Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way” as Want to Read:
Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way

by
4.33 of 5 stars 4.33  ·  rating details  ·  568 ratings  ·  22 reviews
The Buddhist saint N=ag=arjuna, who lived in South India in approximately the second century CE, is undoubtedly the most important, influential, and widely studied Mah=ay=ana Buddhist philosopher. His many works include texts addressed to lay audiences, letters of advice to kings, and a set of penetrating metaphysical and epistemological treatises. His greatest philosophic ...more
Hardcover, 400 pages
Published November 9th 1995 by Oxford University Press, USA (first published 200)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 1,772)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Rohan
This book is hella good. Excellent introduction to Mahayana Buddhism straight from the monk's mouth. Jay Garfield really knows his shit, and draws apt parallels with Hume and Wittgenstein without meandering into comparative philosophy.

The actual text of Fundamental Verses on the Middle Way is way too obscure for anyone who hasn't been schooled in this stuff, and Garfield does a great job of explicating the text, as well as giving references to alternate interpretations and guidance to the differ
...more
Barnaby Thieme
In my opinion, Nagarjuna is the greatest philosopher who has ever lived, and this is his magnum opus. In a series of reductio ad absurdum-like analyses of various types of phenomena, Nagarjuna demonstrates the incoherence of the belief in an inherently existent basis for objects of awareness. Phenomena are in fact dependent on the transient aggregation of their spatial and temporal parts, and cannot be described without invoking the process by which they are registered by a conscious entity. The ...more
Michael Alexander
Hold up, folks, this gets scholarly.

As interpreted by Garfield, Nagarjuna's Mulamadhyamakakarika is most everything I ever wanted to say to the "early" Platonic dialogues but didn't quite have the sharp vocabulary as a college freshman to do so: you only get to worrying about ultimate forms and causes if you think people have to have a coherent meaning when they talk about them, and you don't have to think we're in Berkelian idealism-land otherwise.

In other words: in Garfield's Western-via-Tibe
...more
Cecilia W Yu
Read it cos I had to ...cos my Guru suggested it. Actually maybe he didn't...maybe I only read it because I needed to use it to rebut a particular stupid and pointless series of dogmatism by the pathetlic loser that was my Guru's translator...eek, nothing like having some sort of ex-harvard creep who was born in the Middle of a Republican Convention...yeah his mom broke water there and then stayed until the end and dropped him on his head and kept Cheering Ronald Reagan! Lol. Joke...stupid...do ...more
Bruce
I was about to write that this is one of the dozen most important and influential philosophical works I've ever read. But I must delete "philosophical." This is one of the dozen most important and influential books I've read in any genre. Nagarjuna seems to be little known or read in the West; at least I rarely encounter anyone who has heard of him. He was a 2nd century Buddhist. Let me quote from Library Journal: "Nagarjuna meets contrasting dialectical arguments, thereby proving that all pheno ...more
Thomas
This is a truly eye-opening book, especially if you're not familiar with Madhyamika philosophy. A little background in western epistemology and ontology is helpful (Plato, Hume, Kant) but not absolutely necessary if you're willing to let Garfield lead you through the arguments. My only worry about this is that Garfield is almost too good at this -- it's hard to read this as critically as one should. On the other hand, Nagarjuna is a ferocious logician and his arguments -- incredibly compact as t ...more
Jeremy
Sep 26, 2007 Jeremy rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Seekers all
I had the extreme good fortune to be Jay Garfield's teaching assistant when he was writing this book and got to read (and proofread!) an early draft. More importantly, Prof Garfield explained the text with such clarity and intensity that the wisdom of the middle way was layed before me. Truly changed my life, and continues to inform my priorities. Thanks Jay, Thanks Nagarjuna. OmAhUm Benza Guru Patna Siti Om
Todd Mertz
Nagarjuna present an abrupt distillation of Buddhism that I find more concise and to-the-point than even the Dhammapada. Difficult reading, this is bare bones Mahayana Buddhism.
Ethan
Jan 26, 2008 Ethan rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: philosophers, Buddhists
Shelves: favorites
Nagarjuna is one example of a philosopher that says enough provocative things to hold peoples' interest, but is not quite clear enough for any one interpretation to win out, thus keeping his name on the lips of Indian and Buddhist philosophers for the last 1,800 years. Nagarjuna has come to be interpreted in a wide variety of ways by Indian, Tibetan, Chinese and Western readers. I myself favor the skeptical interpretation that Garfield favors in this translation and which is also one of the main ...more
Camille Martin
The following is an essay in which I investigate the relevance of Nagarjuna to the poetry of contemporary poet Leslie Scalapino. In my discussion of Nagarjuna, I am indebted to Garfield’s clear analyses of the often puzzling and obscure verses of the Mulamadhyamakakarika:
Reading the Minds of Events: Leslie Scalapino’s Plural Time
Celestial Elf
remarkable tract essentially displaying the ultimate arrogance and failure of using mind made concepts to comprehend phiolosphical aspects which origionate outside of mind...
reflecting on the relationship between the ultimate and the relative.
written long before the fashion for trite, candy coated buddhist truisms,
If you have any interest in buddhism i would say this book is a must.
Willkurt
My interest in buddhism waxes and wanes but I'll always have this book nearby. Whether a spiritual read, or merely philosophical exercise, Nagarjuna's work is simply amazing. There is so much in so few words that it will forever be a book that can be read over and over again. I also appreciate the translators notes in this edition, without them much of the power of this book would be lost.
Tyler
woa. mind blowing! i don't think one can ever "finish" this book...
Xiaomin Zu
only read assigned chapters. An awesome translation, and generative reading of this Indian-Tibetan classic.
David Joseph
Better than Garfield.
Eduardo
I got interested in reading this book after I read a paper that criticizes Derrida for not going far enough in his deconstruction and pointed to Nagarjuna's work as a true radical deconstruction. The book really goes beyond deconstruction the opposite to finally deconstruct deconstruction itself. It is not easy to read and a bit tedious at times but worth the effort.
Jeff
A difficult text, but an amazing explication on the Buddhist view of emptiness, and, especially important for a western audience, how that differs from mere nihilism. Essential root text.
Lin Kudla
A little confusing, in my opinion. Garfield attempts to translate the original texts, but it seems like he's only restating them in equally confusing terms.
Kris
For the serious reader in Religious Studies or the student of Mahayana Buddhist philosophy, it's a must read!
David Joseph
A nice introduction to logic for thoughtful practitioners.
Darren
Dec 19, 2007 Darren rated it 4 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Hardcore Buddhist Readers
Deep, intense, and mind altering.
Jeffrey
i will fight you snake king
Benediktus Harjono
Benediktus Harjono marked it as to-read
Nov 27, 2014
Pieter
Pieter marked it as to-read
Nov 27, 2014
Dave
Dave marked it as to-read
Nov 26, 2014
Konstantin
Konstantin marked it as to-read
Nov 23, 2014
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 59 60 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • The Lotus Sutra
  • The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha: A Translation of the Majjhima Nikaya
  • The Long Discourses of the Buddha: A Translation of the Digha Nikaya
  • The Way of the Bodhisattva: A Translation of the Bodhicharyavatara
  • The Diamond Sutra and the Sutra of Hui-Neng
  • The Heart Sutra
  • Moon In a Dewdrop: Writings of Zen Master Dogen
  • In the Buddha's Words: An Anthology of Discourses from the Pali Canon
  • The Zen Teaching of Bodhidharma
  • The Words of My Perfect Teacher
  • The Life of Milarepa: A New Translation from the Tibetan
  • Buddhist Scriptures
  • The Heart of Understanding: Commentaries on the Prajnaparamita Heart Sutra
  • Essential Tibetan Buddhism
  • The Tibetan Yogas Of Dream And Sleep
  • Manual of Zen Buddhism
  • A Flash of Lightning in the Dark of Night: A Guide to the Bodhisattva's Way of Life
  • Crooked Cucumber: The Life and Teaching of Shunryu Suzuki
Acharya Nāgārjuna (Telugu: నాగార్జున) (c. 150 - 250 CE) was an Indian philosopher and the founder of the Madhyamaka school of Mahāyāna Buddhism.

His writings are the basis for the formation of the Madhyamaka school, which was transmitted to China under the name of the Three Treatise (Sanlun) School. He is credited with developing the philosophy of the Prajnaparamita sutras, and was closely associat
...more
More about Nāgārjuna...
Verses from the Center: A Buddhist Vision of the Sublime Nagarjuna Verses on the Great Vehicle and the Heart of Dependent Origination Golden Zephyr The Tree Of Wisdom: She Rab Dong Bu Nagarjuna on the Six Perfections

Share This Book

“Whatever is dependently co-arisen
That is explained to be emptiness.
That, being a dependent designation
Is itself the Middle Way.”
2 likes
“The victorious ones have said
That emptiness is the relinquishing of all views.
For whomever emptiness is a view,
That one has achieved nothing.”
2 likes
More quotes…