages
Published September 15th 1995 by Manchester University Press
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about David Hockney, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about David Hockney

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 50)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
William
I'm glad I read this because Hockney's work is more diverse than I had realized. I was struck by how conscious and intellectual his approach is, and how much he pursued a connection with many art styles which preceded him. I gather from the introduction that Hockney has a reputation as a "popular" artist rather than a serious one, and the book certainly convinces me of his seriousness and contributions to the world of art (not that I personally had doubted it).

The best aspect of the book are the
...more
Beverly
Aug 04, 2012 Beverly rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: art
From this monograph I learned that David Hockney is a more conceptual artist than I realized. He has always been preoccupied with problems of perspective, but also, in his early years, with styles and periods of art. The color plates in this are good, but unfortunately the format is too small. On the other hand the small format probably afforded the reasonable price. The narrative is ok, but somewhat dry and confusing. A critic's perspective is lacking.
Kayo Lu
Kayo Lu rated it really liked it
Jul 19, 2016
abcdefg
abcdefg marked it as to-read
Jul 15, 2016
John
John rated it liked it
May 03, 2016
Chris Lockhart
Chris Lockhart marked it as to-read
Apr 20, 2016
Abbie Riley
Abbie Riley marked it as to-read
Feb 24, 2016
Lee
Lee marked it as to-read
Feb 05, 2016
Sebastian Marzetti
Sebastian Marzetti rated it it was amazing
Nov 07, 2015
Iryna Tiuftiaieva
Iryna Tiuftiaieva marked it as to-read
Nov 02, 2015
Silvia
Silvia rated it it was amazing
Aug 25, 2015
Ted
Ted marked it as to-read
May 29, 2015
Mary
Mary marked it as to-read
May 08, 2015
SparkMagic
SparkMagic is currently reading it
Apr 11, 2015
Christopher Suh
Christopher Suh rated it it was amazing
Mar 17, 2015
Rob
Rob added it
Jan 27, 2015
Robin Antalek
Robin Antalek rated it it was amazing
Jan 24, 2015
Miguel Ferreira
Miguel Ferreira rated it it was amazing
Dec 17, 2014
Andy Abramowitz
Andy Abramowitz marked it as to-read
Sep 04, 2014
Libby Castellani
Libby Castellani rated it it was amazing
Aug 04, 2014
Kate Merriman
Kate Merriman rated it it was amazing
Jul 07, 2015
Lydia
Lydia marked it as to-read
Apr 15, 2014
Penthouse Dizzle
Penthouse Dizzle rated it it was amazing
Feb 24, 2014
Simone
Simone marked it as to-read
Feb 18, 2014
« previous 1 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Share This Book



No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »