Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Pillars of the Earth (The Pillars of the Earth, #1)” as Want to Read:
The Pillars of the Earth  (The Pillars of the Earth, #1)
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

The Pillars of the Earth (The Pillars of the Earth #1)

4.26 of 5 stars 4.26  ·  rating details  ·  364,009 ratings  ·  22,869 reviews
The spellbinding epic set in twelfth-century England,The Pillars of the Earthtells the story of the lives entwined in the building of the greatest Gothic cathedral the world has ever known—and a struggle between good and evil that will turn church against state, and brother against brother.

In a time of civil war, famine and religious strife, there rises a magnificent Cathe
Paperback, 973 pages
Published February 4th 2002 by NAL Trade (first published 1989)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Pillars of the Earth, please sign up.

Popular Answered Questions

Lisa YES! Loved this book and have already started reading the sequel!…moreYES! Loved this book and have already started reading the sequel!(less)
The Hunger Games by Suzanne CollinsHarry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix by J.K. RowlingTo Kill a Mockingbird by Harper LeeTwilight by Stephenie MeyerPride and Prejudice by Jane Austen
Best Books Ever
56th out of 36,075 books — 139,304 voters
Memoirs of a Geisha by Arthur GoldenGone with the Wind by Margaret MitchellThe Pillars of the Earth by Ken FollettThe Book Thief by Markus ZusakThe Other Boleyn Girl by Philippa Gregory
Best Historical Fiction
3rd out of 4,717 books — 18,647 voters

More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
I devour books. That is my euphemism for being so OCD that I can't put it down and live my life until I finish it. For shorter books, that's generally not a problem, but for the 974 page Pillars of the Earth...well, let's just say we ran out of food, my children clung to my legs asking for food, and the floors did not get vacuumed for a good five days while I whittled away at this book.

CLIFF HANGER: This book is not a cliff-hanger at the end of every chapter kind of book, which makes it easier t
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
I did not hate this book (hate would be too strong a word, and I can't hate it because I applaud the fact that Ken Follett attempted to write an epic novel). But I did not like it. I didn't like it from the start; his writing style hit me like a brick, but Jim thoroughly enjoyed the book that I kept trying to convince myself that I ought to give it a chance, hoping it would get better. When I was about 500 pages in, he saw how miserable I was and asked why I didn't just stop reading it, but at t ...more
Nov 18, 2007 amelia rated it 1 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: no one! apparently oprah fans
This is seriously one of the worst books I've ever read. The only reason I finished the book is because I cannot put a book down once I start.

The writing is terrible. The plotting may be dramatic, but I had almost zero interest in any of the characters; they seem to exist merely for events to happen to them, like actors in a disaster movie. Beyond that there seemed to be three characters in the book: Bad guy, good guy, and good victimized-yet-able-to -overcome girl.

What got me most was: Ken Foll
Dan 1.0
Confession time: This is not a book I would have picked out for myself. First of all, look at the size of this kitten squisher! Second of all, Amanda's hate-filled review of it is one of my favorite reviews on Goodreads. However, it's one of my girlfriend's favorite books and when she suggested I give it a read, I knew what was good for me. Lucky for me, I enjoyed it.

Pillars of the Earth is a multigenerational tale about the construction of a cathedral in a fictitious English town in the 1100s.
"Pillars of the Earth" is a very long book. It's got a lot of soap-opera-like twists and turns - no amnesia, but just about everything else, including mistaken identities, illicit marriages, illicit lack of marriage, illegitimate children, questionable parentage, love triangles, revenge, greed, power, a few murders, rape, witches, politics, knights, swords and horsies. OK, that last bit is not so soap-opera-like. There's also lots and lots of architecture. And it's a very long book.

Main sto
Jul 11, 2008 Jax rated it 1 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: People with iron wills and a surfeit of free time.
Recommended to Jax by: My mother, who thought I'd like the cover art.
Shelves: awful
A massive tome with a spine thicker than Arnold Schwartzenegger’s forearm, Pillars looks intimidating enough to make even the most avid readers wary; its 973 pages are densely packed with unforgiving walls of 8-point text with nary a line break in sight. Before I was more than a hundred pages in, however, it became apparent that length was among the least of this behemoth of a book’s problems.

Follett's concept—a medieval, generation-spanning epic built around the construction of a cathedral—is
A tapestry of medieval cathedrals centered around an epic drama and some would term it melodrama but that's open to debate.

Ken Follet actually wanted to write this book years before it was published. But his agent told him to build up his base of fans by writing several more thrillers. His EYE OF THE NEEDLE pushed him up to the best seller list.

At a later point, after writing those novels and studying medieval cathedral architecture, Follet got to write his 900 page novel centering around the
How does one review a book that one cannot even describe?

So many times after gushing about how good Pillars was, people ask me, What’s it about?

And I, swirling in the happy aftermath of a mind so blown away that it’s still traveling near the speed of light, struggle to gather what’s left of analytical thinking and dumbly blurt, “Um, it’s about building this cathedral…”

Way to not to sell a book.

I still have trouble really describing Pillars in a way that satisfies. Because while it is about build
I know I'm going to be in the minority here, but this is truly one of the worst books I have ever read. I came so close to throwing the book across the room on several occasions, and ended up skipping through many pages just to get to the final and not too surprising finish.

The characters were flat and lifeless and seemed to have been transplanted from the 20th century into medieval England. The book was rife with unnecessary profanity that in no way enhanced the storyline and obscene gratuitou
Jason Koivu
Want to know how it feels to build a cathedral? Read the monumentally huge book The Pillars of the Earth by Ken Follett. By the time you're done you will feel as if you've spent the better part of your life on it.


The details are marvelous and intricate. Follett obviously did a lot of research in order to construct this mammoth book.

The love story is intriguing and captivating. A little weird too. But that aside, it's the sort of romance that'll sweep up most readers...sweep them up like a broo
6.0 stars. An absolutely amazing reading experience. This one may actually make it on to my "All Time Favorite" list. I listened to the audio version of this book, which means just over 40 hours of content, and when it was finished, I actually believed it should have been LONGER. This book grabbed me from the opening pages and kept me interested and engaged throughout the entire novel (a very rare feet for a 1000 page novel). With as much as I had heard about this book, I went into it with very ...more
Raeleen Lemay
ok so I just remembered that Eddie Redmayne is in the mini-series for this so like hey of course I have to read it
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Will M.
Set in twelfth-century England, The Pillars of Earth is an epic tale of remarkably unforgettable characters in pursuit of building the greatest Gothic cathedral the world has ever known. As simple as the plot may sound, the novel offered more than what it appeared to have.

This is the best Historical Fiction I've read as of today. This gigantic piece of treasure didn't seem that huge while I was reading it. I'm serious when I say that this even felt shorter than some 300+ pages novel I've read.
I finally finished this book and I loved it!!

The characters were interesting, flawed, and complex. The storyline was captivating, intricate, and exciting. I think that because the story was told from the point of view of many characters (5 or 6, I think), the author was able to show so much more of what was going on in many different places at the same time. Also, the length of the book allowed for a lot of time to pass (almost 50 years). I love how the author incorporated some actual historical
Nov 16, 2007 Patricia rated it 2 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: no one
Hmmm... a family relation lent me this book. I was mostly interested in what kind of books my particular relation was into. I think you can learn a lot about a person by reading their favorite books. I am actually a little disturbed. Yes you may call me a prude, but there was sex in it. I know what your thinking... thats not a shocker. But its not just sex... it is violent sex. It has several graphic rape scenes. And I have to admit violence to women frightens me.
I don't need that graphic of an
Kira Fisher
i can't stress enough how not good this book was. (everett says he likes it that i pan books, so he will be pleased with this review.)

where does one start when explaining what makes a piece of shit unpleasant? is it the smell? is it the origins? is it its inherent turdness?

this book is inherently a turd.

mr follett's preface says that people have told him it is the best book they have ever read, and i have to seriously question what they're comparing it to. sweet valley high? maybe, but not neces
The duck swallows the worm, the fox kills the duck, the men shoot the fox, and the devil hunts the men.
-William Hamleigh, The Pillars of the Earth

This is probably the fifth review I've started for The Pillars of the Earth. The first thing you'll notice is that it's a long read, 900+ pages. Whenever I've attacked a book with similar length I've usually felt that the author was trying to impress me with his big phallic novel, as though the book were really about the size of the book and his abilit
Richard Reviles Censorship Always in All Ways
Rating: 3* of five

The Publisher Says: As a new age dawns in England's twelfth century, the building of a mighty Gothic cathedral sets the stage for a story of intrigue and power, revenge and betrayal. It is in this rich tapestry, where kings and queens are corrupt - and one majestic creation will bond them forever.

Honest. That's all of it. I guess they figure if you haven't read it by now, you ain't a-gonna?

My Review: This was a group read on LibraryThing in 2009...I joined in because I haven't
Toward the end of this 1000 page book I noticed the ad for the equally non-descript titled SEQUEL released 17 years after Pillars. This raises a lot of questions. What kind of author leaves his fans hanging for 17 years? Can there possibly be anything left unsaid after 1000 pages? Is this why Follett looks so smug on the back cover w/his black turtleneck?

Maybe in the sequel he'll explain why he couldn't find room in the story for Martha after age 6. She was my favorite character and she got mayb
I hated this book. Let's just get that out of the way so there is no confusion later on.

Ken Follett describes a gloomy, dismal, nearly barbaric society whose citizens' greatest concerns seem to be their egos and their lust for power and control. He uses the building of the great European cathedrals as the impetus for his story; the magnificent structures were made possible through trickery, lies, greed, criminal acts and selfish ambition. Forget about the Glory of God...that's just history's cov
Phew, finished!

I put this book of for so long that I'm angry I deprived myself of a good read for so many months. This is a book you can sit down, wrap yourself up in and exclude the rest of the world for a bit.

Follett is not a historical author, he usually writes thillers and this reflects in his style of writing. The sentences are short and almost clumsy, which after a while can be grating on your nerves. He has this habit of explaining everything to you as if you couldn't understand a pretty
Franco  Santos
El mejor libro que he leído este año, por ahora. Una completa obra maestra.


Traición, tragedia, injusticia, religión, confrontación, monarquía; muerte, amor, esperanza, odio, secretos y envidia convergen en un sólo lugar, en la construcción de una catedral. Ken Follett creó un complejo juego de realidades y artimañas en donde de un momento para otro el tablero puede cambiar de forma impredecible.

Renunciar a la felicidad es como arrojar piedras preciosas al océano. Es mucho peor que cualquier pec
Jan 19, 2009 Danny rated it 1 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: readers of very long/unending series
Shelves: terrible-tomes
(one minor spoiler ahead, reader beware...)

I started this book without too much expectation but between the self-congratulatory introduction that the author gave to his book and learning part way through that it had become an Oprah pick I must admit that I mentally raised the bar a bit.

Unfortunately, I found the book fell short...

I was very interested through about the first half of the book, it is clear that Follett writes thrillers in his other life and some of the initial action scenes were f
First thing to say....Richard E Grant is a fantastic narrator. There was not a single squirmingly awful accent....Derek Jacobi take note. His women characters were not voiced by men doing silly soppy voices as if that communicated woman but were voiced in such a way that you believed the characterization and it did not jar as inane, patronizing or laughable. He communicated tension and horror, sadness and despair, injustice and vengeance, adoration and admiration, grief and fear and frustration ...more
When a book offers nearly 1,000 pages of story, I expect, at the least, an epic sweep to the proceedings. Characters of interest are nice; characters with depth--even better. Some insight into the world around us and its many complicated workings would get me thinking--and I really like a book that makes me think. A fully-realized literary landscape--one that takes the reader to a place that can only exist in the printed word--would overjoy me. Big books offer a big promise: check out my story, ...more
Ken Follett, best known for his novels of political espionage such as The Hunt for Red October and Patriot Games, steps into a new genre with his epic saga, The Pillars of the Earth. Set in England during the latter part of the 12th century, Pillars presents a sweeping tale of medieval feudal life. The story centers around Prior Philip, a sincere and devoted monk who desires to honor God through the building of a cathedral. The plethora of characters whose lives readers will follow include citi ...more
JG (The Introverted Reader)
To be very simplistic, The Pillars of the Earth is about building a cathedral in the twelfth century in England. But to say that would be doing this book a huge disservice. The building of the cathedral serves as a cornerstone to explore the lives of an intriguing cast of characters and how life was lived at that point in history.

I wasn't too sure what to expect going into this. I just had a vague idea that it was about building a cathedral, and let's face it: to a dedicated reader of fiction th
As I read Pillars of the Earth, it crossed my mind more than once that what I was reading was a wordy, hacktacular mess.

That said, I still enjoyed it.

Maybe it's got pretensions of epic grandeur with gorilla dumps of Cathedral Building 101, and writing that lays there like a dead fish, but buried in all the didactic architectural yammering and unimaginative wordsmithery there was the kind of trashy, cheesy melodrama that I absolutely love. It can excuse a wealth of narrative sins if I'm in the ri
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
A Million More Pages: 1 - The Pillars of the Earth (Pillars of the Earth): Feb 1 13 26 Mar 26, 2015 01:52PM  
Which one is better? 15 192 Mar 24, 2015 11:56AM  
Engrossing 3 23 Mar 22, 2015 09:04PM  
2015 Reading Chal...: The Pillars of Earth by Ken Follett 14 59 Jan 08, 2015 12:05PM  
Yo , Femenina .: * Lectura Conjunta - Los Pilares de la Tierra, de Ken Follett 3 18 Dec 20, 2014 06:53AM  
Literary Exploration: Final Thoughts *Spoilers* 5 59 Dec 13, 2014 11:26AM  
  • When Christ and His Saints Slept  (Henry II & Eleanor of Aquitaine, #1)
  • Azincourt
  • The Scarlet Lion (William Marshal, #3)
  • Sarum: The Novel of England
  • Shaman (Cole Family Trilogy, #2)
  • The Journeyer
  • Antony and Cleopatra (Masters of Rome, #7)
  • The Knight Templar (The Crusades Trilogy, #2)
  • Das zweite Königreich
  • Q
  • Through a Glass Darkly (Through a Glass Darkly, #1)
Ken Follett burst onto the book world in 1978 with Eye of the Needle, a taut and original thriller with a memorable woman character in the central role. The book won the Edgar award and became an outstanding film.

He went on to write four more bestselling thrillers: Triple; The Key to Rebecca; The Man from St Petersburg; and Lie Down with Lions.

He also wrote On Wings of Eagles, the true story of ho
More about Ken Follett...

Other Books in the Series

The Pillars of the Earth (2 books)
  • World Without End (The Pillars of the Earth, #2)
Fall of Giants (The Century Trilogy, #1) World Without End (The Pillars of the Earth, #2) Eye of the Needle Winter of the World (The Century Trilogy #2) Edge of Eternity (The Century Trilogy, #3)

Share This Book

“Having faith in God did not mean sitting back and doing nothing. It meant believing you would find success if you did your best honestly and energetically.” 196 likes
“The most expensive part of building is the mistakes.” 153 likes
More quotes…