Rate this book

Clear rating

1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars

The Post-Birthday World

3.46 of 5 stars 3.46 · rating details · 6,865 ratings · 1,294 reviews

In this eagerly awaited new novel, Lionel Shriver, the Orange Prize-winning author of the international bestseller We Need to Talk About Kevin, delivers an imaginative and entertaining look at the implications, large and small, of whom we choose to love. Using a playful parallel-universe structure, The Post-Birthday World follows one woman's future as it unfolds under the...more

Hardcover, 528 pages

Published March 13th 2007 by Harper (first published January 1st 2007)

more details... edit details

Get a copy:

More…

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Lists with This Book

The Worst Books of All Time

445th out of 5,103 books — 14,150 voters

Best Unappreciated Books

58th out of 1,115 books — 1,882 voters

More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)

filter | sort: default (?) | rating details

May 07, 2008 Kelly rated it 3 of 5 stars Recommends it for: all women, ever, particularly ones who have been around the block a time or two

Shelves: fiction, brit-lit, romantical, po-mo, owned, 21st-century

Ostensibly the classic chick-lit, romcom, virtuous Victorian type story of the young lady who must choose between prudence, security and morality vs. passion and a "consuming love," the story does much more than that, and delves much deeper than the typical story of the kind would do. It is tempting to compare this to Sliding Doors, since the concept is the same. I.e.: one decision later, what happens in two alternate universes. One she chooses to stay with her safe, stable companion Lawrence, t...more Ostensibly the classic chick-lit, romcom, virtuous Victorian type story of the young lady who must choose between prudence, security and morality vs. passion and a "consuming love," the story does much more than that, and delves much deeper than the typical story of the kind would do. It is tempting to compare this to Sliding Doors, since the concept is the same. I.e.: one decision later, what happens in two alternate universes. One she chooses to stay with her safe, stable companion Lawrence, the other she chooses to throw caution to the wind and have a stoned, drunk kiss with a famous British snooker player (BTW: I freely admit I had no idea what snooker was. I'm American.) But this is done in a much more literary way. It is a chick lit subject with Serious Novel writing. I'm more apt to compare it to an estrogen packed version of Ian McEwan's style of writing than Sliding Doors. A single event/moral dilemma that changes the life of the protagonist, leading them into consequences they never would have dreamed possible for so small a thing.

There were so many lines in there that just rang so true to me. I undertook my normally hated practice of underlining things in a book, because I couldn't bear that I didn't remember them later on. That is, until I got too caught up in the story to care. But I'm going to put down a few that I did underline here just to give you an idea of the writing:

In the version of the story where she chooses to cheat, the night after:
"She truly did not understand why, when she had such a powerful motivation not to rock the boat, she would keep being so provocative, or on an evening when she was desperate not to attract close examination, she would be have in an erratic, irritable fashion sure to bring maximum scrutiny. Did she want him to know? Maybe she was forcing him to play a parlor game, like Botticelli: I'm a famous person, and my name begins with a scarlet A. Or maybe Lawrence was supposed to play hangman on the back of a program, and since he would never in a million years guess that she'd chosen F-A-I-T-H-L-E-S-S H-U-S-S-Y, proceed to noose himself, letter by letter."

"This is what the coward in Lawrence had opted for: that they never kiss. That they never look at each other. That he see only the blurred profile of her head; that she always stare at the wall. That she never be permitted to meet those imploring brown eyes and watch them get what they begged for... He loved her so much that it was scary, and he would no more look into her eyes while they were fucking than stare into the face of the sun."

Just an example or two I came across randomly.

Shriver is sure to point out that both endings have their problems, and that there is no black and white. I think it depends on the personality of the reader which life they side with, though the end of the book makes it pretty clear which way she feels. Up until that point, both futures could be equally miserable or equally happy, depending on your point of view in life. I love that the ending is just that, a chosen ending. The story goes on in both ways, and you can choose which to believe, draw your own morals. It was particularly engrossing for someone like me who second guesses nearly all her decisions and always wonders 'what might have been'.

Problems with the book: Shriver seems to get sidetracked with a number of digressions on subjects that she's apparently interested in but which don't seem to fit in with this book. She has characters give odd rants that seem out of character, and her words are just a little too fierce. She is especially sanctimonious on the issue of Americans in London or abroad in general. Shriver also clearly has a huge socioeconomic, national, and also British guilt complex. There's a lot in here about what one "should," do, and big causes of the day (the book takes place between 1997-2003, largely) are mentioned all over the place. It is partially to make a point, so I'll forgive her that, but nonetheless, she seems to be trying to explore her own guilty feelings and impulses on the page in places that don't really fit. There's several rants about the romance of being poor, for instance, the possessive grief after 9/11 (which was actually rather insightful- who "owned" 9/11 after it), stuff about virtuously watching the news every night and caring about the Third World. Yes, part of one of the characters... but a bit too much for it to have been just that.

Also, I have to admit the quality of the writing was somewhat uneven. I'd say the majority of it was good, but there were several spots where she left behind perfectly nuanced, lovely explorations for unsubtle metaphors and heavy handed, clunky expressions.

Overall, it still worked for me though. I liked it quite a bit.(less)

like 21 likes · see review

Apr 24, 2008 Gregory Baird rated it 2 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: fiction-literature

Great Premise with Unlikable Results

Being a fan of Lionel Shriver's previous novel, "We Need to Talk about Kevin", I was thrilled to find that she had a new novel out. I was even more intrigued by the novel's beguiling plot: Irina McGovern, a forty-something ex-pat living in London, finds herself at a crossroads, and the novel proceeds in two separate directions. Irina has been in an almost ten year relationship with Lawrence Trainer that has settled into a comfortable if stultifying groove. H...more Great Premise with Unlikable Results

Being a fan of Lionel Shriver's previous novel, "We Need to Talk about Kevin", I was thrilled to find that she had a new novel out. I was even more intrigued by the novel's beguiling plot: Irina McGovern, a forty-something ex-pat living in London, finds herself at a crossroads, and the novel proceeds in two separate directions. Irina has been in an almost ten year relationship with Lawrence Trainer that has settled into a comfortable if stultifying groove. He's sturdy, reliable, intelligent, and reasonably attractive, but he's also stubborn, judgmental, strict, and their relationship has become exceptionally passionless. He won't even marry Irina because he's against marriage. Enter Ramsey Acton, a beguiling pro Snooker player that is Lawrence's polar opposite: smoldering to Lawrence's blandness, passionate to Lawrence's stoicism, daring where Lawrence is cautious. And here lies the predicament that Irina finds herself in after being left alone with Ramsey for his annual birthday dinner: give in to fiery, passionate temptation ... or remain loyal to the tried-and-true life she has grown accustomed to.

Thus, in storyline 'A' Irina gives in to temptation and leaves Lawrence for Ramsey, while in storyline 'B' she takes smug satisfaction in her own strength of character and loyalty. For a while the back and forth is quite enchanting and clever, and the reader delights in Shriver's carefully concocted parallel structure. But by page 300 those very same parallels that were intriguing and smart become oppressive to the plot and render it hopelessly predictable. If something happens in storyline A you can rely on its counterpoint occurring in B: if Irina has to act as a mediator during a public spat in A, she will be the one causing the scene in B; if she receives a special something in A she will be denied it in B; and so on until the novel's ultimate counterpoint that I cannot reveal here. What was so exciting, at least to me, about the premise of the book was the concept of exploring two different scenarios, and Shriver squanders the opportunity to explore what might have been by slavishly adhering to form -- creating two stories that move in parallel lines instead of diverging ones. Suddenly an otherwise intelligent novel becomes dull and plodding, and the ultimate disappointment is that both A and B's endings are also entirely predictable since both are foreshadowed earlier on. One would have easily been touching and heartfelt if you hadn't been cued to see it coming, and the other might have been shocking if it hadn't been portended earlier on.

Shriver also has a periodic way of getting sidetracked by politics in her novel, which spans roughly fifteen years starting in the 1990s and taking us to the post-9/11 era. They are distracting, and woefully out of place. She takes swipes at Bill Clinton for failing to catch Osama Bin Laden and potshots at Hillary for being ambitious. She decries Britain's National Healthcare system as a hackneyed operation doomed to failure. She even contrives to have all of her characters in Manhattan on the eve of 9/11 for no real reason, since ultimately the atrocity will have very little to do with the plot except to serve Shriver's purpose in analogies for the remainder of the novel -- which is ironic because one character opines that to reduce the scope of that tragedy to such (comparatively) trivial matters is "surely a vain misappropriation of national tragedy". But that didn't stop Shriver from doing it anyway. The aforementioned political asides feel disjointed and don't belong in the plotline, and ultimately neither did 9/11. Had it ultimately had more to do with the plot it would be fine, but it just pops in and then out again as suddenly as it happened. It's a shame that it is becoming commonplace for such a tragic event to be used as a go-to plot device in novels, and while Shriver's depiction of the day is about a million times better -- and more accurate -- than the shockingly offensive turn Claire Messud gave it in last year's "The Emperor's Children", it still feels like a cheap trick.

But what I really disliked about 'The Post-Birthday World" in the end was Shriver's sadistic treatment of Irina. In both storylines she is doomed to apologize for other people's messes in addition to hers, to accept a grotesquely unfair portion of the blame for every misdeed committed, and to be misused and taken advantage of. It comes down to the men in her life. Ramsey is a brash lush whose raging temper has him emotionally abusing Irina from the beginning of their relationship. Lawrence is such an unrelentingly arrogant, narcissistic jerk that he smothers Irina at every turn. What you would really like is for her to toss them both on the street and tell them to sod off, but Shriver seems more interested in antagonizing Irina than in letting her off the hook even a little bit.

Book clubs would have a field day with this novel because it certainly leaves itself open for debate, but I can't imagine really imagine recommending it to anyone looking for a pleasurable read. For that, I would point them to Shriver's previous effort: "We Need to Talk about Kevin". In that book, her protagonist had some cause to be put through the wringer, but it just feels degrading to watch Irina sink lower and lower.(less)

like 35 likes · see review

May 01, 2008 Hazel Lee rated it 4 of 5 stars

Shelves: fiction-personal-narrative

You know when you express an interest in, say, boats, and then for the next five years all anyone ever gets you has to do with boats? I'm experiencing something similar at the moment. [/irrelevant observation:]

I loved Shriver's other book, We Need To Talk About Kevin, so I was actually a bit nervous about reading this one - I was convinced there was no way it could be as good as the former. And to be honest, I don't think it was, but I still loved it. It teetered on the edge of being too gimmick...more You know when you express an interest in, say, boats, and then for the next five years all anyone ever gets you has to do with boats? I'm experiencing something similar at the moment. [/irrelevant observation:]

I loved Shriver's other book, We Need To Talk About Kevin, so I was actually a bit nervous about reading this one - I was convinced there was no way it could be as good as the former. And to be honest, I don't think it was, but I still loved it. It teetered on the edge of being too gimmicky for my tastes - ::coughDaveEggerscough:: - but overall I think it worked. And I think it will strike a personal chord for anyone who's been through more than one relationship. It certainly did for me.

The premise of the novel is the question, "what if...?" - the protagonist is happily married to one man yet feels strangely attracted to another, and one night she finds herself alone with him, on his birthday, and feels the overwhelming urge to kiss him. [Killers:] It was only a kiss! [/Killers:] And from that point the story splits into two possibilities - does she, or doesn't she? It's an interesting idea: one small decision can change the course of your life. And how. The chapters alternate between the two storylines - in one, Irina did kiss the other man; in the other, she didn't. Oddly reminiscient of the "choose your own adventure" books of the 80s.

Shriver, for the most part, is a master at nailing human emotion into hard words. Her writing always evokes for me the lines from "The Love Song of J Alfred Prufrock" -

And I have known the eyes already, known them all
Eyes that fix you in a formulated phrase

It's the kind of phrasing that makes you furrow your brow and think, yes, I've felt that way before, except I've never been able to put it into words like that. Sometimes her scenes are painful to read as a result. It's been almost refreshing, though, since for the past few months I've been indulging in frilly, sweet fantasy novels, which hold a pleasure of their own but like most things work best in small doses.

I was also afraid that the ending would be a typical "oh look, she made the right/wrong decision!" but it ends on a rather ambiguous note, and I was left pondering whether there ever was a better choice to begin with. Perhaps the message we can take from this book is not that little decisions made big changes, but that no matter how big the changes seem, life still muddles on with its ups and downs, and perhaps, in some fundamental way, nothing ever does change.

The Post-Birthday World reminded me, in the end, of Eternal Sunshine - not because of the content, exactly, but more because of how I think readers will react to it. I think Eternal Sunshine is an absolutely brilliant movie and it makes me cry buckets, but I have friends who don't really see what the fuss is all about. I think it boils down to your own experience. This book will definitely speak to those who've had some kind of painful relationship experience; who've ever had a moment of wondering what their lives would have been like if they had turned right instead of left. (less)

like 20 likes · see review

Apr 24, 2008 Katie rated it 1 of 5 stars

Recommended to Katie by: Jenny

Great conceptualization (I always liked those "Choose Your Own Adventure" books), but lousy execution (not to mention intimation, narration, accentuation and punctuation).

This author knows not the concept of "too much information." Maybe I am on the prudish side, but do we have to be so intimate with a character as to know all their bodily habits and functions? Cervix ≠ sexy.

But when I wasn't curling my lip in disgust, I was banging my head against the wall in frustration and boredom. If not f...more

like 19 likes · see review

Jun 09, 2008 Stephanie A. Higa rated it 1 of 5 stars

Lesson #1: Don't let your husband make more money than you.
Lesson #2: If you can't decide between two (or more) men, they're probably both wrong for you. Especially if they're, oh, self-centered assholes.

I hated this book from page one. Halfway through I declared it to be one of the worst books I had ever read. I hated the characters, the characters' names, the character's jobs (sorry, I still can't distinguish between pool and snooker), the plot, and the prose, which is annoying and littered wi...more Lesson #1: Don't let your husband make more money than you.
Lesson #2: If you can't decide between two (or more) men, they're probably both wrong for you. Especially if they're, oh, self-centered assholes.

I hated this book from page one. Halfway through I declared it to be one of the worst books I had ever read. I hated the characters, the characters' names, the character's jobs (sorry, I still can't distinguish between pool and snooker), the plot, and the prose, which is annoying and littered with a multitude of metaphors so bad they made me cringe. (Do you want snooker to seem classy? Then don't compare the position of the red balls to a whore's open legs!) Bad dialogue too. 90% of this book consists of petty arguments between petty people. Nothing remotely tragic or exciting happens, unless you count the contrived incorporation of 9/11.

The review on the back lauds Shriver's characters. OK, I suppose they could have passed for well-developed if the machinations weren't so obvious. I get it, Lawrence and Ramsey are EXACT OPPOSITES. (Although I was a bit attached to Lawrence for a while because he reminds me a bit of myself. But while Shriver pushes the equality of the two men, the story seems tipped in Ramsey's favor.) No matter what decision Irina would have made, she would still be the same insecure, boring, racist, self-hating American tool. Which reminds me..."the Asian"? "The small brown man"? "American cultural backwash"? And yes I normally try to ignore these sort of markers, but here, they appeared to be just as much the property of the characters as of the narrator.

But: there is one saving grace. I could have put down this book at any time. I wanted to, especially when it started making me feel homicidal (as in The Corrections), but frankly, I was hoping for some insight. And eventually there was, toward the ending. Most of this book is chick lit trying to pass itself off as literary fiction (and failing), but the ending is good. It isn't the cop-out I was expecting. And I suppose it did strike a chord within me-- or perhaps force me to think about parts of my own past which I have tried to tuck away. But I prefer other artistic manifestations of the same basic idea: Third Eye Blind's "The Background", or maybe even Frame and Match, the astronomer vs. snooker-player book Irina writes.(less)

like 15 likes · see review

Aug 07, 2007 jillian rated it 5 of 5 stars

Shelves: contemporaryfiction, chicklit

This book has a plotline that could have been so cheesy - but comes out so well. In the first chapter, mild-mannered childrens book author Irina McGovern goes on a birthday dinner with Ramsey Acton, a snooker star in London. Irina's long-term partner, Lawrence, is absent, at a conference in Sarajevo, and Ramsey's recent divorce from his wife, mean that Irina and Ramsey are alone for the first time in their history. They end up at his house, against the snooker table, and Irina either does - or d...more This book has a plotline that could have been so cheesy - but comes out so well. In the first chapter, mild-mannered childrens book author Irina McGovern goes on a birthday dinner with Ramsey Acton, a snooker star in London. Irina's long-term partner, Lawrence, is absent, at a conference in Sarajevo, and Ramsey's recent divorce from his wife, mean that Irina and Ramsey are alone for the first time in their history. They end up at his house, against the snooker table, and Irina either does - or does not - decide to kiss him and commit adultery.

The book unfolds from there, with each chapter written in two timelines: what would have been if Irina kissed Ramsey, and what would have been if she did not. What I found so amazing was that the characters in the book were so well defined that they still acted consistently, even in radically different timelines. That action might involve hypocrisy, as it does for the women in Irina's life that advise her against a relationship with Ramsey in one storyline, and then admire him as a handsome man when there is no consequence to it - but it is all still in character. Some of the dialogue is even the same in both worlds, albeit used in different contexts, to different people, but that just shows how well-developed the characters really are.

Of course, the same external events happen no matter what, and the crux of the book is how Irina is affected by 9/11. As an American - albeit one living in London - it affects her differently in each reality. The same snooker tournaments still take place, but depending on his relationship with Irina - or his ex-wife, Jude - Ramsey wins or loses in a spectacular success or a miserable failure. Irina writes an award nominated children's book in both storylines, which takes from her relationship with the man in her life, but in one it's a commercial success, and in the other world, it isn't.

The book also addresses one of the most important issues for every woman on the planet: security or sexual chemistry? Does Irina go for the excitement, drama, thrills and despair of Ramsey, to whom she has an insatiable sexual attraction? Or does she stay with the steady, secure, caring Lawrence? The decision she makes, and how it reflects on her self-image, the way her decision affects her self-imposed characteristics, is so far-reaching and so well-explored that it opens up both the not only the immediate good and bad aspects of each path, but the far-reaching consequences that ultimately change how Irina sees herself, and the woman that she becomes.

I thought this was a brilliantly written book, which was not only clever and engaging, but very thoughtful as well. This book showed how one decision could unleash so much inside one person as to re-shape their life - and yet bring it full circle. For, just as the first chapter applies in both storylines, the last chapter could as well. (less)

like 6 likes · see review

May 24, 2007 Bernie rated it 5 of 5 stars Recommends it for: women who've been in relationships!

Shelves: relationships, favorites

.....here is a wonderful novel about the choices we make in love - and how it affects our lives. I was really blown away by this novel and recommend it to all and sundry. The writing was so smart, and not in an "aren't I clever with pop references?" way which many chick-lit authors do. Not that this is "chick lit" - far from it in depth and scope. Although it was hard to follow the parallel worlds at first, I really got into it and was turning the pages with excitement to see what would come nex...more

like 5 likes · see review

May 04, 2007 Megan rated it 4 of 5 stars

Like a "Sliding Doors" with class, this book plays out what would happen if a woman stayed with her stable, responsible lover of ten years, and what would happen if she left him for his irresistibly sexy, volatile friend. Since I constantly "Sliding Doors" my own life--how would life be different if I moved to another city? loved a different man? chose a different career?--I was fascinated to see how the author would resolve the dilemma of, love vs. responsibility; attraction versus lifestyle.

W...more

like 7 likes · see review

Jan 19, 2009 Sarah Null rated it 2 of 5 stars

Recommended to Sarah by: ShellBell

Shelves: a-z-author-challenge, owned

Like the main character's path branching in two directions, so did my opinion of this book. Really, I'd give this 2 1/2 stars. At times I liked it, and at times I HATED it. Sometimes I was bored, and sometimes I was riveted. Sometimes I thought Irina was whiney and annoying and a pain in the ass, and sometimes I saw bits of myself in her (although, granted, those were probably my whiney, annoying, PItA bits).

What really bugged me, and what I hoped would resolve itself in the end, was precisely w...more Like the main character's path branching in two directions, so did my opinion of this book. Really, I'd give this 2 1/2 stars. At times I liked it, and at times I HATED it. Sometimes I was bored, and sometimes I was riveted. Sometimes I thought Irina was whiney and annoying and a pain in the ass, and sometimes I saw bits of myself in her (although, granted, those were probably my whiney, annoying, PItA bits).

What really bugged me, and what I hoped would resolve itself in the end, was precisely what the author DIDN'T want resolved. Irina McGovern's entire future apparently hinges on one decision: whether or not to cheat on her partner of 10 years and kiss another man. From there, two Sliding Doors-esque parallel futures unfold. In one, Irina does kiss him, and leaves her common law husband for him. In the other, Irina does not give into temptation and stands by her man. The problem was, no matter which decision Irina made, she didn't seem happy. When she was with Lawrence (her "husband"), she tried to commit herself to the relationship but felt unsettled and unsatisfied sexually. Lawrence was a class-A asshole who never kissed her and wouldn't even have sex face-to-face. She still harbored lustful thoughts for Ramsey, the other guy, who appeared to be a classy and passionate alternative to the cold Lawrence. In the other future, when she is with Ramsey, he's a histrionic, self-centered, alcoholic prick whose only redeeming quality is that he's dynamite in the sack. Irina spends most of her time with this man fighting with him and wistfully remembering Lawrence, who may not have been as passionate in bed, but in whom she found a more compatible domestic partner. Lawrence, in this future, never turns into the class-A asshole but instead remains a virtuous, faithful, and supportive friend to Irina in spite of the fact that she cheated on him with and left him for one of his friends. In both futures, Irina believes the grass to be greener on the other side.

As it turns out, the author makes it pretty clear that the point she's making with this book is that a person doesn't have only one destiny. That any decision a person makes on any given day can totally shape their future and send it in a different direction. Although she accomplished that by never really telling the reader whom Irina should have ended up with, in a way she does give Irina only one desitny: to be unhappy. Also, in each parallel story line, very similar events would happen but in slightly different ways. It was like the two futures were the same ball game, with the only difference being that in one Irina was playing for the blue team and in the other, for the red.

And speaking of ball games, much of the book involves the game of snooker, as Ramsey is a professional player. Irina (a Russian-American ex-patriate living in London) often remarks on the fact that Americans don't know or care about snooker, and she was right. There were far too many detailed descriptions of matches that bored me, and that I skimmed over. The book probably could have been a good 100 pages shorter without all that snooker (though snooker actually was also a metaphor of sorts).

All that said, I stayed up last night until 2:00 so I could finish it. I still don't know, though, if it was because I was anxious to finish it or anxious to get it over with.(less)

like 6 likes · see review

Jun 16, 2008 Abby rated it 5 of 5 stars

I raced through this book because I was so engrossed by the story line(s). I suppose it's chick-lit in the sense that women probably have an easier time relating to the story than men would, but it's so much better than most chick-lit garbage out there (I followed this book with a true chick-lit piece of crap and wanted to pull my hair out). What amazed me about this book is how much is stuck with me after I was done reading it. I kept thinking about the characters and the choices and the outcom...more

like 8 likes · see review

Apr 11, 2011 Tori rated it 3 of 5 stars

This is one of those rare books that may be objectively good but that I still didn’t like all that much. In Sliding Doors fashion, Irina McGovern’s life takes two distinct paths: in one, she submits to temptation and kisses her sexy snooker playing friend Ramsey, resulting in the end of her relationship with the steadfast Lawrence; in the other, she resists temptation and stays put.

The concept is fun and suggests a lot about what stock the author places in soul mates and fate. We all have moment...more This is one of those rare books that may be objectively good but that I still didn’t like all that much. In Sliding Doors fashion, Irina McGovern’s life takes two distinct paths: in one, she submits to temptation and kisses her sexy snooker playing friend Ramsey, resulting in the end of her relationship with the steadfast Lawrence; in the other, she resists temptation and stays put.

The concept is fun and suggests a lot about what stock the author places in soul mates and fate. We all have moments that feel like potential turning points, decisions that could have changed our lives. I was admitted into a program to teach English in Japan right after college, but I moved to New York City instead. What would my life have been if I’d made one single decision differently? It’s this kind of speculation that gives The Post-Birthday World the potential to be so much fun.

Unfortunately, though, Lionel Shriver didn’t quite deliver. While Irina’s life takes two distinct paths, they are completely grounded in her relationships; Irina feels that having a man to take care of her is the ultimate goal. She feels bad about it, but she feels it nonetheless. As if to show that the man chosen is the center of the universe around which all other things orbit, Shriver takes pains to make the rest of Irina’s life constant: at the same juncture in each life, Irina turns from illustrating other authors’ books to writing her own and meets with great success (in one life it’s critical, in the other it’s commercial). A Christmas visit to her mother brings out the best and worst of her partner in both lives. Shriver seems to want to say simultaneously that one decision can change everything and that none of our decisions affect anything.

It also didn’t help that I immediately liked one of Irina’s lives — or at least her better halves — better than the other, quickly giving my reading a lopsided quality. That said, Shriver created both Lawrence and Ramsey with a heavy hand. Instead of making them both decent men with quirks and flaws, they’re basically both assholes. So, naturally, Shriver focuses a lot of energy on what Irina doesn’t like about each life. Sure, she throws us a positive bone here and there, but for the most part we hear that Irina and Ramsey fight too much or that Lawrence smothers here and reprimands her for dressing too sexy or daring to have a second glass of wine. It’s hard to spend 500 pages with a protagonist who has two lives and grumbles about them both but never straightens her spine enough to build a better, third option. I wanted Irina to end up single in both versions, which tells you a little something about the options Shriver has given her. Also: the endless time spent on the sex in each relationship — it is the backbone of her life with Ramsey, whereas with Lawrence it’s frequent and attentive but routine to the extreme — became routine to the extreme to this reader.

After the spectacular We Need To Talk About Kevin (my nominee for best novel with an after-school special for a title), I’ll happily give Shriver another shot. Sadly, this one didn’t live up, though.(less)

like 2 likes · see review

May 02, 2012 Chrissy rated it 1 of 5 stars Recommends it for: no one

This book utterly bored and irritated me, all at the same time.

The supposed purpose of the book was to show how one seemingly small decision can drastically impact your life, but that your decisions will still result in very similar parallels. The moral I took from this story was essentially to dump the guy before he dumps you. And that if your life is fated to be miserable, it's going to be miserable no matter what you do. Inspiring, don't you think?

The author's obsession with the finer details...more

like 3 likes · see review

Feb 20, 2008 Meera rated it 2 of 5 stars

The premise of this book was interesting, much like the movie Sliding Doors, what would happen if you made a single decision, and your life could have gone on two alternative paths from that decision? There is a single first, and a last chapter, and apart from that, the other chapters are duplicates of the alternate lives that the protagonist could have led. However, at over 500 pages long, this book was an exercise in patience, especially when it was littered with excessive description and poin...more

like 4 likes · see review

Aug 26, 2007 Stephanie Gevatkoff rated it 3 of 5 stars

This was a girly book for sure, but I found it incredibly depressing.
This book goes in two parallel stories and begins and ends with the same chapter that suffices for both stories. Basically, there are two chapter 2s, 3s, 4s etc. The chapters that have a black number are the ones where she is rebellious and defiant and the white ones are the ones where she is behaving herself.
To boil this book down to just a few sentences, the main character has a boyfriend she's been with for years. This coup...more

like 2 likes · see review

Aug 28, 2007 Stephanie rated it 5 of 5 stars

I am always hesitant to read books that garner lots of critical attention - those books that seem to be the "must-reads" every few months. However, I really enjoyed this book. At the end of the first chapter, the main character has a choice to act in one of two ways in a certain situation. From there on out, there are two sets of chapters that tell parallel narratives of what happens as result of this choice -- one set follows the "yes" trajectory and one the "no" trajectory. This seemingly smal...more

like 2 likes · see review

Oct 29, 2008 Nicola added it

Shelves: unfinished

I'm usually pretty tenacious when it comes to finishing books, but after 100 densely-packed-yet-pointless pages of this, I gave up.

In We Need To Talk About Kevin, Shriver's rambling, circuitous style was reined in by a strong story. This novel has no such anchor. It's just not ABOUT much.

The premise is interesting: a practically-married woman goes on a date with a handsome acquaintance; in one version of events, she kisses him and embarks on an affair, in another, she refrains and stays with her...more

like 2 likes · see review

Aug 01, 2008 Laura rated it 4 of 5 stars

I really liked this one, very creative! See the review from the Washington Post: Lionel Shriver's wonderful new novel, her latest since the prize-winning We Need to Talk About Kevin, creates parallel universes that indulge all our what-if speculations. Spared any fork-in-the-road choices, Irina McGovern, a children's book illustrator, can have her beefcake and eat it too. A professional, independent woman not enamored of feminist bumper stickers, Irina admits, "The only thing I can't live withou...more I really liked this one, very creative! See the review from the Washington Post: Lionel Shriver's wonderful new novel, her latest since the prize-winning We Need to Talk About Kevin, creates parallel universes that indulge all our what-if speculations. Spared any fork-in-the-road choices, Irina McGovern, a children's book illustrator, can have her beefcake and eat it too. A professional, independent woman not enamored of feminist bumper stickers, Irina admits, "The only thing I can't live without is a man." In this case, Shriver grants her two.

The first, Lawrence Trainer, a sweetly geeky terrorism expert, offers tranquil domesticity; Irina fixes nightly bowls of popcorn while they watch BBC snooker tournaments, cooks voluptuous if economical meals and enjoys reliable same-side-of-the-bed, same-position sex. Though not officially married, so entrenched are the pair they might as well be. "Some friends regarded Irina-and-Lawrence as a factual matter," Shriver writes, "like the existence of France."

For more than nine years, "monogamy had been effortless" -- until the second man turns up. He's Ramsey Acton, dazzling celebrity snooker champion and husband of Irina's collaborator, Jude. Every year on Ramsey's birthday, Irina and Lawrence dine out with Ramsey and Jude. One July, Lawrence, away on business, encourages Irina to meet Ramsey, newly divorced, for the traditional birthday ritual. After four sakes, a deluxe platter of sashimi, cognac and a joint, Irina watches Ramsey play snooker and thinks, "If Ramsey didn't kiss her, she was going to die."

The rest of the story pivots on this will-they-or-won't-they as the novel splits into alternating chapters; in one, they kiss; in another, she turns away. Who is Irina's Mr. Right? In excessive, often obsessive, detail, Shriver explores Irina's life with each candidate through the quotidian and across a larger political and social landscape that includes Bosnia, the death of Princess Diana and 9/11. One chapter shows Irina as too cocooned in her love nest to notice outside events; its alternate has her relate the fall of the Twin Towers to her own predicament: "Today of all days it should have been possible to weep the whole day through, but it wasn't. The fact that she had sobbed for whole evenings at a go over the loss of one boyfriend yet now found it too demanding to whimper over the loss of multitudes for more than two or three minutes was just one of those ugly facts about herself that Irina would have to live with."

Shriver is a crackerjack chronicler of the lives of the self-absorbed; she understands the ties that bind and the ones that sunder. Studying Ramsey's depleted rooms after his divorce, Irina notes, "For women, marriages foreclosed often resulted in an accumulation of booty; for men, these failed projects of implausible optimism were more likely to manifest themselves in material lack. It was hard to resist the metaphorical impression that women got to keep the past itself, whereas men were simply robbed of it."

Shriver is equally clever at shifting around polar opposites and mirror images. Irina's book is a success; Irina's book is a failure. Ramsey's career takes off; it hits the skids. Lawrence is always loyal -- or is he? Though Ramsey can be difficult, earthmoving sex more than compensates. Soon enough, even that changes. No choice is perfect; no soulmate seizes center stage.

While the focus stays on Irina and her two men, the author serves up side dishes of politics, snooker lore and menu plans. Culinary metaphors abound: Ramsey's skin is "like one of those complex reduction sauces you get in upscale restaurants . . . and you can never quite figure out what's in it." Sentences sparkle with such mouth-watering descriptions of food that you'll want to run to the refrigerator. Lovely small portraits of Irina's larger-than-life Russian mother, her sister Tatyana and Ramsey's idiosyncratic competitors charm and enlighten.

As Irina learns that no matter what kind of man a woman picks, "she'll wonder if she wouldn't rather have the other," the accretion of details, the parsing of characters' angst, the little moments blown into big can seem like so much navel-gazing. However fascinating, the microscopic analysis of the two objects of Irina's affection can also be wearying. Nevertheless, the rewards for sticking with these 500-plus pages are as delicious as one of Irina's feasts.

(less)

like 1 like · see review

Apr 30, 2008 Laura rated it 2 of 5 stars

I love the premise. Irina chooses between staying with her long-time live-in boyfriend (tried and true, boring) or leaving him for a new one (thrilling, passionate). The story breaks apart at that point and follows each pathway, switching between the two parallel stories. This could have been great, but the parallel stories are too parallel, the men are fairly unlikable, and Irina seems to have few innate personality characteristics of her own (unless you count gorgeous-but-doesn't-know-it).

It'...more

like 2 likes · see review

Sep 02, 2008 Taylor rated it 3 of 5 stars Recommends it for: people looking for a book with the fun of fluff but the importance of something more substantial

Shelves: fiction, the-power-of-love, just-like-a-woman, women-writers

Post-Birthday World is a bit of a mixed bag. I read the bulk of it in two days and was tearing up towards the end. After I set the book down and my mother asked me how it was, my response was, "It was okay," then I proceeded to tell her, at length, about the story, what I liked and what I didn't like.

The story is set in London, where Irina McGovern has lived in domestic comfort with her partner (not husband) of 10 years, Lawrence (both in their 40s). After starting a tradition of having yearly d...more

like 5 likes · see review

Apr 23, 2008 Angeld01 rated it 1 of 5 stars · review of another edition

As someone who owns "Sliding Doors" and has made a habit of watching it nearly once a year...I love the concept of small changes making a big difference in your life.

But I do not like this book. Some books start slow. Stephen King, my favorite writer of all time, has been known to start slow (at least by me). But this book - stays slow.

Irina is living a content (boring) life with Lawrence. A man whom refuses to marry her, withholds emotion and affection - but whom she is never-the-less proud to...more

like 4 likes · see review

Aug 18, 2007 Ailsa rated it 4 of 5 stars

The conceit may not be original (the basic premise of the book is very Sliding Doors) but I really enjoyed its execution.

The basic plot revolves around an expatriate American illustrator in London (Irina), who either leaves her ten year relationship with Mr. Dependable for a "hard living Snooker player" (I have to admit when I read that in the dust jacket cover I internally groaned) or... she doesn't. What follows is the journey through her parallel lives, and the consideration that no future or...more The conceit may not be original (the basic premise of the book is very Sliding Doors) but I really enjoyed its execution.

The basic plot revolves around an expatriate American illustrator in London (Irina), who either leaves her ten year relationship with Mr. Dependable for a "hard living Snooker player" (I have to admit when I read that in the dust jacket cover I internally groaned) or... she doesn't. What follows is the journey through her parallel lives, and the consideration that no future or choice is neccessarily "better" for Irina, merely different.

There are a lot of things Shriver does right in this novel: I love the way events mirror one and other through both version of Irina's life, but are subtly distorted, as if we see two versions of her life unfolding in a house of mirrors. I suppose some people might find it slightly repetitious, but I thought, if not subtle, it at least had an elegant balance. This was pleasingly reflected structually: the book is arranged by a single opening chapter and a single closing chapter, whilst every other chapter is duplicated.

The subject matter also is exploited by Shriver (much as she did in 'We Need to Talk About Kevin) to unfurl a huge amount of philosophising. About the nature of love, of relationships and what you must sacrifice in order to make them survive, being American, being British, being foreign, London, New York, winning, losing, celebrity, culture, ownership, sex, politics, and of course (is it not a requisite for contemp. fiction?) 9/11. Whilst she manages to get ALL that and probably more in without the story feeling encumbered I have to say I find some of what Shriver has to say a little disquieting. I.e: Irina's frequent insistance that she is nothing without a man, and the sense I get that Shriver finds this a perversely liberating confession for her character to make. And you don't really come out of this book feeling very pro-humanity: Shriver depicts all people as innately duplicitous and two-face, no-one's character seems a certainty, everyone's behaviour is almost purely situational.

Other things that nagged: I really don't like snooker. It was quite as bad as I'd initially feared but I had real trouble labouring through those snooker-y scenes. Oh and Ramsey's (the snooker player that Irina possibly shacks up with) south London accent was, in print, irritating and off putting. In fact any time Shriver tried to write London dialect(s) it sounded, to me, like an American transcribing Dick Van Dyk. And yet she lives in London! The mind boggles. Oh, and in the snooker-player reality, Irina's book that echoed the story line of 'The Post-Birthday World': save me. I really think it is lazy exposition to have your character explain what you're trying to say in your book by writing her own similarly themed book and then talking at length about it. And then winning a prize for it.

Despite my griping (I'm not quite sure how this review got so negative... whoops) I really really enjoyed this book. The good thing about the alternating chapters was that I constantly felt like I was waiting to get to the exciting bit: of both stories. So I was very well kept on tenterhooks the whole way through. It was a complete escapism book, something you can really dive into and come out of feeling thoughtful and still lost inside it. I love that; when I book resonates after you've finished like you haven't quite come out of the dream.(less)

like 1 like · see review

May 27, 2012 Joyce rated it 5 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: great-reads, relaxing-reads, reviewed-reads, favourite-reads, contemporary-lit-reads

I have always loved the idea of parallel worlds, and I think that is why I find this book an incredibly appealing read. I like how Shriver placed such importance on a single moment, reminding us that not only are our actions consequential, but even the smallest, transient thoughts that run through our minds.

Perhaps some might find Irina self-destructive, but I think that it is her ability to practise mental kindness to the men in her life that made her so tolerant to both Ramsey and Lawrence's...more

like 2 likes · see review

Oct 08, 2007 Mary Catherine rated it 3 of 5 stars

The premise of this book is intriguing: A woman in a long-term relationship finds herself in a situation where she is very tempted to kiss another man. From that point on, the story splits into two, one version where she does kiss the other guy and one where she doesn’t.

Ultimately, I’m not sure the book really lives up to that interesting premise. It is very long; I think it could have been a good 100 pages shorter and been better for it. The writing is good, but I found myself actively disliki...more

like 1 like · see review

Sep 01, 2008 ehnonymus rated it 2 of 5 stars

i liked the premise of this book (it's much like sliding doors) and at moments i liked its execution but overall i'd have to say i was constantly irritated while reading it. i hate that the author used the same plot and even dialogue for both stories, just turning it on its head for its regurgitation in plot line b, really it just felt like laziness. and i would have been much more involved in the main character's feelings if she hadn't been quite such a simpering idiot. i spent much of the tale...more

like 2 likes · see review

Aug 20, 2007 Elizabeth rated it 3 of 5 stars Recommends it for: The determined

Shelves: gladireaditbutneveragain

Am I glad I read this book? In truth, yes I am. Would I read it again or wholeheartedly recommend it? Absolutely not. This novel is not for the faint-hearted. It is over 500 pages of waiting. Waiting for the inevitable...waiting for the probable...waiting for the two options presented to differ significantly enough to merit their structural definition...waiting. The ending was most certainly not worth waiting for and the journey wasn't worth it.

But.

The murderous tome holds a few sentences that a...more

like 1 like · see review

May 15, 2011 Cait rated it 2 of 5 stars

I was not told this was a book about infidelity and the fiddly FEELINGS people FEEL about other people.

Overall, I did not like this book. Because I did not like enough of the characters, at any given time, to empathize with them and wish them well. They were either pathetic, in one story line, or cruel in the other. There wasn't really a whole lot of middle ground.

BUT. The concept was interesting, and very well executed. And the ending was solid- which feels like weird praise to give, but in the...more

like 1 like · see review

Mar 07, 2008 Lanette rated it 1 of 5 stars Recommends it for: someone who has absolutley nothing better to do with hours and hours and hours.

Recommended to Lanette by: Amy (Bookclub, 3/07)

Read the first 100+ pages and decided I couldn't continue on... I simply didn't CARE about what happened to ANY of the characters. I didn't even read the last chapter to see how it ended. After reassurances that it got better, I picked it up again last night. I skimmed the snooker crap, which cut out about 1/2 the remaining 400 pages... while I do admit it DID get a tad better, the sex was unneccessary (not just sour grapes since I haven't gotten any in months) and the characters were not at all...more

like 3 likes · see review

Dec 23, 2007 Alicia rated it 5 of 5 stars

From the moment I picked up this book--its cover featured an empty cupcake wrapper with a few crumbs beside it--I knew I'd like it, and I DID! I've never read anything else by Shriver, but I may have to seek some of her earlier works now. Anyway, this is the story of a married woman who is tempted to kiss an old friend. Will she or won't she?? Actually, it's both--both scenarios are played out in alternating chapters (the same narrative structure as the move Sliding Doors). The parallels between...more

like 2 likes · see review

Sep 23, 2007 Celia Powell rated it 3 of 5 stars

This two-part narrative of Irina's marriage which splits after a birthday party, and explores what happens if she decides to kiss or not to kiss another man. At times I found the similar things popping up in each narrative (phrases people would say, for instance) a little contrived, but then I decided it was a good way of illustrating that it's the same world, although different events are happening in it. I found it a little hard to stay focussed towards the end - the depth of detail is, as oth...more

like 1 like · see review

Aug 18, 2008 Laura rated it 4 of 5 stars Recommends it for: someone with time and a willingness to overlook very obvious character flaws

Shelves: fiction

liked the plot and the idea of the book better than actually reading it...she probably could have gotten the point across in 150 fewer pages.

that said, though, i think the book aptly illustrates that there's no point worrying yourself about what could have been, and that the-grass-is-always-greener-on-the-other-side people will waste half their life resenting their own choices. The heroine was one of those people, and more than the trite passion vs. stability theme that seems obvious, outlining...more

like 1 like · see review

« previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 … 99 100 next »

new topic
Discuss This Book

There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Recommend it | Stats | Recent status updates

combine
Other Editions (31)

More editions...

Genres

Book Club

38 users

Contemporary

22 users

Novels

20 users

Adult Fiction

11 users

Romance

10 users

Adult

10 users

Relationships

10 users

Literature

10 users

Literary Fiction

8 users

European Literature > British Literature

6 users

See top shelves...

Readers also enjoyed similar books

About Lionel Shriver

Lionel Shriver's novels include the New York Times bestseller The Post-Birthday World and the international bestseller We Need to Talk About Kevin, which won the 2005 Orange Prize and has now sold over a million copies worldwide. Earlier books include Double Fault, A Perfectly Good Family, and Checker and the Derailleurs. Her novels have been translated into twenty-five languages. Her journalism h...more

More about Lionel Shriver...

Books by Lionel Shriver

More…

Share This Book

Facebook Twitter Your website

Trivia About The Post-Birthday...

2 trivia questions

More quizzes & trivia...

Quotes from The Post-Birthday World

“There is one province in which, sooner or later, virtually everyone gets dealt a leading role--hero, heroine, or villain.... Unlike the slight implications of quotidian dilemmas that confront the average citizen in other areas of life ... the stakes in this realm could not be higher. For chances are that at some point along the line you will hold in your hands another person's heart. There is no greater responsibility on the planet. However you contend with this fragile organ, which pounds or seizes in accordance with your caprice, will take your full measure.” — 48 people liked it

“Lovers communicate not inside sentences, but between them. Passion lurks within interstice. It is grouting rather than bricks.” — 17 people liked it

More quotes…

title link	preview: The Post-Birthday World
avg rating	preview: The Post-Birthday World Goodreads rating: 3.46 (6865 ratings)
small image	preview: click here [close]
med image	preview: click here [close]
BBCode	[url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/393060.The_Post_Birthday_World?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book][img]http://d.gr-assets.com/books/1348752137l/393060.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/393060.The_Post_Birthday_World?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book]The Post-Birthday World by Lionel Shriver[/url]

The Post-Birthday World

Friend Reviews

Community Reviews

Share This Book

Share This Book on Your Website