91st out of 936 books
—
3,328 voters
Story of the Eye
Only Georges Bataille could write, of an eyeball removed from a corpse, that "the caress of the eye over the skin is so utterly, so extraordinarily gentle, and the sensation is so bizarre that it has something of a rooster's horrible crowing." Bataille has been called a "metaphysician of evil," specializing in blasphemy, profanation, and horror.
Story of the Eye, written in...more
Story of the Eye, written in...more
Paperback, 103 pages
Published
January 1st 2001
by City Lights Publishers
(first published 1928)
Friend Reviews
To see what your friends thought of this book,
please sign up.
Community Reviews
(showing
1-30
of
3,000)

ADULTS ONLY! KIDS YOU STAY AWAY!

take the sex act and strip away the burden of reality and what do you have?
take two characters and make them fuck. you are the author and they are your puppets. they will do anything you want. does fucking equal life? can fucking be a form of transgression? so be it, make it so. add another character. a menage! subtract that character, the poor thing. have your characters fuck right next to her cold hanging corpse. they are fucking death! add another character,...more
Sick, disgusting and kinky but never boring. It certainly makes an impression. But if it were to be any longer I would start chucking off the stars. Lucky for Mr. Bataille that he kept the story short and writing up to standards. I'm sure if you try hard you could find some social commentary in there and a few metaphors, but it takes an effort to look beyond all the fetish and gore. Besides lewdness itself makes a point here.
This book is obscene and fantastic. It's a very short read, and if you can divorce the pornographic content from the subject matter- you'll end up in a world of symbolism and psychological return from the likes of William Golding. If you're the kind of person who likes to take a book apart and analyze the text- this one's for you. But if you read for narrative pleasure you should run in the other direction.
The short of it is an unnamed narrator outlines his sexual exploits with his peers in th...more
The short of it is an unnamed narrator outlines his sexual exploits with his peers in th...more
Apr 19, 2012
K.D. Oliveros
rated it
3 of 5 stars
Recommended to K.D. by:
1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die (2006-2010)
This may be a short read: a novella composed of only 103 pages of letters printed using big font. Definitely a short read. However, it is full-packed with explicit and sickening sex scenes so this is not for readers who are squeamish when it comes to sex. Also, this is not a book to titillate readers. The sex scenes are so disgusting I did not feel anything that made we want to have sex.
Rather, the internal stirring I had while reading this came due to George Bataille's (1897-1962) deep philoso...more
Rather, the internal stirring I had while reading this came due to George Bataille's (1897-1962) deep philoso...more
Oct 01, 2007
Baiocco
rated it
3 of 5 stars
Recommends it for:
Anyone Who Thinks A Girl Sitting In A Saucer of Milk Is A Deeply Erotic Image
Shelves:
fiction
Every once in a while I have to read something dirty, lusty and depraved--I don't know what it is about me, but it's necessary. And I don't really mind. And I don't feel dirty afterwards, but rather refreshed actually. So there.
George Bataille, besides beind the lliterary executor to Walter Benjamin's controversial (he was a Jew facing persecution from Nazis during World War II) manuscript for his lifelong masterpiece The Arcades Project, was a total degenerate, sensualist scumbag and The Story...more
George Bataille, besides beind the lliterary executor to Walter Benjamin's controversial (he was a Jew facing persecution from Nazis during World War II) manuscript for his lifelong masterpiece The Arcades Project, was a total degenerate, sensualist scumbag and The Story...more
Sep 15, 2007
John Kupper
rated it
1 of 5 stars
Recommends it for:
fans of Showgirls, Plan 9 from Outer Space
Shelves:
fiction
This book is sort of like the Showgirls of literature: it's so terrible in almost every way, and so poorly written that you simply can't look away.
And don't get me wrong, I don't mean terrible as "offensive" or "obscene." I've read worse. This book is just plain bad.
Bataille somehow manages the most boring descriptions of incredibly kinky sex. Which brings me back to my first point. This book is so bad it's hilarious. I couldn't stop laughing the whole way through--at, not with.
And don't get me wrong, I don't mean terrible as "offensive" or "obscene." I've read worse. This book is just plain bad.
Bataille somehow manages the most boring descriptions of incredibly kinky sex. Which brings me back to my first point. This book is so bad it's hilarious. I couldn't stop laughing the whole way through--at, not with.
Dec 06, 2008
Patrick
rated it
2 of 5 stars
·
review of another edition
Recommends it for:
perverts. idiots.
This book was unabashedly, humiliatingly retarded. It's the kind of book that's so famous and then you read it and wonder if someone is pulling a practical joke on you.
I've read better fanfic porn.
I've read better fanfic porn.
This book is filthy, and not in the fun way. This is the most disturbing book I've ever read. It is as offensive as you can get, save for maybe incest, but even that wouldn't be too out of place in this book. It is 85 pages of fornication, masturbation, urinating, and something gross involving eggs and eyes. It's anything BUT erotic.
However, I couldn't put this book down, as much as I may have wanted to. It's the second half of the book that gets the most disturbing, but it also makes the most s...more
However, I couldn't put this book down, as much as I may have wanted to. It's the second half of the book that gets the most disturbing, but it also makes the most s...more
Many have claimed that this is the most atrocious perverse thing they've ever experienced or conversely the most illuminating, mind-expanding thing they've every experienced, so of course I had to check it out. I found it to be neither. Indeed, the book was pretty fucking weird and perverse. And that coming from me is saying something. However, it wasn't anywhere near my "too out there" benchmarks set by other books and/or films. Anyway, the book is Bataille's take on the human condition which a...more
This book is unforgettable. I cannot help but rave about it to anyone who cares to listen. This is very eloquently done and the violence and gore in this is strangely erotic and well-written. This may not be for all people but the strange pull of this book to me and to anyone who cares to read it will surely make you weirdly disgusted at yourself for actually liking or even falling in love with this work.
One of the best novels I have read in a while. I would love to read more of this great auth...more
One of the best novels I have read in a while. I would love to read more of this great auth...more
Jan 30, 2012
MJ Nicholls
rated it
4 of 5 stars
·
review of another edition
Recommended to MJ by:
Jasmine
The last orgy I attended was in Dundee. I turned up two minutes late, improperly dressed (my gimp mask hadn’t been drycleaned in time), and offended the host by complimenting him on his lovely breasts, and even more cracking vagina. I was told to gently lube the testicles of a history teacher for the first romp—clearly the host was furious with me, as the history teacher was my own father—then invited over for a little frottage against the pelvis of a divorced Cher impersonator. She sang ‘Gypsie...more
Karen hates this book. That is a lie, but she doesn't like it so much.
apparently all the things that people do are insipid, which is exactly why Bataille feels no need for anyone to have sex for much of this book. On the other hand, they do lots of other crap that is far creepier. Which is to say that he made the point.
The book like all french erotica books is not actually about sex. from what I can tell it is about obsession. An obsession with Marcelle. There is also something about he connec...more
apparently all the things that people do are insipid, which is exactly why Bataille feels no need for anyone to have sex for much of this book. On the other hand, they do lots of other crap that is far creepier. Which is to say that he made the point.
The book like all french erotica books is not actually about sex. from what I can tell it is about obsession. An obsession with Marcelle. There is also something about he connec...more
Jun 25, 2012
Xandra
rated it
2 of 5 stars
Shelves:
fiction-1900-1949,
thriller-mystery-horror,
sexuality,
transgressive,
french,
crap,
reviewed
I don’t mind bizarre lewdness or surreal disgusting situations. Nonchalant mentions of a rape or a crime, in the same manner one would mention their coffee was a bit too cold in the morning don’t shock me as much as they probably should. Crack however many eggs you want between your buttocks and urinate on various surfaces in any number of positions. I’ll remain impassible. Piss down your leg, on your mother, in a priest’s nostrils, on your clothes, on mannequins, on any surface imaginable. If y...more
Page 2, and already this is what we get, funniness and dirtiness:
"Now in the corner of the hallway there was a saucer of milk for the cat. 'Milk is for the pussy, isn't it?' said Simone. 'Do you dare me to sit in the saucer?'"
Ooooooo-kaaaayyy...!
Well, after some diversion, I'm back into this one and have barely started and Bataille, in the first dozen pages, wastes no time giving us two teens masturbating then hooking up with another girl on the beach and doing this and that to one another. Thi...more
"Now in the corner of the hallway there was a saucer of milk for the cat. 'Milk is for the pussy, isn't it?' said Simone. 'Do you dare me to sit in the saucer?'"
Ooooooo-kaaaayyy...!
Well, after some diversion, I'm back into this one and have barely started and Bataille, in the first dozen pages, wastes no time giving us two teens masturbating then hooking up with another girl on the beach and doing this and that to one another. Thi...more
This book can be read in about 30 minutes. Sadly, I imagine it must have taken slightly longer to write. The same things happen over and over, which you’d imagine wouldn’t be such a bother since the previous book I read was ‘Replay’ by Ken Grimwood, except in Story of the Eye the scenes aren’t particularly moving, interesting, or even necessary. Come to think of it, Story of the Eye pretty much sucked.
I got this based on some online recommendations; some dude on Amazon had a ‘Listmania’ entry...more
I got this based on some online recommendations; some dude on Amazon had a ‘Listmania’ entry...more
Okay, yes. The opening lines of "Story of te Eye" rank right up there with the openings of "Hundred Years of Solitude" and "Gravity's Rainbow". Trust me: you'll never quite look at eggs the same way again. And there is a 2004 film version of this--- a seldom-seen film that I'm hunting down. (Damn it--- who played Simone?)
Having said that...
"Story of the Eye" is hilarious, appalling, disgusting, disturbing, deft, wicked, clever, and farther over the top than you ever thought of being. Imagine......more
Having said that...
"Story of the Eye" is hilarious, appalling, disgusting, disturbing, deft, wicked, clever, and farther over the top than you ever thought of being. Imagine......more
Ah, Bataille puts Freud to shame in the myriad ways he explores the connections between sex and death in man's mind...Some people have complained that the characters are underdeveloped - if one reads the postscript about Bataille's father, you begin to see that it is intentional. Characters are symbols, symbols are characters, and the whole story is a kaleidoscope of psychological 'isms, and has less to do with sex (if you're looking for good porn, look elsewhere) than to do with having the read...more
Jan 15, 2008
Doug
added it
"In pornographic novels, action has to be limited to the copulation of clichés. Style, structure, imagery should never distract the reader from his tepid lust. The novel must consist of an alternation of sexual scenes. The passages in between must be reduced to sutures of sense, logical bridges of the simplest design, brief expositions and explanations, which the reader will probably skip but must know they exist in order not to feel cheated...Moreover, the sexual scenes in the book must follow...more
This is a book that I sat down and read in one sitting, I was so engrossed. That being said, this book is not for the squeamish, and if you're looking for steamy erotic scenes, again, not for you. However, if you're interested in the study of psychosexuality and Freudian psychoanalysis, then I would take a gander at Bataille's fantasy on the constellation of sex and violence. The imagery is both wonderful and disturbing--perhaps more frequently the latter--but in all cases vivid, which makes Bat...more
it was interesting to read a piece of great erotica. this edition included essays by susan sontag and roland barthes. although the barthes piece was a little too technical for me to be bothered carefully understanding (i think i can postpone linguistics for just now) this is such an awesome formula and if penguin modern classics editions always had a couple of excellent essays from brilliant scholars appended i would probably buy them exclusively. anyway i think they were necessary in this case,...more
I read those first few pages standing in the doorway of City Lights bookshop when I was nineteen before heading across to Specs for a whiskey. The memory of the milk and the cupboard has never left me. R and I used to read it to each other in drunken revelry walking down Columbus Avenue, delirious to be alive, ecstatic that someone was going—or rather had gone—much further than we ever thought possible. Kundera writes that a work of art does not necessarily "progress" like sciece does, but inste...more
intellectual filth?
OUI!
intellectual filth à la Bataille
No, merci!!
It reads like a dishwasher manual and I understand that was the point (perhaps overdone). I saw soon enough through all the symbolism and half way through this little piece of porn jewel I can say I have learnt everything that was to learn about Monsieur B.'s prose. It's not that terrible but I do have better things to read... I should have finished it in one sitting but after two days I don't feel like finishing, not interested...more
OUI!
intellectual filth à la Bataille
No, merci!!
It reads like a dishwasher manual and I understand that was the point (perhaps overdone). I saw soon enough through all the symbolism and half way through this little piece of porn jewel I can say I have learnt everything that was to learn about Monsieur B.'s prose. It's not that terrible but I do have better things to read... I should have finished it in one sitting but after two days I don't feel like finishing, not interested...more
Jan 21, 2008
Beverly
rated it
5 of 5 stars
Recommends it for:
To readers/writers stuck in a rut.
Recommended to Beverly by:
Faith Wilding
Bataille's masterpiece, a genius of eloquent pornographic imagery, so that one's disgust is coupled with desire. I never read anything so appalling and enthralling at the same time. A literary work that parallels Bosch's paintings where vivid color draws the eye into close range with the unspeakable horror of forms. Bataille accomplishes the same with words in this book. So intense are the references that I guarantee you will never see an egg in the same way again, nor will you write anything in...more
George Bataille's brief Sade-esque novella is a mordantly brilliant dip into the post-Nietzschen world modernity. The Story of the Eye is a pornographic disintegration of the Western ethical code. It is both magnificent and foul; a more daring and original work than his later philosophy/anthropology. A seminal piece of 20th century literature; although it was published well before the cultural abominations of our current nihilism, we are still not ready for this bleak and punkish work of literar...more
So, my first review is to be of a sordid French philosopher? pornographer? eye fetish haver? Any way you look at it (pun unfortunately intended) this book makes an impression. I'd love to say I immediately understood what Bataille was aiming for with this masterpiece of shock and awe but other than his obvious natural ability to adorn the basest sentiments with a coy philosophy and an indelibly straightforward prose I can't seem to find the deeper point of this book. Excusing the natural procliv...more
This is one of those "controversial" and "transgressive" books.
Lots of sex. Most of it depraved. A lot of bodily fluids. There's an Englishman. And a priest. A bullfight and some weird ass connection between eyes and testicles and eggs. Fuck if I know what all of it means.
There is one scene in which the narrator and his girlfriend are taking in bullfight and the air is putrid with the stench of equine and human piss. So what do they do? Steal away to the shithouse to get it on of course!
There's...more
Lots of sex. Most of it depraved. A lot of bodily fluids. There's an Englishman. And a priest. A bullfight and some weird ass connection between eyes and testicles and eggs. Fuck if I know what all of it means.
There is one scene in which the narrator and his girlfriend are taking in bullfight and the air is putrid with the stench of equine and human piss. So what do they do? Steal away to the shithouse to get it on of course!
There's...more
I think the biggest mistake people make, in regards to this book, is expecting it to be about sex. That would be too boring; is it erotica? Not really, unless you consider eggs, eyes and bull testicles to be erotic. It is, however, extremely perverse and depraved; I think it may be the logical conclusion of French Decadence literature. Existential sleaze might be an appropriate categorization.
The first half of the novella I found to be droll and perhaps even somewhat insipid. The second half is...more
The first half of the novella I found to be droll and perhaps even somewhat insipid. The second half is...more
It has been said that great writing needs no justification: it is its own defence. Well, if that be the case let’s just start with the book’s synopsis: Story of the Eye concerns the sexual prowess of an ...unnamed narrator and his accomplice in licentiousness, Simone. Together they coerce the mentally unstable Marcelle into their world and are soon pushing boundaries of decency under the watchful and encouraging gaze of an aristocratic voluptuary named Lord Edmund. Over the course of this novell...more
WTF?
I mean SERIOUSLY WTF?
I had NO idea what I was getting myself into with this one. One of my GR friends had just read this and I somehow missed her review but did see her comment about where she had been able to get this book for free online. It being one of the books on the 1001 books list I decided that I should go ahead and read it. AND WTF?
I am trying so hard to understand why this story is on the 1001 Books List. Here is my theory as discussed between several editors:
1: I am not sure th...more
I mean SERIOUSLY WTF?
I had NO idea what I was getting myself into with this one. One of my GR friends had just read this and I somehow missed her review but did see her comment about where she had been able to get this book for free online. It being one of the books on the 1001 books list I decided that I should go ahead and read it. AND WTF?
I am trying so hard to understand why this story is on the 1001 Books List. Here is my theory as discussed between several editors:
1: I am not sure th...more
There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
Be the first to start one »
French essayist, philosophical theorist and novelist, often called the "metaphysician of evil." Bataille was interested in sex, death, degradation, and the power and potential of the obscene. He rejected traditional literature and considered that the ultimate aim of all intellectual, artistic, or religious activity should be the annihilation of the rational individual in a violent, transcendental...more
More about Georges Bataille...
Share This Book
1 trivia question
More quizzes & trivia...
“To others, the universe seems decent because decent people have gelded eyes. That is why they fear lewdness. They are never frightened by the crowing of a rooster or when strolling under a starry heaven. In general, people savor the "pleasures of the flesh" only on condition that they be insipid.
But as of then, no doubt existed for me: I did not care for what is known as "pleasures of the flesh" because they really are insipid; I cared only for what is classified as "dirty." On the other hand, I was not even satisfied with the usual debauchery, because the only thing it dirties is debauchery itself, while, in some way or other, anything sublime and perfectly pure is left intact by it. My kind of debauchery soils not only my body and my thoughts, but also anything I may conceive in its course, that is to say, the vast starry universe, which merely serves as a backdrop.”
—
21 people liked it
But as of then, no doubt existed for me: I did not care for what is known as "pleasures of the flesh" because they really are insipid; I cared only for what is classified as "dirty." On the other hand, I was not even satisfied with the usual debauchery, because the only thing it dirties is debauchery itself, while, in some way or other, anything sublime and perfectly pure is left intact by it. My kind of debauchery soils not only my body and my thoughts, but also anything I may conceive in its course, that is to say, the vast starry universe, which merely serves as a backdrop.”
“We did not lack modesty—on the contrary—but something urgently drove us to defy modesty together as immodestly as possible.”
—
10 people liked it
More quotes…

Loading...























































May 19, 2013 02:04pm
updated May 19, 2013 03:39pm