Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Whole Equation: A History of Hollywood” as Want to Read:
The Whole Equation: A History of Hollywood
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Whole Equation: A History of Hollywood

3.61  ·  Rating Details  ·  202 Ratings  ·  24 Reviews
With the same style and insight he brought to his previous studies of American cinema, acclaimed critic David Thomson masterfully evokes the history of America’s love affair with the movies and the tangled history of Hollywood in The Whole Equation.

Thomson takes us from D.W. Griffith, Charlie Chaplin, and the first movies of mass appeal to Louis B. Mayer, who understood w
...more
Paperback, 420 pages
Published February 14th 2006 by Vintage (first published 2004)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Whole Equation, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Whole Equation

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 414)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Tfitoby
Oct 03, 2014 Tfitoby rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction, film
David Thomson tells the history of American cinema with enthusiasm and wit, loaded with sass and bile he still manages to convey a great love for the medium despite being painfully aware that it has always been a place for hucksters and conmen to screw over everyone it can in the never ending hunt for a quick buck.

In Thomson's Hollywood nothing is straightforward, everybody has an ulterior motive and nobody gets away clean. His love of noir and especially Chinatown is apparent in this approach.
...more
Buck
May 20, 2009 Buck rated it it was ok
David Thomson is in love with movies, which is not surprising in itself, given his profession. Luckily (for us, not so much for him) his is the bitter, exasperated kind of love that an intelligent man might conceive, against his will, for a brainless little skank. It’s this ambivalent quality that gives his criticism its torque, propelling it beyond the naïve boosterism of the standard Entertainment Weekly puffery.

But I'm not here to talk about Thomson’s many virtues because, for me, the flaws i
...more
Kevin Cecil
Oct 03, 2014 Kevin Cecil rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: film, history, male-author
It is frustrating how well David Thompson writes about film considering how little he seems to respect it. Film through Thompson's lens seems a bit dirty, in both the kid in the mud, and Larry Flint way. He looks down on film, constantly lauding literature and other arts as superior. Which is fine, hell I share the same condescending view towards video games - only I wouldn't bother to write a page on them, much less a book. Thompson gets the title from Fitzgerald's THE LAST TYCOON, his final, u ...more
Alan
Feb 14, 2011 Alan rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Anyone who's ever thought about the movie business
Recommended to Alan by: Other work
The Whole Equation was a doomed enterprise from the very start, of course, at least in a way... one man, one volume, could not hope to encompass the whole of Hollywood's history from its inception in the 19th Century to the 21st. Yet David Thomson's discursive musings are a great success in another way, for they do provide an evocative and, I daresay, valid sense of the sweep of that history, or at least of its early years.

Thomson is a guy who is utterly enthralled by the cinema. He was born in
...more
Michael Rivera
Jul 07, 2007 Michael Rivera rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: still trying to figure that out
Shelves:
I started reading this book in September 2005, and made it to the 3rd chapter - while on a cruise. Theoretically, I am still currently reading. However, I really don't know that I will have the gumption to finish the book. It was rather dry and not real interesing to me - but perhaps that is just me. It seems to me to be difficult to write the history of Hollywood in one book. The subject should be more specialized. There's too much to write about Hollywood to cover it thoroughly.
Terry Clague
Feb 06, 2014 Terry Clague rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
In which David Thomson talks at meandering length about the "movies". The style is what Rob Langham would call "talking in statements" and others might label "highly irritating", "self-indulgent" and/or "pretentious". There are some interesting sections to be sure, but it feels cobbled together. The less said about his sexual obsession with Nicole Kidman, the better.
Paul Maullin
Oct 13, 2015 Paul Maullin rated it it was amazing
I have read one other Thomson book about movies and no matter what you think you know he brings a range of insights and wacky perspectives. He is THE philosopher of movies. I don't entirely agree with his dislike of modern movies, but I agree with his sadness at the retreat from complexity and the human level in modern film. He wrote the book in 2003 and his worry about what technology was doing to the experience of watching has only grown more obvious. I sometimes show movies in my English clas ...more
Eric
Jul 31, 2014 Eric marked it as to-read
I picked up this book because I love David Thomson; I bought it because of this line: 'Charlie Chaplin fucked like a very wealthy man with an utterly private life.'
Todd Stockslager
Jun 09, 2015 Todd Stockslager rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: history
Not really a straight forward history of Hollywood, but a critic's examination of what Hollywood means to the history of movies. As such, it is both disappointing and surprisingly good as you enjoy Thomson's informed insights but disagree with his conclusions and wish he might fit them into a historical time line.

Probably the strongest praise I can give this book, and if not a classic it is very easily deserving of its "worth my time" rating, is that it made me take notes on his sources to read
...more
Jonathan
Apr 28, 2014 Jonathan rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
A great personal take on the movies. Don't let the subtitle "A History of Hollywood" fool you, this is no history book. Rather it, rightly, melds history, apocrypha and criticism to piece together the story of film. I love Thomson's voice here. It feels a bit incomplete and ultimately harried, though. If I had to guess I'd bet Thomson fills in the blanks in his latest, Moments That Made the Movies. Still, Thomson's deconstruction of the Edward Hopper painting, New York Movie, shows a true origin ...more
Stop
Jun 19, 2009 Stop added it
Read the STOP SMILING interview with author David Thomson

The 21st Interview: David Thomson
by José Teodoro

David Thomson is a historian, critic and the author of several books on movies of tremendous influence, among them The Biographical Dictionary of Film, The Whole Equation and, most recently, Have You Seen…?: A Personal Introduction to 1000 Films and Try To Tell the Story: A Memoir. He’s contributed to publications such as Film Comment, Salon and the Guardian. His prose remains highly distinct
...more
T Fool
May 23, 2009 T Fool rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Even reviews by Pauline Kael – those classics – don’t have much impact anymore. It’s hard to say how many books have handled Hollywood seriously. Thomson’s has. You’d expect some of what’s in here: chronology, celebrity, the grit beneath the glitz. But in no small awe you’ll be by his deriving of the ‘equation’ and how he shows it to apply.

Yes. Culture, Hollywood-delivered, begins as popular gadget-entertainment, mass cheap delight. That tradition, one of technical innovation and wonder, continu
...more
FrankH
May 19, 2012 FrankH rated it liked it
Quite an interesting read, with an intuitive, ambitious premise -- Hollywood helped create pop culture, but in turn was itself influenced by the tides of 20th century American history and the unique personalities of the early moguls like Mayer and Thalberg, often in ways that were unpredictable. For a book that has such a rambling anecdotal feel to it, Thomson does successfully convey pieces of American cinema 'Equation'. It's an impressionistic style -- tell the story of Myron Selznick to depic ...more
Tim Read
Sep 08, 2010 Tim Read rated it liked it
Ok, so I gave this 3 stars. This seems fair to a book that is frustrating and engrossing in equal parts. There is a quote line on the back of my copy which says something along the lines of you don't get a unicorn to pull a cart, which I think is a much more eloquent way of expressing what I felt about it.
It's a curates egg of a book, full of fascinating stories about old Hollywood, a mad dash from the 50's through too the 90's and the occasionally rather tangential aside and also the obligator
...more
Bookmarks Magazine

Thomson (The New Biographical Dictionary of Film **** Jan/Feb 2003) claims that the strange bedfellows art and money created American film, but that full understanding of this union "is too hard" to grasp. Critics agree: Thomson may have bitten off more than he can chew. His range is amazing, and so are his digressions. Known for his incisive, biting insight into film, Thomson doesn't disappoint here. His beautiful prose, impressive knowledge, and passion for film float the book. But distracting

...more
Ryan
Feb 08, 2009 Ryan rated it really liked it
This book was very different from what I initially thought it would be. Although it claims to be "A History of Hollywood", it really is more a personal musing about film that uses Hollywood as a framework. It took some getting used to, as Thomson's style in this book is very colloquial, with lots of parenthetical flights. But once I got onto his wavelength, I found it be quite a good book. He brings up philosophical questions about film (as opposed to say, books) that I hadn't ever thought about ...more
Amy
Feb 29, 2016 Amy rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction
Urgh I hated this and skimmed most of it. I was expecting a general overview, but it turns out the clue is in the title: "a" history, not "the" history of Hollywood. It wasn't explained who this David guy is or why his opinions matter, but I could not get along with him at all.

I didn't really learn anything new or interesting either. The author fixated on just a few films/actors/examples (he's obsessed with Nicole Kidman for some reason, she comes up a lot) and it all came across very one-sided
...more
Art
Mar 22, 2008 Art rated it liked it
Shelves: filmcriticism
Generally I eat this stuff up: a well-written, insightful look at the movies that engagingly theorizes while dishing up dirt here and there. But perhaps Thomson's amazing Biographical Dictionary of Film just raised my expectations too much....

The book moves from the early silent days to the present, using Los Angeles as a sort of through-line (and Chinatown as an exemplar) but things feel half-baked at times and the framework isn't entirely nailed down.

But an enjoyable and lightning fast read
...more
Chris
Jan 27, 2009 Chris rated it really liked it
This was a really neat look at Hollywood through a lot of different lenses - unlike a typical history, the narrative jumps around and examines the development of Hollywood and its principal figures from several different angles. Thoughtful and occasionally surprising writing.
matt

excellent, absorbing, ideosynchratic, epigrammatic, anecdotal, synechdotal, aphoristic history of hollywood from a really interesting, learned, tough-minded, deeply literate, wise and witty film historian and world-class film buff
Bill
May 31, 2007 Bill rated it liked it
Recommends it for: Cineastes
It's more anecdotal than I'd expected, so it's a nice read. Anyone looking to read a history of Hollywood should start here. The author inserts a little too much of himself into the text, but his research and knowledge are exhaustive.
Jeremiah
Jan 25, 2011 Jeremiah rated it did not like it
I had to change my review. It started off interesting but ended up (actually middled up because I gave up in the middle) self-indulgent, diary-like meandering prose. It's more about David Thomson's thought process than Hollywood.
Steve
Jan 13, 2011 Steve rated it it was amazing
You don't have to agree with everything David Thomson says to enjoy his passionate writing. And a kick up the arse to watch a lot of films that I've been meaning to for years.
Mark Peters
Dec 19, 2012 Mark Peters rated it it was amazing
A lifetime of film contemplation condensed into a book. Assured and masterful.
taylore
taylore marked it as to-read
May 12, 2016
Megan Murphy
Megan Murphy marked it as to-read
May 05, 2016
Daniel McCaffrey
Daniel McCaffrey marked it as to-read
Apr 26, 2016
Mariana Ferreira
Mariana Ferreira marked it as to-read
Apr 18, 2016
Stephanie Cieplinski
Stephanie Cieplinski marked it as to-read
Apr 12, 2016
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 13 14 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Kiss Kiss Bang Bang: Film Writings, 1965-1967
  • Final Cut: Art, Money, and Ego in the Making of Heaven's Gate, the Film that Sank United Artists
  • Who the Hell's in It: Conversations With Hollywood's Legendary Actors
  • Orson Welles, Vol. 1: The Road to Xanadu
  • Citizen Kane
  • Pre-Code Hollywood: Sex, Immorality, and Insurrection in American Cinema; 1930-1934
  • The Seduction of Place: The History and Future of Cities
  • Midnight Movies
  • Documentary: A History of the Non-Fiction Film
  • The Shape of Things to Come: Prophecy and the American Voice
  • Easy Riders, Raging Bulls
  • My Lunches with Orson
  • The Story of Film
  • Gods Like Us: On Movie Stardom and Modern Fame
  • The Great Movies II
  • What is Cinema?: Volume 2
  • The Parade's Gone By...
23220
David Thomson is the author of more than twenty books, including biographies of David O. Selznick and Orson Welles, and The New Biographical Dictionary of Film.
More about David Thomson...

Share This Book



“I suspect that a greater and more insidious influence [than violence in movies] may lie in what they tell us about being in love, and how to conduct ourselves while in that condition.” 0 likes
More quotes…