The Shawshank Redemption (Bfi Modern Classics)

My rating:

add to my books

The Shawshank Redemption (BFI Modern Classics / BFI Film Classics)

by Mark Kermode, Rob White (Editor)

4.03 · rating details · 30 ratings · 2 reviews

This study traces the history of "The Shawshank Redemption" and draws on interviews with writer/director Frank Darabont and leading players Tim Robbins and Morgan Freeman. The book also explores the near-religious fervour that the film inspires in a huge number of devoted fans.

Paperback, 96 pages

Published August 26th 2003 by British Film Institute

more details... edit details

Get a copy:

More…

There is a good chance some of your friends read this book. Sign in to see!

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Lists with This Book

This book is currently not featured on any Listopia lists. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 49)

filter | sort: default (?) | rating details

Jul 06, 2009

Eric Bridges rated it

This needs to be said in capital letters so that it will grab people's attention and hopefully stop them from rating this book what they would have given King's novella:

THIS BOOK IS NOT KING'S NOVELLA (RITA HAYWORTH AND SHAWSHANK REDEMPTION), WHICH THE MOVIE WAS BASED ON. IT IS A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE FILM WRITTEN BY MARK KERMODE AND RELEASED BY BFI MODERN CLASSICS.

With that said, on with my actual review.

This is well written, in terms of actual writing ...moreThis needs to be said in capital letters so that it will grab people's attention and hopefully stop them from rating this book what they would have given King's novella:

THIS BOOK IS NOT KING'S NOVELLA (RITA HAYWORTH AND SHAWSHANK REDEMPTION), WHICH THE MOVIE WAS BASED ON. IT IS A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE FILM WRITTEN BY MARK KERMODE AND RELEASED BY BFI MODERN CLASSICS.

With that said, on with my actual review.

This is well written, in terms of actual writing style and readability, but ultimately lacking. Mark Kermode basically goes through the movie from beginning to end and attempts to translate a lot of the scenes and actions into symbols and themes. A lot of the conclusions he draws seem like a bit of a stretch to me. For example, Kermode writes, "Although Darabont has subsequently informed me that no such parallels were intended, it is possible (should one so wish) to find powerful echoes of the Last Supper in [the roof-tarring scene:]...a head-count of the inmates depicted in this sequence clearly reveals thirteen prisoners on the roof...More strikingly still, both King's source and Darabont's adaptation make it clear that, having provided the blessed beer, 'Only Andy didn't drink', a detail which fits neatly with the biblical descriptions of Jesus blessing, giving, but crucially not partaking of the wine..." (32). It seems to me that these two, what more likely are coincidences, don't provide enough substantial evidence to open up this scene to any necessary parallels between it and the last supper. I understand that Dufresne (Tim Robbins) is, I guess in some way -- maybe time and effort -- sacrificing himself to do the paperwork to get the beers that he hands out. And that because of his sacrifice they are all able to celebrate and enjoy the reward together, ultimately giving hope that there is life amongst the death of the prison. And that that event leads to the beginning of him being seen as a sort of legend that lives on through the passing of his story from one person to another (or as Kermode would say, from one disciple to another). However, when you study this scene in terms of the bigger-picture impact it has on the course of the film in comparison to what the last supper meant, and how it impacted the bigger-picture ministry of Jesus Christ, the parallels break down (and to be noted, some of the parallels that I listed above Kermode doesn't even go into.) Excuse me for getting theological, but some clarification on the first communion need to be made. The last supper was about Jesus Christ breaking bread and taking wine as a symbol for the giving over of His body and blood (meaning his death on the cross) for the disciples, and essentially the world, and the promise that we too would have to go to this cross if we were to believe in Him. As Christ's blood bound together the disciples in that moment, so would Christ's blood, shed through the giving of his follower's lives by way of the cross, bind together the Church in the future. None of this is evident in the roof-tarring scene. Andy's sacrifice is merely a way through which he can work the system in order for him and a couple guys to feel more human again. His sacrifice doesn't provide the way through which the other disciples will learn to live: other prisoners don't start trying to subvert the system and undermine authority because of him. And also, Kermode's second claim that Jesus didn't drink from the cup at first communion isn't as clearly stated in the gospels as he would have you believe. A lot of the gospels give slightly different accounts of this event, and even the gospels that he cites, Matthew and Mark, don't clearly state that Jesus didn't drink from the cup. Jesus's language about not drinking from the wine again until his second coming, leads me to believe that he drank from the cup the first time. There is the possibility that he drank wine during the meal, and then didn't drink wine during communion, being that some gospels list him saying he passed the cup after the meal, but there is no way of really telling. At best, we could say that it isn't conclusive whether he did or didn't. I don't mean to get overly religious, but I wanted to give an in-depth critique of one of his claims to show what I meant when I said many of his claims are a stretch. Much of the book gives analysis in the same way: concentrating on very specific, seemingly correct, but ultimately superficial connections between the movie and the Christian worldview. Kermode never really connects the dots between a lot of his claims which leaves the reader with great things to throw out at someone if your citing off references as to what this movie is "really" about, but leaves them paralyzed to offer any serious, well-thought out and congruent arguments. It's as if Kermode didn't have an all encompassing thesis for the book, but instead decided to analyze each scene individually and make connections where he could. If one knows a little something of the bible and what's in it, it becomes more obvious that Kermode's argument is lacking. I don't want to act like religious parallels cannot be made. I do believe there are some religious themes in the movie (an innocent man, condemned for a crime he didn't commit, is placed into a world he never belonged in, and helps the other guilty prisoners, through what he does and how he lives, see that humanity and another life are still possible if we learn to subvert the system and always continue to have hope.) However, Kermode doesn't do a great job of presenting these themes. Also, I don't want to act like there is nothing I took from this book (I did give it three stars, not one). Kermode gives an interesting interpretation having to do with the church of cinema and how Dufresne escapes through that and also gives a lot of little interesting tidbits about the movie along the way. Overall, the book is a short read, and a pretty easy one at that, and even with it's problems it might be worth reading just to get thinking more critically about the movie. However, if you're looking for a thorough and insightful analysis of this movie, especially in terms of why it worked, you might have to look elsewhere. (less)

like 2 likes

· see review

Aug 07, 2007

Ellen rated it

Enjoyable, short novella. Good for a first Stephen King read.

· see review

Dec 03, 2011

Mike Roberts marked it as to-read

Nov 29, 2011

Gainerm marked it as to-read

Nov 28, 2011

David Kazzie rated it

Nov 28, 2011

Jennifer marked it as to-read

Nov 13, 2011

Wayne Parkin rated it

Oct 22, 2011

Rob Blundell marked it as to-read

Sep 30, 2011

Max Dedulle is currently reading it

Sep 06, 2011

Silver marked it as to-read

Sep 05, 2011

Andy Bukaty rated it

Aug 07, 2011

Annie rated it

Jul 24, 2011

son pham added it

Jul 13, 2011

Ray Morehead marked it as to-read

Jun 16, 2011

Queenjade rated it

May 25, 2011

MissJimix rated it

May 12, 2011

Tyrone Everett rated it

May 08, 2011

Daniel McCarthy rated it

Mar 05, 2011

Sevim Dogan Ozkan rated it

Feb 21, 2011

Terry rated it

Feb 06, 2011

Calista marked it as to-read

Shelves: books-made-into-movies

Jan 21, 2011

Nicko Gibson added it

Shelves: owned

Jan 12, 2011

Jesse marked it as to-read

Jan 01, 2011

Neal Fultz added it

Nov 28, 2010

Po marked it as to-read

Nov 28, 2010

Alexis Cadorna rated it

May 03, 2010

Danvers added it

Shelves: own

Apr 12, 2010

Meedo Taha marked it as to-read

Apr 04, 2010

Camille marked it as to-read

Feb 10, 2010

Maggie rated it

« previous 1 2 next »

new topic
Discuss This Book

There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Recommend it | Stats | Recent status updates

Genres

Culture > Film

2 users

See top shelves...

Books by Mark Kermode

It's Only a Movie: Reel Life Adventures of a Film Obsessive

Dans Les Coulisses De L'exorciste, Ou, La Petite Histoire Du Film Le Plus Terrifiant De Tous Les Temps

More…

Share This Book

Facebook Twitter Your website

Pin It

Trivia About The Shawshank Red...

No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »

title link	preview: The Shawshank Redemption
avg rating	preview: The Shawshank Redemption Goodreads rating: 4.03 (30 ratings)
small image	preview: click here [close]
med image	preview: click here [close]
BBCode	[url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/39660.The_Shawshank_Redemption?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book][img]http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1317067102m/39660.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/39660.The_Shawshank_Redemption?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book]The Shawshank Redemption by Mark Kermode[/url]