<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	
<book>
  <id>445116</id>
  <title><![CDATA[A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series)]]></title>
  <isbn><![CDATA[0226750191]]></isbn>
  <isbn13><![CDATA[9780226750194]]></isbn13>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264m/445116.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264s/445116.jpg</small_image_url>
  <description><![CDATA[&lt;div&gt;How do we come to trust our knowledge of the world? What are the means by which we distinguish true from false accounts? Why do we credit one observational statement over another?<br/><br/>In <em>A Social History of Truth</em>, Shapin engages these universal questions through an elegant recreation of a crucial period in the history of early modern science: the social world of gentlemen-philosophers in seventeenth-century England. Steven Shapin paints a vivid picture of the relations between gentlemanly culture and scientific practice. He argues that problems of credibility in science were practically solved through the codes and conventions of genteel conduct: trust, civility, honor, and integrity. These codes formed, and arguably still form, an important basis for securing reliable knowledge about the natural world.<br/><br/>Shapin uses detailed historical narrative to argue about the establishment of factual knowledge both in science and in everyday practice. Accounts of the mores and manners of gentlemen-philosophers are used to illustrate Shapin's broad claim that trust is imperative for constituting every kind of knowledge. Knowledge-making is always a collective enterprise: people have to know whom to trust in order to know something about the natural world.&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
  <work>
  <best_book_id type="integer">445116</best_book_id>
  <books_count type="integer">2</books_count>
  <desc_user_id type="integer" nil="true"></desc_user_id>
  <id type="integer">433842</id>
  <media_type nil="true"></media_type>
  <original_language_id type="integer" nil="true"></original_language_id>
  <original_publication_day type="integer" nil="true"></original_publication_day>
  <original_publication_month type="integer" nil="true"></original_publication_month>
  <original_publication_year type="integer">1994</original_publication_year>
  <original_title>A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series)</original_title>
  <rating_dist>total:21|5:8|4:2|3:8|2:2|1:1|</rating_dist>
  <ratings_count type="integer">21</ratings_count>
  <ratings_sum type="integer">77</ratings_sum>
  <reviews_count type="integer">30</reviews_count>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
</work>

  <average_rating><![CDATA[3.67]]></average_rating>
  <ratings_count><![CDATA[21]]></ratings_count>
  <text_reviews_count><![CDATA[1]]></text_reviews_count>
  
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/445116.A_Social_History_of_Truth_Civility_and_Science_in_Seventeenth_Century_England]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/445116.A_Social_History_of_Truth_Civility_and_Science_in_Seventeenth_Century_England]]></link>
  <authors>
    <author>
    <id>10128</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Steven Shapin]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/10128.Steven_Shapin]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.65</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>88</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>7</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>
    <reviews start="1" end="20" total="30">
      <review>
  <id>9817575</id>
    <user>
    <id>277300</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Maria]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Seattle, WA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/277300-maria]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1187163302p3/277300.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1187163302p2/277300.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">445116</id>
  <isbn>0226750191</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780226750194</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264m/445116.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264s/445116.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/445116.A_Social_History_of_Truth_Civility_and_Science_in_Seventeenth_Century_England</link>
  <average_rating>3.67</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[&lt;div&gt;How do we come to trust our knowledge of the world? What are the means by which we distinguish true from false accounts? Why do we credit one observational statement over another?<br/><br/>In <em>A Social History of Truth</em>, Shapin engages these universal questions through an elegant recreation of a crucial period in the history of early modern science: the social world of gentlemen-philosophers in seventeenth-century England. Steven Shapin paints a vivid picture of the relations between gentlemanly culture and scientific practice. He argues that problems of credibility in science were practically solved through the codes and conventions of genteel conduct: trust, civility, honor, and integrity. These codes formed, and arguably still form, an important basis for securing reliable knowledge about the natural world.<br/><br/>Shapin uses detailed historical narrative to argue about the establishment of factual knowledge both in science and in everyday practice. Accounts of the mores and manners of gentlemen-philosophers are used to illustrate Shapin's broad claim that trust is imperative for constituting every kind of knowledge. Knowledge-making is always a collective enterprise: people have to know whom to trust in order to know something about the natural world.&lt;/div&gt;]]>
  </description>
  <published>1994</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
            <shelf name="currently-reading" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sat Dec 01 00:00:00 -0800 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Dec 01 16:21:18 -0800 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Jan 12 21:42:14 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[This is a fascinating book, but for every page of actual argument, it engages in three pages of preemptive defense against critiques arising from obscure humanist turf wars. JESUS FUCKING CHRIST SHUT UP ALREADY AND GET TO THE POINT.]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/9817575]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/9817575]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>81567623</id>
    <user>
    <id>3022972</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Julia]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Brick, NJ]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/3022972-julia-dudek]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1260307172p3/3022972.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1260307172p2/3022972.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">445116</id>
  <isbn>0226750191</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780226750194</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264m/445116.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264s/445116.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/445116.A_Social_History_of_Truth_Civility_and_Science_in_Seventeenth_Century_England</link>
  <average_rating>3.67</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[&lt;div&gt;How do we come to trust our knowledge of the world? What are the means by which we distinguish true from false accounts? Why do we credit one observational statement over another?<br/><br/>In <em>A Social History of Truth</em>, Shapin engages these universal questions through an elegant recreation of a crucial period in the history of early modern science: the social world of gentlemen-philosophers in seventeenth-century England. Steven Shapin paints a vivid picture of the relations between gentlemanly culture and scientific practice. He argues that problems of credibility in science were practically solved through the codes and conventions of genteel conduct: trust, civility, honor, and integrity. These codes formed, and arguably still form, an important basis for securing reliable knowledge about the natural world.<br/><br/>Shapin uses detailed historical narrative to argue about the establishment of factual knowledge both in science and in everyday practice. Accounts of the mores and manners of gentlemen-philosophers are used to illustrate Shapin's broad claim that trust is imperative for constituting every kind of knowledge. Knowledge-making is always a collective enterprise: people have to know whom to trust in order to know something about the natural world.&lt;/div&gt;]]>
  </description>
  <published>1994</published>
</book>

    <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Dec 20 10:08:46 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Dec 20 10:08:49 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/81567623]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/81567623]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>79901764</id>
    <user>
    <id>219032</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Madeline]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/219032-madeline-stevens]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1259871006p3/219032.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1259871006p2/219032.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">445116</id>
  <isbn>0226750191</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780226750194</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264m/445116.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264s/445116.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/445116.A_Social_History_of_Truth_Civility_and_Science_in_Seventeenth_Century_England</link>
  <average_rating>3.67</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[&lt;div&gt;How do we come to trust our knowledge of the world? What are the means by which we distinguish true from false accounts? Why do we credit one observational statement over another?<br/><br/>In <em>A Social History of Truth</em>, Shapin engages these universal questions through an elegant recreation of a crucial period in the history of early modern science: the social world of gentlemen-philosophers in seventeenth-century England. Steven Shapin paints a vivid picture of the relations between gentlemanly culture and scientific practice. He argues that problems of credibility in science were practically solved through the codes and conventions of genteel conduct: trust, civility, honor, and integrity. These codes formed, and arguably still form, an important basis for securing reliable knowledge about the natural world.<br/><br/>Shapin uses detailed historical narrative to argue about the establishment of factual knowledge both in science and in everyday practice. Accounts of the mores and manners of gentlemen-philosophers are used to illustrate Shapin's broad claim that trust is imperative for constituting every kind of knowledge. Knowledge-making is always a collective enterprise: people have to know whom to trust in order to know something about the natural world.&lt;/div&gt;]]>
  </description>
  <published>1994</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="history-of-science" />
        <shelf name="honors-program" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sat Jan 01 00:00:00 -0800 2005</read_at>
  <date_added>Fri Dec 04 14:04:05 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Fri Dec 04 14:04:24 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/79901764]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/79901764]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>79316685</id>
    <user>
    <id>1149294</id>
    <name><![CDATA[El Sekine]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Brooklyn, NY]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1149294-el-sekine]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1210298937p3/1149294.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1210298937p2/1149294.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">445116</id>
  <isbn>0226750191</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780226750194</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264m/445116.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264s/445116.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/445116.A_Social_History_of_Truth_Civility_and_Science_in_Seventeenth_Century_England</link>
  <average_rating>3.67</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[&lt;div&gt;How do we come to trust our knowledge of the world? What are the means by which we distinguish true from false accounts? Why do we credit one observational statement over another?<br/><br/>In <em>A Social History of Truth</em>, Shapin engages these universal questions through an elegant recreation of a crucial period in the history of early modern science: the social world of gentlemen-philosophers in seventeenth-century England. Steven Shapin paints a vivid picture of the relations between gentlemanly culture and scientific practice. He argues that problems of credibility in science were practically solved through the codes and conventions of genteel conduct: trust, civility, honor, and integrity. These codes formed, and arguably still form, an important basis for securing reliable knowledge about the natural world.<br/><br/>Shapin uses detailed historical narrative to argue about the establishment of factual knowledge both in science and in everyday practice. Accounts of the mores and manners of gentlemen-philosophers are used to illustrate Shapin's broad claim that trust is imperative for constituting every kind of knowledge. Knowledge-making is always a collective enterprise: people have to know whom to trust in order to know something about the natural world.&lt;/div&gt;]]>
  </description>
  <published>1994</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Nov 29 13:39:40 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Nov 29 13:39:40 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/79316685]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/79316685]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>76545947</id>
    <user>
    <id>820792</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Heather]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/820792-heather-d-n]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1201160753p3/820792.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1201160753p2/820792.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">445116</id>
  <isbn>0226750191</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780226750194</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264m/445116.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264s/445116.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/445116.A_Social_History_of_Truth_Civility_and_Science_in_Seventeenth_Century_England</link>
  <average_rating>3.67</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[&lt;div&gt;How do we come to trust our knowledge of the world? What are the means by which we distinguish true from false accounts? Why do we credit one observational statement over another?<br/><br/>In <em>A Social History of Truth</em>, Shapin engages these universal questions through an elegant recreation of a crucial period in the history of early modern science: the social world of gentlemen-philosophers in seventeenth-century England. Steven Shapin paints a vivid picture of the relations between gentlemanly culture and scientific practice. He argues that problems of credibility in science were practically solved through the codes and conventions of genteel conduct: trust, civility, honor, and integrity. These codes formed, and arguably still form, an important basis for securing reliable knowledge about the natural world.<br/><br/>Shapin uses detailed historical narrative to argue about the establishment of factual knowledge both in science and in everyday practice. Accounts of the mores and manners of gentlemen-philosophers are used to illustrate Shapin's broad claim that trust is imperative for constituting every kind of knowledge. Knowledge-making is always a collective enterprise: people have to know whom to trust in order to know something about the natural world.&lt;/div&gt;]]>
  </description>
  <published>1994</published>
</book>

    <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Nov 02 19:56:31 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Nov 02 19:56:31 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/76545947]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/76545947]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>74566937</id>
    <user>
    <id>63030</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Lauren]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Charlottesville, VA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/63030-lauren]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1177788510p3/63030.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1177788510p2/63030.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">445116</id>
  <isbn>0226750191</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780226750194</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264m/445116.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264s/445116.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/445116.A_Social_History_of_Truth_Civility_and_Science_in_Seventeenth_Century_England</link>
  <average_rating>3.67</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[&lt;div&gt;How do we come to trust our knowledge of the world? What are the means by which we distinguish true from false accounts? Why do we credit one observational statement over another?<br/><br/>In <em>A Social History of Truth</em>, Shapin engages these universal questions through an elegant recreation of a crucial period in the history of early modern science: the social world of gentlemen-philosophers in seventeenth-century England. Steven Shapin paints a vivid picture of the relations between gentlemanly culture and scientific practice. He argues that problems of credibility in science were practically solved through the codes and conventions of genteel conduct: trust, civility, honor, and integrity. These codes formed, and arguably still form, an important basis for securing reliable knowledge about the natural world.<br/><br/>Shapin uses detailed historical narrative to argue about the establishment of factual knowledge both in science and in everyday practice. Accounts of the mores and manners of gentlemen-philosophers are used to illustrate Shapin's broad claim that trust is imperative for constituting every kind of knowledge. Knowledge-making is always a collective enterprise: people have to know whom to trust in order to know something about the natural world.&lt;/div&gt;]]>
  </description>
  <published>1994</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Wed Oct 21 17:48:45 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Oct 14 18:19:38 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Oct 14 18:19:38 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/74566937]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/74566937]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>64732198</id>
    <user>
    <id>1180367</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Jordan]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Houston, TX]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1180367-jordan]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1226255306p3/1180367.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1226255306p2/1180367.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">445116</id>
  <isbn>0226750191</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780226750194</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264m/445116.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264s/445116.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/445116.A_Social_History_of_Truth_Civility_and_Science_in_Seventeenth_Century_England</link>
  <average_rating>3.67</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[&lt;div&gt;How do we come to trust our knowledge of the world? What are the means by which we distinguish true from false accounts? Why do we credit one observational statement over another?<br/><br/>In <em>A Social History of Truth</em>, Shapin engages these universal questions through an elegant recreation of a crucial period in the history of early modern science: the social world of gentlemen-philosophers in seventeenth-century England. Steven Shapin paints a vivid picture of the relations between gentlemanly culture and scientific practice. He argues that problems of credibility in science were practically solved through the codes and conventions of genteel conduct: trust, civility, honor, and integrity. These codes formed, and arguably still form, an important basis for securing reliable knowledge about the natural world.<br/><br/>Shapin uses detailed historical narrative to argue about the establishment of factual knowledge both in science and in everyday practice. Accounts of the mores and manners of gentlemen-philosophers are used to illustrate Shapin's broad claim that trust is imperative for constituting every kind of knowledge. Knowledge-making is always a collective enterprise: people have to know whom to trust in order to know something about the natural world.&lt;/div&gt;]]>
  </description>
  <published>1994</published>
</book>

    <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
            <shelf name="to-read" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Jul 23 19:40:36 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Jul 23 19:40:36 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/64732198]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/64732198]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>50715345</id>
    <user>
    <id>394742</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Scott]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Washington, DC]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/394742-scott-benfield]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1254256730p3/394742.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1254256730p2/394742.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">445116</id>
  <isbn>0226750191</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780226750194</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264m/445116.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264s/445116.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/445116.A_Social_History_of_Truth_Civility_and_Science_in_Seventeenth_Century_England</link>
  <average_rating>3.67</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[&lt;div&gt;How do we come to trust our knowledge of the world? What are the means by which we distinguish true from false accounts? Why do we credit one observational statement over another?<br/><br/>In <em>A Social History of Truth</em>, Shapin engages these universal questions through an elegant recreation of a crucial period in the history of early modern science: the social world of gentlemen-philosophers in seventeenth-century England. Steven Shapin paints a vivid picture of the relations between gentlemanly culture and scientific practice. He argues that problems of credibility in science were practically solved through the codes and conventions of genteel conduct: trust, civility, honor, and integrity. These codes formed, and arguably still form, an important basis for securing reliable knowledge about the natural world.<br/><br/>Shapin uses detailed historical narrative to argue about the establishment of factual knowledge both in science and in everyday practice. Accounts of the mores and manners of gentlemen-philosophers are used to illustrate Shapin's broad claim that trust is imperative for constituting every kind of knowledge. Knowledge-making is always a collective enterprise: people have to know whom to trust in order to know something about the natural world.&lt;/div&gt;]]>
  </description>
  <published>1994</published>
</book>

    <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Mar 28 10:29:40 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Mar 28 10:29:40 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/50715345]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/50715345]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>47225454</id>
    <user>
    <id>71909</id>
    <name><![CDATA[David Singerman]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Cambridge, MA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/71909-david-singerman]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1219203007p3/71909.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1219203007p2/71909.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">445116</id>
  <isbn>0226750191</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780226750194</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264m/445116.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264s/445116.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/445116.A_Social_History_of_Truth_Civility_and_Science_in_Seventeenth_Century_England</link>
  <average_rating>3.67</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[&lt;div&gt;How do we come to trust our knowledge of the world? What are the means by which we distinguish true from false accounts? Why do we credit one observational statement over another?<br/><br/>In <em>A Social History of Truth</em>, Shapin engages these universal questions through an elegant recreation of a crucial period in the history of early modern science: the social world of gentlemen-philosophers in seventeenth-century England. Steven Shapin paints a vivid picture of the relations between gentlemanly culture and scientific practice. He argues that problems of credibility in science were practically solved through the codes and conventions of genteel conduct: trust, civility, honor, and integrity. These codes formed, and arguably still form, an important basis for securing reliable knowledge about the natural world.<br/><br/>Shapin uses detailed historical narrative to argue about the establishment of factual knowledge both in science and in everyday practice. Accounts of the mores and manners of gentlemen-philosophers are used to illustrate Shapin's broad claim that trust is imperative for constituting every kind of knowledge. Knowledge-making is always a collective enterprise: people have to know whom to trust in order to know something about the natural world.&lt;/div&gt;]]>
  </description>
  <published>1994</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Feb 22 22:21:17 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Feb 22 22:21:17 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/47225454]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/47225454]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>45403732</id>
    <user>
    <id>43599</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Davie]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Stanford, CA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/43599-davie]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1255926063p3/43599.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1255926063p2/43599.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">445116</id>
  <isbn>0226750191</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780226750194</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264m/445116.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264s/445116.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/445116.A_Social_History_of_Truth_Civility_and_Science_in_Seventeenth_Century_England</link>
  <average_rating>3.67</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[&lt;div&gt;How do we come to trust our knowledge of the world? What are the means by which we distinguish true from false accounts? Why do we credit one observational statement over another?<br/><br/>In <em>A Social History of Truth</em>, Shapin engages these universal questions through an elegant recreation of a crucial period in the history of early modern science: the social world of gentlemen-philosophers in seventeenth-century England. Steven Shapin paints a vivid picture of the relations between gentlemanly culture and scientific practice. He argues that problems of credibility in science were practically solved through the codes and conventions of genteel conduct: trust, civility, honor, and integrity. These codes formed, and arguably still form, an important basis for securing reliable knowledge about the natural world.<br/><br/>Shapin uses detailed historical narrative to argue about the establishment of factual knowledge both in science and in everyday practice. Accounts of the mores and manners of gentlemen-philosophers are used to illustrate Shapin's broad claim that trust is imperative for constituting every kind of knowledge. Knowledge-making is always a collective enterprise: people have to know whom to trust in order to know something about the natural world.&lt;/div&gt;]]>
  </description>
  <published>1994</published>
</book>

    <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
            <shelf name="to-read" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Feb 04 17:26:52 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Feb 04 17:26:52 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/45403732]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/45403732]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>36938763</id>
    <user>
    <id>1677078</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Tonychinese]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[beijing, China]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1677078-tonychinese-xin]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">445116</id>
  <isbn>0226750191</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780226750194</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264m/445116.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264s/445116.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/445116.A_Social_History_of_Truth_Civility_and_Science_in_Seventeenth_Century_England</link>
  <average_rating>3.67</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[&lt;div&gt;How do we come to trust our knowledge of the world? What are the means by which we distinguish true from false accounts? Why do we credit one observational statement over another?<br/><br/>In <em>A Social History of Truth</em>, Shapin engages these universal questions through an elegant recreation of a crucial period in the history of early modern science: the social world of gentlemen-philosophers in seventeenth-century England. Steven Shapin paints a vivid picture of the relations between gentlemanly culture and scientific practice. He argues that problems of credibility in science were practically solved through the codes and conventions of genteel conduct: trust, civility, honor, and integrity. These codes formed, and arguably still form, an important basis for securing reliable knowledge about the natural world.<br/><br/>Shapin uses detailed historical narrative to argue about the establishment of factual knowledge both in science and in everyday practice. Accounts of the mores and manners of gentlemen-philosophers are used to illustrate Shapin's broad claim that trust is imperative for constituting every kind of knowledge. Knowledge-making is always a collective enterprise: people have to know whom to trust in order to know something about the natural world.&lt;/div&gt;]]>
  </description>
  <published>1994</published>
</book>

    <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Nov 04 20:26:10 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Nov 04 20:26:13 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/36938763]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/36938763]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>28900050</id>
    <user>
    <id>1368193</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Dietmar]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Linz, Austria]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1368193-dietmar]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1218288570p3/1368193.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1218288570p2/1368193.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">445116</id>
  <isbn>0226750191</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780226750194</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264m/445116.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264s/445116.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/445116.A_Social_History_of_Truth_Civility_and_Science_in_Seventeenth_Century_England</link>
  <average_rating>3.67</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[&lt;div&gt;How do we come to trust our knowledge of the world? What are the means by which we distinguish true from false accounts? Why do we credit one observational statement over another?<br/><br/>In <em>A Social History of Truth</em>, Shapin engages these universal questions through an elegant recreation of a crucial period in the history of early modern science: the social world of gentlemen-philosophers in seventeenth-century England. Steven Shapin paints a vivid picture of the relations between gentlemanly culture and scientific practice. He argues that problems of credibility in science were practically solved through the codes and conventions of genteel conduct: trust, civility, honor, and integrity. These codes formed, and arguably still form, an important basis for securing reliable knowledge about the natural world.<br/><br/>Shapin uses detailed historical narrative to argue about the establishment of factual knowledge both in science and in everyday practice. Accounts of the mores and manners of gentlemen-philosophers are used to illustrate Shapin's broad claim that trust is imperative for constituting every kind of knowledge. Knowledge-making is always a collective enterprise: people have to know whom to trust in order to know something about the natural world.&lt;/div&gt;]]>
  </description>
  <published>1994</published>
</book>

    <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
            <shelf name="philosophy" />
        <shelf name="science" />
        <shelf name="to-read" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Jul 31 13:09:06 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Jul 31 13:09:06 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/28900050]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/28900050]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>20981871</id>
    <user>
    <id>1115044</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Peter]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Seattle, WA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1115044-peter]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1209159769p3/1115044.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1209159769p2/1115044.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">445116</id>
  <isbn>0226750191</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780226750194</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264m/445116.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264s/445116.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/445116.A_Social_History_of_Truth_Civility_and_Science_in_Seventeenth_Century_England</link>
  <average_rating>3.67</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[&lt;div&gt;How do we come to trust our knowledge of the world? What are the means by which we distinguish true from false accounts? Why do we credit one observational statement over another?<br/><br/>In <em>A Social History of Truth</em>, Shapin engages these universal questions through an elegant recreation of a crucial period in the history of early modern science: the social world of gentlemen-philosophers in seventeenth-century England. Steven Shapin paints a vivid picture of the relations between gentlemanly culture and scientific practice. He argues that problems of credibility in science were practically solved through the codes and conventions of genteel conduct: trust, civility, honor, and integrity. These codes formed, and arguably still form, an important basis for securing reliable knowledge about the natural world.<br/><br/>Shapin uses detailed historical narrative to argue about the establishment of factual knowledge both in science and in everyday practice. Accounts of the mores and manners of gentlemen-philosophers are used to illustrate Shapin's broad claim that trust is imperative for constituting every kind of knowledge. Knowledge-making is always a collective enterprise: people have to know whom to trust in order to know something about the natural world.&lt;/div&gt;]]>
  </description>
  <published>1994</published>
</book>

    <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
            <shelf name="phil" />
        <shelf name="to-read" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Fri Apr 25 12:24:08 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Fri Apr 25 12:24:08 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/20981871]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/20981871]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>20136981</id>
    <user>
    <id>867650</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Dave]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Milwaukee, WI]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/867650-dave]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1201983871p3/867650.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1201983871p2/867650.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">445116</id>
  <isbn>0226750191</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780226750194</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264m/445116.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264s/445116.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/445116.A_Social_History_of_Truth_Civility_and_Science_in_Seventeenth_Century_England</link>
  <average_rating>3.67</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[&lt;div&gt;How do we come to trust our knowledge of the world? What are the means by which we distinguish true from false accounts? Why do we credit one observational statement over another?<br/><br/>In <em>A Social History of Truth</em>, Shapin engages these universal questions through an elegant recreation of a crucial period in the history of early modern science: the social world of gentlemen-philosophers in seventeenth-century England. Steven Shapin paints a vivid picture of the relations between gentlemanly culture and scientific practice. He argues that problems of credibility in science were practically solved through the codes and conventions of genteel conduct: trust, civility, honor, and integrity. These codes formed, and arguably still form, an important basis for securing reliable knowledge about the natural world.<br/><br/>Shapin uses detailed historical narrative to argue about the establishment of factual knowledge both in science and in everyday practice. Accounts of the mores and manners of gentlemen-philosophers are used to illustrate Shapin's broad claim that trust is imperative for constituting every kind of knowledge. Knowledge-making is always a collective enterprise: people have to know whom to trust in order to know something about the natural world.&lt;/div&gt;]]>
  </description>
  <published>1994</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Apr 14 10:53:35 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Apr 14 10:53:35 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/20136981]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/20136981]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>18146059</id>
    <user>
    <id>883418</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Mario22]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/883418-mario22]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1238770397p3/883418.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1238770397p2/883418.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">445116</id>
  <isbn>0226750191</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780226750194</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264m/445116.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264s/445116.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/445116.A_Social_History_of_Truth_Civility_and_Science_in_Seventeenth_Century_England</link>
  <average_rating>3.67</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[&lt;div&gt;How do we come to trust our knowledge of the world? What are the means by which we distinguish true from false accounts? Why do we credit one observational statement over another?<br/><br/>In <em>A Social History of Truth</em>, Shapin engages these universal questions through an elegant recreation of a crucial period in the history of early modern science: the social world of gentlemen-philosophers in seventeenth-century England. Steven Shapin paints a vivid picture of the relations between gentlemanly culture and scientific practice. He argues that problems of credibility in science were practically solved through the codes and conventions of genteel conduct: trust, civility, honor, and integrity. These codes formed, and arguably still form, an important basis for securing reliable knowledge about the natural world.<br/><br/>Shapin uses detailed historical narrative to argue about the establishment of factual knowledge both in science and in everyday practice. Accounts of the mores and manners of gentlemen-philosophers are used to illustrate Shapin's broad claim that trust is imperative for constituting every kind of knowledge. Knowledge-making is always a collective enterprise: people have to know whom to trust in order to know something about the natural world.&lt;/div&gt;]]>
  </description>
  <published>1994</published>
</book>

    <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Mar 19 19:38:32 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Mar 19 19:38:44 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/18146059]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/18146059]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>17467213</id>
    <user>
    <id>759434</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Willliam]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Buffalo, NY]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/759434-willliam]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">445116</id>
  <isbn>0226750191</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780226750194</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264m/445116.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264s/445116.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/445116.A_Social_History_of_Truth_Civility_and_Science_in_Seventeenth_Century_England</link>
  <average_rating>3.67</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[&lt;div&gt;How do we come to trust our knowledge of the world? What are the means by which we distinguish true from false accounts? Why do we credit one observational statement over another?<br/><br/>In <em>A Social History of Truth</em>, Shapin engages these universal questions through an elegant recreation of a crucial period in the history of early modern science: the social world of gentlemen-philosophers in seventeenth-century England. Steven Shapin paints a vivid picture of the relations between gentlemanly culture and scientific practice. He argues that problems of credibility in science were practically solved through the codes and conventions of genteel conduct: trust, civility, honor, and integrity. These codes formed, and arguably still form, an important basis for securing reliable knowledge about the natural world.<br/><br/>Shapin uses detailed historical narrative to argue about the establishment of factual knowledge both in science and in everyday practice. Accounts of the mores and manners of gentlemen-philosophers are used to illustrate Shapin's broad claim that trust is imperative for constituting every kind of knowledge. Knowledge-making is always a collective enterprise: people have to know whom to trust in order to know something about the natural world.&lt;/div&gt;]]>
  </description>
  <published>1994</published>
</book>

    <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Mar 10 16:48:43 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Mar 10 16:48:43 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/17467213]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/17467213]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>17017921</id>
    <user>
    <id>769235</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Sayaka]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[New York, NY]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/769235-sayaka]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1204931663p3/769235.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1204931663p2/769235.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">445116</id>
  <isbn>0226750191</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780226750194</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264m/445116.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264s/445116.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/445116.A_Social_History_of_Truth_Civility_and_Science_in_Seventeenth_Century_England</link>
  <average_rating>3.67</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[&lt;div&gt;How do we come to trust our knowledge of the world? What are the means by which we distinguish true from false accounts? Why do we credit one observational statement over another?<br/><br/>In <em>A Social History of Truth</em>, Shapin engages these universal questions through an elegant recreation of a crucial period in the history of early modern science: the social world of gentlemen-philosophers in seventeenth-century England. Steven Shapin paints a vivid picture of the relations between gentlemanly culture and scientific practice. He argues that problems of credibility in science were practically solved through the codes and conventions of genteel conduct: trust, civility, honor, and integrity. These codes formed, and arguably still form, an important basis for securing reliable knowledge about the natural world.<br/><br/>Shapin uses detailed historical narrative to argue about the establishment of factual knowledge both in science and in everyday practice. Accounts of the mores and manners of gentlemen-philosophers are used to illustrate Shapin's broad claim that trust is imperative for constituting every kind of knowledge. Knowledge-making is always a collective enterprise: people have to know whom to trust in order to know something about the natural world.&lt;/div&gt;]]>
  </description>
  <published>1994</published>
</book>

    <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
            <shelf name="to-read" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Mar 04 15:14:43 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Mar 04 15:14:47 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/17017921]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/17017921]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>13471850</id>
    <user>
    <id>816880</id>
    <name><![CDATA[HonRevDrStainTruth]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Long Beach, CA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/816880-honrevdrstaintruth]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1201067162p3/816880.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1201067162p2/816880.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">445116</id>
  <isbn>0226750191</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780226750194</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264m/445116.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264s/445116.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/445116.A_Social_History_of_Truth_Civility_and_Science_in_Seventeenth_Century_England</link>
  <average_rating>3.67</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[&lt;div&gt;How do we come to trust our knowledge of the world? What are the means by which we distinguish true from false accounts? Why do we credit one observational statement over another?<br/><br/>In <em>A Social History of Truth</em>, Shapin engages these universal questions through an elegant recreation of a crucial period in the history of early modern science: the social world of gentlemen-philosophers in seventeenth-century England. Steven Shapin paints a vivid picture of the relations between gentlemanly culture and scientific practice. He argues that problems of credibility in science were practically solved through the codes and conventions of genteel conduct: trust, civility, honor, and integrity. These codes formed, and arguably still form, an important basis for securing reliable knowledge about the natural world.<br/><br/>Shapin uses detailed historical narrative to argue about the establishment of factual knowledge both in science and in everyday practice. Accounts of the mores and manners of gentlemen-philosophers are used to illustrate Shapin's broad claim that trust is imperative for constituting every kind of knowledge. Knowledge-making is always a collective enterprise: people have to know whom to trust in order to know something about the natural world.&lt;/div&gt;]]>
  </description>
  <published>1994</published>
</book>

    <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Jan 24 20:44:24 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Jan 24 20:44:24 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/13471850]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/13471850]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>10319830</id>
    <user>
    <id>653230</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Garrett]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Minneapolis, MN]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/653230-garrett]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1251583002p3/653230.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1251583002p2/653230.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">445116</id>
  <isbn>0226750191</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780226750194</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264m/445116.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264s/445116.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/445116.A_Social_History_of_Truth_Civility_and_Science_in_Seventeenth_Century_England</link>
  <average_rating>3.67</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[&lt;div&gt;How do we come to trust our knowledge of the world? What are the means by which we distinguish true from false accounts? Why do we credit one observational statement over another?<br/><br/>In <em>A Social History of Truth</em>, Shapin engages these universal questions through an elegant recreation of a crucial period in the history of early modern science: the social world of gentlemen-philosophers in seventeenth-century England. Steven Shapin paints a vivid picture of the relations between gentlemanly culture and scientific practice. He argues that problems of credibility in science were practically solved through the codes and conventions of genteel conduct: trust, civility, honor, and integrity. These codes formed, and arguably still form, an important basis for securing reliable knowledge about the natural world.<br/><br/>Shapin uses detailed historical narrative to argue about the establishment of factual knowledge both in science and in everyday practice. Accounts of the mores and manners of gentlemen-philosophers are used to illustrate Shapin's broad claim that trust is imperative for constituting every kind of knowledge. Knowledge-making is always a collective enterprise: people have to know whom to trust in order to know something about the natural world.&lt;/div&gt;]]>
  </description>
  <published>1994</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 -0800 2006</read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Dec 12 08:57:10 -0800 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Dec 12 08:57:24 -0800 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/10319830]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/10319830]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>8449657</id>
    <user>
    <id>589166</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Bianhe]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Chicago, IL]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/589166-bianhe]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1193779506p3/589166.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1193779506p2/589166.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">445116</id>
  <isbn>0226750191</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780226750194</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264m/445116.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174843264s/445116.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/445116.A_Social_History_of_Truth_Civility_and_Science_in_Seventeenth_Century_England</link>
  <average_rating>3.67</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[&lt;div&gt;How do we come to trust our knowledge of the world? What are the means by which we distinguish true from false accounts? Why do we credit one observational statement over another?<br/><br/>In <em>A Social History of Truth</em>, Shapin engages these universal questions through an elegant recreation of a crucial period in the history of early modern science: the social world of gentlemen-philosophers in seventeenth-century England. Steven Shapin paints a vivid picture of the relations between gentlemanly culture and scientific practice. He argues that problems of credibility in science were practically solved through the codes and conventions of genteel conduct: trust, civility, honor, and integrity. These codes formed, and arguably still form, an important basis for securing reliable knowledge about the natural world.<br/><br/>Shapin uses detailed historical narrative to argue about the establishment of factual knowledge both in science and in everyday practice. Accounts of the mores and manners of gentlemen-philosophers are used to illustrate Shapin's broad claim that trust is imperative for constituting every kind of knowledge. Knowledge-making is always a collective enterprise: people have to know whom to trust in order to know something about the natural world.&lt;/div&gt;]]>
  </description>
  <published>1994</published>
</book>

    <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Oct 30 14:16:30 -0700 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Oct 30 14:16:30 -0700 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/8449657]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/8449657]]></link>
</review>
    </reviews>
  <popular_shelves>
          <shelf name="to-read" />
          <shelf name="history-of-science" />
          <shelf name="philosophy" />
          <shelf name="honors-program" />
          <shelf name="science" />
          <shelf name="history-science" />
          <shelf name="phil" />
          <shelf name="meta" />
          <shelf name="history" />
          <shelf name="currently-reading" />
      </popular_shelves>
  <book_links>
    <book_link>
  <id>8</id>
  <name><![CDATA[WorldCat]]></name>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book_link/follow/8?book_id=445116</link>
</book_link>
  </book_links>
</book>
</GoodreadsResponse>