I have read a majority of this book and I will confirm the following:

"* His obvious lack of a copyeditor;
* His entire disregard for even addressing other points of view;"

I disagree with the following:
"* His attempt to tackle complex issues with a poorly developed philosophical toolbox; and, most importantly,
* His total lack of logical flow or structure beyond asking the reader to accept things on his authority."

I know that Rizzi do More...

This book is an epistemological nightmare. Rizzi asks the reader to take on radical and unfounded views, sometimes without even a loose explanation or logical construction beyond "That makes sense, right?"

Even though I disagree with nearly every tenet of Rizzi's philosophy, I still would give it a respectable two or three star rating if it weren't for:

* His obvious lack of a copyeditor;
* His entire disregard for even addressing other points of view;
* His a More...

About the need for philosophy, to root science in truth

Thinking for beginners and students.