Arthur and George

by Julian Barnes
Arthur and George  
published January 9th 2007 by Vintage
first published 2005
binding Paperback
isbn 1400097037   (isbn13: 9781400097036)
pages 464
literary awards 2005 Booker Prize Nominee
description A real tour de force from masterful author Julian Barnes is Arthur & George, which was short-listed for the 2005 Man Booker Prize. ...more
date added
01-31-07



Sign in to Goodreads to see your friends' reviews of Arthur and George.







discuss this book

topics replies last activity
The Description could use a spoiler alert. 1 04/25/2008 08:02PM

groups with this book

Readers Night Out




friend reviews (0)

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.






other reviews (showing 1-20 of 1214)



Stephanie
Stephanie rated it: 3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars
04/03/08

Read in April, 2008
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Like this review?   yes  
  2 comments

Kelly
Kelly rated it: 2 of 5 stars2 of 5 stars2 of 5 stars2 of 5 stars2 of 5 stars
02/26/08

bookshelves: did-not-finish, fiction, truly-dreadful
Unfortunately, Mr. Barnes, I am afraid that I must decline to finish this novel. Not since attempting the Painted Veil a little while ago have I been so deceived in anyone. I will blame the pile of five star reviews for this, as well as a very clever publisher who created an intriguing 100 words to grab me on the back of the novel, and information given to me that you had written the geniunely quality A History of the World in 10.5 Chapters.

Did you just get lazy after that? Is this what sitt...more
Like this review?   yes  
  18 comments

Helen
01/30/08

bookshelves: historical-fiction
"I enjoyed this novel a lot, although it's rather oddly constructed. The first part of the book describes the early years of George Edalji, the son of a Parsi vicar and Scottish mother, and those of Arthur Conan Doyle. George becomes a solicitor, Arthur studies to become a doctor but of course it is as a writer that he makes his name. [return][return]Barnes paints a convincing and engrossing picture of middle-class Edwardian England (Arthur is married to tubercular Touie and must wait over ...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Maureeen
Read in June, 2007
recommends it for: fans of sherlock holmes, historical novels, british humour, criminal justice, philosophy
The novel reflects the reserve of the English people. Insights are profound, and there is serious philosophical reflection, but it is all understated. For this reason, this novel is excellent for both people looking for an entertaining read, and people who expect an intellectual stimulation. Irony and astute observation make for a novel that is often incredibly funny. Barnes renders the cahracters in an endearing manner, I as a reader found myself immensely concerned with their outcomes. This wi...more
Like this review?   yes   (1 person liked it)
  1 comments

Alina
02/26/08

Read in February, 2008
recommends it for: those interested in Doyle or British law (or Barnes fans)
This book was very good, which meant that I was a bit disappointed. (Only for Julian Barnes does "very good" not live up to his potential.) I find Barnes to be a genius and master at writing. The word choices and writing flow coupled with his incredibly portrayal of deep human emotion produces books that absolutely involve the reader. This story, although 'very good' did not capture me quite as intensely as other of his works have.
This book is centered on the lives of two men -- Arth...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Trevor
Trevor rated it: 4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars
06/23/07

Read in May, 2007
I couldn't decide whether this book fell under the "loved it" or "it was amazing" category. I finally settled on "loved it" but only because I want to try (try) to keep my "it was amazing" books to an exclusive few. However, I must say that I was amazed by the book. Barnes writing was smooth and effortless to read. At the same time it was penetrating, and he could articulate feelings and contradictions with clarity.
The story was wonderful. It is abo...more
Like this review?   yes   (1 person liked it)
  add a comment

Suzanne
Suzanne rated it: 3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars
08/19/07

bookshelves: nonfiction
Read in January, 2007
recommends it for: friends
Slow to start. But was drawn into this unique story and its revelatory details of the real author Sir Walter Scott.

Publisher's Weekly
Arthur is Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, physician, sportsman, gentleman par excellence and the inventor of Sherlock Holmes; George is George Edalji, also a real, if less well-known person, whose path crossed not quite fatefully with the famous author's. Edalji was the son of a Parsi father (who was a Shropshire vicar), and a Scots mother. In 1903, George, a solicit...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Steve
Steve rated it: 4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars
02/08/08

Read in February, 2008
What a great premise for a work of historical fiction. Take a larger-than-life figure known to all, make him larger still, and overlay his story on top of one with little fame but deserving of more. The acclaimed character was Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, who turned out to be even more intriguing than his detective stories would suggest. From early days in Mam’s kitchen listening to chivalric tales of adventure, to heroics in sports and at war, Arthur liked thinking of himself as an honorable kn...more
Like this review?   yes   (1 person liked it)
  add a comment

Trish
Trish rated it: 4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars
12/02/07

Read in July, 2006
I really enjoyed this book, but I can't think of annyone to whom I could recommend it. I told Aaron that it isn't post-modern enough for him. Aaron's favorite Julian Barnes book is, I believe, A History of the World in 10 1/1 Chapters, while mine is the more narratively traditional Flaubert's Parrot. And Arthur & George is yet more traditional.

Arthur is Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, the creator of Sherlock Holmes. George is George Edalji, a man falsely convicted of a bizarre rural crime. Barn...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Kay
Kay rated it: 5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars
12/14/07

bookshelves: british_lit, victoriana
Read in December, 2007
I give five stars sparingly, so I was torn between giving and "four" and a "five" here. Ultimately, though, when I considered that I'd put aside all other tasks one weekend to devote to finishing this book, I decided that this was five-star material.

The last book I'd read by Barnes, England, England was a bit of a disappointment -- it came off, it seemed to me, like second-rate Tom Sharpe. But this book was a different matter. I especially liked the way it unfol...more
Like this review?   yes   (1 person liked it)
  3 comments

Suzy
Suzy rated it: 3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars
11/07/07

Read in June, 2007
It's not that this book is bad, it's just that it's not good....

A story about two men - Arthur & George - whose lives begin in very different places, yet end up colliding for a very strange reason. The best part of this book is the first 100 pages. The author does a tremendous job in describing the two men (at this point, boys), the writing style here is simple yet subtle, and there are a few twists. That is, you think you have a good idea of who each boy is - then suddenly you realize t...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Franzi
05/15/08

Read in April, 2008
The book is a good read because of it's character studies, because the characters are far from perfect.
The book is an even better read because it is actually based on real events.
The book is amazing because it screws with your head.

As the blurb says, the book is about the difference between thinking, believing and knowing. The first time you're being tricked is right in the beginning. You probably won't notice until p.50 or something. From that moment on, you'll be on your guards. To a ...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Jane
Jane rated it: 2 of 5 stars2 of 5 stars2 of 5 stars2 of 5 stars2 of 5 stars
04/25/07

Read in April, 2007
recommends it for: Sherlock Holmes Fans, lawyers, historical fiction fans
ok... just finished this book...

It's a fictionalized story of a true incident involving George Edjali. George was a half-Indian solicitor in England who was accused of brutally slaughtering animals. It's obvious that he didn't do the crimes but he was convicted anyway... pursued by a bumbling British police force, who was probably targeting George because of his race. Of course, Sir Conan Doyle, the author of the Sherlock Holmes series, comes to his rescue to clear his name.

I was rea...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Jennifer
Jennifer rated it: 3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars
04/27/07

Read in January, 2007
I remembered reading a review of this book, and thinking that sounds novel (pardon the pun). Based on fact, but written in a way that more closely resembles fiction than a biography.

Barnes sucks the reader in fairly quickly by setting up the two central characters on a collision course that no one would have anticipated. A country solicitor and a world-renowned author don't have anything in common other than the pursuit of equity and justice.

I'm not fan of Sherlock Holmes, having never...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Anna
Anna rated it: 4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars
09/25/07

Read in October, 2007
recommends it for: anyone dying to find out what qualifies as a "yarn" for the NY Times Book Review
Detective novels typically tell one story; this one tells several. (Even the crime itself is not one thing but many.) This unexpected multplicity is sometimes illuminating, sometimes frustrating, and often both. Thinking I have a mystery in my hands, I read into offhand paragraphs. I intepret literary metaphors as clues. I hypothesize. And Barnes is brilliant enough to reward just enough of this work to keep me hungry. The story moves quickly after the first 40 pages or so, and even when ...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Neil
Neil rated it: 4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars
06/28/08

Read in June, 2008
I don't go for whodunnits so much, mostly because I have such a poor head for plot that by the time the mystery is revealed, I've long forgotten who these people are that are now being identified as the criminals. This piece of historical fiction is no different in that regard, but the mystery of who committed the crime is only a small part of what Barnes is trying to do.

The other topics that the book tackles--changing definitions of masculinity and honor in early 20th century England, the s...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

James
12/30/07

bookshelves: fiction, lincolnparkgroup
Read in December, 2007
Julian Barnes uses an elegant and readable writing style to create the dual fictional lives of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and George Edalji in this his tenth novel. The result is a compelling narrative that at once is both interesting as fictional biography and as a detective story. Personally, I found the mystery and Doyle's investigation into its' source was more interesting, but the rest of the novel was well enough told to almost keep up with the suspense created by the mystery. The combination ...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Esilenna
Arthur and George, set in late nineteenth-century Britain, deals with a sequence of events that became known as The Great Wyrley Outrages.

George, son of a Parsee father and a Scottish mother, grows up in the obscure and modest circumstances of a village vicarage in rural Staffordshire and eventually becomes a solicitor in Birmingham. Meanwhile, Arthur goes from humble beginnings in Edinburgh to becoming a doctor, an author and one of the most famous men of his time. Their stories are parallel ...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Bill
Bill rated it: 5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars
07/23/08

Read in July, 2008
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Diane
Diane rated it: 4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars
03/12/08

Read in March, 2008
recommended to Diane by: Steve's review on Goodreads
recommends it for: Historical & non-fiction fans
Many thanks to Steve on Goodreads for his Arthur & George review which drew me to the book.

I liked everything about A & G, from the way the individual stories were told, to the new things I learned about Arthur Conan Doyle, to the changes in English law made because of George's trial & treatment. I read the book on a vacation trip, stealing time between activities & staying up late to see what happened next.

"Arthur & George" was the first novel I've read b...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment


« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 60 61



book data (includes all editions)

avg rating (all editions): 3.60 (863 ratings)
avg rating (this edition): 3.59 (702 ratings)
number of reviews: 200