The Life You Can Save: Acting Now to End World Poverty

My rating:

add to my books

The Life You Can Save: Acting Now to End World Poverty

by Peter Singer

3.95 · rating details · 532 ratings · 180 reviews

Using ethical arguments, provocative thought experiments, illuminating examples, and case studies of charitable giving, philosopher Peter Singer shows that our current response to world poverty is not only insufficient but ethically indefensible.

Singer contends that we need to change our views of what is involved in living an ethical life. To help us play our part in bring

...more

Hardcover, 224 pages

Published March 3rd 2009 by Random House (first published January 1st 2009)

more details... edit details

Get a copy:

More…

There is a good chance some of your friends read this book. Sign in to see!

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Lists with This Book

A People's History of the United States by Howard Zinn

Walden and Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau

Best Books To Frame Thinking

62nd out of 190 books — 55 voters

The Tale of Peter Rabbit by Beatrix Potter

The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe by C.S. Lewis

For Pete's Sake ...

106th out of 172 books — 29 voters

More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 1,356)

filter | sort: default (?) | rating details

Mar 29, 2009

Vegantrav rated it

This book underscores why Peter Singer is the most influential philosopher living today. He takes his utilitarianism very seriously, and the implications of this philosophy, if followed, would radically change our world for the better. In this book, Singer lays out the case for why those of us in affluent nations should be giving to charity to help the poor worldwide. What is actually most surprising to me is the final section in which he lays out the numbers: if the richest 10% of those in ...more

like 7 likes

· see review

Apr 22, 2009

Worthless Bum rated it

Shelves: philosophy, ethics

This most recent work by my favorite philosopher is something of an expanded and up to date version of the ideas expressed in his seminal 1972 essay "Famine, Affluence, and Morality". The idea being, people in wealthy countries give pitifully small amounts of money to those in abject poverty in the third world - people who are so poor that their lives are in jeopardy - and thus they should give much more generously. Singer employs the familiar "Pond" thought experiment in add...more

like 2 likes

· see review

Jul 06, 2011

Rory rated it

Shelves: gave-up-on, nonfiction

I'm not sure what I expected out of this book. Probably an articulate, super-strong inspiration to give money to charity...and instruction on how and where to give it so that my meager offerings would do the most "good." But instead I just felt guilty and shamed after reading the first few chapters, and frustrated after skimming the rest.

That's actually how Singer wants you to feel, believes everyone should feel--that it's a basic measure of humanity to give a significant ...more

like 1 like

· see review

Aug 07, 2011

Nick Ziegler added it · review of another edition

Can easily be read in a sitting or two. Singer begins by setting a stringent standard for adjudicating the moral worth of acts and omissions, then casually surveys the psychological literature on why our evolutionary heritage and general proclivities might prove problematic in this regard. Having addressed commonplace concerns, Singer provides a factual basis on which to assess the efficacy and reliability of aid and development organizations and methods, and offers practical assessments regar...more

· see review

Aug 03, 2011

Ruby added it · review of another edition

There are about 1 billion people living in what are considered affluent countries. Those countries government and private donations give an amount of money that works out to roughly $60 per person in donations.

There are 3 billion people living in poverty – living on less than $2/day. Even in countries that have very small economies, this is not considered enough money to give a person access to housing, food, education, and basic health care.

Given those two things, $60/person is clearly not enou...moreThere are about 1 billion people living in what are considered affluent countries. Those countries government and private donations give an amount of money that works out to roughly $60 per person in donations.

There are 3 billion people living in poverty – living on less than $2/day. Even in countries that have very small economies, this is not considered enough money to give a person access to housing, food, education, and basic health care.

Given those two things, $60/person is clearly not enough money to be donating. Singer outlines in the beginning of the book how when people are presented with the story of a child drowning in a pond and a man wearing a new armani suit and shoes, that it is his moral obligation to rescue the child, regardless that he will ruin $3,000 worth of clothes. Although this is very over-simplified view, he expands this thought into arguments for and against helping people on a larger, and broader scale. How it is difficult for some people to offer money to people they’ve never met both in their home countries and internationally, and the arguments that can be made to cultivate a culture of giving.

Singer asks us to look at places where we spend money on things we would not miss. $3 lattes instead of making coffee at home, bottled water when we could filter, or in many places outright drink the tap water, soda at convenience stores and restaurants, clothes we don’t really wear, or more shoes we don’t need. He then asks people to look even above that for people who are capable, and consider giving even more. He argues that people should give as much as they can to just before the point that they are doing more harm to themselves than good for other people.

The book is divided into several different categories:
1.The Argument: Saving a child, why it is wrong not to help, common objections to giving
2. Human Nature: Why we don’t give more, creating a culture of giving
3. The Facts About Aid: How much does it cost to save a life, which charities do it best, and improving aid
4. A New standard for Giving: Your child and the children of others, asking too much?, A realistic approach.

His final conclusion is that if everyone who lives above the poverty line themselves contributed 5% of their income, and the super rich gave a little more than that, we would have more than enough money to combat poverty, and the three chronic health issues that he outlines: 27,000 who kids die of preventable diseases every day, at least 3 million women living with fistula who are not allowed to contribute to their local economies due to isolation, and the several million people who have gone blind from reversible cataracts.(less)

· see review

Mar 26, 2009

Dave Golombek rated it

This is perhaps Singer's simplest book, in that he adresses a much narrower subject than he frequently tackles, but in doing so, her creates his most persuasive work (amongst those I've read), and the one with the broadest appeal. This book covers the moral and ethical imperative to donate to charity, in particular those charities helping the poorest in the world.

The book starts with a few simple examples, such as finding a child drowning in a pond or stuck on railroad tracks and bri...more

like 1 like

· see review

Nov 02, 2011

Ian Guy rated it

· review of another edition

Singer's challenge is in your face. If you can help the poorest of the poor and do nothing you are not a good person. We all have an obligation to our neighbours (wherever they may be). In the concluding chapters Singer softens his stance slightly by suggesting that we must give until there is nothing left to give to a suggestion that those on low incomes give 1% to the poor, mid incomes 5% and higher incomes proportionally more. he's also suggesting a form of taxation that would achieve this - ...more

· see review

Oct 11, 2011

Victoria Wheeler rated it

I read this book as someone who was already very sympathetic to Singer's argument that giving is important. I was not only already familiar with Singer's work, but as a practicing Christian, I already tithe. Instead, what I was looking for was to hear Singer's argument for particularly how we should give. In that case, I think he does a great job showing that it is very important to focus on the impoverished. I also very much enjoyed the beginning section, in which Singer justifies why giving is...more

· see review

Sep 30, 2011

Kristin rated it

· review of another edition

Shelves: be-the-change

When I was in college, my roommate and I joked about choosing a major by process of elimination and we soon crossed philosophy of the list. For me, this book is the opposite of the college reading assignments I saw as hard to understand and irrelevant. Peter Singer shows the extent of extreme poverty around the globe and challenges us "to see helping those in great need as an indispensable part of what it is to live an ethical life." Are fancy clothes, dinners out, entertainment, an...more

· see review

Aug 06, 2011

Haven Wendy rated it

A very interesting and impacting book, as it looked at fighting world poverty (an issue important to me) from a purely logical point of view. That is a perspective I have not considered before, but this book "proves" the need for those of us living in affluence to help those living in extreme poverty. And shows we can impact this global issue that hinders millions of people from living in any type of comfort and health.

I have always known that the simple fact that I have more than ...more

· see review

Jun 02, 2011

Jennie rated it

This book has a lot of misdirected energy. For the majority of the book, the author makes the philosophical argument that as citizens of wealthy nations, we have the ethical responsibility to live ascetically and give all of our disposable income to charity. He then proceeds to explain our resistance to that idea as a function of "human nature", but comes off sounding like his knowledge of human nature is derived from the analysis of clinical studies more than from interactions with ac...more

· see review

May 15, 2011

Jeff Culver rated it

Anousheh Ansari paid $20 million for 11 days in space. Comedian Lewis Black said she did it because it was “the only way she could achieve her life’s goal of flying over every single starving person on earth and yelling ‘Hey, look what I’m spending my money on!’”

It turns out that we’re all Anousheh Ansaris in subtle and not so subtle ways. This anecdote, and Singer’s book as a whole, unwraps his two key claims that 1) “If it is in your power to prevent something bad from happening, w...moreAnousheh Ansari paid $20 million for 11 days in space. Comedian Lewis Black said she did it because it was “the only way she could achieve her life’s goal of flying over every single starving person on earth and yelling ‘Hey, look what I’m spending my money on!’”

It turns out that we’re all Anousheh Ansaris in subtle and not so subtle ways. This anecdote, and Singer’s book as a whole, unwraps his two key claims that 1) “If it is in your power to prevent something bad from happening, without sacrificing anything nearly as important, it is wrong not to do so,” and 2) “By donating to aid agencies, you can prevent suffering and death from lack of food, shelter, and medical care, without sacrificing anything nearly as important.”

The most helpful part of Singer’s book, especially for those who’ve read his other oft-anthologized pieces on poverty, are those that respond to objections. Here are just a couple. “People work for their money and have the right to spend it on themselves.” Reply: If you stick me down in the middle of Bangladesh or Peru, you’ll find how much this talent is going to produce in the wrong kind of soil. Additionally, most of the poor do work at least as hard as you. “America is generous and gives plenty through foreign aid.” Reply: The average nation’s effort in 2006 came to 46 cents of every $100 of gross national income, while the U.S. gave only 18 cents of every $100 it earned. Adding nongovernmental (private) aid sums America’s total aid at no more than 25 cents of every $100 earned – still near the bottom of the international aid league.

If you’re in a hurry, you could probably safely skip the entire section on “The Facts about Aid” as well as his needlessly vise-tightening and somewhat oppositional chapter on “Your Child and the Children of Others.” His argument is just as strong without this chapter, and his main point, “parents aren’t justified in providing luxuries for their children ahead of the basic needs of others,” isn’t much buttressed by providing extreme examples of poverty zealots who are trying to refrain from loving their children more than they love the children of strangers.

Skipping the section on the Facts about Aid, though, would cause the reader to miss Singer’s horrifying account of fistulus, a condition in which there is a hole (fistula) between the vagina and either the bladder or rectum. This results in urine or feces trickling through the vagina, a foul smell, and subsequent social isolation. The Fistula Foundation is able to cure 93 percent of its patients, and when the girl is ready to go, she is given her bus fare home and a new dress. The cost? Roughly $450.

And so Singer’s book is littered with these kind of uncomfortable statements: “If you have a spare $450 and are thinking about whether to spend it on yourself or to use it to help others, it won’t be easy to find anything that you need nearly as much as a fourteen-year-old girl with a fistula needs an operation. If you have only $50, you can make the same comparison between what the money means to you and what it could mean to someone who is unable to see because of an easily removable cataract.”

Singer's is a challenging vision of what it means to live an ethical life. It turns out that the infamous "baby-killer" proponent of infanticide (who gives away 20% of his income, though you won't hear him mention that in this book) is advocating for the lives of millions of babies. But wrestling with his arguments means that our life of superfluous amenities comes under withering moral fire.
(less)

· see review

Nov 17, 2010

Kate Lawrence rated it

Shelves: social-issues

Would you save the life of a dying child if it didn’t require very much of you to do so? No risk to your life, no long period of time, no special skills, no great expense? Nearly everyone says that they would. Yet we have that opportunity constantly, and few of us respond.
Peter Singer became famous as the author of Animal Liberation, the ground-breaking book that launched the modern animal rights movement over 35 years ago and first started me on the path to becoming vegetarian. His l...moreWould you save the life of a dying child if it didn’t require very much of you to do so? No risk to your life, no long period of time, no special skills, no great expense? Nearly everyone says that they would. Yet we have that opportunity constantly, and few of us respond.
Peter Singer became famous as the author of Animal Liberation, the ground-breaking book that launched the modern animal rights movement over 35 years ago and first started me on the path to becoming vegetarian. His latest is a must-read if you’re seriously committed to bringing your beliefs and everyday actions into harmony. Here he shows how powerful it would be if those of us in the middle class or above would commit to giving even 5% of our income to reputable organizations working to alleviate poverty and disease worldwide. Currently, although many Americans do make charitable contributions, the majority of that giving is to support churches, educational institutions or cultural organizations here at home. The amount of U.S. private philanthropy for foreign aid amounts to only 7 cents on every $100 of earned income (!), and the U.S. government budget allocates less than 1%, far less than most people think.
Singer provides background on giving patterns, examines each of the common objections to giving, and discusses how to evaluate whether aid organizations are effective. He analyzes how little it costs to save or vastly improve a life in the poorest countries; for example, only $50 for a cataract operation that enables a blind person to see. He takes a look at how we waste money on unnecessary expenditures; for example, we could make coffee for pennies at home but instead buy lattes for $3, and we buy clothing and gadgets that we do not need and may not even use.
As in previous writings, Singer doesn’t shy away from engaging controversy head-on, with calm, careful, and compelling reasoning, and a writing style of astounding clarity. I dare you to read this book and remain unchanged.
(less)

· see review

Jun 23, 2010

Xing rated it

Recommends it for: anyone who earns a decent income

Wonderful, wonderful book in so many ways.
Peter Singer draws on a wealth of experience and information, and takes a mature, evaluative look at the gap between rich and poor.

He summarises basic statistics regarding this disparity (earning power, standards of living, extent of charitable giving, in different parts of the world), but this is not the main focus of the book. (I recommend The World Food Problem: Tackling the Causes of Undernutrition in the Third World, for that.)
...more

· see review

May 23, 2010

Elizabeth marked it as to-read

from the library
frim the library computer

Preface
THE ARGUMENT
Saving a Child
Is It Wrong Not to Help?
Common Objections to Giving
HUMAN NATURE
Why Don't We Give More?
Creating a Culture of Giving
THE FACTS ABOUT AID
How Much Does It Cost to Save a Life, and How Can You Tell Which Charities Do It Best?
Improving Aid
A NEW STANDARD FOR GIVING
Your Child and the Children of Others
Asking To...more

· see review

Jul 23, 2009

Brenda Pike rated it

I feel bad giving this only three stars, because Peter Singer is my idol. And when I read the article it's based on in the NY Times, I was deeply affected by it. It prompted Jason and I to decide to increase our donations from 1% to 5% of our income once we pay off our student loans this year. But I don't think the book adds that much to the article, except length. Certainly not clarity. I was looking forward to a discussion of the most effective ways to improve the lives of the world's poor, an...more

· see review

Aug 06, 2011

René rated it

Shelves: philosophie

My son encouraged me to read this book and I am thankful he did. My way to donate has qualitatively and quantatively increased since he first talked to me about it.

Yes, we could all give more, but probably due to his unconditional love for animals, nowhere does Peter Singer mention that Americans spend yearly over $52 billions in pet care, which is over one quarter of what the Millenium Development Goals would require every year to fix the most pressing needs of the world's poorest ...more

· see review

Apr 28, 2009

Jessie rated it

Shelves: nonfiction

Hm.
3 1/2 stars actually. I'm of many minds about this book: could be a dynamite conversation-starter and change-agent; could be toxic and guilt-inducing; could be another way for us to say "I'm living right; gold star please." Singer's the Animal Liberation guy and his argument (this bk is a moral argument, not at all pulling-on-heart-stringsy) is full of shoulds and cocksureness. Not a voice that I like, writerly-wise, but he is clear and he does boil down some dizzying info...more

· see review

Apr 10, 2009

Anne rated it

Peter Singer is a professor of bioethics at Princeton. In this book, he asks what each of us can do to help end world poverty - suggesting that every person with means to spare (most of us) should aim to give 5% of their income each year to charity. Specifically, Singer advocates donations to international organizations, despite most people's inclination to give to organizations closer to home. Singer then addresses various philosophical or ethical responses from people who choose not to give - ...morePeter Singer is a professor of bioethics at Princeton. In this book, he asks what each of us can do to help end world poverty - suggesting that every person with means to spare (most of us) should aim to give 5% of their income each year to charity. Specifically, Singer advocates donations to international organizations, despite most people's inclination to give to organizations closer to home. Singer then addresses various philosophical or ethical responses from people who choose not to give - from futility arguments to the diffusion of responsibility. Singer maintains that it is morally indefensible to turn a blind eye to the lives that are lost each day as a result of poverty - given that it is within all of our power to do something as individuals to change this. Singer is very convincing - and he does it in a way that is not about guilt, but rather about common sense. He acknowledges that most people who will choose to read his book are people who already give in some sense - in both money and time. But, while I think it would be great if everyone read this book, I do think even if you already give much of your time and income, that this is a good book for thinking about why you give and how you decide which organizations to give to. It has helped me to think about being more focused in my giving, and to prioritize in different ways. I am always interested in ideas that further creating a culture of giving - in our smaller communities and in our society as a whole. Singer has great anecdotes about big change by small people, and admirable recognition of people like Warren Buffet and Bill Gates who regularly give large percentages of their income. This book will help you to re-evaluate what you "can" give to others, and why it is so necessary to do so. Even in these tough economic times at home, this book is a reminder that millions and millions of people world-wide are struggling just to obtain clean drinking water, immunizations, and daily food - and that there is always more we can be doing to help.
(less)

· see review

Jan 06, 2011

Lisa rated it

· review of another edition

Shelves: non-fiction, 21st-century, australia

This is a wonderful book that can change your life and make you feel at last that you can do something about the tragedies we see on TV all the time.

In a nutshell, Singer asks us why if we would not hesitate to jump into a pond to save the life of a drowning child, we do not have the same impulse to save the lives of children who are dying of preventable disease and malnutrition in developing countries. He says that if we are choosing to spend money on bottled water, for example, w...more

like 2 likes

· see review

Nov 18, 2010

May-Ling rated it

Shelves: favorites, saving-the-world

this book is seriously amazing. i think peter singer is the best writer of logical arguments i've come across. he lays out a moral and ethical framework that i cannot deny, although clearly i'm already bought into his ideals. also, it's incredibly readable and i zipped through it like a fiction novel as opposed to a non-fiction piece. his philosophical examples really make you think and case studies are inspiring. i wasn't thrilled with the last chapter and the numbers game he plays, but i thin...more

· see review

Jul 20, 2010

JoyfulK rated it

Shelves: ideas-to-change-the-world

Singer's idea is great, but whether there needs to be a whole book about it is questionable. Here's the idea: donate a small part of your after-tax income, on a progressive scale, to projects that are working to end starvation. The scale starts out at 1% for people who have enough income to feed and shelter themselves and their families, and goes up for those who have more.

If you already don't agree this is a useful idea, read the book for the ethical arguments pro and con. Singer is...more

· see review

Oct 05, 2009

Steven Tomlinson rated it

With more and more evidence that charitable organizations are making a difference for the world's poorest and more rigorous data on exactly what it costs to save a life -- about $300 prevents a child's death in a developing country, $50 restores sight, $450 for deformity-correcting surgeries that reunite outcasts with their societies -- it gets harder to avoid Singer's conclusion: If we aspire to live ethical lives, we must seriously reconsider what we do with our money. Back of the envelope c...more

· see review

Jul 24, 2009

Cappy rated it

Shelves: philosophy

An excellent, accessible presentation of a distressingly unheeded argument.

"Do you have a bottle of water or a can of soda on the table beside you as you read this book? If you are paying for something to drink when safe drinking water comes out of the tap, you have money to spend on things you don't really need." (pg. xi)

"South Asia is still the region with the largest number of people living in extreme poverty, a total of 600 million, including 455 millio...more

like 1 like

· see review

Jun 07, 2011

Jon Silver rated it

This book is so weird! The beginning is horrible, it will really make you mad. He says drinking anything but tap water with your meals is spending too frivolously and people should spend any excess money they have towards helping the global poor. Okay, fine. Then, to dispel opposition, he responds to a bunch of high schoolers who were given an assignment to oppose such generosity. Great job Peter Singer, you really tore those high schoolers apart!

The middle of the book is great thou...more

· see review

May 25, 2009

Melissa rated it

An incredibly uncomfortable book to read. If you take Singer's message to heart, you will be challenged to completely rethink the way you spend money and what you can morally allow yourself to consider "necessary." On the other hand, radical and empowering. Basically, fairly modest contributions from every middle class person in the world (and proportionately-sized large-scale contributions from the ultra-wealthy) could virtually wipe out world poverty, defined here as starvation, maln...more

· see review

Nov 20, 2011

Miller Sherling rated it

This book starts off quite uncomfortable-making for those of us lucky enough to be affluent. Singer piles on psych research results, stats about poverty and affluence around the world, moral arguments, and the relationships among them all. His book somehow ends on an optimistic note. He puts together a formula for giving, none of it too much for anyone to handle (not by a long way!) to end poverty. Along the way, he formulates a useful way to frame personal versus public praise and blame, solvin...more

· see review

Mar 23, 2011

Matej Kurian rated it

· review of another edition

Shelves: own, lent

Thought-provoking call to action. Written in an easily-accessible language Singer presents compelling moral and economic argument for greater giving of the West to the extremely poor.

Singer addresses everything a philanthropy primer should: morality, aid effectiveness, scope of aid needed as well as practical ways of getting started.

My favorite part is when Singer deals with common critiques of the aid industry, and suggests how to donate effectively.

If the ti...more

· see review

Apr 08, 2010

Ugh rated it

I am not part of the target audience for this book, and neither, I suspect, are you. I'll come to why later...

I do like the way Singer approaches his books - he starts out by telling you where you're going to end up, and then proceeds to take you to your destination in a clear and concise manner, dealing with likely objections before they arise as he goes - but reading this I thought for a while that we were heading squarely for a two-star rating, partly because of that target audien...moreI am not part of the target audience for this book, and neither, I suspect, are you. I'll come to why later...

I do like the way Singer approaches his books - he starts out by telling you where you're going to end up, and then proceeds to take you to your destination in a clear and concise manner, dealing with likely objections before they arise as he goes - but reading this I thought for a while that we were heading squarely for a two-star rating, partly because of that target audience problem I mentioned at the start. Let me explain...

Singer starts out by stating the case for why it's morally wrong not to give, and give substantially, to those much less fortunate. But frankly, if any of what he says here hasn't already occurred to you, and subsequently seemed obvious and irrefutable, then what have you been thinking about all your life? He then goes on to tackle common objections to this view, which is a good approach, but few of the objections make you think "ooh, I wonder how Singer's going to refute THIS one!" when you read them - most of them are blatantly excuses right from the off. There are some interesting stats about foreign aid thrown in here, but mostly they're aimed at an American audience, which isn't what I'm refering to when I say you're probably not his target reader, I mention it just in case (like me) you aren't American...

Things pick up a bit in part 2, which is probably where I started to shift my opinion into three-star territory. Here Singer relates some of the psychology of giving, some of which may be familiar to you already but overall it's still quite interesting.

Part three, however, is definitely interesting, as Singer sums up attempts to determine how much it costs to save a life. Frankly, I was surprised. Not by how little it costs, but actually the complete opposite. Somehow I'd picked up the idea that donating twenty or thirty pounds or so to Oxfam was there or thereabouts enough to save a life, when in fact you'll see that that's not the case. Donate that much every month for a year or so and that's more like it...

It was when I got to part 4 that I realised just how far I was from being the target of Singer's arguments (although the extent to which he states the bleeding obvious in part 1 is a substantial clue). Here he sets out his guidelines for how much you should be giving based on your income. He considers the superrich, the rich, and the comfortable. How does he define comfortable? Anyone earning more than $105,000 per year. Ooooookay. Anything less than that he doesn't really bother with - there's a sentence or two about giving around one percent of your income, and he keeps banging on about water bottles for us mere mortals, as if he doesn't realise that people refill them with tap water dozens of times before buying a new one, but that's about it.

So there I was at around the halfway point, all ready to recommend that you instead buy something else with many more pages than this and then donate the money you would therefore save overall (by not spending thick-book money on something thin) to charity, when it turned out that Singer was thinking more in terms of yachts and supercars than paperback books and a dollar or two here or there.

And that is what I mean when I say that you're probably not his target audience. Yes, for a successful businessman or lawyer or doctor etc this book is a clear, concise, well reasoned, practical little handbook that ought to convince and may well set off a few light bulbs and therefore deserve four or five stars. For my imagined average user of GoodReads - already well read, thoughtful, probably not that well off (otherwise you'd be too busy drinking champagne and out of crystal goblets to bother reading this stuff) - it's a mildly interesting but largely redundant confirmation of things that you already figured out for yourself a long time ago...

Still, you can't fault his intentions.

(less)

like 1 like

· see review

Apr 06, 2009

Shel rated it

Shelves: post-grad-school, activism, read-this-for-all, sam-n-i

Ethicist Peter Singer makes a compelling argument that we
need to create a stronger Culture of Giving and suggests a specific standard for what people in wealthy countries could do to help those in impoverished ones.

He references Charlotte Perkins Gilman's story "The Unnatural Mother" in talking about the "radical" utopian ideal of having a larger sense of family, mentioning how some utopian communities have tried (and failed) to instill a sense of community...more

· see review

« previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 … 45 46 next »

new topic
Discuss This Book

There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Recommend it | Stats | Recent status updates

combine
Other Editions (9)

More editions...

Videos About This Book

Add a comment

Genres

Non Fiction

50 users

Philosophy

27 users

Social Issues > Poverty

11 users

Politics

10 users

Social Movements > Social Justice

7 users

Economics

4 users

Social Science

4 users

Sociology

3 users

Social Issues > Activism

3 users

Academic

2 users

See top shelves...

Readers Also Enjoyed

About Peter Singer

Peter Albert David Singer is an Australian philosopher. He is the Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics at Princeton University, and laureate professor at the Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics (CAPPE), University of Melbourne. He specializes in applied ethics, approaching ethical issues from a secular preference utilitarian perspective.

He has served, on two occasions, as c...more

More about Peter Singer...

Books by Peter Singer

The Way We Eat: Why Our Food Choices Matter

One World: The Ethics of Globalization, Second Edition

More…

Share This Book

Facebook Twitter Your website

Pin It

Trivia About The Life You Can ...

No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »

Quotes from The Life You Can Save:...

“Hebrew word for "charity" tzedakah, simply means "justice" and as this suggests, for Jews, giving to the poor is no optional extra but an essential part of living a just life.” — 7 people liked it

“Extreme poverty is not only a condition of unsatisfied material needs. It is often accompanied by a degrading state of powerlessness. ” — 3 people liked it

More quotes…

Groups That Shelved The Life You Can ...

Daily Show / Colbert Report

346 members

last activity Feb 01, 2012 04:00pm

shelf: read

title link	preview: The Life You Can Save: Acting Now to End World Poverty
avg rating	preview: The Life You Can Save: Acting Now to End World Poverty Goodreads rating: 3.95 (532 ratings)
small image	preview: click here [close]
med image	preview: click here [close]
BBCode	[url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/4722934-the-life-you-can-save?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book][img]http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1255828999m/4722934.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/4722934-the-life-you-can-save?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book]The Life You Can Save: Acting Now to End World Poverty by Peter Singer[/url]

The Life You Can Save: Acting Now to End World Poverty

Friend Reviews

Community Reviews

Readers Also Enjoyed

Share This Book

Share This Book on Your Website