Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Ultimate Punishment: A Lawyer's Reflections on Dealing with the Death Penalty” as Want to Read:
Ultimate Punishment: A Lawyer's Reflections on Dealing with the Death Penalty
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Ultimate Punishment: A Lawyer's Reflections on Dealing with the Death Penalty

3.77  ·  Rating Details ·  494 Ratings  ·  56 Reviews
A gripping examination of the case for and against capital punishment by a respected criminal lawyer and celebrated novelist. In the words of Harvard Law Professor, Laurence H. Tribe--"Ultimate Punishment is the ultimate statement about the death penalty: to read it is to understand why law alone cannot make us whole."

As a respected criminal lawyer, Scott Turow has been in
...more
Paperback, 176 pages
Published August 1st 2004 by Picador (first published 2003)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Ultimate Punishment, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Ultimate Punishment

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
James
Feb 18, 2009 James rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
It's OK. This is a lawyer's contemplation. It should not be confused with philosophical contemplation. As a lawyer, Turow is excellent. He spots issues. He sees different points of view. He even persuasively puts on arguments on both sides, and convincingly reaches his own conclusions using his political and prosecutorial experiences. But don't expect any profound insight and meditative breakthroughs. His use of examples is sparse and a little confusing.

The book raises more subjects than it res
...more
Larry Bassett
I am on the thin book rampage, a revolution against thick books. I have these thin books. Why shouldn’t I read them? This particular is not only thin (164 pages) but is a spin off from my last book that was also about the death penalty, A Saint on Death Row. That one left me feeling a little flat so I am hoping Scott Turow’s Ultimate Punishment will perk me up.

When I start a new book I very often read several GR reviews just to get a lay of the land. And sometimes I need help to get it. In readi
...more
Paul Eckert
Nov 21, 2010 Paul Eckert rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Scott Turow was part of a committee appointed by then-Illinois governor George Ryan to examine capital punishment and how it can be improved, or if should be abolished altogether. Ultimate Punishment is Turow’s experience on this panel, which spent 2 years investigating capital punishment, coupled with his other experiences as a lawyer.

Luckily, Turow is not just another extremist advocating only one side. He approaches the issue by carefully examining the consequences of having a death penalty
...more
Sara
Aug 03, 2008 Sara rated it it was amazing
Turow was asked by the Governor of Illinois to participate in a commission to review and recommend reforms for capital punishment. I liked his self-label of being a death penalty agnostic and can probably apply it to myself. He addressed many facets of the capital punishment system including the investigation, eligibility, the prosecutions decision to seek the death penalty, the trial, and review of the sentencing.

At the end of the book I was no more certain about my stance on the death penalty
...more
Louis
Jan 10, 2009 Louis rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
A very thought-provoking book on the death penalty. Turow is best known for his legal novels, but he is also an accomplished and well-respected lawyer. This book recounts his time on a commission in Illinois reviewing the death penalty both philosophically and in practical application. While it did not change my mind as far as supporting the death penalty in theory, it did enlighten me to flaws in the system that need to be corrected as we go forward.
M
May 26, 2010 M rated it it was amazing
Strong argument for monitoring of cases where the defendant has been remanded to death. Actual factual examples of cases before the Illinois Commission on the Death Penalty that were overturned due to several improper criminanl procedures, including suppression of evidence, trumped up charges, lies, deliberate with holding of information, filing of false reports and includes issues that the victims have to contend with. Recommended.
SueAnn
Aug 21, 2009 SueAnn rated it really liked it
Really interesting stuff. I listened to the audio version. One point that Turow makes is that our founding fathers recognized slavery and capital punishment. While we no longer agree with slavery, has our opinion on capital punishment changed as well?
Jennifer
May 25, 2015 Jennifer rated it it was ok
Shelves: criminology, america, law
A strangely insubstantial, wafer-thin book, as though any real sentiment the author might have possessed was washed down with a pressure hose. The death penalty isn't a topic I would consider to inspire apathy, and the author indeed indicates that he shares this opinion. I'm not all that clear on why, then, this text is so subdued. I'm not necessarily looking for a diatribe, and I certainly believe in the wisdom of acknowledging the nuances and facets of a debate like this. I also appreciate the ...more
Chris
Sep 23, 2014 Chris rated it really liked it
A truly interesting book. Mr Turow reflects on the Illinois death penalty and his investigation as part of a panel to recommend reforms to the death penalty in the early 2000's.

Mr Turow considers all kinds of angles, is the death penalty just? is it practical (he notes that the cost of a death penalty trial outweighs the cost of incarcerating a convict for life and that there aren't enough death penalty cases each year for abolition to show appreciable savings, both points I found fascinating)?
...more
Bob Schmitz
Feb 26, 2011 Bob Schmitz rated it liked it
Many years ago I read a couple of Scott Turow's legal mystery's and a couple of years ago I read "One L" about his experience in law school a wonderful perceptive and descriptive non-fiction piece. I picked up Ultimate Punishment to see what this smart guy has to say about Capital Punishment. Turns out he has a ton to say.

In 2001 or 2002 Turow was appointed by the governor of Illinois to a blue ribbon committee to examine capital punishment in the state. In this book Turow recounts his two year
...more
Carin
Dec 09, 2007 Carin rated it really liked it
Shelves: death, legal, political
Mr. Turow was on the committee in Illinois that looked into the way the death penalty has been applied, to see if there should be a moratorium on it, as the governor has suggested after a large number of capitol cases were found, upon appeal, to have been in error (DNA proven in 50% of the cases). This brief book is the result. It is fair look at the system, from people on many sides of the argument, investigating everything from the financial costs to the racial makeup of the convictions, and i ...more
Christina
May 12, 2010 Christina rated it really liked it
Shelves: read-books-2005
I've always enjoyed Turow's legal thrillers, so seeing him put his formidable intelligence to the question of the death penalty was enjoyable as well. I was already inclined to agree with his opinion (the death penalty is wrong) but I was appreciated the exploration of different concerns. But would this book change the mind of a death penalty supporter? I'm not so sure.
Rob
Jun 23, 2009 Rob rated it liked it
Read this book if you haven't already made up your mind about the death penalty, or if you're pro-death penalty and willing to have your thoughts challenged. As an opponent of the death penalty, I wasn't particularly moved. Still, Turow's a great writer (if needlessly self-promoting) and I share many of his views. Plus, at 120 pages, it's a quick read.
Clifford
Jul 19, 2009 Clifford rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This book didn't change my mind because I was already firmly opposed to the death penalty, but I did appreciate the close examination of the issues by a lawyer who has examined them closely and thoughtfully.
Marik Casmon
Aug 08, 2009 Marik Casmon rated it liked it
A compassionate and logical book of essays about the death penalty, one which examines the issue from many, perhaps all, sides.
Kecia
Dec 05, 2008 Kecia rated it it was amazing
This book forced me to challenge all preconceptions I had about the death penalty and ask myself if I could pull the lever. I could not.
Natasha
Oct 25, 2009 Natasha rated it really liked it
This book definitely opened my eyes to many issues surrounding the death penalty.
Barry
Dec 07, 2013 Barry rated it really liked it
Just excellent- a thought provoking non- fiction analysis of the death penalty by Scott Turow. Turow is best known for his fictional works with a criminal law context- but he also served on a Commission in Illinois to review issues attendant to the death penalty experience in this state. Its very well done

Some questions probed:

What are the goals of punishment?
What do we think of the perfectibility of human beings and the perdurability of evil?
What value do we place on life of the murderer and of
...more
David
Nov 29, 2010 David rated it liked it
This is a thoughtful, even-handed examination of the merits and demerits of the death penalty. The author concludes that because the justice system in our democracy is essentially incapable of adopting all of the specific reforms necessary to make the death penalty fair, equitable, appropriate, and less prone to error, it should be abolished. In other words, if you can't get it right, then you shouldn't get it. He gave little attention to the prospect that the death penalty sends a message that ...more
Stephen
Jan 02, 2013 Stephen rated it really liked it
This is an excellent collection of concise essays about various issues related to capital punishment, such as police investigations of heinous crimes, housing dangerous killers in prison, the burden of victims' families, the legislative process that produces death penalty laws, and the author's service on the Illinois death penalty commission. Mr. Turow incorporates into several essays his experience as a federal prosecutor and defense attorney in capital cases. Many of the essays present argume ...more
Mary Whisner
Mar 29, 2013 Mary Whisner rated it really liked it
Years ago I picked up this slender book. Subtitled "a lawyer's reflections on dealing with the death penalty," it relates Turow's experience handling a couple of death penalty appeals pro bono and serving on the Illinois commission that looked at the death penalty. He said he began as a "death penalty agnostic" -- not opposed, not for -- and ended up so concerned that the report he participated in led to Gov. Ryan's decision to declare a moratorium on the punishment.

This is a thoughtful discussi
...more
Kris - My Novelesque Life
Feb 11, 2015 Kris - My Novelesque Life rated it really liked it
4 STARS

"A gripping examination of the case for and against capital punishment by a respected criminal lawyer and celebrated novelist. In the words of Harvard Law Professor, Laurence H. Tribe--"Ultimate Punishment is the ultimate statement about the death penalty: to read it is to understand why law alone cannot make us whole." (From Amazon)

I quite liked Turow's views on capital punishment and it makes you think of your own opinions.
Janice
Oct 08, 2013 Janice rated it really liked it
Shelves: owned-books
I would have given this book five stars, but there was a chapter that prattled on about one of his other books. It wasn't pertinent to the point of his book, and generally seemed to be a shameless plug. The rest of the book was a fair look at the death penalty issue, with valuable insight and thorough research.
Robin
Apr 25, 2008 Robin rated it really liked it
I wasn't sure what to expect, but this turned out to be a very good, thought-provoking look at the death penalty. Turow did an excellent job of depicting his own struggles in coming to a personal conclusion on the death penaalty, and in doing so, it really felt like a fair and balanced view. It definitely made me take a look at my own values.
Andrew
Dec 17, 2011 Andrew rated it really liked it
Solid book by an accomplished, seasoned writer. Turow has the gift of being able to see events from more than one perspective. His account of his days on the capital punishment commission during Illinois' moratorium on the death penalty in the early 2000's is well-paced, nuanced, and balanced. Would make a very good complement to Helen Prejean's Dead Man Walking.
Lindsay
I found this book a very enlightening, multifaceted review of issues surrounding capital punishment. It is also pretty graphic, and some of the descriptions made me physically ill. They were germane to the topic and it wouldn't have been as effective without explaining the crimes that, according to the judicial system, deserved ultimate punishment.
Rebecca
Jul 18, 2012 Rebecca rated it really liked it
This was a pretty quick read-not a deep dive into the politics or morals associated with the larger debate. Instead it was a satisfying pragmatic walk through the moratorium in IL and one commission members approach. It was transparent and well written. There is no agenda to change minds but I did find a lot of my own feelings were in line with the author.
Ryan Miller
Jan 24, 2012 Ryan Miller rated it liked it
A good general discussion of the major issues surrounding the death penalty. The author weighs heavily on his personal experience, and most examples and specific policies are taken from Illinois (to the exclusion of other states with different issues).
Lisa
Apr 01, 2011 Lisa rated it liked it
Kind of interesting how it is decided who gets life in prison & who gets a death sentence. This was research done for a report & recommendation by over 20 lawyers & others for the state of Illinois when their death penalty was put on hold.
John of Canada
Jan 21, 2014 John of Canada rated it really liked it
Scott Turow writes very clearly.I tried to keep an open mind,and was pleased that Turow presented a fair,balanced argument.I've read One L(non-fiction)as well as several of his novels.He's writing is vastly superior to that of John Grisham.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong
  • The Dreams of Ada
  • False Justice: Eight Myths that Convict the Innocent
  • Gideon's Trumpet: How One Man, a Poor Prisoner, Took His Case to the Supreme Court-and Changed the Law of the United States
  • Executed on a Technicality: Lethal Injustice on America's Death Row
  • Defending the Damned: Inside Chicago's Cook County Public Defender's Office
  • Tulia: Race, Cocaine, and Corruption in a Small Texas Town
  • Ladies And Gentlemen Of The Jury: Greatest Closing Arguments In Modern Law
  • Surviving Justice: America's Wrongfully Convicted and Exonerated
  • Bloodsworth: The True Story of the First Death Row Inmate Exonerated by DNA
  • Black's Law Dictionary
  • Actual Innocence: When Justice Goes Wrong and How to Make it Right
  • The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
  • Angel of Death Row: My Life as a Death Penalty Defense Lawyer
  • The Best Defense: The Courtroom Confrontations of America's Most Outspoken Lawyer of Last Resort-- the Lawyer Who Won the Claus von Bulow Appeal
  • Landmark: The Inside Story of America's New Health-Care Law and What It Means for Us All
  • A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law
  • Senatorial Privilege: The Chappaquiddick Cover-Up
2749
Scott Turow is the author of worldwide bestselling novels including Presumed Innocent, Innocent, Ordinary Heroes, The Burden of Proof, Reversible Errors and Limitations. His works of nonfiction include One L, his journal from his first year at law school, and Ultimate Punishment, which he wrote after serving on the Illinois commission that investigated the administration of the death penalty and i ...more
More about Scott Turow...

Share This Book



“There will always be cases that cry out to me for ultimate punishment. That is not the true issue. The pivotal question instead is whether a system of justice can be constructed that reaches only the rare, right cases, without also occasionally condemning the innocent or the undeserving.” 0 likes
More quotes…