by
3.24 of 5 stars
Following from Charles Simic's assertion that "the issue for poets of any age is how to rejuvenate the lyric poem," Daniel Sumrall's poetry in the ... read full description

reviews

Nov 09, 2008
Peter rated it: 1 of 5 stars
Usually Gold Wake Press publishes poetry that doesn’t suck. The poems in “Well Enough” demonstrate a contrived awkwardness that leaves such a bad taste in the mouth. There is an acute soullessness throughout the collection, as if these poems were created by an automaton. This work feels like the albatross around contemporary poetry’s neck. Beyond pretentious.
0 comments like (4 people liked it)
Oct 13, 2008
Emma rated it: 3 of 5 stars
My favorite of these five poems is "Adolescents in Western Wisconsin," probably because it offers the reader a finely-detailed sense of place. The images ("dim birds," "forgotten freight rails," "a litany of crucifixes") seem shaped by the poet's own sense of sorrow and boredom and wistfulness. I like poems that make me think and feel, but I also want to see. This poem has all of that.

The other poems seem more abstract and thus difficult to ent More...
0 comments like (1 person liked it)
Feb 05, 2009
Joy rated it: 4 of 5 stars
When I asked Daniel Sumrall if I should write a review for his chapbook Well Enough at goodreads, he told me not to bother because people were either indifferent or hostile to his work. This naturally made me more curious.
Although I had a million and one things to do, I decided to read his poetry. Sumrall’s style is approachable and easy to understand. I’m not struggling to understand his meaning and can enjoy his intent, at least with the first poem.
His beginning poem begs the qu
More...
0 comments like (1 person liked it)
Nov 19, 2008
Robert rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Daniel Sumrall, Well Enough (Gold Wake Press, 2008)

Well Enough, a very short (five pages) chapbook, is in part saved by its brevity; after all, how can you give up on something that's only five pages long? That's short enough that one can suffer through even the worst writer without using up too much time. And Sumrall is far from the worst writer I've encountered this year (or, for that matter, this month). Still, he's not the best, either. The poems in this brief collection seem to More...
0 comments like (1 person liked it)
Oct 21, 2008
Abailart rated it: 5 of 5 stars
Well Enough

I approached these five poems slowly. I read them a few times, read them again a few days later. Finally I read them as carefully as I am able – slowly and aloud. I like them very much. I will give them five stars. But here’s a problem: I am going against the grain, others have rated them lower. I have no idea how to rate poetry. I think it ‘must give pleasure’ (Stevens) and five stars is simply my pleasure rating. I understand something of what Carlyle meant in describin More...
0 comments like (1 person liked it)
Jan 13, 2009
Shannon rated it: 4 of 5 stars
I especially liked [As though it were the room:] and Adolescents in Western Wisconsin.

0 comments like (1 person liked it)
Oct 09, 2011
Brian rated it: 3 of 5 stars
"Adolescents in Western Wisconsin" is the most rewarding of the five poems. Through his imagery we take a trip with Daniel back in time and learn a little more about him. All that is missing is his suggestion for a soundtrack to play in the background.

The second part of "When rooms take on their own scent" makes one think of all we have accomplished with science living on the "sphere" of Earth, yet how can we take those rules and apply them to somethin More...
Dec 07, 2008
Michelle rated it: 4 of 5 stars
I liked the first couple of poems best, and the author is super hot!
0 comments like (1 person liked it)
Oct 14, 2008
Juliet rated it: 3 of 5 stars
2 1/2 stars for me.

My favorite of the batch is the 5th poem, which struck me as more resonant and well-crafted than the others.
2 comments like (1 person liked it)
Feb 24, 2009
evan rated it: 3 of 5 stars
"the tow most distant"
Dec 25, 2010
Peycho rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Dec 10, 2010
T. marked it as to-read
Jun 12, 2010
anonymous marked it as to-read
Mar 04, 2010
Cara marked it as to-read
Jan 03, 2010
Meg marked it as to-read
Jun 29, 2009
Kristin marked it as to-read
May 11, 2009
Shaindel marked it as to-read
Apr 26, 2009
Stef marked it as to-read
May 13, 2009
Megan marked it as to-read
Feb 23, 2009
Andrew rated it: 1 of 5 stars
Feb 22, 2009
Heather added it
Jan 30, 2009
Ryan rated it: 2 of 5 stars
Jan 29, 2009
Amish rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Jan 26, 2009
Alexander marked it as to-read
Jan 20, 2009
Nik marked it as to-read
Jan 17, 2009
Ll marked it as to-read
Jan 09, 2009
in rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Jan 03, 2009
Kristine marked it as to-read
Dec 29, 2008
W.B. rated it: 5 of 5 stars
Dec 12, 2008
Matthew marked it as to-read