Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The End of Time: The Next Revolution in Our Understanding of the Universe” as Want to Read:
The End of Time: The Next Revolution in Our Understanding of the Universe
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The End of Time: The Next Revolution in Our Understanding of the Universe

3.97  ·  Rating Details ·  1,535 Ratings  ·  57 Reviews
Time is an illusion. Although the laws of physics create a powerful impression that time is flowing, in fact there are only timeless `nows'. In The End of Time, the British theoretical physicist Julian Barbour describes the coming revolution in our understanding of the world: a quantum theory of the universe that brings together Einstein's general theory of relativity - wh ...more
Hardcover, First Edition, 371 pages
Published September 1999 by Weidenfeld & Nicolson
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
A Brief History of Time by Stephen HawkingCosmos by Carl SaganThe Elegant Universe by Brian GreeneThe Fabric of the Cosmos by Brian GreenePale Blue Dot by Carl Sagan
Cosmology
14th out of 75 books — 115 voters
Introduction to Algorithms by Thomas H. CormenStructure and Interpretation of Computer Programs by Harold AbelsonThe C Programming Language by Brian W. KernighanThe Art of Computer Programming, Volumes 1-3 Boxed Set by Donald Ervin KnuthDesign Patterns by Erich Gamma
Essential Books of Computer Science
117th out of 155 books — 151 voters


More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 2,969)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Manny
Oct 05, 2014 Manny rated it really liked it
Recommends it for: People interested in Big Questions
Recommended to Manny by: Robert
People who read pop science books will know by now that the physics world is rather like that of Star Wars. The dominant String Theorists are the Empire; led by the Vader-like Ed Witten, they control the corrupt funding agencies and rule science with an iron fist. Ranged against them, we have the eccentric and charismatic Rebels. Lee Smolin's Periphery Institute is clearly the main Rebel base, and Peter Woit comes across as a typical Han Solo figure. I rather fancy Roger Penrose as Obi-Wan Kenob ...more
Rob
Mar 21, 2008 Rob rated it it was amazing
Recommends it for: eggheads who are so nerdy that the other eggheads call them "nerd"
if you love Roger Penrose and Lee Smolin, and REALLY UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT, you might like this book. basically, the paradoxical incongruity between quantum theory and general relativity is attacked once more. i was blown away. the strongest argument, for me, that time does not really exist was this: if you look at any ISOLATED quantum system with CONSTANT ENERGY, you will expect it to be in a STATIONARY STATE. think of any isolated atom, with all its electrons sitting in orbita ...more
Robert
I got interested in this book after attending a seminar given by Barbour at the University of New Brunswick.

THIS REVIEW HAS BEEN CURTAILED IN PROTEST AT GOODREADS' CENSORSHIP POLICY

See the complete review here:

http://arbieroo.booklikes.com/post/66...
Lauren
Mar 30, 2016 Lauren rated it it was amazing
Shelves: old
This is absolutely one of my favourite science books. I picked it up initially because the premise fascinated me. The nonexistence (as an objective reality, mind you) of time was something I've always sort of intuited, and to see physics exploring the same conclusions immediately sparked my interest. Ironically, though, that is not the strongest part of this book.

I think any good science book should not only explain to you a theory and its application, but give you the context as well. A good sc
...more
Erik
Apr 09, 2009 Erik rated it really liked it
Julian Barbour is the foremost representative of the Machian view of physics, epitomized by the idea that time disappears on the cosmological view replaced by the comparison of changes with changes within time. There is no time for the universe itself. Turns out he can defend that view with a timeless view of both GTR and of QM by way of the stationary state DeWitt-Wheeler equation. He also has an explanation of why there seems to be time in terms of traces and time-capsules which result from qu ...more
Nicholas
Aug 18, 2016 Nicholas rated it liked it
Shelves: physics
I was too far into this before it became a chore, and feeling unable to rescind the investment I'd made, I ploughed on.The problem for me was mainly one of clarity and lack of allegorical description when dealing with complex theories, which I felt should have been present in a work aimed at a lay readership a part of which I presumed myself to be. There seemed to be a lack in the consistency of the intellectual level of to whom the book is addressed. On the one hand you are reminded of Pythago ...more
Cassandra Kay Silva
Dec 04, 2011 Cassandra Kay Silva rated it liked it
Shelves: science
I mean the idea behind the book was really good. I was excited to read about a whole new way to excuse ourselves from this time like track forward we seem to find ourselves in. Some of the backing seemed pretty sound from my grasp of these issues. The problem is, I was left with kind of giant question mark at the end? The conclusion was frankly so poorly written that I found myself re reading the original entry chapters to kind of tie MYSELF back to the context since the author didn't do it for ...more
Bria
Sep 20, 2009 Bria added it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Billy Pilgrim
I strongly suspect the main problem is that I was too stupid and distractable to do a good job reading this, but as far as I could glean:

This book contains, in order of most pages devoted to the least:
-Holding the reader's hand and reassuring them that it's not too hard to understand it
-Referring to what will be explained and made much clear later in the book
-Repeating or rephrasing minor points or peripheral frameworks in order to make the ideas easier to picture
-Brief summaries of or mere refe
...more
Jerry
Jan 02, 2012 Jerry rated it liked it
Shelves: science
Not very convincing. Argument is that space-time doesn’t exist. It is an illusion. Like the sun seeming to orbit the earth. States of the universe exist and seem to order themselves in a temporal sequence. Life may really be more like an event simulation than like a continuous simulation. States move from one quantum state to another quantum state in a quantum “time”. States of existence may be probabilistic (like quantum physics) where the uncertainty is not in knowing what state the system is ...more
Christopher
Jul 17, 2008 Christopher is currently reading it  ·  review of another edition
My x-wife gave me this book in 2002, and I have not had the chance to really read it. Right now I am putting a potential Theory of Everything, and this book was mentioned in the last book I read because it contains a clear idea about how construct a background-independent theory.
Jimmy Ele
May 08, 2015 Jimmy Ele rated it really liked it
This is one of the toughest books I've ever had to get through. I realized I was in over my head about 70 pages in, and then as I struggled to keep up with the mathematical lingo I realized that there's no way I'm going to (mathematically) catch up in order to understand every single concept.

I gave it 4 stars because the concepts that I could grasp (which I would say was about 85% of the book) are now in my mental tool belt. I am particularly enamored by the idea of the NOW. I will not attempt
...more
Joe
Mar 09, 2009 Joe rated it liked it
I have mixed feelings about this book. His idea that there is no such thing as time and that this insight will unify physics is really, really impressive. It makes sense once you wrap your brain around it and can really change world outlook. However, he has a huge problem getting where he's going. He makes these incredibly intuitive leaps without explaining why until later and then by then we've forgotten exactly where he was going. I like what he had to say, I wish it had been better structured ...more
Brian
May 17, 2009 Brian rated it liked it
I am very interested in sorting out the nature of "time" - is time a fundamental dimension? was there an absolute time=0? will it go on to infinity? The idea that time will go to infinity, that the universe will plod on forever really bothers me. It seriously makes me sick to my stomach. This is regardless of my thoughts on death...it bothers me whether I'll be relaxing in heaven or my spirit ceases to exist or I enjoy becoming parts of future trees and animals. I'm not sure that the world "endi ...more
Mark
Sep 22, 2013 Mark rated it liked it
Recommends it for: Sceince/physics enthusiasts.
The author puts forth the theory that time is just an illusion and does not exist. According to this idea, all events
are just a series of "nows" that our minds string together as a movie, giving us the illusion of time moving forward.
As I understand it, each "now" is like a parallel/different world (or analogous to a different/parallel world) along the
lines of Everett's 'many-worlds hypothesis'.

Getting into a little more (technical) detail, Barbour seems to believe that the universe is govern
...more
Ian Murray-Watson
Apr 16, 2015 Ian Murray-Watson rated it liked it
Have read it twice (I think) but have yet to understand it in anything like the depth required to say anything sensible about it. I found it fascinating that Barbour and Smolin, coming at the problem from complete opposite positions, often seem to end up saying the same thing. Is Time not just the only Reality, but also a complete Illusion? It exists and doesn't exist at one and the same time - makes perfect sense to me - or does it?
Ed van der Winden
Feb 27, 2016 Ed van der Winden rated it it was amazing
Not an easy read. Before I was never able to finish this, because I lost track of the arguments. Now I did. Worthwhile. I think Barbour hits the mark very closely with his theories. It could very well be that time does not really exist, but it an entirely relative consequence of the way the universe is build.
Kevin
Feb 15, 2013 Kevin rated it it was amazing
A shattering work that challenges the key discovery of the 20th century: whether time is a hard function in the theory of relativity. if not then time itself is relative. unearthing less commonly known theories discovered in parallel to einstein, barbour dissects his arguments carefully then speculates madly. both gestures not only appear valid, but probably more scientifically stable than relativity's highly unstable spawn: quantum dynamics. barbour makes the case for restating the quantum as s ...more
Pvw
Oct 15, 2010 Pvw rated it did not like it
Shelves: science
I have since long been open to the idea that time is only an illusion, a static extension in a complex multi-dimensional form. Barbour's book does no good job in promoting that idea, even though it wants to. All his babble about Platonia (Barbour's name for the static multiverse) and the existence of 'time capsules' (micro-sized qualities of atoms that allow observers to distinguish between past and future), is too far-fetched. Instead of opening readers' eyes to the possibility that all events ...more
Stephen Dranger
Aug 29, 2014 Stephen Dranger rated it really liked it
Very instructive in teaching the reader about the many different ways one can view time in physics as well as the notion of an absolute and relative universe. Barbour gives us the basics of what we need to know to understand the basics of his theory that time is really an illusion. If that sounds like nebulous hippie-dippie nonsense to you, reading this book will convince you otherwise, because there's nothing like that in there -- Barbour supports his theory with sound logic, which is what make ...more
Roger Booth
Jul 23, 2014 Roger Booth rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
When I was 19, this question occurred to me:
If a tree falls in the woods, and there are no conscious beings in the universe, does it fall quickly, or does it fall slowly?
This book answers that question.
I am too lazy to read the book in it's entirety, so I found an excellent summary.
http://beingsufficiently.blogspot.com...

If you read that correctly, you come away with the sense that every moment experienced is a miracle.
And it is only 5% bullshit :) That's less than my daily recommended allowance
...more
Thomas Jung
Apr 23, 2014 Thomas Jung rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Great read. I was expecting the typical, but it struck me by surprise how interestingly it's written.
110
Nov 28, 2009 110 marked it as to-read
Does time exist ? a good summary of Barbour's book is at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKsNra... - refers to the Leibniz-Clarke correspondence (cf. http://www.bun.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~suchii/..., section on the "relational theory"). See also http://www.bun.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~suchii/... for more references on the question of time in philosophy of physics.
A link is to be made with Izutsu's "Creation and the Timeless Order of Things: Essays in Islamic Mystical Philosophy", also with atomist theory in Islami
...more
Palmyrah
Apr 25, 2012 Palmyrah rated it liked it
I don't know how credible the ideas advanced in this book are; I don't suppose more than a few hundred people in the world are actually qualified to give an opinion on that. Dr. Barbour writes very well (his education has clearly ranged far beyond his speciality), and though I did not always agree with him, I enjoyed reading his book and learnt a lot from it, particularly about working with configuration spaces and fun things you can do with the Schrödinger wave equation.

I remain unconvinced of
...more
Gordon Gatiss
Sep 19, 2013 Gordon Gatiss rated it liked it
A good read. This book is very readable and worth the knowledge that the 335 pages of narrative uncover. Barbour clearly knows his stuff, and although I was not able to completely understand everything he says, I did get an appreciation of his reasons and arguments. This book will certainly give you a better understanding and appreciation of science. It is long, but if you persist and keep reading, your reward will come with more knowledge and understand about life and this wonderful universe we ...more
David Dutcher
It is change that we perceive occurring all around us, not time. Put simply, time does not exist.
Tony
Jul 24, 2007 Tony rated it did not like it
Recommends it for: would be physicists
The curiosity of quantum mechanics lead me to attempt this book. Having had the theory of space/time mentioned is several recent books, I wanted to know more about the topic. I thought this book might be more of a layman's explanation. I was wrong. I struggled through the first three chapters and finally gave up. I will look for Quantum Theory for Dummies books to further this non-mathematician's quest for knowledge of worm holes and time travel.
Angela
Jul 05, 2009 Angela rated it it was amazing
Shelves: non-fiction, science
I've been delaying finishing this book just because I didn't want it to end. I didn't completely understand everything, (and there was a bit of hand-waving for some of the more mathematically complex bits), but the parts I did understand were fascinating.

Also, it was interesting to get a glimpse of how this researcher does research - the effects of having children, postal strikes, etc.
Roger Blakesley
Mar 14, 2013 Roger Blakesley rated it did not like it
Julian made a good effort. He sees the problem: that the next big leap will require a leap in mathematics (or some reality-describing language) akin to Newton/Leibniz.

Instead the book gets rambly with descriptions of red or green multidimensional mists.

I am sure Julian could see it in his mind, but he failed to communicate.

It was pretty readable, but taught nothing.
Joe
Aug 29, 2010 Joe rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: nut-jobs and whack-a-doos
Shelves: physics
Seriously? What the fuck is this book about? Some shit about pulling triangles out of a burlap sack. It's very hard to follow and there's no evidence to support Barbour's claims about the nature of time.

Luckily, I traded this book for Jamie's copy of The Problem with Physics by Lee Smolin, which was terrific.
Michaeldelicio
Oct 30, 2009 Michaeldelicio rated it it was amazing
A great book for the layperson grasping at understanding high-level physics. The author posits his own theory, intended as a more elegant solution to the problems of string theory and quantum mechanics, essentially by arguing that Time is an illusory concept, and not intrinsic to the laws of physics.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 98 99 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • About Time: Einstein's Unfinished Revolution
  • Faster Than the Speed of Light: The Story of a Scientific Speculation
  • The Life of the Cosmos
  • Not Even Wrong: The Failure of String Theory and the Search for Unity in Physical Law
  • A World Without Time: The Forgotten Legacy of Gödel And Einstein
  • Einstein's Universe
  • Wrinkles in Time
  • The Fabric of Reality: The Science of Parallel Universes--and Its Implications
  • Cycles of Time: An Extraordinary New View of the Universe
  • Quintessence: The Mystery of Missing Mass in the Universe
  • Endless Universe: Beyond the Big Bang
  • Higher Speculations: Grand Theories and Failed Revolutions in Physics and Cosmology
  • The Emergent Multiverse: Quantum Theory According to the Everett Interpretation
  • The Inflationary Universe: The Quest for a New Theory of Cosmic Origins
  • A Different Universe: Reinventing Physics from the Bottom Down
  • New Theories of Everything
  • Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces That Shape the Universe
  • Time's Arrow and Archimedes' Point: New Directions for the Physics of Time

Share This Book



“The mature brain is a time capsule. History resides in its structure.” 6 likes
“Yesterday seems to come before today, because today contains records (memories) of yesterday.” 1 likes
More quotes…