More Sex Is Safer Sex: The Unconventional Wisdom of Economics
by Steven E. Landsburg
|
|
Sign in to Goodreads to see your friends' reviews of More Sex Is Safer Sex: The Unconventional Wisdom of Economics.
discuss this book
friend reviews (0)
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
lists with this book
This book is not in any lists. Go add it to a list.
other reviews (showing 1-20 of 184)
bookshelves:
economics,
non-fiction
Read in June, 2007
recommends it for:
Freakonomicists
With all the good pop economics book coming out, I really beginning to choosing to study political science rather than the Dismal Science.
More Sex is Safer Sex treads the same path as Freakonomics, The Wisdom of Crowds, and The Undercover Economist, all of which do a better or more entertaining job of tying economic principles into everyday life. Steven E. Landsburg revels in coming up with unorthodox solutions to problems—truly charitable people should only give to ONE charity, racial profi...more
More Sex is Safer Sex treads the same path as Freakonomics, The Wisdom of Crowds, and The Undercover Economist, all of which do a better or more entertaining job of tying economic principles into everyday life. Steven E. Landsburg revels in coming up with unorthodox solutions to problems—truly charitable people should only give to ONE charity, racial profi...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
This was book basically a wannabe Freakonomics. There were a lot of interesting topics and things that made you think. Except the topics he talked about were not that really relevant or useful. And whereas Freakonomics backed everything up with empirical proof and extensive research, this book was entirely done from his armchair. Moreover, his logic was at times a little dubious, and at times I just disagreed. His title sucks, and makes you believe that the only reason he wrote this book was to...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in October, 2007
To quote (out of context) from the book:
"If this whole discussion strikes you as the sort of idle Sunday dorm-room chitchat that kept you from studying for your chemistry final but never amounted to anything of practical importance..."
Well yes, that's exactly how this book strikes me. Interesting. Thought-provoking. Rigorous? Not so much. But hey, if it were, it wouldn't have been such a fun and fast read.
"If this whole discussion strikes you as the sort of idle Sunday dorm-room chitchat that kept you from studying for your chemistry final but never amounted to anything of practical importance..."
Well yes, that's exactly how this book strikes me. Interesting. Thought-provoking. Rigorous? Not so much. But hey, if it were, it wouldn't have been such a fun and fast read.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Actually a book about economics. This one is the less-intelligent child of Freakonomics, the pop phenomenon that put economics on the map for people too cool for economics. Spend 30 minutes skimming this one, and you will pick up some interesting insights. I think what both books do ultimately is make us see that when we make decisions, our incentives and motivations are often different than we think.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in November, 2007
recommends it for:
robots
Ugh! The author comes off so cold and calculating I found it difficult to even finish the book. His arguments are based on economic analysis and pretty much nothing else. I get the impression that if he saw somebody drowning he'd pull out his notebook and calculate whether or not it'd economically worthy his time/effort to save the person.
As many others have said before me, read Freakonomics instead.
As many others have said before me, read Freakonomics instead.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in December, 2007
The perfect book for an economics junkie like me. If you liked freakonimics, this is a slightly deeper more serious book that amazes the reader in much the same way. The title is the subject matter of the first chapter and is quite an interesting discussion. the principle behind it applies to many other situations as well.
heartily recommend to anyone who liked freakonomics
heartily recommend to anyone who liked freakonomics
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in February, 2008
While this is a fun book to read, I didn't find it as compelling as Freakonomics. Essentially this is a collection of his Slate articles, with some additions to each of them. Therefore, it has tons more in the way thought exercises, but a lot less in the way of real-world analysis. If you like his work in Slate, or need more examples after enjoying Freakonomics, enjoy.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
on-hold
Read in July, 2007
I’m about 1/3 of the way through it. So far I’ve found some of the author’s conclusions to be a little far-fetched. Really though, I just found a couple of more interesting books to read so this one is temporarily on the back burner.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
integrate
Read in November, 2007
I like to read books from economists, and this one was great. He has great humor along with his great observations about life. When you look at life through an economist-lense, sometimes outcomes are different than I would have expected.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in December, 2007
A not-so-subtle libertarian conservative manifesto masquerading as a "freakanomics" style book to cash in on the trend.
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
Read in September, 2007
Easily readable pop-econ, in the style of Freakonomics (actually Landsberg's pop econ books were pre Freakonomics). You don't agree with all of the wacky economic outcomes and solutions, but they get you thinking.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in May, 2007
Read this in one sitting at Tattered Cover. Bite-sized, think-o-matic economics. Enjoyed it immensely. The format limited many of the ideas to half-baked, but what was there was fairly darn interesting.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
recommends it for:
Anyone who thinks the answer is obvious
How could you not be intrigued by just the title? Great introduction in how to think economically (quick to add, not necessarily like an economist). Please refer to your favorite political representative.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
the-sociologist-in-me
Read in December, 2007
recommends it for:
not many of you
This book promised to be another brain teaser similar to the style of 'Freakonomics.' I wasn't that impressed. A few good arguments mixed with a lot of not-so-interesting-stuff.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in May, 2007
one of the best armchair economis in a long while. although he point poinniards at The Freakonomics, the standard is more classic linear(ised) econometric modelling
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in January, 2007
This one made me think! I didn't always agree with his logic nor did I think he always made valid points, but he did make me think about how people act.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
the title may throw you off a bit, but this is great stuff. I liked freakonomics and i totally dig this. Full of creative thinking and wonderful ideas.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
I think he made everything up. From what I hear. First few chapters were entertaining but overall it just gave me headaches.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in November, 2007
Interesting view of economists perspective on everyday occurrences....Theorists prepare yourselves for a good read
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in December, 2007
Sort of the same genre as Freakonomics, but with much less compelling evidence and a blowhard of an author.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment


















