Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Golem 100” as Want to Read:
Golem 100
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Golem 100

3.15  ·  Rating Details ·  362 Ratings  ·  26 Reviews
In a mega-city of the future...

They were nice ladies, really. Just bored. And they never expected to succeed. But intoning ancient rituals to raise the devil, they unwittingly began a rampage of rape, torture and murder. For they concocted a new devil, Golem100. And the Golem continues to grow...

Tracking the monstrous path of depravity are three super talents: Gretchen Nun
Paperback, 384 pages
Published December 7th 1989 by Mandarin (first published 1980)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Golem 100, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Golem 100

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Jul 30, 2011 Lyn rated it did not like it
In praise of the one star rating.

Good reads should have five stars and then a DNF – did not finish. Because just as love is not the opposite of hate, indifference is the opposite of love, the one star is that rarest of accolades, the book so bad you want to finish.

Many people have a favorite book or a list of the best novels they've ever read. This book falls on the opposite side of the spectrum - the worst book. I trudged through and finished this out of morbid curiosity.

So, what is this about?
Jun 07, 2016 Tyler rated it it was ok
Shelves: didn-t-make-it
Something happened to sci-fi writers in the late 70's / early 80's. Either it was the drugs, or the sex, or the mind-blowing hot-tub action, but as a whole they all collectively got really bad. I'm lumping this in with the minor works of Samuel Delaney and Robert Heinlein. We get it, dudes, orgies are groovy, and space sex with tons of chicks is even better on designer drugs from Mars, but, damn, really, did you ever try to read your own books and fall asleep about half-way through? Or did the c ...more
John Tye
Aug 07, 2007 John Tye rated it did not like it
Despite his prominent status in the science fiction world, Bester produced a relatively small volume of work in the genre. That makes it a treat to find something of his you've not previously read. Unless, of course, it turns out to be this book.

The novel's concept is not completely without merit, with an interesting combination of characters. Unfortunately, the writing does not rise to a particularly high standard, and what is obviously meant to pass for cleverness feels forced and contrived. T
Oct 15, 2014 Peteralee1 rated it did not like it
Extremely odd. I've some of Bester's other works and really enjoyed it, but this was just too disjointed and strange for me to get in into. I forced myself to finish, hoping that something coherent would emerge, but unfortunately it never did.

Skip it.
Isabel (kittiwake)
"We can't all be monsters," Shima protested.
"Deep down inside, in our Underworld, we are. Up here, at the top of the iceberg, we censor and control it; but what happens when that brute beast in us escapes control, breaks out of the cage, and runs wild? Then you have Golem 100."
"How does it break out of the cage?"
"Sharpen a wit, baby. the bee-ladies get together in Regina's hive. They play witchcraft games. Of course they never succeed in raising the Devil because he doesn't exist. That's just fo
My rule, when I’m not enjoying as book, is to read the first fifty pages before I stop reading it. (The rule is Nancy Pearl’s from her Book Lust: Recommended Reading for Every Mood, Moment, and Reason.) I couldn’t even read that much of this dreck; I read to page 39.

The plot as far as I read: A group of wealthy ladies get together to summon Satan because they are bored. And they keep doing it, because they think they have been unsuccessful. Meanwhile, there are a series of awful, horrific crime
Despite my love of all things weird in modern majickal horror/sci-fi, there seems to be a limit of crazy hodge-podge ideas that one can cram into approximately 400 pages. I suspect that the limit is learned from my prior exposure to authors such as Neil Gaiman, Tim Powers, Raymond Feist and Roger Zelazny.

I am certain that I heard all of them indicate that Alfred Bester was amongst the best in this style of writing... but Golem 100 reaches my tolerance of scientific/majickal riffing craziness abo
Oct 13, 2013 Woolsyzygy rated it liked it
Crazy and horrifying. His prose and use of illustration make it a frantic mess, but by the end, it congeals into a haunting, thought-provoking conclusion. Bester has always speculated about how the human race will take its next evolutionary step and has never been afraid to explore bizarre possibilities. The 23rd century New York is a dystopia swallowed by the hip, tragic, and goofy drug/refugee culture; The Golem100 is a pretty far-fetched, almost absurd, monster; the characters who rise agains ...more
Jul 28, 2014 Logan rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Crap. I only read about 120 pages and then skipped around to see if it ever started making any sense, but, no. It's just crap. Poorly written, uninteresting crap with terrible dialogue and ridiculous characters and a stoooopid premise. Hard to believe the same guy that wrote THE DEMOLISHED MAN and THE STARS MY DESTINATION and all those dozens of great short stories could spread his legs and drop a load like this one. Ah well.
Aug 02, 2011 Clare rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
An interesting read, as always, from Alfred Bester, however, not as good as his other books. I loved the ideas about the id and it is an interesting version of a future world. Although Alfred Bester is one of my favorite authors I could have skipped this book and been fine. Unless you absolutely love his books, skip it.
Christopher Wang
Aug 28, 2015 Christopher Wang rated it really liked it
the beginning was good

the trips with the images was very novel and bester is probably on par with PKD at times

the middle bit dragged on a little long

the very ending was absolutely amazing

the book has grown on me exponentially since I finished it a few hours ago
Jul 13, 2011 TheGriffinReads rated it it was ok
I didn't particularly love this book, but it was the first "orthographically experimental" work I encountered. For several chapters, Bester attempts expressionism in typography and imagery, eventually abandoning written language for several pages.
Splash Champion
Aug 08, 2013 Splash Champion rated it did not like it
Shamlessly reading for the cover. :)
UPDATE: certainly one of the oddest novels I come across. The narrative was far too in-cohesive to be read as anything other than as an experiment in altered perceptions.
Matt Piechocinski
I think what Bester was trying to pull off was pretty cool, but some parts really fail in execution to the extent that I lost track of what the hell was going on.
Nicholas Mantzaris
Feb 26, 2015 Nicholas Mantzaris rated it liked it
Very interesting conceptually and - mostly - stylistically, but other than that it contained a lot of "pseudo-science" and logical leaps that seemed almost childish at some points.
Matt Sears
Mar 28, 2010 Matt Sears rated it it was ok
Shelves: sci-fi, pulp
Fifty pages of decent action driven sci fi/horror, and then 330 pages of diluted psychobabble and condensed dick jokes. There are some moments, but would you sift through shit for a few quarters?
Jan 24, 2010 Max rated it liked it
A different yet satisfying Bester effort. Doesn't live up to the standards set by The Demolished Man and The Stars, My Destination. Still a great read with a scene of displaced comic gore.
Aug 26, 2010 Megan rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Despite all the sex and the violence and general pulpiness, this book definitely contains some of the sweet social commentary that I love from Bester's more highly-regarded books.
Jul 30, 2012 Keith rated it it was ok
Shelves: science-fiction
Bester wrote some of the best stories in the genre, but this, more experimental, book just doesn't do it for me. To list it as OK falls so far beneath the usual standard I would apply to his work.
Was with this book up until the last 20 pages or so. Too much anarchy in the end. Though I think that was part of the point of the book, so...
Shaun Andrews
Shaun Andrews rated it really liked it
Nov 06, 2012
May 11, 2012 Andrew rated it did not like it
Shelves: science-fiction
Old school science fiction at its best.
Richard rated it it was amazing
Aug 25, 2011
Tabatha rated it it was ok
Jul 12, 2007
Michael Tambasco
Michael Tambasco rated it it was ok
Feb 29, 2012
Scott Rhine
Scott Rhine rated it liked it
Apr 26, 2011
Richard rated it really liked it
Apr 03, 2012
Alexandra rated it it was amazing
Jan 17, 2010
Jason Brezinski
Jason Brezinski rated it liked it
Oct 17, 2016
Rodrigo rated it liked it
Oct 07, 2012
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Ambient
  • Barefoot in the Head
  • The Reproductive System
  • Driftglass
  • Star Songs of An Old Primate
  • Einstein's Bridge
  • Worlds of the Imperium (Imperium, #1)
  • The Deep Beyond: Cuckoo's Egg / Serpent's Reach (Union-Alliance Universe)
  • Store of the Worlds: The Stories of Robert Sheckley
  • Inside Outside
  • The Jagged Orbit
  • Men, Martians and Machines
  • Dervish is Digital (Artificial Reality Division, #2)
  • The Reefs of Earth
  • Fremder
  • Cuarteles de invierno
  • Greener Than You Think (Classics of Modern Science Fiction 10)
Alfred Bester (1913–1987) was an American science fiction author, TV and radio scriptwriter, magazine editor and scripter for comic strips and comic books.

Though successful in all these fields, he is best remembered for his science fiction, including The Demolished Man, winner of the inaugural Hugo Award in 1953, a story about murder in a future society where the police are telepathic, and The St
More about Alfred Bester...

Share This Book

No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »