<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	
<book id="4778797">
  <title><![CDATA[Snark: A Polemic in Seven Fits (It's Mean, It's Personal, and It's Ruining Our Conversation)]]></title>
  <isbn><![CDATA[1416599452]]></isbn>
  <isbn13><![CDATA[9781416599456]]></isbn13>
    <work>
  <best_book_id type="integer">4778797</best_book_id>
  <books_count type="integer">2</books_count>
  <default_description>What is snark? You recognize it when you see it -- a tone of teasing, snide, undermining abuse, nasty and knowing, that is spreading like pinkeye through the media and threatening to take over how Americans converse with each other and what they can count on as true. Snark attempts to steal someone's mojo, erase her cool, annihilate her effectiveness. In this sharp and witty polemic, &lt;I&gt;New Yorker&lt;/i&gt; critic and bestselling author David Denby takes on the snarkers, naming the nine principles of snark -- the standard techniques its practitioners use to poison their arrows. Snarkers like to think they are deploying wit, but mostly they are exposing the seethe and snarl of an unhappy country, releasing bad feeling but little laughter.&lt;P&gt;In this highly entertaining essay, Denby traces the history of snark through the ages, starting with its invention as personal insult in the drinking clubs of ancient Athens, tracking its development all the way to the age of the Internet, where it has become the sole purpose and style of many media, political, and celebrity Web sites. Snark releases the anguish of the dispossessed, envious, and frightened; it flows when a dying class of the powerful struggles to keep the barbarians outside the gates, or, alternately, when those outsiders want to take over the halls of the powerful and expel the office-holders. Snark was behind the London-based magazine Private Eye, launched amid the dying embers of the British empire in 1961; it was also central to the career-hungry, New York-based magazine Spy. It has flourished over the years in the works of everyone from the startling Roman poet Juvenal to Alexander Pope to Tom Wolfe to a million commenters snarling at other people behind handles. Thanks to the grand dame of snark, it has a prominent place twice a week on the opinion page of the &lt;I&gt;New York Times&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;P&gt;Denby has fun snarking the snarkers, expelling the bums and promoting the true wits, but he is also making a serious point: the Internet has put snark on steroids. In politics, snark means the lowest, most insinuating and insulting side can win. For the young, a savage piece of gossip could ruin a reputation and possibly a future career. And for all of us, snark just sucks the humor out of life. Denby defends the right of any of us to be cruel, but shows us how the real pros pull it off. Snark, he says, is for the amateurs.</default_description>
  <id type="integer">4843635</id>
  <media_type>book</media_type>
  <original_language_id type="integer" nil="true"></original_language_id>
  <original_publication_day type="integer">13</original_publication_day>
  <original_publication_month type="integer">1</original_publication_month>
  <original_publication_year type="integer">2009</original_publication_year>
  <original_title>Snark: A Polemic in Seven Fits (It's Mean, It's Personal, and It's Ruining Our Conversation)</original_title>
  <rating_dist>total:137|5:6|4:23|3:48|2:43|1:17|</rating_dist>
  <ratings_count type="integer">137</ratings_count>
  <ratings_sum type="integer">369</ratings_sum>
  <reviews_count type="integer">293</reviews_count>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">44</text_reviews_count>
</work>

  <average_rating><![CDATA[2.69]]></average_rating>
  <ratings_count><![CDATA[137]]></ratings_count>
  <text_reviews_count><![CDATA[44]]></text_reviews_count>
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/4778797.Snark_A_Polemic_in_Seven_Fits]]></url>
  <authors>
        <author id="225286">
      <name><![CDATA[David Denby]]></name>
      <role><![CDATA[]]></role>
      <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/225286.David_Denby]]></url>
      <average_rating><![CDATA[3.19]]></average_rating>
      <ratings_count><![CDATA[327]]></ratings_count>
      <text_reviews_count><![CDATA[81]]></text_reviews_count>
    </author>
      </authors>
    <reviews start="1" end="20" total="293">
    <review id="49359359">
    <user id="11228">
    <name><![CDATA[Suman]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[El Cerrito, CA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/11228-suman?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>1</rating>
  <votes>5</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sun Mar 15 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Mar 15 13:24:19 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Mar 15 21:37:36 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Intellectually lazy...<br/><br/>You've had this situation. There's six hours to go before a 10 page paper is due, and you haven't begun writing yet. You have this dynamite thesis and things seem to be really coming together in your head, but once you start putting pen to paper you find out the fol...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/49359359">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/49359359?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="46334391">
    <user id="1369501">
    <name><![CDATA[Lisa]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Wichita, KS]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1369501-lisa?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>1</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="language-linguistics" />
        <shelf name="nonfiction" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sat Feb 28 00:00:00 -0800 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Feb 14 11:22:47 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Feb 28 11:44:48 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[A quick, generally interesting book on the nature of snark and why it's bad. Denby is a clever writer but the book suffers somewhat from his trying to hit a moving target in defining what snark is. Often, it seems as if &quot;I know it when I see it&quot; is the definition, but he gives copious exam...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/46334391">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/46334391?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="42605091">
    <user id="897473">
    <name><![CDATA[Bev]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Atlanta, GA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/897473-bev?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>1</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[bloggers, Myspacers, politicos]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sat Jan 10 00:00:00 -0800 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Jan 10 15:10:17 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Jan 10 15:39:21 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[This is a terrific book that neatly separates meaningful satire and irony(Denby likes Jonathan Swift and the Colbert Report) from the kind of lazy, nasty pot-shots and knowing in-jokes that pollute public discourse and deliver debate into the hands of whoever is willing to be the most unfair at the ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/42605091">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/42605091?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="46594336">
    <user id="43599">
    <name><![CDATA[Davie]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Stanford, CA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/43599-davie?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>1</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>true</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="finished" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sun Feb 01 00:00:00 -0800 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Feb 16 20:56:09 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Feb 16 20:56:09 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Finished for now, although technically I did not read all the pages (maybe should have a separate list for these ones).<br/><br/>Snark as a word and a book title have such potential -- why oh why did you have to disappoint me so? Maybe if Denby had titled the book, &quot;random things in the world...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/46594336">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/46594336?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="65185694">
    <user id="166012">
    <name><![CDATA[Ben]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Amherst, MA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/166012-ben?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue Jul 28 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Jul 27 16:37:08 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Jul 28 16:00:52 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[     A book like Snark - and by that I mean any work that sets out to define and critique a cultural phenomenon that is still in the process of running its course - is both important and doomed to a maximum of only partial success. A book like this can only be partially successful because the author...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/65185694">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/65185694?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="49506932">
    <user id="789091">
    <name><![CDATA[Cameron]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Lancaster, CA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/789091-cameron?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="lit-crit" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Thu Mar 19 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Mar 16 18:25:46 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Fri Mar 20 10:53:55 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Snarky is one of my favorite adjectives.  For me it recalls a mode of surviving the degradations of corporate inanity, customer irritability, and coworker absurdity.  Snark provided a vehicle to vent with sympathetic ears and alleviate tension with acid humor and commiseration.  So when Denby's &quot;...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/49506932">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/49506932?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="71430104">
    <user id="226426">
    <name><![CDATA[Diane]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Austin, TX]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/226426-diane-ramirez?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sun Sep 20 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Sep 16 10:29:57 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Sep 20 23:03:32 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[What is snark? According to Denby (and I like his assessment), it's cheap easy humor, it's devoid of passion or ideals or belief, it's an assumed knowing wink, it's the outsider slamming those on the inside, often until he or she is accepted in themselves. This is a quick read, as not much further d...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/71430104">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/71430104?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="60419008">
    <user id="1058994">
    <name><![CDATA[Ryan]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Eugene, OR]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1058994-ryan-mishap?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="philosophy" />
        <shelf name="political-category" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Jun 20 10:38:10 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Jun 27 13:11:08 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[     The author's prose is as silly as the effeminate scarf he wears about his neck in the unflattering author's photo....<br/>     That, my friends, is snark, as Denby deftly identifies it: insulting, mean, and--unlike satire or political irony--it stands for nothing and serves no cause but to mak...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/60419008">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/60419008?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="44648808">
    <user id="1049964">
    <name><![CDATA[David]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1049964-david?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>1</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue Jan 27 00:00:00 -0800 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Jan 28 10:32:37 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Jan 28 10:41:24 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[This very brief book (125pp.) contains about 20-25 worthwhile pages. The rest, especially the supposed historical background, is pure filler. If you want to understand snark and its prevalence read the following blogs: Dead Spin, Wonkette, Perez Hilton, and With Leather. What differentiates snark fr...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/44648808">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/44648808?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="58966420">
    <user id="1597254">
    <name><![CDATA[Kacper]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Brooklyn, NY]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1597254-kacper?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Jun 09 04:24:28 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Jun 09 04:28:18 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[&quot;The crab that tries to escape the barrel -- the girl who dresses differently or studies harder -- gets pulled back into the barrel. Who does she think she is? A young writer who creates an ambitious work of fiction gets snarked by journalists of lesser ambition. What a pretentious phony! Snark...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/58966420">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/58966420?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="70428283">
    <user id="2510037">
    <name><![CDATA[Josh]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Brookline, MA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2510037-josh?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>1</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Wed Sep 09 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Sep 07 20:21:23 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Sep 09 08:38:30 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[How not to write a book. Denby feels that we Internet bloggers and start-up journalists are, yes, destroying culture, but also just plain mean. But then he brands meanness appropriate if you're good with words, in which case it becomes &quot;criticism.&quot; From his diatribe against Maureen Dowd an...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/70428283">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/70428283?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="51064737">
    <user id="1795722">
    <name><![CDATA[residentoddball]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Arlington, TX]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1795722-residentoddball?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>1</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="own-it" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sun Jun 07 15:00:42 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Mar 31 14:27:41 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Jun 07 15:00:42 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[<u>Snark</u> is a tantalizing read for those who like to perceive and dissect the incredibly subtle attributes of communication, especially in the light of modern technology.<br/><br/>To his credit (and in contrast to what other reviews have said), Denby masterfully etches out the acute definition of sna...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/51064737">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/51064737?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="68633671">
    <user id="1657954">
    <name><![CDATA[Chrishna]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1657954-chrishna?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Aug 23 20:18:47 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Aug 23 20:22:38 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[The ultimate irony, this book was snarky!  Although, it re-emphasized that we really need to elevate the level of discussion in this country.  People seem to only respond to URGENT ALERTS flashing across the television screen or the most outrageous hyperbole.  I'm actually worried that I might live ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/68633671">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/68633671?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="57585216">
    <user id="1061079">
    <name><![CDATA[Matt]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Spokane, WA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1061079-matt?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sat May 02 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Wed May 27 23:20:35 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed May 27 23:24:41 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Entertaining, informative, breezy, and a bit funny, too.  This is the first nonfiction book I've read in some time, and at no point did I feel like I was reading a school assignment for a media literacy class (which, I'm sure, in many such classes, this book will appear on the syllabi).  I enjoyed t...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/57585216">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/57585216?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="54299875">
    <user id="2265178">
    <name><![CDATA[Talitha]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2265178-talitha?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 -0800 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Apr 28 18:03:26 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Apr 29 08:10:33 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I was really excited to read this book, because the way people speak to each other is one of my personal soapbox issues.<br/><br/>I found myself really disapointed in <em>Snark</em>, because it only takes a handful of pages to realize that the author believes that 'snark' refers to anything anyone says abo...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/54299875">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/54299875?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="65262439">
    <user id="905073">
    <name><![CDATA[Diandra]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Long Beach, CA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/905073-diandra?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="2009" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon Aug 03 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Jul 28 08:37:31 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Aug 03 14:55:22 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[This was interesting, redundant to a point of excess, and all together taught me nothing new except the history of snark.  Which was droll, at best.  I never believed snarkiness was new, nor do I believe there honestly is an influx of snarky &quot;journalism&quot;.  However, I do believe that given ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/65262439">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/65262439?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="52506257">
    <user id="1058004">
    <name><![CDATA[Kathleen]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Santa Rosa, CA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1058004-kathleen?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Wed Apr 01 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Apr 13 10:15:42 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Apr 14 14:16:48 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Denby has done his homework for this slim volume. Beginning with historical chapters, he moves into what snarkiness is and isn't. While, the title intrigued me, (and I liked his American Sucker) the examples he used (politicians and celebrities) just didn't grab me. The principles seemed rather cont...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/52506257">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/52506257?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="60118761">
    <user id="151241">
    <name><![CDATA[Carrie]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Sammamish, WA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/151241-carrie?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>1</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="2009" />
        <shelf name="nonfiction" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Jun 17 20:03:32 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Jun 17 20:03:51 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[The front of the book says snark is mean, it's personal and it's ruining our conversation.  Unfortunately, the rest of the book doesn't do a very good job of expounding on that.  There's an insanely dry and boring academic history of snark, there's a random collection of examples, most of which don'...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/60118761">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/60118761?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="44375618">
    <user id="26188">
    <name><![CDATA[Jafar]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[London, The United Kingdom]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/26188-jafar?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Jan 26 03:21:52 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Oct 04 09:34:23 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[You can read the book description for what Denby means by <em>snark</em>. I don’t know how big of a deal snark is. I guess I’m mostly insulated from it. I stay clear of politics. Never see a political ad or take a look at the political blogs. No interest in celebrity gossips. Don’t read much in terms o...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/44375618">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/44375618?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="58643796">
    <user id="1354924">
    <name><![CDATA[Sarah]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1354924-sarah?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Fri Jun 05 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Jun 06 08:32:45 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Jun 06 10:01:04 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[D.D.'s manifesto. I respect him for writing this book. The historic look at snark was informative and very interesting, good ol' Juvenal etc...A quick several hour read, as a good manifesto should be. You should give it a shot, very timely. Like his film reviews for The New Yorker, he is for the mos...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/58643796">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/58643796?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    </reviews>
  <popular_shelves>
        <shelf name="to-read" />
        <shelf name="currently-reading" />
        <shelf name="nonfiction" />
        <shelf name="non-fiction" />
        <shelf name="language" />
        <shelf name="culture" />
        <shelf name="humor" />
        <shelf name="words" />
      </popular_shelves>
  <book_links>
    <book_link id="8">
  <name><![CDATA[WorldCat]]></name>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book_link/follow/8?book_id=4778797</link>
</book_link>
  </book_links>
</book>
</GoodreadsResponse>