The Cult of the Amateur: How today's Internet is killing our culture

by Andrew Keen

book data

223 ratings, 2.54 average rating, 94 reviews (more data...)

rating	frequency	%
5		4%
4		18%
3		28%
2		22%
1		25%

edit

published

June 5th 2007 (first published 2008) by Currency

binding

Hardcover, 240 pages

isbn

0385520808 (isbn13: 9780385520805)

description

Amateur hour has arrived, and the audience is running the show

In a hard-hitting and provocative polemic, Silicon Valley insider and pundit Andrew Keen...more

[close] Amateur hour has arrived, and the audience is running the show

In a hard-hitting and provocative polemic, Silicon Valley insider and pundit Andrew Keen exposes the grave consequences of today’s new participatory Web 2.0 and reveals how it threatens our values, economy, and ultimately the very innovation and creativity that forms the fabric of American achievement.

Our most valued cultural institutions, Keen warns—our professional newspapers, magazines, music, and movies—are being overtaken by an avalanche of amateur, user-generated free content. Advertising revenue is being siphoned off by free classified ads on sites like Craigslist; television networks are under attack from free user-generated programming on YouTube and the like; file-sharing and digital piracy have devastated the multibillion-dollar music business and threaten to undermine our movie industry. Worse, Keen claims, our “cut-and-paste” online culture—in which intellectual property is freely swapped, downloaded, remashed, and aggregated—threatens over 200 years of copyright protection and intellectual property rights, robbing artists, authors, journalists, musicians, editors, and producers of the fruits of their creative labors.

In today’s self-broadcasting culture, where amateurism is celebrated and anyone with an opinion, however ill-informed, can publish a blog, post a video on YouTube, or change an entry on Wikipedia, the distinction between trained expert and uninformed amateur becomes dangerously blurred. When anonymous bloggers and videographers, unconstrained by professional standards or editorial filters, can alter the public debate and manipulate public opinion, truth becomes a commodity to be bought, sold, packaged, and reinvented.

The very anonymity that the Web 2.0 offers calls into question the reliability of the information we receive and creates an environment in which sexual predators and identity thieves can roam free. While no Luddite—Keen pioneered several Internet startups himself—he urges us to consider the consequences of blindly supporting a culture that endorses plagiarism and piracy and that fundamentally weakens traditional media and creative institutions.

Offering concrete solutions on how we can rein in the free-wheeling, narcissistic atmosphere that pervades the Web, THE CULT OF THE AMATEUR is a wake-up call to each and every one of us. [close]

find at: Amazon | Half.com | Barnes & Noble | Abebooks | compare prices…

new topic
discuss this book

topics	posts	views	last activity
buy keflex without prescription	1	1	6 hours, 8 min ago
100+ Book Challenge: Jim Takchess 2009 100+ list	32	172	12 hours, 15 min ago
wbkucb jhf mvf	1	2	3 days ago, 08:45AM
dvjkfd fv djh c	1	4	3 days ago, 04:31AM
hgdcvd kujbd	1	1	3 days ago, 02:11AM

friend reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

lists with this book

This book is currently not featured on any Listopia lists. Add this book to your favorite list »

other reviews (showing 1-20 of 406)

sort: default (?) | date
filters: all | text-only

09/26/08

oriana rated it:

(review of isbn 1857885201)

bookshelves: read-2008, why-werent-you-better

Let me start by saying that I opened this book with a totally open mind. Seriously! I too think that blogs, MySpace, and YouTube are doing horrible things to our culture in this country, so I though I was going to be the choir this guy was preaching to.

Not so.

And let me say, too, that the reason this is two stars and not one (and actually was almost three) is that it really made me mad, and really made me think, which is no small feat. Plus it got me into several (loud) a...more

Like this review? yes (16 people liked it)

6 comments

02/21/08

Lon Harris rated it:

Read in February, 2008

Keen gets off to a dazzlingly bad start, misstating the concept of Google search on Page 6.

"The logic of Google's search engine...reflects the "wisdom" of the crowd. The search engine is an aggregation of the ninety million questions we collectively ask Google each day; in other words, it just tells us what we already know."

Is this intentionally dense? I mean, yes, Google uses the experiences others have had in some ways to create your new experience...more

Like this review? yes (6 people liked it)

2 comments

08/30/07

Kelly Hoffman rated it:

bookshelves: 2007, sociology

Read in September, 2007

In a nutshell, the book comes close to making some valid points, but treats them so frivolously and superficially that by the end of the last chapter you feel like you've just spent an hour listening to your great-grandma's best friend Eileen talk about how much her corns are bothering .

Throughout the book, Keen lacks any sense of historical context. You feel like he believes that nothing happened in popular culture prior to 1990. He blames the internet for television's audience fr...more In a nutshell, the book comes close to making some valid points, but treats them so frivolously and superficially that by the end of the last chapter you feel like you've just spent an hour listening to your great-grandma's best friend Eileen talk about how much her corns are bothering .

Throughout the book, Keen lacks any sense of historical context. You feel like he believes that nothing happened in popular culture prior to 1990. He blames the internet for television's audience fragmentation, for instance, when in reality that has been a growing problem for networks since the 1980's and the rise of cable. He seems to think that YouTube gave birth to opposition research - but political candidates have been following each other around with video cameras long before the macaca scandal. He complains that now, people can "seek out the information that mirrors back our own biases and opinions and conforms with our distorted versions of reality" - like no one ever did that before. He claims that "[b]efore the Web 2.0, independent media content and paid advertising existed separately, in parallel, and were easily distinguishable from each other." Like product placement in movies. He says "What happens to truth when politicians begin buying channels on YouTube to trash their opponents?" Well, probably the same damn thing that happened when they began buying airtime on television, or ad space in newspapers.

Keen is decidedly pro-establishment. He bemoans the fact that new are stealing time away from television and movies. Right, because TV and movies produce such top-quality entertainment every time. I'm sorry, but is Hamster Dance really that much worse than The War at Home? Is it such a tragedy if people start reading Perez instead of watching Access Hollywood? And I honestly believe that the Salad Fingers series (Google it) has more artistic value than Norbit, Silent Hill, and The Mangler 3: The Mangler Reborn combined.

The "amateurs" and "Web 2.0" that he denounces throughout the book aren't even responsible for his most virulent complaints. Peer-to-peer file sharing, for instance, with its impact on the entertainment industry, has been around much longer that "Web 2.0" and has nothing whatsoever to do with "democratized media." It's merely a technological innovation like the cotton gin.

In short, Keen is a Luddite. Every transitional technology is met with resistance from established technology providers. There's a period of time when people don't really know what to do with the new technology. And eventually the system corrects itself and life goes on. This is why it's called transitional technology. It's absolutely true that the legal system hasn't caught up with the internet and associated technologies - but it will. The entertainment industry will, too. And people will learn that you can't cite Daily Kos or WorldNetDaily in your term papers any more than you can cite the Enquirer. Basically, all he wants to do is "protect the legacy of our mainstream media and two hundred years of copyright protections." Which is fine. But if that's your goal, just say so in the introduction, not your final chapter, and deal with that issue - don't pretend you actually care about the minds and hearts of people when it all comes down to protecting industry.

Ah yes, his last chapter, titled "Solutions." Possibly the most annoying chapter in the whole book. What are Keen's brilliant, expert solutions?
- Adaptation of existing businesses to new technology
- Restructuring of web sites to provide higher quality content
- Adaptation of existing legal principles
- Parents being aware of what their kids are doing.

All of these have been happening, and they started long before this book was published, and Keen adds absolutely nothing original.

Way to anger the librarians!
(less)

Like this review? yes (6 people liked it)

1 comment

02/21/08

C.k. rated it:

While there are some interesting points of discussion in the book, it's far too hyperbolic, doom and gloom in perspective. Very black and white. Very polarized around one thought without much variation. So if you disagree with the one huge premise of the book (that the rise of the amateur is destroying culture), you won't enjoy it. It's also rather offensive how Keen continually refers to people as typing Monkeys. It reminds me of every other dull, short-sighted book throughout the ages which ha...more

Like this review? yes (3 people liked it)

add a comment

09/05/08

James added it (review of isbn 1857883934)

Read in September, 2008

In cyberspace, nobody can hear you scream. That’s because everybody’s too busy blogging brickbats at Sarah Palin, corrupting Bill Gates’ profile on Wikipedia, poking their buddies on Facebook, and recording a juggling video on YouTube. Simultaneously.

At least, this is what Andrew Keen would have you believe. In The Cult of the Amateur, Keen launches a full-frontal assault on the wave of user-generated content that, in his view, has turned the information superhighway into a te...more

Like this review? yes (2 people liked it)

add a comment

05/26/08

Adam rated it:

(review of isbn 1857883934)

bookshelves: annoying, inspiring, read-2008

Read in August, 2008

recommends it for: webby types

On the one hand this is a very ranty and kind of confused argument about how there's lots of crap on the internet. Which is kind of an obvious statement and which ignores the fact that there's lots amazing stuff online as well. On the other hand it makes some good points about the consequences of over-estimating the worth of user-generated content.

Keen's "beware the amateurs they make everything shit" argument is initially directed against Web 2.0 (and I should point out th...more On the one hand this is a very ranty and kind of confused argument about how there's lots of crap on the internet. Which is kind of an obvious statement and which ignores the fact that there's lots amazing stuff online as well. On the other hand it makes some good points about the consequences of over-estimating the worth of user-generated content.

Keen's "beware the amateurs they make everything shit" argument is initially directed against Web 2.0 (and I should point out that he's an insider when it comes to the online stuff, so it is an expert opinion, however ranty it may be), but then the book broadens its scope to include things like online piracy, porn and gambling.

These things seem to me to be distinct from Web 2.0 and the problems inherent with amateur content. It's like he's trying to come up with as many reasons as possible that the internet is bad, and he comes across as a bit of a shrill and histrionic luddite - which he obviously isn't - as a result.

There are good points made, though, about things like the economic impact and cultural flow-on of things like file sharing and free classified listings. Newspapers and record companies will indeed have to come up with ways to deal with the new playing field, and this will impact on writers and musicians (as well as other creative types), but it feels like Keen is simply railing against change more than anything else.

It made me think of the Douglas Adams quote about technology whereby any tech that exists when you're born is perfectly natural, and any tech that is developed after you turn thirty is an abomination.

The last chapter is the best of the book. It presents a "where to now?" scenario that is optimistic, engaging and hopeful in a way that the rest of the book is not. It's a nice counterpoint to the shrill complaints and soapboxing that come before. You have to wade through some cranky stuff (as in "that guys's a crank!"), but it's sort of worth it.

I'm not saying this book was a waste of time - it got me thinking about some interesting stuff, and it did make some good points about making sure that creative people are rewarded for their efforts so that they can go on being creative people. I just didn't like the vaguely elitist line he drew between "experts" and "amateurs".

If nothing else, this is a good book for anyone who loves reading the letters to the editor so that they can scream at their partners about how this guy is such a freakin' idiot!(less)

Like this review? yes (2 people liked it)

1 comment

03/01/08

Douglas rated it:

Has a copy to sell/swap — Read in June, 2007

recommends it for: no one.

Given that Andrew Keen is a Silicon Valley entrepreneur, whose writings have appeared have appeared in a number of prestigious publications, I surmise that he is reasonably intelligent and well-informed about technology and culture. It is with great shock and disappointment that I read the book "The Cult of the Amateur."

Keen believes that all these empowered individuals (like you and me) are 1) poisoning civic discourse by blurring the lines between facts, inferences and o...more Given that Andrew Keen is a Silicon Valley entrepreneur, whose writings have appeared have appeared in a number of prestigious publications, I surmise that he is reasonably intelligent and well-informed about technology and culture. It is with great shock and disappointment that I read the book "The Cult of the Amateur."

Keen believes that all these empowered individuals (like you and me) are 1) poisoning civic discourse by blurring the lines between facts, inferences and opinions, 2) destroying excellence in culture by cutting, pasting, remixing and mashing up existing culture, and 3) destroying time-honored societal institutions like newspapers, the mainstream media, the recording industry and Hollywood.

You will find many ideas in the course of this book which have been suggested, vigorously debated, and ultimately rejected by the blogosphere, such as "Wikipedia is a stupid, poor man's version of the Encyclopedia Britannica," "anonymous blogs are a grave threat to public discourse," "journalism is a discipline like law or medicine, requiring rigorous training and certification," "blogs and their readers form an echo-chamber, a group of people who only listen to what they want to hear," "John Kerry was unjustly maligned by a small cadre of right-wing bloggers," and on and on. If the material in this book appeared in the form of a blog, it would be vigorously "fisked," examined on a page-by-page basis and ripped to pieces. It is ironic that Keen writes in glowing terms of Robert Fisk, the man from whom the term "fisking" comes, in the course of the book.

About a quarter of this book is an anti-blogosphere screed, with no balancing mention of mainstream media malfeasance, such as the attempt of the producers of 60 Minutes to influence the 2004 Presidential election with fradulent documents, or the leaking of confidential government information by the New York Times. Sometimes it gets personal, when Charles Johnson of little green footballs is referred to as "a rabidly pro-Israel blogger."

There are concerns raised later in the book about privacy, online gambling and online pornography. While I share his concerns about privacy, I reject the idea that its either a recent problem, or a problem with amateurs not bowing to the wisdom of their betters. While I'm in agreement with him that the cultural mainstreaming of gambling and pornography are unwholesome developments, I reject the idea that they have anything to do with the empowered individuals Keen finds so troubling in the first part of the book. It's almost as if he mentions every cultural problem that has something or other to do with the internet, and hoping that you'll associate it with the amateurs mentioned in the first part of the book.

Keen mentions in the introduction that he started to become disenchanted with Tim O'Reilly's Web 2.0 vision of the empowerment of individuals in September of 2004. And that is the hideous, horrible problem with this book. It is so September 2004. It is full of nostalgic longing for the day when the producers of 60 Minutes could decide who was going to be President, the day where Walter Cronkite could say "And that's the way it is," the day where the New York Times declared what was and wasn't newsworthy. The point of this book was that September 2004 is a better time than now, a point with which I vigorously disagree.

The only redeeming factor is that instead of just whining, he offers some websites at the end of the book that he sees as promising developments, such as Citizendium, Joost and iAmplify. He sees these websites as correcting the excesses of Wikipedia, YouTube and MySpace, respectively. (less)

Like this review? yes (2 people liked it)

add a comment

02/22/08

Julia rated it:

bookshelves: contemporary-culture

recommends it for: Luddites

I love a good anti-internet polemic as much as the next girl. In fact, I actually thought I'd be the one person in my workplace to secretly love this book as I am part-curmudgeon and just don't get "these kids today" with their truthiness and solipsism. But, man, this book was truly terrible -- poorly researched, free of historical context and alarmist. It's like when the Frankfurt School got their panties in an uproar over that new-fangled radio thingee except Keen doesn't have half t...more I love a good anti-internet polemic as much as the next girl. In fact, I actually thought I'd be the one person in my workplace to secretly love this book as I am part-curmudgeon and just don't get "these kids today" with their truthiness and solipsism. But, man, this book was truly terrible -- poorly researched, free of historical context and alarmist. It's like when the Frankfurt School got their panties in an uproar over that new-fangled radio thingee except Keen doesn't have half the philosophical heft as Adorno.

The text moves from "Wikipedia needs editors" to "I'm bummed Tower closed" to raving about "the children, protect the children" -- insulting the great "monkey" unwashed all the way. His assessment of the internet fails to take into account curation, filtering mechanisms, subscription services (eMusic gets a small nod towards the end) and open source technologies that have allowed NON-amateurs to seize the means of production after having been shut out by mainstream tastemakers for the better part of the Twentieth Century. (As a consultant for The Future of Music Coalition's International Artist Project, I'm thinking particularly of musicians who hail from outside of Keen's eurocentric frame of reference.)

Speaking of Keen's perspective on music and remixing, does remixing Dylan diminish the original, or does it reify its authenticity? I'm not entirely sure. Maybe, Baudrillard could tell us. But, the point is that Keen's arguments aren't complex or original. And, they don't amount to more than, say, a series of blog posts by one of your more evolved monkeys.

I really am all for taking on the detrimental affects of online social networks, advertising and the incessant, flattery-filled "you"-ness of contemporary culture, but pound for pound, I'll take Thomas De Zengotita's Mediated: How the Media Shapes Your World and the Way You Live It over The Cult of the Amateur any day.

(Ok, one more thing, I know Keen isn't willing to raise those user-generating amateurs above monkey-level, but he's got to grant internet users a little agency. In his book, we're all constantly being duped, unable to filter out the crap or, for God's sake, turn off our bloody computers every now and again... which I'm going to do right now.)(less)

Like this review? yes (2 people liked it)

1 comment

02/10/08

Angelo rated it:

bookshelves: digital-economy

Read in January, 2008

If you tend to get pulled into discussions about the pros and cons of social media, Andrew Keen’s “The cult of the amateur” is a good book to get you all fired up. It is full of holes, plenty of hyperbole, and comes across as an angry dissertation by someone who wanted to get things off his chest in a hurry. But that’s precisely why it’s important to check it out.

These are the kind of arguments someone in the room will bring up when debating whether comments ought to be mod...more If you tend to get pulled into discussions about the pros and cons of social media, Andrew Keen’s “The cult of the amateur” is a good book to get you all fired up. It is full of holes, plenty of hyperbole, and comes across as an angry dissertation by someone who wanted to get things off his chest in a hurry. But that’s precisely why it’s important to check it out.

These are the kind of arguments someone in the room will bring up when debating whether comments ought to be moderated, or the management team should care about comments by the ’stupid public’ in relation to a YouTube video.

Keen is the kind of person who would have dismissed Abraham Zapruder’s film as unreliable and amateurish, just because he was not a real journalist. Keen is very passionate about the morphing or passing away of the old media. Some of what he observes is accurate, about the digital economy, the downside of internet as an economic and communication conduit. The usual suspects are paraded: click fraud, Google bombing, anonymous Youtube videos (like the Penguin attack on Al Gore by a PR firm), online gambling, fake blogs etc.

For every Perez Hilton and Matt Drudge, bottom-up distribution through blogs, podcasts, Flickr and Digg has created discourse about journalism and law, for instance –from the likes of Jeff Jarvis, Lawrence Lessig and Glen Reynolds. He omits mention of how the pajama bloggers he vilifies fact-checked and checkmated Dan Rather. He would be terribly upset that NBC anchor, Brian Williams writes a blog, and that the queen of England released her Christmas day message through the same democratized distribution network that amateurs upload content, YouTube.

But Cult’s true weakness is in mixing up his argument about amateurism, with an argument about all things digital. To suggest that YouTube, Google, iTunes and CraigsList is causing the extinction of newspapers, television and record labels misses the reality about how these older media were structured, and how some of them failed to respond to changing audience behavior and interests. Smart journalists realize that this isn’t the slippery slope, and that they could adapt. A few weeks ago Dan Shearer, senior editor of the Mesa Republic hailed a citizen reporter for being the first responder with information and pictures of a church fire.

“Ignorance meets bad taste meets mob rule” does fit some of the awful content that passes for entertainment and news, but we haven’t said bye bye to the experts and gatekeepers. It’s just that they are different, and operate differently. To me “ignorance meets bad taste meets mob rule” has nothing to do with the democratization of media; it’s what we have put up for years on (sigh) the six-o-clock news on television, long before the digital tsunami hit.

Just for the record (I bet you’ve heard these arguments before) this is the lens through which Keen sees social media:

* Amazon: “chief slayer of the independent book store”
* YouTube: “a large commercial break”
* Google: a “parasite,” and “an electronic mirror of ourselves”
* Pastors who research sermons online are “plagiarists,” Lessig is “misguided,” and the internet is a “moral hazard.

There is hope. The last chapter, Solutions, does offer some ideas as to what could be done to save the world from going to hell in a hand-basket. But I won’t spoil it for you. It’s a book I still believe everyone even mildly involved in media and communications ought to read, after Wikinomics. When looking up Wikinomics on Amazon, it does not come up as “Customers who bought this item also bought,” recommendation. But then the “chief slayer of the independent bookstore” wouldn’t be reliable, would it?
(less)

Like this review? yes (2 people liked it)

add a comment

06/29/07

Mike rated it:

Read in July, 2007

recommends it for: folks interested in Web 2.0 and technology

I expected to be upset by this book. I was. This is no more than a poorly reasoned and weekly supported anti-Web 2.0 rant by a failed Internet entrepreneur. His claims that the participatory nature of Web 2.0 will ruin culture because it removes the highly trained cultural gatekeepers (publishers, record and move producers, etc.) from the equation of what we read, watch, listen to, etc. is ludicrous. If these gatekeepers were providing such high quality content the 2.0 revolution wouldn't be...more

Like this review? yes (2 people liked it)

add a comment

08/31/07

Jeremy rated it:

Read in August, 2007

recommends it for: members of the flat-earth society

This book made me all kinds of cranky. I accept the premise on its face, that the web is chock full of amateurs blathering on about their most mundane thoughts and dreams. I part ways with the author when he claims that our culture and values will be destroyed because of it. By decrying the fate of the major movie studios and record labels, and the precipitous drop in their revenues, it's pretty clear who he's writing this book for. By pretending that the public at large has a relationship of in...more

Like this review? yes (2 people liked it)

add a comment

02/23/08

Matthew rated it:

Read in February, 2008

recommends it for: people who get inspired when they're pissed off.

It's been a very long time since I've read a book so in opposition to most of my core values regarding creativity and expression. From page one and on almost every page following, I've found things that offend me. This book avoided a no-star rating only because the writer has inspired me to be more committed to my views on independent creative endeavors.

Like this review? yes (2 people liked it)

add a comment

10/09/08

Tom rated it:

Read in October, 2008

recommended to Tom by: Barnes & Noble
recommends it for: Internet Junkies

I went into reading this book having already viewed a Google talk video where the author discussed it and took Q&A. I found that the core tenet of the book, that the "Web 2.0" so-called democratization of all media is a profoundly bad thing that undermines talent and professional skill and does nothing to enrich our lives, is pretty accurate. The promise of the democratization, that an average citizen can publish a blog post, a song or a video that is as valuable to the reader, listene...more

Like this review? yes (1 person liked it)

add a comment

03/01/08

James rated it:

Read in December, 2007

Based on the title, I thought this was going to be another book about the Bush Administration. But instead of being about the incompetence, hubris, cronyism, and greed that’s running our government and ruining our country, The Cult of The Amateur is about the incompetence, vanity, narcissism, and greed that’s running the Internet and killing our culture.

Overall, Keen’s polemic is a very relevant book and one I wish everyone would read. It’s sure to spark a lot of debate at dinn...more

Like this review? yes (1 person liked it)

1 comment

01/08/08

Bob rated it:

bookshelves: know-your-enemy

Read in November, 2007

Often described as a polemic, "The Cult of the Amateur" is simply a screed against societal and economic change. It is a moralistic bombast against the populist notion of cooperation and collaboration in favor of a single point of reference determined and espoused by an expert. The author pulls out all of the goblins: narcissism, lying, thievery, gambling and pornography; to warn readers that their culture is under siege by know-nothing friends and neighbors bent on self-expressio...more Often described as a polemic, "The Cult of the Amateur" is simply a screed against societal and economic change. It is a moralistic bombast against the populist notion of cooperation and collaboration in favor of a single point of reference determined and espoused by an expert. The author pulls out all of the goblins: narcissism, lying, thievery, gambling and pornography; to warn readers that their culture is under siege by know-nothing friends and neighbors bent on self-expression and actualization at the cost of a national dialog. To believe the premise, our society will unravel — even our economy is at stake! — if my neighbors and I allow ourselves to chronicle the times we live in without heeding the checks and balances of experts. We are, with each visit to Wikipedia, with each blog post and each download; jeopardizing jobs in traditional publishing, distribution and media. What purports to be a defense of our national character ends up being a defense of the hayday of mass media where three networks and a handful of newspapers made the news and controlled the water-cooler-conversations through a self-chosen circle of "experts." I have found it impossible to separate the words on the page from their outspoken author, Andrew Keen. Lacking direction and focus, Keen leaps from conclusion to conclusion often contradicting himself: as in his mourning the loss of niche knowledge among the staff of Tower Records and lambasting the uncontrolled blogosphere for perpetuating a never ending series of narrow interests. Keen’s academic pedigree shines through each sentence and illuminates his general distrust of the common man. This book is an unconscious paean to media darlings of a by-gone era: the condescending, idealistic academician as talking-head. Yes. Gambling can be dangerous and pornography is not for children. No. The crowd is not imbued with wisdom. Our society is experiencing significant growing pains and experimenting with new technologies and freedoms. Through seven chapters, Keen focuses only on the negative consequences of technological advances and condemns our innate human curiosity and expression as irrevocably bad. In the eighth and final chapter, Keen finally allows that there are benefits and acknowledges that we may yet reign in this beast of Web 2.0 and realize our own folly. He might be right. We may yet welcome experts into our conversations, should they decide to participate rather than instruct. Doing so will strike a balance between narcissistic echoes in the blogosphere and self-referential experts espousing their wisdom. It is a bit of a strain to think how Keen, after seven chapters of self-righteously divisive language, can make that allowance; but the final chapter is a welcomed return to reality and pragmatism. If you must read this book, I highly recommend checking it out from an American library—where royalties are not paid.(less)

Like this review? yes (1 person liked it)

add a comment

07/02/07

Jonathan rated it:

Read in July, 2007

While Keen does make some interesting points, his constant railing against all aspects of Web 2.0 grows old. We get it. You don't like user-created content, at least when it is created by people other than yourself (more on this later). Keen might be trying to get us to rally to the cause of saving the Internet, but in the end one can't help but wonder if he is just a bitter man who missed the 2.0 boat.

As one can expect from the title of the book, he is not fond of amateurs, stating...more

Like this review? yes (1 person liked it)

add a comment

02/03/09

Roger rated it:

Read in February, 2009

As someone who thinks there isn't nearly enough skepticism about our current headlong rush into total technological immersion, I expected to sympathize with Keen's points. And I did, to a point. But the subject deserves a better treatment than this.

The book deals with three main points.

First is the philosophy. Here Keen seems to agree with Tom Lehrer's old line: "The reason most folk songs are as atrocious as they undoubtedly are is that they were written by 'the ...more As someone who thinks there isn't nearly enough skepticism about our current headlong rush into total technological immersion, I expected to sympathize with Keen's points. And I did, to a point. But the subject deserves a better treatment than this.

The book deals with three main points.

First is the philosophy. Here Keen seems to agree with Tom Lehrer's old line: "The reason most folk songs are as atrocious as they undoubtedly are is that they were written by 'the people.'" The digirati, who hold disproportionate sway over the shaping of our culture, have championed the idea that uncredentialed commonfolk have something to say and that they are worth hearing. Keen disagrees. A quick look at YouTube or a random blog will show he's right 99% of the time. But he ignores cases in which knowledge is too specialized or too time sensitive to be printed in any form, or too rare in traditional media. In those cases, blogs and Wikipedia (also Goodreads) are ideal. Since he doesn't address these situations, he can't even begin to ask the key question: is the din of self-involved, uninformed twaddle emanating from MySpace, Twitter and blogs worth sorting through to find the useful information?

Second are his thoughts on internet gambling and pornography. He's not a fan. But as far as I can tell, these have nothing, specifically, to do with Web 2.0, so I can't figure out why they're in this book.

Third, and most interesting, are the business aspects. Here Keen outlines the frightening and likely scenarios facing our media. As blog readership rises and newspaper readership falls, will we have more and more commentary on less and less actual news? Will a music industry composed of nothing but unpaid amateurs (half of whom are just remixing preexisting works) ever result in another Beatles or Radiohead? Would an unprofitable publishing industry ever have produced a John Updike? (The answers, by the way, are yes, no, and no. Anyone who thinks true geniuses will toil in poverty for love of the art and still produce top-notch work without any kind of educational or editorial structure are fooling themselves.) I think the longheld implicit assumption has been that people will eventually find ways to make money off digital distribution. For television producers and 3-minute pop singers, this may be true (it may be less money, but not so much to threaten the industry). But longform media (in-depth reporting, novels, full-length albums) are in trouble, and THAT really is a serious threat to our culture. Someone ought to write a better book about that.(less)

Like this review? yes

add a comment

04/26/09

Natbas rated it:

Read in April, 2009

This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.

It is clear as daylight that Andrew Keen hates people who do things that they ought not do. He calls them Amateurs, but he means idiots- monkeys.

The introduction to this book says it all.

A friend of his tells him about his latest brainwave. He plans to write a software for publishing music, text and video on the internet. Nothing new, but still, the friend says,

"It's MySpace meets YouTube meets Wikipedia meets Google, on steroids"

And Keen...more

Like this review? yes

add a comment

01/28/09

Bradley rated it:

(review of isbn 0385520816)

This books seems to suffer from the same problems of many other polemical tracts these days. Keen makes a very good point about the demise of the gatekeeper class - something that has indeed become very prevalent lately. This argument would have been best made over the course of an article; the argument does not hold together over the course of an entire book. The later chapters seem to be more about the evils of Google and other large internet companies than about the failing of newer forms ...more

Like this review? yes

add a comment

02/03/09

Kevin rated it:

Read in February, 2009

recommends it for: Anyone that has an interest in Social Media, for better or worse

This past Monday I finished reading the cult of the amateur by Andrew Keen. From the moment I started reading this book I was surprised and taken back by the content and how the whole of Social Media could be viewed in such an overly negative way

My mind was filled with both thoughts of rage (yes rage) and miss-understandings of how one person (Keen) could be so overly negative and only see one side (the weaker side) of the argument surrounding Social Media and it's effect on a globa...more This past Monday I finished reading the cult of the amateur by Andrew Keen. From the moment I started reading this book I was surprised and taken back by the content and how the whole of Social Media could be viewed in such an overly negative way

My mind was filled with both thoughts of rage (yes rage) and miss-understandings of how one person (Keen) could be so overly negative and only see one side (the weaker side) of the argument surrounding Social Media and it's effect on a global society.

Now it isn't that I think only good can come from Social Media, because that isn't the case, I am often highly critical of it myself and often share some of the same opinions as Keen ((The opinions I share are centred around Internet Gambling, Pornography etc.)) , but I believe I have much more of an open mind than Keen puts on display in this book.

Keen is overly critical and negative of everything (and I mean everything) that the Internet has offered society thus far, citing only the highlights when it serves his purpose. I fully understand this is how arguments are generally presented (in order to make money), however, a good argument would be one that presents "both sides of the coin". This type of book would let the readers choose sides for themselves and if an author can do this and readers still choose to agree with the author than a solid statement has been made. This is something that Keen fails to do in the cult of the amateur.

I originally picked up this book not for it's content but rather for the bright orange cover that it showed off. You see I am attracted to shiny objects and bright colours so this was a natural read for me based on criteria such as this.

Although not a great read by any means, the cult of the amateur is a must read for anyone interested in Social Media, on either side of the argument. At the very least Keen's writing provides some background information to many of the services and websites that the majority of Internet users make use of on a daily basis.(less)

Like this review? yes

add a comment

« previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 … 20 21 next »

recent status updates | recommend it | blog it

combine
other editions (4)

title link
avg rating
small image
med image
large image

The Cult of the Amateur: How today's Internet is killing our culture

book data

new topic
discuss this book

friend reviews

lists with this book

other reviews (showing 1-20 of 406)

blog this book

combine
other editions (4)

popular shelves

groups with this book

Audio books on iTunes

The Cult of the Amateur: How today's Internet is killing our culture

book data

new topic discuss this book

friend reviews

lists with this book

other reviews (showing 1-20 of 406)

blog this book

combine other editions (4)

popular shelves

groups with this book

Audio books on iTunes

new topic
discuss this book

combine
other editions (4)