reviews
Sep 10, 2008
This book was quite simply not what I expected.
If you're looking for a history of conceptions of nature explored from a feminist and environmentalist perspective, this book is great; if, however, you are looking for a more theoretical approach to the interconnections between women and nature (as the subtitle seems to promise), this book isn't quite what you're looking for.
It does definitely deal with those interconnections and gives lots of specific examples of how wome More...
If you're looking for a history of conceptions of nature explored from a feminist and environmentalist perspective, this book is great; if, however, you are looking for a more theoretical approach to the interconnections between women and nature (as the subtitle seems to promise), this book isn't quite what you're looking for.
It does definitely deal with those interconnections and gives lots of specific examples of how wome More...
2 comments
like
(1 person liked it)
Dec 29, 2010
I'm not quite sure what I expected, but it certainly wasn't this extremely dull and slightly preachy book. I consider myself an environmentalist but I wouldn't rate this as one.
Admittedly, I did not read this in it's entirety because it was extremely ponderous in many sections. I ended up jumping chapters and skimming through bits and pieces.
From what I gathered, Merchant seems extremely resentful of science, she complains repeatedly that science has reduced nature to " More...
Admittedly, I did not read this in it's entirety because it was extremely ponderous in many sections. I ended up jumping chapters and skimming through bits and pieces.
From what I gathered, Merchant seems extremely resentful of science, she complains repeatedly that science has reduced nature to " More...
Aug 28, 2011
Merchant is an historian of science, and her book studies how humankind's relationship with the natural world changed, especially over the past six centuries. Basically, we went from regarding the world as a living organism -- a "mother" -- to viewing nature as a machine ("natural resources"). Fascinating stuff -- not WHAT we think, exactly, but why we think as we do. Merchant is a good writer, if a little academic, when she stays on topic, but has an annoying tendency to dig
More...
0 comments
like
(1 person liked it)
Aug 15, 2011
First published in 1980, The Death of Nature represents the conjunction of the women's rights movement (which Merchant dates from the publication of The Feminine Mystique in 1963) and the ecology movement, nationally recognized in the U.S. by Earth Day 1970. Merchant focuses primarily on Europe from 1500 to 1700, tracing the shift from the view of nature as organism that lasted into the Middle Ages to the view of nature as machine that came out of the Scientific Revolution. Part of her argument
More...
Aug 14, 2008
In her 1980 book, The Death of Nature, Carolyn Merchant developed a feminist theory through the lens of the ecology movement. She explained how the pre-scientific world not only maintained a sense of chivalry and respect toward nature, but also associated feminine and life-giving characteristics to nature. Prior to the works of the founding ‘fathers’ of modern science, such as Bacon and Descartes, the values and images associated with women and nature were revered; however, as the worldview chan
More...
Aug 05, 2011
This is an important book that details the shift from an organic worldview to a mechanistic one, which is one based on oppression towards women and nature. Mercant's writing does leave something to be desired, but the content of her ideas is what is most important. The history of science and worldview that she traces here is essential in understanding our current ecological condition.
Jul 25, 2011
Dense, dully written with a clear vendetta against men. Good information I suppose, but I'd rather shoot myself before re-reading this book!! It was so bad that I added my own review on the back cover at the time I finished it "Pain in the ass to read, this book marked the death of my soul!"
Apr 03, 2008
Okay, the point of this book is interesting, but it's so poorly written I wanted to scratch my eyes out. She's basically talking about the transition from an organic worldview to a mechanistic one. It's such a great topic, but it was so tedious! I offer a sentence: "For Descartes, unlike Marsenne and Gassendi, clear and distinct ideas were the basis for ascertaining the essence or true nature of things behind the appearances and their necessary connections." Shoot me in the head!
More...
More...
0 comments
like
(2 people liked it)
Mar 01, 2010
Tedious is the only word I can think of to describe this book. There are a few, brief paragraphs, that I actually enjoyed, but for the most part I found myself reading multiple pages without remembering a single word I'd read. She makes a few valid points, but has an annoying tendency to oversimplify some very complicated issues.
Feb 26, 2008
I thought this book was great. Basically the argument is that during the scientific revolution people began to view nature in terms of mechanical forces. This replaced the idea of nature as a feminine and womanly. I really liked it, a bit too "man bashy" (if that is a word) at times, but still really good.
Mar 19, 2008
a pretty good synthesis of the hostory of science with ecofeminism. I still weave this stuff into my courses. her later work is not nearly as good as this.
Dec 13, 2007
I only rate this book a three because I was able to get tons of quotes from it for papers.
Jun 29, 2007
A revolutionary book for how society viewed women and nature. But, you need to be committed.
Feb 08, 2012
Feb 07, 2012
Jan 26, 2012
Jan 25, 2012
Jan 23, 2012
Dec 29, 2011
Dec 28, 2011
Dec 21, 2011
Dec 16, 2011
Dec 09, 2011
Nov 30, 2011
Nov 29, 2011
Nov 27, 2011
Nov 16, 2011
Nov 13, 2011
