Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Arguing Marbury v. Madison” as Want to Read:
Arguing Marbury v. Madison
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Arguing Marbury v. Madison

it was amazing 5.0  ·  Rating Details ·  2 Ratings  ·  0 Reviews
Marbury v. Madison, decided in 1803, is the foundation stone of the American doctrine of judicial review. Remarkably, the case was decided without the parties having presented an oral argument to the Supreme Court. This book begins with a unique transcript of an oral argument in the case, conducted before a bench of four distinguished federal judges. The transcript is foll ...more
Hardcover, 224 pages
Published August 9th 2005 by Stanford Law and Politics
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Arguing Marbury v. Madison, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Arguing Marbury v. Madison

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-7)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Arthur Kyriazis
Arthur Kyriazis rated it it was amazing
Apr 23, 2013
Gautam Patel
Gautam Patel rated it it was amazing
Sep 09, 2008
BookDB marked it as to-read
Oct 26, 2016
Jordan added it
Mar 31, 2012
Josh marked it as to-read
Jul 26, 2014
Martin Ochoa
Martin Ochoa marked it as to-read
Oct 21, 2015
Eric marked it as to-read
Jan 10, 2017
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
Mark Tushnet is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and the author of A Court Divided: The Rehnquist Court and the Future of Constitutional Law. He divides his time between Washington, DC, and Cambridge, Massachusetts.
More about Mark Tushnet...

Share This Book