Kropotkin: 'The Conquest of Bread' and Other Writings

Rate this book

Clear rating

1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars

Kropotkin: 'The Conquest of Bread' and Other Writings

4.14 of 5 stars 4.14 · rating details · 511 ratings · 41 reviews

Peter Kropotkin's most detailed description of the ideal society embodies anarchist communism and the social revolution that was to achieve it. This edition's introduction traces his evolution as an anarchist, from his origins in Russian aristocracy to his disillusionment with the Russian Revolution.

Paperback, 304 pages

Published August 25th 1995 by Cambridge University Press (first published January 1st 1919)

more details... edit details

Get a copy:

More…

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Lists with This Book

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 1,202)

filter | sort: default (?) | rating details

Nov 17, 2011 Joshua added it

Shelves: hippie, sabbatical11-12

[Read online at http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/anarchist_... ]

Treads some of the same ground as "Fields, Factories and Workshops", definitely worth a read. Again, Kropotkin impresses me with his prescience about so many of the issues that we grapple with today. What follows below is less of a review than it is a collection of quotations:

As a frequent teacher of thermodynamics, I appreciated (and will attest to) his statement that the field was first really "invented" by the engineers, and only turne...more

1 like · like · see review

Jun 15, 2012 Dana Garrett rated it 5 of 5 stars

Shelves: anarchism-read

In the Conquest of Bread Peter Kropotkin sketches his vision of how an anarchist communist society might work. He sees it organized as divided up into agricultural and industrial communes federated together for mutual benefit. Diversity of activities would dominate the workday as people would, when capable, achieve competence in a variety of trades. The workday for necessities would be short because Kropotkin believes that the agricultural and industrial capabilities exist to create post scarcit...more

1 like · like · see review

Jul 07, 2012 Sean Mccarrey rated it 2 of 5 stars · review of another edition

This book was thoroughly disappointing, especially after reading Memoirs of a Revolutionist, which was an incredible book. This book however, was pretty much a 279 page rant about what a perfect society would look like, and what was wrong with the industrialized world at that time, rather than how these things could realistically be achieved. One reason for this is, as Kropotkin points out, was that these anarchist ideals could be achieved rather easily once some great revolution had occurred....more This book was thoroughly disappointing, especially after reading Memoirs of a Revolutionist, which was an incredible book. This book however, was pretty much a 279 page rant about what a perfect society would look like, and what was wrong with the industrialized world at that time, rather than how these things could realistically be achieved. One reason for this is, as Kropotkin points out, was that these anarchist ideals could be achieved rather easily once some great revolution had occurred. Humanity only need to catch a glimpse of some efficient anarchist organization and they would fall in line. It's strange then, that Kropotkin gives example after example of where anarchist principles already exist in organizations of that period, be it the Red Cross, various communes, the British Life Boat Association, Russian peasant communes, the Royal Society of Zoology, etc. I wonder if these organizations were so well founded, and it would only take humanity glimpsing them during a period of revolution, why then, did the French not turn to anarchism in 1793, 1848, or 1871? For that matter, with the Soviets of the Russian Revolution that decided things in consensus, and ran their factories and farms efficiently without outside intervention, particularly of the State (such as the Kronstadt sailors), why was anarchism so easily defeated by state-sponsord Communism?
The answer lies in the fact that people are fully engrossed in the systems that they are a part of. Just because the oppressors and their tools are shattered does not mean that people stop thinking in certain manners and change towards whichever way the wind blows. Humanity is cultured and steeped in systems of capitalism, and state run systems, to the point where are very cities are designed upon the premise of the good of the state, as Kropotkin points out. Why then, would he expect people to readily abandon that system when they have had little education to the contrary, and even if they do try to change the status-quo they will be unfamiliar with the systems of anarchism until they are fully educated in them. This can be seen in the case of Occupy Wall Street. And in Occupy Wall Street one can see why his simplistic prognosis for revolution being a sudden and necessary cure-all failed. While organizers of the movement in various cities did attempt to make some form of change, they were often stymied by a lack of knowledge of their own consensus system (General Assembly), and that made it all too easy for those with enough will to wreck havoc on the organizational structure, especially when no one involved even seemed to be aware that the movement was fundamentally anarchist (at least outside of New York). So when I read Kropotkin's ideas about a spontaneous committee arising to address the cities need for food and supply, I do have to laugh. In reality, this would become so complicated, even if it did happen there would surely be so much infighting among organizations and power players that nothing of value would have gotten done. Kropotkin himself must have seen this system fall apart during his last days in the Russian Revolution.
I wish this book would have been better, but as it stands, it is a lot of pie-in-the-sky BS.(less)

2 likes · like · see review

Nov 21, 2011 Nick rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: economics, history, liberty, political-theory

Kropotkin is a great writer. Also, there is way too much content in this, and it is way too late for me to review it in any detail. Just some things off the top of my head. This is a much better book for understanding Kropotkin's anarcho-communism than Mutual Aid, is, although I think Mutual Aid is a better book overall. He espouses some proto-knowledge problem stuff and refutes the Marxist labor theory of value. He makes a big point in the early chapters of stressing that humanity is extremely...more

1 like · like · see review

Mar 06, 2011 Nick Klagge rated it 3 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: economics

Reading this book was a strange experience for me. From what I had read about Kropotkin before picking up the book, I had expected I'd really like it--critique of capitalism, Communism without the state, warm and fuzzy anarchism. But while I thought Kropotkin made a number of incisive points, I came away from CoB feeling wholly unconvinced. Part of it may be the 100+ year time gap: Kropotkin writes for a society that is largely organized around agriculture and industrial manufacturing, and while...more Reading this book was a strange experience for me. From what I had read about Kropotkin before picking up the book, I had expected I'd really like it--critique of capitalism, Communism without the state, warm and fuzzy anarchism. But while I thought Kropotkin made a number of incisive points, I came away from CoB feeling wholly unconvinced. Part of it may be the 100+ year time gap: Kropotkin writes for a society that is largely organized around agriculture and industrial manufacturing, and while of course those things are of course still important today, it just seems clear that he's writing about a very different time and place.

My first issue with Kropotkin's proposals centers around violence. The bedrock of his anarchist program is expropriation--the invalidation of the institution of private property and the seizing of all property by the people. He begins by making a pretty cogent argument for why property is theft, centering around the idea that the vast quantity and variety of human efforts going into any one item are such as to make it absurd for a single person to pretend to "rightful ownership" thereof. Therefore, he argues, it is only right that the people should expropriate property from its present claimants. Yet he is extremely vague about the nature of such expropriation, and in particular doesn't give attention to the fact that it would likely require a great deal of violence and killing (no doubt bringing about the demise of many workers as well as capitalists). I think this is an extremely important point for any expropriationist to take seriously. After all, it would be a completely plausible position to say that all property is theft, and yet that violence to expropriate it is not justified. In this sense Kropotkin refuses to count the cost, or to consider the implications of the fact that his ideal society would be born in blood.

My second issue with CoB is that I think Kropotkin provides a very weak moral foundation for his society. Even if we agree with him that capitalism and property are unjust institutions, what then? The alternative vision that he provides is still very much painted from the perspective of homo economicus--a society that minimizes work (which is disutility, natch) and studies "the needs of humanity, and the economic means to satisfy them." Here I turn to a passage from Alasdair MacIntyre on Aristotle, quoted by Stanley Hauerwas (all my favorite dudes!) in this excellent 2010 interview with Wunderkammer magazine (http://wunderkammermag.com/arts-and-c...):

“…from an Aristotelian standpoint, it can never be right to weigh preferences in such a way that everybody counts for one and nobody for more than one. And it would be a fundamental mistake to try to maximize the satisfaction of the preferences of all the members of a given society.”

Hauerwas glosses MacIntyre as referring to the practice of weighing vicious and virtuous desires equally. As Hauerwas goes on to say, the position that MacIntyre is critiquing (which implicitly advantages pleonexia) stands at the heart of modern economic rationality--but I would argue that it also stands at the heart of Kropotkin's anarchist program. It's true that the needs that Kropotkin emphasizes--food, clothing, shelter--are hardly open to reasonable critique, but nonetheless I think that any system that focuses wholly on the fulfillment of "needs" without giving attention to the construction of those needs is dangerously incomplete. (cf. "parasitic liberalism" thesis)

I have not given up on anarchism as a subject of intellectual inquiry and am looking forward to reading Tolstoy's "The Kingdom of God is Within You" and Ellul's "Anarchy and Christianity."(less)

1 like · like · see review

Jan 26, 2010 Matt rated it 5 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Though Kropotkin was clearly writing for a different century, his basic principles are sound, and the effect of his writing is to show that, with a little thought and imagination, alternate and more just ways of organizing society are indeed possible. We are so saturated with capitalistic assumptions that we have to create space to consider other options. In many ways, Kropotkin is immensely practical; the title of the book refers to the fact that any revolution must quickly solve the issue of "...more

like · see review

Apr 01, 2012 Hadrian rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: economics-finance-business, nonfiction, politics-and-foreign-policy

Well, this was interesting to look over. Especially after my big focus on Chinese authoritarian capitalism over the past few weeks.

Kropotkin advocates a unique ideology, which might now be classified as 'anarcho-communism'. This combination was jarring, from my biased American viewpoint, especially because communism is immediately associated with central planning and statism. Kropotkin, to his credit, immediately identifies some of the problems with central planned economies.

After this, he cons...more Well, this was interesting to look over. Especially after my big focus on Chinese authoritarian capitalism over the past few weeks.

Kropotkin advocates a unique ideology, which might now be classified as 'anarcho-communism'. This combination was jarring, from my biased American viewpoint, especially because communism is immediately associated with central planning and statism. Kropotkin, to his credit, immediately identifies some of the problems with central planned economies.

After this, he constructs his new ideal society with loving detail, moving from the basic necessities (food, clothing, shelter), to wages and the structure and distribution of goods, and education. He avoids much hard economic detail, and this book is made for mass discussion.

Now I find myself in agreement with him in more areas that I would have thought. Mechanization, technology, and planning have made many previously awful jobs much more reasonable and efficient. Women need to be brought out and made equal, of course, of course. Cooperation has worked in some fields, particularly with modern technology and the internet. I could go on about crowd-sourcing, the public domain, GNU, Creative Commons Licenses, and so forth. I agree that happy and autonomous workers are best, in terms of production, and happiness. Not to mention that there has been an empirically shown biological imperative for altruism. (see: Stephen Jay Gould's essay for further detail)

However, I confess I am distrustful that people will willingly buy into such ideas, what after the spread of the idea of rugged individualism. Or whether if people are simply good enough to willingly move over to communes, or participate in group or community thinking. Or if any moneyed interests will conspire to make such a society impossible. And this is coming from an avowed idealist/optimist. Although I'd much prefer this society to a Social Darwinist 'every man for himself' arena. Only too often have I seen evolution, a wonderful biological theory, tarnished by being used as a justification for societal misfortunes and inequalities.

Will such a utopia work? Perhaps. I'm not really sure. My inner empirical scientist wants to say 'try it out and let's see'. Perhaps that's the only way to be sure.(less)

1 like · like · see review

Aug 28, 2012 Tiago rated it 5 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Kropotkine's Conquest of Bread is one of the most important yet underrated political/economy books ever written, essential to the literate anarchist (are there other ones? most who call themselves anarchist are in reality nihilists).

The book exposes how with the advent of industrialization there are surplus means of achieving a just and plentiful society, where no one starves and no one lives in poverty, all this with a minimal and communitarian government.

One of those reads that leaves you wond...more

like · see review

Oct 31, 2010 Calígula rated it 5 of 5 stars · review of another edition

"The study of the needs of mankind, and the means of satisfying them with the least possible waste of human energy"

Clear, comprehensive and to the point.

This text was written more than a hundred years ago and arguably some of its ideas are either outdated, unrealistic or simply wrong.

Still, the book is so well-written, passionate, positive and inspiring, and many of the things covered here are still so relevant today that I cannot recommend it enough.

A must for anyone interested in other ways of...more

like · see review

Jun 01, 2013 Alyssa Miller rated it 5 of 5 stars · review of another edition

"But, if plenty for all is to become a reality, this immense capital—cities, houses, pastures, arable lands, factories, highways, education—must cease to be regarded as private property, for the monopolist to dispose of at his pleasure.

This rich endowment, painfully won, builded, fashioned, or invented by our ancestors, must become common property, so that the collective interests of men may gain from it the greatest good for all.

There must be Expropriation. The well-being of all—the end; exprop...more

like · see review

Dec 11, 2012 Mario García rated it 5 of 5 stars · review of another edition Recommends it for: Anyone who doesn't understand how the world works and how ignorant are we about the recent past

Recommended to Mario by: My good judgment

This is one of those books which help you understand who is a good reader and who is not. Not because it is particularly difficult, but because some people lacks proper attention to detail. Nonetheless, before I go on, let me take one or two things off my chest.

Many people has identified this book as an utopia, but it is quite curious for me that they didn't even read:
*

we, "the utopian dreamers", we shall have to consider the question of daily bread

We have already had too much of Jacobin Utop

...more

like · see review

Apr 22, 2012 Tinea rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Recommended to Tinea by: Brandon (and others)

Shelves: anarchism-and-activism, food-agriculture-hunger

Uplifting, light, and truly enjoyable! While I stand by an earlier assertion that best way to learn about anarchism nowadays is through radical permaculture ecologists and intersectional women of color feminists, I was surprised to find The Conquest of Bread is really worth reading, too. In terms of your old white European male anarcho-communists, Kropotkin is the go-to guy; I'd put him ahead of Emma Goldman for timid students of anarchist theory, since he focuses more on practicalities and visi...more Uplifting, light, and truly enjoyable! While I stand by an earlier assertion that best way to learn about anarchism nowadays is through radical permaculture ecologists and intersectional women of color feminists, I was surprised to find The Conquest of Bread is really worth reading, too. In terms of your old white European male anarcho-communists, Kropotkin is the go-to guy; I'd put him ahead of Emma Goldman for timid students of anarchist theory, since he focuses more on practicalities and vision of the future while she brings instead critique of the present and passionate calls to arms. Feel free to skim the pages of statistics and outdated examples Kropotkin uses to support his hypotheses.

According to Kropotkin, the means to conquer bread is permaculture: intensive, small-scale, urban, soil-building, ecologically efficient agriculture based on an scientific assessment of "what are the needs of all, and what are the means of satisfying them"-- steps one and two an ecological design process. He calls for doing the least amount of work necessary to meet material needs (echoed in the present by both anarchists and permaculturalists), with all participating in labor so that that everyone may have free time and energy to pursue passions like science, art, music, writing, etc etc etc, the enjoyable productivity that Kropotkin reminds us so many people take up when they have time freed from draining work weeks. The aim, in his words, is to "Produce the greatest amount of goods necessary to the well-being of all, with the least possible waste of human energy." Elegantly efficient.

There are other lessons in here. Kropotkin argues in favor of free association and diversity and decentralization of production, and against coercion and centralized authority, always with examples and evidence to support his claims, but also always with a heartfelt uplifting of human creativity, inclinations toward kindness and mutual support, and general respect for the mass of people being competent and able. Finally, he argues for "the need for luxury." It is this acknowledgement of the importance of happiness that I think makes Kroptkin and anarchism so much more embedded in reality than other social theories, including capitalism's pursuit of competitive self-interest. We want bread but we want roses too-- Kropotkin says start there, with our needs and desires, and then figure out the best means of meeting them.

[For the (A) book club](less)

2 likes · like · see review

Aug 15, 2010 Rob rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: non-fiction, politics, read-in-2010

A must-read for anyone interested in anarcho-communism, not only an important book in its ideological development but also a great argument in its own right. A lot of the book is obviously outdated, and slogging through the figures can be a bit much, but the rational an not emotional nature of the writing lends credence to Kropotkin's theories. It's interesting that Kropotkin uses "anarchism" and "communism" interchangably here, given what disparate, slap-fighting camps they've become. There's a...more

like · see review

Nov 27, 2012 James rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

This was an interesting book that I picked up wanting to learn more about Kropotkin himself. The approach that he represents might be best described as anarcho-communist, but this is not entirely pie in the sky. He sets out reasonable assumptions and describes how to fulfill them. It does require a paradigm shift (ie look at need rather than production and a we're all in this together from the perspective of a lifeboat viz. you don't ask for the qualifications of the fellow boaters, you just giv...more

like · see review

Jan 13, 2008 Brendan Conner rated it 3 of 5 stars

Shelves: political-theory

The book is an account of Kropotkin's 'anarchist communist' program as it is set apart from those of Alexander Berkman and Errico Malatesta, for instance. Kropotkin's inductive method, for the social sciences, presents the reader with the possibility of large-scale decentralization, but, in a unique take, Kropotkin claims decentraization has in fact already happened despite the fact that the media and books of history, haven't noticed. "Three hundred and fifty million Europeans love or hate one...more

like · see review

Sep 06, 2007 Javier rated it 4 of 5 stars

Shelves: post-college, anarchism

A seemingly much-ignored classic--Kropotkin here lays out the specifics of 'the ideal society,' where labor-time would be vastly reduced, everyone would have necessities provided for, and leisure time would be greatly maximized so as to allow for the greater cultivation of self and community. I, for one, saw many of Kropotkin's claims here echoed in later anarchist works, esp. in those of Ursula Le Guin and Murray Bookchin. Highly recommended--certainly a more constructive account of politics/...more

like · see review

Nov 10, 2011 Frank is currently reading it · review of another edition

Shelves: quit-reading

Definitely skip the introduction by Charles Weigl, unless you are a political/economic historian-theorist weenie. Kropotkin's writing is actually fun and easy to read, as opposed to this academic block of text.

like · see review

Nov 18, 2008 Megan rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: labor, politics, non-fiction

An amazingly clear and down-to-earth text for one trying to pronounce an entirely alternative form of social organization. I had harbored somewhat negative connotations of Kropotkin prior to this (not really sure where they came from), and so found myself pleasantly surprised. In general, the book serves as a reminder of the principles that classical political economy is founded upon, and how different economic theory can look if we challenge those principles by focusing not only on the ways tha...more

1 like · like · see review

Jan 16, 2013 Adam rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

While a fantastic book, it was meant more for working class and those without a familiarity with the philosophical basis for anarchism, and in particular, anarcho-communism.

like · see review

Feb 27, 2013 Nranger7 rated it 5 of 5 stars · review of another edition

One of the best books I had to read for a class on the History of Anarchism.

like · see review

Dec 14, 2012 Richard rated it 5 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Accessible, well written intro to anarchist-communist theory.

like · see review

Jul 11, 2012 J. Rogue rated it 5 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: anarchism, to-reread

I first read this over a decade ago and it blew my mind.

like · see review

Jun 15, 2012 Kevin rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: anarchism

9/10

like · see review

Sep 06, 2011 Austin rated it 5 of 5 stars

Shelves: re-reading, owned

Kropotkin was one of those rare thinkers whose empathy and compassion were as boundless and far-ranging as his intellect. Although his social, economic, and political vision is incredibly utopian, and further problematized by the technological and political-economic developments of the past century, his core ethical principles and observations on the best aspects of social psychology are perhaps more relevant than ever.

like · see review

Dec 16, 2010 Jonathan Noe rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition Recommends it for: Anarcho-Communists

Shelves: critical-consciousness

I thought Peter Kropotkin's faith in humanity to reorganize according anarchist communist principles was not only inspiring but also condemning to those who proclaim greed and self-interest as humanity's primarmy motivator. He used real life examples to show how the ideals of anarchist communism have and always will exist in society no matter how individualistic those within that society claim to be.

like · see review

Dec 01, 2009 Aurochz rated it 2 of 5 stars

Shelves: anarchism, politics

Not a very good exposition of communist anarchism. Doesn't really go into detail as to how society would work or how the economic system would function. Makes vague aspersions to voluntary boat services being a model for a whole society. Condemns wages and money, while proposing labor notes... I wouldn't recommend this book, but if you have to read it, I would recommend this translation and version.

like · see review

Jul 07, 2008 Bill rated it 5 of 5 stars · review of another edition

You know all those questions folx have about how social (collective) anarchism would work?
Koropotkin answers those questions in "Conquest Of Bread" with examples of everyday 19th century life.
Find and read the book online:
Conquest of Bread

like · see review

Jan 11, 2009 Spicy T AKA Mr. Tea rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: activism, anarchism, communism, economics, history, labor, socialism

This was a pretty accessible and interesting read; P. Kropotkin was one of anarchism's classic theorists, activists, and writers. I was excited by the food chapter and discouraged by the chapter on "women's work." Otherwise, a solid and understandable read.

like · see review

Sep 27, 2007 Lee added it · review of another edition Recommends it for: any person that knows me

What do you expect? It's Kropotkin. Basically, it is an argument for anarchist-communism, and lays the foundation for applying the theory into practice in small, decentralized collective projects in a libertarian communist society. Want to know more? Read it. Want to know more, ask me when I reread it again.

like · see review

Oct 01, 2009 Erin rated it 3 of 5 stars · review of another edition

I would love to read a more modern take on Kropotkin's thesis. Lamentable, but I just don't see how his version of anarchism could be achievable in the present world.

like · see review

« previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 … 40 41 next »

new topic
Discuss This Book

topics	posts	views	last activity
Anarchist & R...: [Feb/Mar] The Conquest of Bread - Kropotkin	10	64	Jun 17, 2012 02:44pm

combine
Other Editions (40)

More editions...

Genres

Politics

29 users

Non Fiction

19 users

Philosophy

16 users

Economics

10 users

Anarchism

9 users

History

8 users

Cultural > Russia

6 users

Classics

4 users

Social Issues > Activism

3 users

Sociology

2 users

See top shelves...

Readers also enjoyed similar books

About Pyotr Kropotkin

Pyotr Alexeyevich Kropotkin was a geographer, a zoologist, and one of Russia's foremost anarchists. One of the first advocates of anarchist communism, Kropotkin advocated a communist society free from central government. Because of his title of prince, he was known by some as "the Anarchist Prince". Some contemporaries saw him as leading a near perfect life, including Oscar Wilde, who described hi...more

More about Pyotr Kropotkin...

Books by Pyotr Kropotkin

Anarchism: A Collection of Revolutionary Writings

Fields, Factories and Workshops Tomorrow

More…

Share This Book

Facebook Twitter Your website

Trivia About The Conquest of B...

1 trivia question

More quizzes & trivia...

Quotes from The Conquest of Bread

“The means of production being the collective work of humanity, the product should be the collective property of the race. Individual appropriation is neither just nor serviceable. All belongs to all. All things are for all men, since all men have need of them, since all men have worked in the measure of their strength to produce them, and since it is not possible to evaluate every one's part in the production of the world's wealth.
All things are for all. Here is an immense stock of tools and implements; here are all those iron slaves which we call machines, which saw and plane, spin and weave for us, unmaking and remaking, working up raw matter to produce the marvels of our time. But nobody has the right to seize a single one of these machines and say, "This is mine; if you want to use it you must pay me a tax on each of your products," any more than the feudal lord of medieval times had the right to say to the peasant, "This hill, this meadow belong to me, and you must pay me a tax on every sheaf of corn you reap, on every rick you build."
All is for all! If the man and the woman bear their fair share of work, they have a right to their fair share of all that is produced by all, and that share is enough to secure them well-being. No more of such vague formulas as "The Right to work," or "To each the whole result of his labour." What we proclaim is The Right to Well-Being: Well-Being for All!” — 9 people liked it

More quotes…

title link	preview: Kropotkin: 'The Conquest of Bread' and Other Writings
avg rating	preview: Kropotkin: 'The Conquest of Bread' and Other Writings Goodreads rating: 4.14 (511 ratings)
small image	preview: click here [close]
med image	preview: click here [close]
BBCode	[url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/450719.Kropotkin?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book][img]http://d.gr-assets.com/books/1349093463l/450719.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/450719.Kropotkin?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book]Kropotkin: 'The Conquest of Bread' and Other Writings by Pyotr Kropotkin[/url]

Kropotkin: 'The Conquest of Bread' and Other Writings

Friend Reviews

Community Reviews

Share This Book

Share This Book on Your Website